Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Rhinovirus and other respiratory viruses exert different effects on lung allograft function that are not mediated through acute rejection

2012; Wiley; Volume: 27; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/ctr.12054

1399-0012

D. Sayah, Jonathan L. Koff, Lorriana E. Leard, Steven R. Hays, Jeffrey A. Golden, Jonathan P. Singer,

Viral Infections and Immunology Research

Abstract Background Community acquired respiratory virus ( CARV ) infections in lung transplant recipients ( LTR ) have been associated with adverse outcomes, including acute rejection ( AR ) and decline in allograft function, in some but not in all studies. Methods Spirometry and transbronchial biopsy results of LTR diagnosed with CARV infection over a two‐yr period were extracted from clinical records. Primary outcomes, studied at 1–2.5 months postinfection, were as follows: (i) incidence of biopsy‐proven AR (grade >A0) and (ii) allograft function, defined by forced expiratory volume in one s ( FEV 1 ). A reference group of biopsies (n = 526) collected during the study period established the baseline incidence of AR . Rhinovirus ( RV ) and non‐rhinovirus (non‐ RV ) infections were analyzed as subgroups. Results Eighty‐seven cases of CARV infection were identified in 59 subjects. Incidences of AR were similar in the post‐ CARV and reference groups and did not differ significantly after RV vs. non‐ RV infection. Allograft function declined significantly after non‐ RV infection, but not after RV infection. Conclusions In LTR , CARV infections other than RV are associated with allograft dysfunction at 1–2.5 months after infection. However, CARV s do not appear associated with AR at this time point. The impact of specific CARV s on lung allografts, including the development of chronic allograft rejection, merits further study.