A COMPARISON OF PATIENT AND PARTNER RESPONSES TO A BRIEF SEXUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE
1999; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 162; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68086-x
ISSN1527-3792
AutoresSusan D. Mathias, Michael P. O’Leary, James M. Henning, David J. Pasta, Susan Fromm, Raymond C. Rosen,
Tópico(s)Pelvic floor disorders treatments
ResumoNo AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Original Articles1 Dec 1999A COMPARISON OF PATIENT AND PARTNER RESPONSES TO A BRIEF SEXUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE SUSAN D. MATHIAS, MICHAEL P. O'LEARY, JAMES M. HENNING, DAVID J. PASTA, SUSAN FROMM, and RAYMOND C. ROSEN SUSAN D. MATHIASSUSAN D. MATHIAS , MICHAEL P. O'LEARYMICHAEL P. O'LEARY , JAMES M. HENNINGJAMES M. HENNING , DAVID J. PASTADAVID J. PASTA , SUSAN FROMMSUSAN FROMM , and RAYMOND C. ROSENRAYMOND C. ROSEN View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68086-XAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Patient self-administered questionnaires have recently been developed to assess sexual function in men with erectile dysfunction. However, it may also be important to assess satisfaction with and any improvements in sexual function from the perspective of the female partner. We report the results of a brief 3-item questionnaire developed for the female partner and its association with an 11-item questionnaire developed for men with erectile dysfunction. Materials and Methods: Men and their female partners each self-administered a brief sexual function questionnaire several times during a clinical trial of an experimental treatment for erectile dysfunction. Items addressed the frequency and firmness of erection, and satisfaction with sex life on a 5-point Likert scale with responses ranging from 0 to 4. We compared mean values of the 3 items common to each questionnaire by respondent, and also analyzed item and scale correlations using weighted kappa statistics and/or the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Data from 389 pairs were available. Generally patient results were fairly consistent with those of partners. Men reported slightly more frequent erection (1.6 versus 1.5), identical firmness of erection (1.2) and less satisfaction (1.2 versus 1.4) than partners. Weighted kappas of the 3 items ranged from 0.47 to 0.61, representing good agreement. The Pearson correlations were slightly higher. Internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's α of the 3-item scale was 0.69 (0.77 for patient and 0.81 for partner). Conclusions: These data support the use of patient and partner assessments of sexual function in clinical trials of erectile dysfunction. References 1 : Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: Results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J. Urol.1994; 151: 54. Abstract, Google Scholar 2 : Efficacy and safety of intracavernosal alprostadil in men with erectile dysfunction. New Engl. J. Med.1996; 334: 873. Google Scholar 3 Impotence. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. J.A.M.A.1993; 270: 83. Google Scholar 4 : The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology1997; 49: 822. Google Scholar 5 : Quality of life effects of alprostadil therapy for erectile dysfunction. J. Urol.1997; 157: 2124. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Quality of life in patients using self-administered intracavernous injections of prostaglandin E1 for erectile dysfunction. J. Urol.1996; 156: 80. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Evaluation of sexual satisfaction in partners of men experiencing erectile failure. J. Sex. Marital Ther.1990; 16: 70. Google Scholar 8 : The Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS). Brit. J. Clin. Psychol.1985; 24: 63. Google Scholar 9 : Development of the male function profile/impotence questionnaire. Psychol. Rep.1991; 68: 1151. Google Scholar 10 : A brief male sexual function inventory for urology. Urology1995; 46: 697. Google Scholar 11 : Minimally invasive therapies in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in anticoagulated cases: a study of satis-faction and safety. J. Urol.1996; 155: 1277. Link, Google Scholar 12 : Through the eyes of women: the sexual and psychological responses of women to their partner's treatment with self-infection or external vacuum therapy. J. Urol.1992; 147: 1024. Link, Google Scholar 13 : Patient and partner satisfaction with the AMS 700 penile prosthesis. J. Urol.1992; 147: 62. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Psychosexual functioning of partners of men with presumed nonorganic erectile dysfunction: cause or consequence of the dysfunction. Arch. Sex. Behav.1995; 24: 157. Google Scholar 15 : Efficacy and safety of apomorphine SL vs placebo for male erectile dysfunction (MED). J. Urol.1998; 159: 261. abstract 920. Google Scholar 16 : Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin. Trials1991; 12: 142S. Google Scholar 17 : A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas.1960; 20: 37. Google Scholar 18 : Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika1951; 16: 297. Google Scholar 19 : Construction of scales for the Center for Marital and Sexual Health (CMASH) sexual functioning questionnaire. J. Sex. Marital Ther.1997; 23: 103. Google Scholar 20 : Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. J. Clin. Epidemiol.1988; 41: 1065. Google Scholar 21 : The accuracy of self and informant ratings of physical functional capacity in the elderly. J. Clin. Epidemiol.1992; 45: 791. Google Scholar 22 : Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sildenafil Study Group. New Engl. J. Med.1998; 338: 1397. Google Scholar From Lewin-TAG, Inc., San Francisco, California, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, TAP Holdings, Inc., Deerfield, Illinois, and Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey© 1999 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByGriebling T (2018) Re: Sexual Function in the Late Postmenopause: A Decade of Follow-up in a Population-Based Cohort of Australian WomenJournal of Urology, VOL. 194, NO. 2, (496-496), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015. Volume 162Issue 6December 1999Page: 1999-2002 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1999 by American Urological Association, Inc.Keywordssexual dysfunction, psychologicalsexual partnersquestionnairesimpotenceMetricsAuthor Information SUSAN D. MATHIAS More articles by this author MICHAEL P. O'LEARY More articles by this author JAMES M. HENNING More articles by this author DAVID J. PASTA More articles by this author SUSAN FROMM More articles by this author RAYMOND C. ROSEN More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Referência(s)