Artigo Acesso aberto

A Questionnaire on Monuments

2018; The MIT Press; Volume: 165; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1162/octo_a_00327

ISSN

1536-013X

Autores

Lucía Allais, Noel W. Anderson, Andrew Weiner, Tania Bruguera, Tom Burr, Mary Carroll, Cassils, Paul Chan, Andrew Cole, Michael Diers, Sam Durant, Joanna Fiduccia, Noah Fischer, Finbarr Barry Flood, Eric Foner, Coco Fusco, Renée Green, Rachel Harrison, Sharon Hayes, Thomas Hirschhorn, Andreas Huyssen, Silvia Kolbowski, Benjamin Kunkel, Hari Kunzru, Rachel Kushner, James Benning, John Lansdowne, Thomas J. Lax, An-My Lê, Sarah Lewis, Alex Lichtenstein, Andrew Lichtenstein, Greil Marcus, Achille Mbembé, Sarah Nuttall, Naeem Mohaiemen, Maya Nadkarni, Steven Nelson, Tavia Nyong’o, Ruth B. Phillips, Chris Reitz, Cameron Rowland, Kirk Savage, Gregory Sholette, Robert Slifkin, Irene V. Small, Jason Smith, Martino Stierli, Dell Upton, Mabel O. Wilson, Jessica Winegar,

Tópico(s)

Law in Society and Culture

Resumo

“A Questionnaire on Monuments” features 49 responses to questions formulated by Leah Dickerman, Hal Foster, David Joselit, and Carrie Lambert-Beatty: “From Charlottesville to Cape Town, there have been struggles over monuments and other markers involving histories of racial conflict. How do these charged situations shed light on the ethics of images in civil society today? Speaking generally or with specific examples in mind, please consider any of the following questions: What histories do these public symbols represent, what histories do they obscure, and what models of memory do they imply? How do they do this work, and how might they do it differently? What social and political forces are in play in their erection or dismantling? Should artists, writers, and art historians seek a new intersection of theory and praxis in the social struggles around such monuments and markers? How might these debates relate to the question of who is authorized to work with particular images and archives?”

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX