Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Clinical and Laboratory Management of Male Infertility: An Opinion on its Current Status

2000; Wiley; Volume: 21; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb03411.x

ISSN

2047-2927

Autores

Sergio Oehninger,

Tópico(s)

Sexual Differentiation and Disorders

Resumo

Journal of AndrologyVolume 21, Issue 6 p. 814-821 Free Access Clinical and Laboratory Management of Male Infertility: An Opinion on its Current Status SERGIO OEHNINGER MD, Corresponding Author SERGIO OEHNINGER MD Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Urology and the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.Department of Ob/Gyn and Urology and Division of Endocrinology and Infertility, 601 Colley Ave, Norfolk, VA 23507 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author SERGIO OEHNINGER MD, Corresponding Author SERGIO OEHNINGER MD Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Urology and the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.Department of Ob/Gyn and Urology and Division of Endocrinology and Infertility, 601 Colley Ave, Norfolk, VA 23507 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author First published: 02 January 2013 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb03411.xCitations: 7AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Aitken RJ, Clarkson JS, Fishel S. Generation of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation and human sperm function. Biol Reprod. 1989a; 41: 183–187. 10.1095/biolreprod41.1.183 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Aitken RJ, Clarkson JS, Hargreave TB, Irvine DS, Wu FC. Analysis of the relationship between defective sperm function and the generation of reactive oxygen species in cases of oligozoospermia. J Androl. 1989b; 10: 214–220. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00091.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Aitken RJ, Gordon E., Harkiss D., Twigg JP, Milne P., Jennings Z., Irvine DS. Relative impact of oxidative stress on the functional competence and genomic integrity of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1998; 59: 1037–1046. 10.1095/biolreprod59.5.1037 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Aitken RJ, Irvine DS, Wu FC. Prospective analysis of sperm-oocyte fusion and reactive oxygen species generation as criteria for the diagnosis of infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 164: 542–551. 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)80017-7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Amann RP, Hammerstedt RH. In vitro evaluation of sperm quality: an opinion. J Androl. 1993; 14: 397–406. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1993.tb03247.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Barroso G., Morshedi M., Oehninger S. Analysis of DNA fragmentation, plasma membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine and oxidative stress in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 1338–1345. 10.1093/humrep/15.6.1338 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Bhasin S., DeKretser D., Baker HWG. Pathophysiology and natural history of male infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994; 79: 1525–1529. 10.1210/jc.79.6.1525 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Bonduelle M., Camus M., de Vos A., Staessen C., Tournaye H., van Assche E., Verheyen G., Devroey P., Liebaers I., van Steirteghem A. Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(Suppl 1): 243–264. 10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_1.243 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Brinkworth MH. Paternal transmission of genetic damage: findings in animals and humans. Int J Androl. 2000; 23: 123–135. 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2000.00222.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Burkman LJ, Coddington CC, Franken DR, Krugen TF, Rosenwaks Z., Hogen GD. The hemizona assay (HZA): development of a diagnostic test for the binding of human spermatozoa to the human hemizona pellucida to predict fertilization potential. Fertil Steril. 1988; 49: 688–697. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59841-0 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fertility, Family Planning and Women's Health: New Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1997: 1–11. Google Scholar Chandley AC. Chromosome anomalies and Y chromosome microdeletions as causal factors in male infertility. Hum Reprod. 1998a; 13(Suppl 1): 45–50. 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_1.45 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Chandley AC. Genetic contribution to male infertility. Hum Reprod. 1998b; 13(Suppl 3): 76–83. 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_3.76 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Chapman NR, Barratt CLR. The role of carbohydrate in sperm-ZP3 adhesion. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996; 2: 767–774. 10.1093/molehr/2.10.767 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar Cross NL, Morales P., Overstreet JW, Hanson FW. Two simple methods for detecting acrosome-reacted human sperm. Gamete Res. 1986; 15: 213–226. 10.1002/mrd.1120150303 Web of Science®Google Scholar Cummins JM, Pember SM, Jequier AM, Yovich JL, Hartmann PE. A test of the human sperm acrosome reaction following ionophore challenge. Relationship to fertility and other seminal parameters. J Androl 1991; 12: 98–103. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1991.tb00223.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar de Jonge C. Commentary: forging a partnership between total quality management and the andrology laboratory. J Androl. 2000; 21: 203–205. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb02095.x PubMedGoogle Scholar ESHRE Andrology Special Interest Group. Consensus Workshop on Advanced Diagnostic Andrology Techniques. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11: 1463–1479. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019420 Google Scholar Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D., Zinaman MJ, Clegg E., Purvis K., de Angelis P., Claussen OP. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 1039–1049. 10.1093/humrep/14.4.1039 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Franken DR, Bastiaan HS, Oehninger S. Physiological induction of the acrosome reaction in human sperm: validation of a microassay using minimal volumes of solubilized, homologous zona pellucida. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000; 17: 156–160. 10.1023/A:1009418222397 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Franken DR, Morales PJ, Habenicht UF. Inhibition of G protein in human sperm and its influence on acrosome reaction and zona pellucida binding. Fertil Steril. 1996; 66: 1009–1011. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58698-1 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Gorczyca W., Traganos F., Jesionowska H., Darzynkiewicz Z. Presence of DNA strand breaks and increased sensitivity of DNA in situ to denaturation in abnormal human sperm cells: analogy to apoptosis of somatic cells. Exp Cell Res. 1993; 207: 202–205. 10.1006/excr.1993.1182 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hinsch E., Oehninger S., Hinsch K. ZP3–6 peptide and acrosome reaction. Semen evaluation, testing and selection: a new look in the 2000s. In Andrology in the Nineties Precongress Training Course. Genk, Belgium: April 22, 1998: 25–30. Google Scholar Hofmann N., Hilscher B. Use of aniline blue to assess chromatin condensation in morphologically normal spermatozoa in normal and infertile men. Hum Reprod. 1991; 6: 979–982. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137472 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hughes CM, Lewis SEM, McKelvey-Martin VJ, Thompson W. A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men using a modified comet assay. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996; 2: 613–619. 10.1093/molehr/2.8.613 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar Hull MGR, Glazener CMA, Kelly NJ. Population study of causes, treatment and outcome of infertility. Br Med J. 1985; 291: 1693–1697. 10.1136/bmj.291.6510.1693 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Huszar G., Vigue L. Correlation between the rate of lipid peroxidation and cellular maturity as measured by creatine kinase activity in human spermatozoa. J Androl. 1994; 15: 71–77. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1994.tb01687.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Huszar G., Vigue L., Morshedi M. Sperm creatine phosphokinase M-iso-form ratios and fertilizing potential of men: a blinded study of 84 couples treated with in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1992; 57: 882–888. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54975-9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar In't Veld P., Brandenburg H., Verhoeff A., Dhont M., Los F. Sex chromosomal abnormalities and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet. 1995; 346: 773. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91531-1 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Irvine DS. Declining sperm quality: a review of facts and hypotheses. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 11: 655–671. 10.1016/S0950-3552(97)80005-3 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Irvine DS. Epidemiology and etiology of male infertility. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13(Suppl 1): 33–44. 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_1.33 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kruger TF, Menkveld R., Stander FSH, Lombard CJ, Van der Merne JP, van Zyl JA, Smith K. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986; 46: 1118–1123. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)49891-2 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Liu DY, Baker HWG. Tests of human sperm function and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1992; 58: 465–483. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55247-9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Liu DY, Lopata A., Johnston WIH, Baker HW. A human sperm-zona pellucida binding test using oocytes that failed to fertilize in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1988; 50: 782–788. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)60316-3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Lopes S., Jurisicova A., Sun J-G, Casper RF. Reactive oxygen species: potential cause for DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 896–900. 10.1093/humrep/13.4.896 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Manicardi GC, Bianchi PG, Pantano S., Azzoni P., Bizzaro D., Bianchi U., Sakkas D. Underprotamination and nicking of DNA in ejaculated human spermatozoa are highly related phenomena. Biol Reprod. 1995; 52: 864–867. 10.1095/biolreprod52.4.864 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Martin RH. Genetics of human sperm. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998; 15: 240–245. 10.1023/A:1022528007564 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Morshedi M., Taylor S., Duru K., Montgomery C., Barroso G., Oehninger S. A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing ISolate™-processed Versus Washed Semen in Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) Therapy Using Husband's Sperm: Efficiency and Pregnancy Outcome. Presented at the ASRM Annual Meeting and Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Program: 396. Google Scholar Mortimer D. The essential partnership between diagnostic andrology and modern assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 1994; 9: 1209–1213. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Mortimer D. Sperm preparation methods. J Androl. 2000; 21: 357–366. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb03390.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Mortimer D., Curtis EF, Camenzind AR. Combined use of fluorescent peanut agglutinin lectin and Hoechst 33258 to monitor the acrosomal status and vitality of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1990; 5: 99–103. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137050 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Fecundity and Infertility in the United States, 1965–1988. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics. DHHS publication PHS 91–1250. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service; 1990. Google Scholar Oehninger S., Acosta AA, Morshedi M., Veeck L., Swanson J., Simmons K., Rosenwaks Z. Corrective measures and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization patients with severe sperm morphology abnormalities. Fertil Steril. 1988; 50: 283–387. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)60074-2 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Oehninger S., Acosta AA, Veeck L., Brzyski RG, Kruger TF, Muasher SJ, Hodgen GD. Recurrent failure of in vitro fertilization: role of the hemizona assay (HZA) in the sequential diagnosis of specific sperm/ oocyte defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 164: 1210–1215. 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90684-J PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Oehninger S., Franken D., Alexander N., Hodgen G. Hemizona assay and its impact on the identification and treatment of human sperm dysfunctions. Andrologia. 1992b; 24: 307–321. 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1992.tb02660.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Oehninger S., Franken D., Kruger T. Approaching the next millennium: how should we manage andrology diagnosis in the intracytoplasmic sperm injection era Fertil Steril. 1997a; 67: 434–436. 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80065-9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Oehninger S., Franken DR, Sayed E., Barroso G., Kolm P. Sperm function assays and their predictive value for fertilization outcome in IVF therapy: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2000; 6: 160–168. 10.1093/humupd/6.2.160 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Oehninger S., Kruger TF, Simon T., Jones SD, Mayer J., Lanzendorf S., Toner JP, Muasher S. A comparative analysis of embryo implantation potential in patients with severe teratozoospermia undergoing in vitro fertilization with a high insemination concentration or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11: 1086–1089. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019302 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Oehninger S., Mahony M., Özgür K., Kolm P., Kruger T., Franken D. Clinical significance of human sperm-zona pellucida binding. Fertil Steril. 1997b; 67: 1121–1127. 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81449-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Oehninger S., Toner JP, Muasher SJ, Coddington CC, Acosta AA, Hodgen GD. Prediction of fertilization in vitro with human gametes: is there a litmus test Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992a; 167: 1760–1767. 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91772-3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ombelet W., Bosmans E., Janssen M., Cox A., Vlasselaer J., Gyselaers W., Vandeput H., Gielen J., Pollet H., Maes M., Steeno O., Kruger T. Semen parameters in a fertile versus subfertile population: a need for change in interpretation of semen testing. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 987–993. 10.1093/humrep/12.5.987 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Pfeffer J., Pang M-G, Hoegerman SF, Osgood CJ, Stacey MW, Mayer J., Oehninger S., Kearns WG. Aneuploidy frequencies in pellet and swim-up semen fractions from ten oligoasthenoteratozoospermic patients donating sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Fertil Steril. 1999; 72: 472–478. 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00279-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Roberts KP. Y-chromosome deletions and male infertility: state of the art and clinical implications. J Androl. 1998; 19: 255–259. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1998.tb02003.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar St John JC. Incorporating molecular screening techniques into the modern andrology laboratory. J Androl. 1999; 20: 692–701. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1999.tb03373.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Sakkas D., Mariechoz E., Manicardi G., Bizzaro D., Bianchi PG, Bianchi U. Origin of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Rev Reprod. 1999; 4: 31–37. 10.1530/ror.0.0040031 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1993 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64: 13–21. PubMedGoogle Scholar Tesarik J. Appropriate timing of the acrosome reaction is a major requirement for the fertilizing spermatozoon. Hum Reprod. 1989; 4: 957–961. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137020 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Urry RL. Advances in diagnosing and treating sperm problems and advanced reproductive techniques. In: JA Smith, ed. High Tech Urology: Technological Innovations and their Clinical Applications. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992: 251–270. Google Scholar Vogt PH. Human chromosome deletions in Yq11 AZF candidate genes and male infertility: history and update. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998; 4: 739–744. 10.1093/molehr/4.8.739 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Wilcox LS, Mosher WD. Use of infertility services in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82: 122–127. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Wong PY. CFTR gene and male fertility. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998; 4: 107–110. 10.1093/molehr/4.2.107 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 3rd ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1992: 23–26. Google Scholar World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1999: 4–33. Google Scholar Yanagimachi R., Yanagimachi H., Rogers BJ. The use of zona-free animal ova as a test-system for the assessment of the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1976; 15: 471–476. 10.1095/biolreprod15.4.471 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Zinaman MJ, Brown CC, Selevan SG, Clegg ED. Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with healthy couples. J Androl. 2000; 21: 145–153. 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb03284.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume21, Issue6November‐December 2000Pages 814-821 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX