Beyond Difference: From Canonical Geography to Hybrid Geographies
2004; American Association of Geographers; Volume: 94; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00432.x
ISSN1467-8306
Autores Tópico(s)Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
ResumoAnnals of the Association of American GeographersVolume 94, Issue 4 p. 756-763 Beyond Difference: From Canonical Geography to Hybrid Geographies Mei-Po Kwan, Mei-Po Kwan Department of Geography, The Ohio State UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Mei-Po Kwan, Mei-Po Kwan Department of Geography, The Ohio State UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 02 December 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00432.xCitations: 36 1036 Derby Hall, 154 North Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1361, e-mail: [email protected]. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Kay Anderson, Mona Domosh, Steve Pile, and Nigel Thrift, eds. 2003. Handbook of cultural geography. London: Sage. Barnes, Trevor J. 2000. Quantitative revolution. In The dictionary of human geography, ed. Ron J. Johnston, Derek Gregory, Geraldine Pratt, and Michael Watts, 664–67. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell. Barnes, Trevor J. 2001. Lives lived, and lives told: Biographies of geography's quantitative revolution. Environment and Planning D 19: 409–29. Barnes, Trevor J. 2002. Performing economic geography: Two men, two books, and a cast of thousands. Environment and Planning A 34: 487–512. Barnes, Trevor J. Forthcoming. Culture: Economy. In Space of geographical thought: Deconstructing geography's binaries, ed. Paul Cloke and R. J. Johnston. London: Sage. Barnes, Trevor J., and Matthew Hannah. 2001. The place of numbers: Histories, geographies, and theories of quantification. Environment and Planning D 19: 379–83. Bell, Scott, and Maureen Reed. 2004. Adapting to the machine: Integrating GIS into qualitative research. Cartographica 39 (1): 55–66. Bennett, Robert J. 1985. Quantification and relevance. In The future of geography, ed. Ron J. Johnston, 211–24. London: Methuen. Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The location of culture. London: Routledge. Billinge, Mark, Derek Gregory, and Ron Martin. 1984. Reconstructions. In Recollections of a revolution: Geography as spatial science, ed. Mark Billinge, Derek Gregory, and Ron Martin, 1–24. London: MacMillian. Blunt, Alison. 2003. Geography and the humanities tradition. In Key concepts in geography, ed. Sarah L. Holloway, Stephen P. Rice, and Gill Valentine, 73–91. London: Sage. Brown, Michael. 1995. Ironies of distance: An ongoing critique of the geographies of AIDS. Environment and Planning D 13: 159–83. Casetti, Emilio. 1999. The evolution of scientific disciplines, mathematical modeling, and human geography. Geographical Analysis 31 (4): 332–39. Chorley, Richard J., and Peter Haggett. 1967. Models, paradigms and the new geography. In Models in geography, ed. Richard J. Chorley and Peter Haggett, 19–42. London: Methuen. Cieri, Marie. 2003. Between being and looking: Queer tourism promotion and lesbian social space in Greater Philadelphia. ACME 2: 147–66. Clark, William A. V. 1999. Geographical Analysis at the beginning of a new century. Geographical Analysis 31 (4): 324–27. Paul Cloke, Chris Philo, and D. Sadler, ed. 1991. Approaching human geography: An introduction to contemporary theoretical debates. London: Paul Chapman. Cosgrove, Denis. 2003. Globalism and tolerance in early modern geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (4): 852–70. Driver, Felix. 2001. Human geography, social science, the arts and the humanities. Area 33 (4): 431–34. Manfred M. Fischer, and Arthur Getis, ed. 1997. Recent developments in spatial analysis: Spatial statistics, behavioural modelling and computational intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. FitzSimmons, Margaret. 1989. The matter of nature. Antipode 21 (2): 106–20. Forsyth, Tim. 2003. Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. New York: Routledge. Gilbert, David. 1995. Between two cultures: Geography, computing, and the humanities. Ecumene 2 (1): 1–13. Gilbert, Melissa R. 1994. The politics of location: doing feminist research at “home.” The Professional Geographer 46: 90–96. Gober, Patricia. 2000. In search of synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (1): 1–11. Golledge, Reginald G. 1999. Looking back and looking forward. Geographical Analysis 31 (4): 318–23. Goodchild, Michael F. 1995. Geographic information systems and geographic research. In Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems, ed. John Pickles, 31–50. New York: Guilford. Goodchild, Michael F. 1999. Reflections of a past editor. Geographical Analysis 31 (4): 328–31. Gould, Peter. 1979. Geography 1957–1977: The Augean period. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69: 139–51. Gould, Peter. 1994. Sharing a tradition—Geographies from the enlightenment. The Canadian Geographer 38: 194–214. Gould, Peter. 1999. Becoming a geographer. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. Gregory, Derek. 1981. Human agency and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 6: 1–18. Gregory, Derek. 1994. Geographical imaginations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Gregson, Nicky. 2003. Discipline games, disciplinary games and the need for a post-disciplinary practice: Response to Nigel Thrift's “The future of geography.” Geoforum 34: 5–7. Hannah, Matthew G., and Ulf Strohmayer. 2001. Anatomy of debate in human geography. Political Geography 20: 381–404. Hanson, Susan. 1999. Isms and schisms: Healing the nature-society and space-society traditions in human geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89 (1): 133–43. Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge. Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge. Harvey, David. 1969. Explanation in geography. London: Edward Arnold. Heffernan, Mike. 2003. Histories of geography. In Key concepts in geography, ed. Sarah L. Holloway, Stephen P. Rice, and Gill Valentine, 4–22. London: Sage. Hess, David J. 1997. Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press. Hubbard, Phil, Rob Kitchin, Brendon Bartley, and Duncan Fuller. 2002. Thinking geographically: Space, theory and contemporary human geography. London: Continuum. Jiang, Hong. 2003. Stories remote sensing images can tell: Integrating remote sensing analysis with ethnographic research in the study of cultural landscapes. Human Ecology 31 (2): 215–32. Johnston, Ron. 2000a. Intellectual respectability and disciplinary transformation? Radical geography and the institutionalisation of geography in the USA since 1945. Environment and Planning A 27: 971–90. Johnston, Ron. 2000b. On disciplinary history and textbooks: or where has spatial analysis gone? Australian Geographical Studies 38 (2): 125–37. Johnston, Ron. 2003. Geography and the social science tradition. In Key concepts in geography, ed. Sarah L. Holloway, Stephen P. Rice, and Gill Valentine, 51–71. London: Sage. Kobayashi, Audrey, and Suzanne Mackenzie. 1989. Introduction: Humanism and historical materialism in contemporary geography. In Remaking human geography, ed. Audrey Kobayashi and Suzanne Mackenzie, 1–14. Boston: Unwin Hyman. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kwan, Mei-Po. 2002a. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2): 645–61. Kwan, Mei-Po. 2002b. Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s. Gender, Place and Culture 9 (3): 271–79. Kwan, Mei-Po. 2002c. Quantitative methods and feminist geographic research. In Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods, ed. Pamela Moss, 160–73. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell. Kwan, Mei-Po, and Jiyeong Lee. 2004. Geovisualization of human activity patterns using 3D GIS. In Spatially integrated social science, ed. Michael F. Goodchild and Donald G. Janelle, 48–66. New York: Oxford University Press. Kwan, Mei-Po, and Joe Weber. 2003. Individual accessibility revisited: Implications for geographical analysis in the twenty-first century. Geographical Analysis 35 (4): 341–53. Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Lawson, Victoria. 1995. The politics of difference: Examining the quantitative/qualitative dualism in post-structuralist feminist research. The Professional Geographer 47 (4): 449–57. Mahtani, Minelle. 2002. Tricking the border guards: Performing race. Environment and Planning D 20: 425–40. Mair, Andrew. 1986. Thomas Kuhn and understanding geography. Progress in Human Geography 10: 345–70. Marino, John A. 2002. On the shores of Bohemia: Recovering geography. In Early modern history and the social sciences: Testing the limits of Braudel's Mediterranean, ed. John A. Marino, 3–2. Kirksville, MO: Truman State University Press. Martin, Geoffrey J. 1989. “The nature of geography” and the Schaefer-Hartshorne debate. In Reflections on Richard Hartshorne's The Nature of Geography, ed. J. Nicholas Entrikin and Stanley D. Brunn, 69–90. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers. Massey, Doreen. 1999. Space-time, “science” and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 24: 261–76. Massey, Doreen. 2001. Geography on the agenda. Progress in Human Geography 25 (1): 5–17. McDowell, Linda. 1992. Valid games? A response to Erica Schoenberger. The Professional Geographer 44 (2): 212–15. McLafferty, Sara. 1995. Counting for women. The Professional Geographer 47 (4): 436–42. McLafferty, Sara, and Valerie Preston. 1997. Gender, race, and the determinants of commuting: New York in 1990. Urban Geography 18 (3): 192–212. Mitchell, Katharyne. 1997. Different diasporas and the hype of hybridity. Environment and Planning D 15: 533–53. Morrill, Richard. 1993. Geography, spatial analysis, and social science. Urban Geography 14 (5): 442–46. Pamela Moss, ed. 2002. Feminist geography in practice: Research and methods. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell. Mountz, Alison. 2002. Feminist politics, immigration, and academic identities. Gender, Place and Culture 9 (2): 187–94. Murdoch, Jonathan. 1997. Inhuman/nonhuman/human: Actor-network theory and the prospects for a nondualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society. Environment and Planning D 15: 633–799. Nagar, Richa. 2002. Footloose researchers, “traveling” theories, and the politics of transnational feminist praxis. Gender, Place and Culture 9 (2): 179–86. Nast, Heidi. 1994. Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. The Professional Geographer 46: 54–66. Nightingale, Andrea. 2003. A feminist in the forest: Situated knowledges and mixing methods in natural resource management. ACME 2 (1): 77–90. Oberhauser, Ann M., Donna Rubinoff, Karen De Bres, Susan Mains, and Cindy Pope. 2004. Geographic Perspectives on Women. In Geography in America at the dawn of the 21st century, ed. Gary Gaile and Cort Willmott, 738–60. New York: Oxford University Press. O'Kelly, Morton E. 1999. Introduction to the thirtieth anniversary special edition. Geographical Analysis 31 (4): 311–23. Openshaw, Stan. 1991. A view of the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again. Environment and Planning A 23: 621–28. Parks, Lisa. 2001. Plotting the personal: Global positioning satellites and interactive media. Ecumene 8 (2): 209–22. Pavlovskaya, Marianna E. 2002. Mapping urban change and changing GIS: Other views of economic restructuring. Gender, Place and Culture 9 (3): 281–89. Plummer, Paul, and Eric Sheppard. 2001. Must emancipatory economic geography be qualitative? Antipode 33 (2): 194–99. Poon, Jessie. 2003. Quantitative methods: Producing quantitative methods narratives. Progress in Human Geography 27 (6): 753–62. Pratt, Geraldine. 1989. Quantitative techniques and humanistic-historical materialist perspectives. In Remaking human geography, ed. Audrey Kobayashi and Suzanne Mackenzie, 101–15. Boston: Unwin Hyman. Pratt, Geraldine. 1996. Trashing and its alternatives. Environment and Planning D 14: 253–56. Pratt, Geraldine. 2002. Collaborating across our differences? Gender, Place and Culture 9 (2): 195–200. Raju, Saraswati. 2002. We are different, but can we talk? Gender, Place and Culture 9 (2): 173–77. Rose, Gillian. 1993. Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Rose, Gillian. 1995. The interstitial perspective: A review essay on Homi Bhabha's “The location of culture.” Environment and Planning D 13: 365–73. Rose, Gillian. 2000. Hybridity. In The dictionary of human geography, ed. Ron J. Johnston, Derek Gregory, Geraldine Pratt, and Michael Watts, 364–65. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell. Sack, Robert D. 1974. The spatial separatist theme in geography. Economic Geography 50: 1–19. Sayer, Andrew. 1985. The difference that space makes. In Social relations and spatial structures, ed. Derek Gregory and John Urry, 49–66. London: Macmillan. Sayer, Andrew. 1999. Long live postdisciplinary studies! Sociology and the curse of disciplinary parochialism/imperialism (draft). Published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University at: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/sayer-long-live-postdisciplinary-studies.pdf/ (last accessed 19 July 2004). Schaefer, Fred K. 1953. Exceptionalism in geography: A methodological examination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 43: 226–49. Schuurman, Nadine. 1999. Critical GIS: Theorizing an emerging science. Cartographica 36 (4): 1–10. Schuurman, Nadine. 2002. Reconciling social constructivism and realism in GIS. ACME 1 (1): 73–90. Sheppard, Eric. 1995. Dissenting from spatial analysis. Urban Geography 16 (4): 283–303. Sheppard, Eric. 2001. Quantitative geography: Representations, practices, and possibilities. Environment and Planning D 19: 535–54. Sibley, David. 1995. Geographies of exclusion. London: Routledge. Silvey, Rachel. 2002. Sweatshops and the corporatization of the university. Gender, Place and Culture 9 (2): 201–7. Silvey, Rachel, and Victoria Lawson. 1999. Placing the migrant. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89 (1): 121–32. Soja, Edward. 1980. The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70: 207–25. Staeheli, Lynn, and Richa Nagar. 2002. Feminists talk across worlds. Gender, Place and Culture 9 (2): 167–72. Suchan, Trudy A., and Cynthia A. Brewer. 2000. Qualitative methods for research on mapmaking and map use. The Professional Geographer 52 (1): 145–54. Sui, Daniel Z. 2004. GIS, cartography, and the “Third Culture”: Geographic imaginations in the computer age. The Professional Geographer 56 (1): 62–72. Taaffe, Edward J. 1993. Spatial analysis: Development and outlook. Urban Geography 14 (5): 422–33. Valentine, Gill. 2002. People like us: Negotiating sameness and differences in the research process. In Feminist geography in practice: Research and methods, ed. Pamela Moss, 116–26. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell. Warf, Barney. 2004. Advancing human geography at the Commencement du Siècle. The Professional Geographer 56 (1): 44–52. Whatmore, Sarah. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. London: Sage. Wolch, Jennifer. 2002. Anima urbis. Progress in Human Geography 26 (6): 721–42. Wolch, Jennifer. 2003. Radical openness as method in urban geography. Urban Geography 24 (8): 645–46. Woodward, David. 2001. The “two cultures” of map history— scientific and humanistic traditions: A plea for reintegration. In Approaches and challenges in a worldwide history of cartography, eds. David Woodward, Catherine Delano-Smith, and Cordell D. K. Yee, 49–67. Barcelona: Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya. Wright, Dawn J., Michael F. Goodchild, and James D. Proctor. 1997. GIS: Tool or Science? Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as “tool” versus “science.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87 (2): 346–62. Wyly, Elvin K. 1998. Containment and mismatch: Gender differences in commuting in metropolitan labor markets. Urban Geography 19: 395–430. Wyly, Elvin K. 2004. Geographies of the United States in the year 2004. The Professional Geographer 56 (1): 91–95. Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Young, Robert J. C. 1995. Colonial desire: Hybridity in theory, culture and race. New York: Routledge. Citing Literature Volume94, Issue4December 2004Pages 756-763 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)