Of "This" and "That" in Lawrence v Texas
2003; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 2003; Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/scr.2003.3536950
ISSN2158-2459
Autores Tópico(s)Legal and Constitutional Studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessOf "This" and "That" in Lawrence v TexasMary Anne CaseMary Anne Case Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Supreme Court Review Volume 20032003 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/scr.2003.3536950 Views: 36Total views on this site Citations: 21Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 2004 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Madina Agénor, Ashley E. Pérez, Alexa L. Solazzo, Ariel L. Beccia, Mihail Samnaliev, Janson Wu, Brittany M. Charlton, S. Bryn Austin Assessing Variations in Sexual Orientation- and Gender Identity-Related U.S. State Laws for Sexual and Gender Minority Health Research and Action, 1996–2016, LGBT Health 9, no.33 (Apr 2022): 207–216.https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2021.0157Michael C. I. Nwogugu Chapter-7: Complex Systems Challenges: Epidemics, the Welfare-State and the Constitution, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569636R. Alan Thompson Lawrence v. Texas, (Aug 2019): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118929803.ewac0322Nicholas D. Conway, Soren Jordan, Joseph Daniel Ura Courts and Issue Attention in Canada, Social Science Quarterly 99, no.44 (Mar 2018): 1324–1348.https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12496Robert M. Howard, Christine H. Roch, Susanne Schorpp Leaders and Followers: Examining State Court-Ordered Education Finance Reform, Law & Policy 39, no.22 (Mar 2017): 142–169.https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12073Adam Feldman Opinion Construction in the Roberts Court, Law & Policy 39, no.22 (Mar 2017): 192–209.https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12074Macarena Sáez Sexual Orientation and the Law, (Apr 2016): 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss687Emma Potter Radical Relations: Lesbian Mothers, Gay Fathers, and Their Children in the United States since World War II, Journal of Family Theory & Review 7, no.22 (Jun 2015): 187–191.https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12075Margaret Cruikshank Lesbian and gay rights movement, United States, (Apr 2015): 649–719.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs265Scott Barclay, Daniel Chomsky How Do Cause Lawyers Decide When and Where to Litigate on behalf of Their Cause?, Law & Society Review 48, no.33 (Aug 2014): 595–620.https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12093Lucas Loafman, Andrew Little Race, Employment, and Crime: The Shifting Landscape of Disparate Impact Discrimination Based on Criminal Convictions, American Business Law Journal 51, no.22 (Apr 2014): 251–314.https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12028Monica Florence The Body Politic, (Nov 2013): 366–380.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118610657.ch22Vera Bergelson Consent Defense, (Jan 2014): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517383.wbeccj441Eric A. Gentes Due Process, (Jan 2014): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517383.wbeccj472Ché D. Williamson Civil Liberties, (Jan 2014): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517383.wbeccj535Erica E. Hartwell, Julianne M. Serovich, Erika L. Grafsky, Zachary Y. Kerr Coming Out of the Dark: Content Analysis of Articles Pertaining to Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Issues in Couple and Family Therapy Journals, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 38 (Feb 2012): 227–243.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00274.x Private Power, Religious Communities, and the State, (Nov 2011): 118–140.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118153321.ch7June Carbone Is Fertility the Unspoken Issue in the Debate Between Liberal and Conservative Family Values?, Law & Social Inquiry 32, no.33 (Aug 2007): 809–839.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00078.xCatherine A. Lugg Thinking About Sodomy, Educational Policy 20, no.11 (Jan 2006): 35–58.https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805285374Katherine Franke, Marsha Garrison, Elizabeth Scott The Curious Relationship of Marriage and Freedom, (): 87–104.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087568.007Shahar Lifshitz, Marsha Garrison, Elizabeth Scott The Pluralistic Vision of Marriage, (): 260–284.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087568.017
Referência(s)