Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Action of Recombinant Human Apoptotic Endonuclease G on Naked DNA and Chromatin Substrates

2001; Elsevier BV; Volume: 276; Issue: 51 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1074/jbc.m108461200

ISSN

1083-351X

Autores

Piotr Widłak, Lily Y. Li, Xiaodong Wang, William T. Garrard,

Tópico(s)

DNA Repair Mechanisms

Resumo

Endonuclease G (endoG) is released from mitochondria during apoptosis and is in part responsible for internucleosomal DNA cleavage. Here we report the action of the purified human recombinant form of this endonuclease on naked DNA and chromatin substrates. The addition of the protein to isolated nuclei from non-apoptotic cells first induces higher order chromatin cleavage into DNA fragments ≥ 50 kb in length, followed by inter- and intranucleosomal DNA cleavages with products possessing significant internal single-stranded nicks spaced at nucleosomal (∼190 bases) and subnucleosomal (∼10 bases) periodicities. We demonstrate that both exonucleases and DNase I stimulate the ability of endoG to generate double-stranded DNA cleavage products at physiological ionic strengths, suggesting that these activities work in concert with endoG in apoptotic cells to ensure efficient DNA breakdown. Endonuclease G (endoG) is released from mitochondria during apoptosis and is in part responsible for internucleosomal DNA cleavage. Here we report the action of the purified human recombinant form of this endonuclease on naked DNA and chromatin substrates. The addition of the protein to isolated nuclei from non-apoptotic cells first induces higher order chromatin cleavage into DNA fragments ≥ 50 kb in length, followed by inter- and intranucleosomal DNA cleavages with products possessing significant internal single-stranded nicks spaced at nucleosomal (∼190 bases) and subnucleosomal (∼10 bases) periodicities. We demonstrate that both exonucleases and DNase I stimulate the ability of endoG to generate double-stranded DNA cleavage products at physiological ionic strengths, suggesting that these activities work in concert with endoG in apoptotic cells to ensure efficient DNA breakdown. second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase/(direct IAP binding protein with low pI) apoptosis-inducing factor caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease (also termed DFF40) DNA fragmentation factor exonuclease III micrococcal nuclease Nonidet P-40 topoisomerase II long terminal repeat human immunodeficiency virus 1 Endonuclease G inhibitor of CAD. Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, plays an important role in both development and maintenance of tissue homeostasis (reviewed in Refs. 1Jacobson M.D. Weil M. Raff M.C. Cell. 1997; 88: 347-354Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2428) Google Scholar and 2Nagata S. Cell. 1997; 88: 355-365Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4578) Google Scholar). Two apoptotic pathways have been identified: the death-receptor pathway and the mitochondrial pathway (3Green D.R. Cell. 2000; 102: 1-4Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (900) Google Scholar). Mitochondria have been shown to harbor multiple apoptogenic factors including cytochrome c, procaspases, SMAC/DIABLO,1 AIF, and endoG (4Yang J. Liu X. Bhalla K. Kim C.N. Ibrado A.M. Cai J. Peng T.-I. Jones D.P. Wang X. Science. 1997; 275: 1129-1132Crossref PubMed Scopus (4452) Google Scholar, 5Zou H. Li Y. Liu X. Wang X. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 11549-11556Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1815) Google Scholar, 6Du C., C. Fang M. Li Y. Li L. Wang X. Cell. 2000; 102: 33-42Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2974) Google Scholar, 7Verhagen A. Ekert P.G. Pakusch M. Silke J. Connolly L.M. Reid G.E. Moritz R.L. Simpson R.J. Vaux D.L. Cell. 2000; 102: 43-53Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1998) Google Scholar, 8Susin S.A. Lorenzo H.K. Zamzami N. Marzo I. Snow B.E. Brothers G.M. Mangion J. Jacotot E. Costantini P. Loeffler M. Larochette N. Goodlett D.R. Aebersold R. Siderovski D.P. Penninger J.M. Kroemer G. Nature. 1999; 397: 441-446Crossref PubMed Scopus (3494) Google Scholar, 9Li L.Y. Xu L. Wang X. Nature. 2001; 412: 95-99Crossref PubMed Scopus (1422) Google Scholar, 10Parrish J. Li L. Klotz K. Ledwich D. Wang X. Xue D. Nature. 2001; 412: 90-94Crossref PubMed Scopus (355) Google Scholar). Both cytochrome c and SMAC/DIABLO are involved in caspase activation, whereas AIF and endoG have been associated with one of the hallmarks of the terminal stages of apoptosis, DNA breakdown (11Wyllie A.H. Nature. 1980; 284: 555-556Crossref PubMed Scopus (4235) Google Scholar, 12Wyllie A.H. Morris R.G. Smith A.L. Dunlop D. J. Pathol. 1984; 142: 66-77Crossref Scopus (1483) Google Scholar). Apoptotic cell genomic DNA cleavage occurs in at least two stages: initial cleavage at intervals of ≥50 kb, consistent with the size of chromatin loop domains, followed by a second stage of internucleosomal DNA cleavage (also called DNA laddering) (13Oberhammer F. Wilson J.W. Dive C. Morris I.D. Hickman J.A. Waleling A.E. Walker P.R. Sirorska M. EMBO J. 1993; 12: 3679-3684Crossref PubMed Scopus (1169) Google Scholar). AIF (8Susin S.A. Lorenzo H.K. Zamzami N. Marzo I. Snow B.E. Brothers G.M. Mangion J. Jacotot E. Costantini P. Loeffler M. Larochette N. Goodlett D.R. Aebersold R. Siderovski D.P. Penninger J.M. Kroemer G. Nature. 1999; 397: 441-446Crossref PubMed Scopus (3494) Google Scholar), topo II (14Li T.-K. Chen A.Y., Yu, C. Mao Y. Wang H. Liu L.F. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 1553-1560Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar), and caspase-treated DFF/CAD-ICAD (15Sakahira H. Enari M. Ossawa Y. Uchiyama Y. Nagata S. Curr. Biol. 1999; 9: 543-546Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar, 16Zhang J. Lee H. Lou D.W. Bovin G.P. Xu M. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000; 274: 225-229Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar, 17Widlak P. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2000; 5: 373-379Google Scholar) have each been implicated in the higher order DNA cleavage reaction. Nucleosomal DNA laddering, on the other hand, has been associated with several endonucleases, including caspase-activated DFF/CAD-ICAD (18Liu X. Zou H. Slaughter C. Wang X. Cell. 1997; 89: 175-184Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1655) Google Scholar, 19Liu X. Li P. Widlak P. Zou H. Luo X. Garrard W.T. Wang X. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95: 8461-8466Crossref PubMed Scopus (505) Google Scholar, 20Enari M. Sakahira H. Yokoyama H. Okawa K. Iwamatsu A. Nagata S. Nature. 1998; 391: 43-50Crossref PubMed Scopus (2834) Google Scholar, 21Sakahira H. Enari M. Nagata S. Nature. 1998; 391: 96-99Crossref PubMed Scopus (1442) Google Scholar, 22Halenbeck R. MacDonald H. Roulston A. Chen T.T. Conroy L. Williams L.T. Curr. Biol. 1998; 8: 537-540Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 23Liu X. Zou H. Widlak P. Garrard W. Wang X. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 13836-13840Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar, 24Widlak P. Li P. Wang X. Garrard W.T. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 8226-8232Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar, 25Widlak P. Garrard W.T. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2001; 218: 125-130Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar), endoG (9Li L.Y. Xu L. Wang X. Nature. 2001; 412: 95-99Crossref PubMed Scopus (1422) Google Scholar, 10Parrish J. Li L. Klotz K. Ledwich D. Wang X. Xue D. Nature. 2001; 412: 90-94Crossref PubMed Scopus (355) Google Scholar), and DNase I (26Oliveri M. Daga A. Cantoni C. Lunardi C. Millo R. Puccetti A. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001; 31: 743-751Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar). Although some of the catalytic properties of endoG have been reported previously, nucleic acid, not chromatin substrates, had been employed. In addition, most of these studies used various partially purified forms of the protein from different tissue sources, and the possible contributions of impurities remain uncertain (27Ruiz-Carrillo A. Renaud J. EMBO J. 1987; 6: 401-407Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar, 28Côté J. Renaud J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 3301-3310Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 29Côté J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. Science. 1993; 261: 765-769Crossref PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar, 30Gerschenson M. Houmiel K.L. Low R.L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 88-97Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar, 31Ikeda S. Ozaki K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997; 235: 291-294Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar). Furthermore, this nuclease was originally thought to play a role in mitochrondrial DNA replication (29Côté J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. Science. 1993; 261: 765-769Crossref PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar), which seems unlikely because a yeast knockout exhibits no phenotype (32Zassenhaus H.P. Hofmann T.J. Uthayshanker R. Vincet R.D. Zona M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 16: 3283-3296Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar), and the enzyme co-localizes with cytochromec in the intermembrane space as opposed to the matrix where DNA replication occurs (9Li L.Y. Xu L. Wang X. Nature. 2001; 412: 95-99Crossref PubMed Scopus (1422) Google Scholar). One newly recognized function for endoG is as a caspase-independent pathway for DNA breakdown during apoptosis (9Li L.Y. Xu L. Wang X. Nature. 2001; 412: 95-99Crossref PubMed Scopus (1422) Google Scholar,10Parrish J. Li L. Klotz K. Ledwich D. Wang X. Xue D. Nature. 2001; 412: 90-94Crossref PubMed Scopus (355) Google Scholar). Here we study the action of homogenous human recombinant endoG on DNA and chromatin substrates. We have found that the enzyme possesses novel properties including cooperation with exonuclease and DNase I for more efficient DNA breakdown under physiological ionic strengths. Full-length human endoG cDNA with an additional six histidine residues appended to its C terminus and cloned into pFastBacI (Life Technologies, Inc.), was transformed into DH10Bac cells (Life Technologies, Inc.), and the recombinant viral DNA was purified according to the Bac-to-Bac baculovirus expression procedure. The purified bacmids were used to transfect Sf21 insect cells using CellFECTIN reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). Transfected cells were grown in IPL41 medium with 10% fetal calf serum, 2.6 g/liter tryptose phosphate, 4 g/liter yeastolate, and 0.1% Pluronic F-68 plus penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), and Fungizone (0.25 g/ml). Forty milliliters of the amplified viral stock was used to infect 1 liter of cells at 2 × 106 cells/ml. The infected cells were harvested 2 days later, and resuspended and homogenized in 5 volumes of buffer T (20 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mm NaCl, 1 mm β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) with 0.5% Nonidet P-40. These and all subsequent operations were conducted at 4 °C. The cell homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min, and the supernatant was loaded onto a 3-ml nickel affinity column. The column was washed with 30 ml of buffer T with 0.5% Nonidet P-40, then 30 ml of buffer T, and followed by 200 ml of buffer T plus 1m NaCl. The column was washed once more with buffer T, and proteins were eluted with buffer T plus 250 mm imidazole. The eluted proteins were loaded onto a Superdex 200 column (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) and eluted with buffer A (20 mmHepes-KOH, pH 7.0, 10 mm KCl, 1.5 mmMgCl2, 1 mm NaEDTA, 1 mm NaEGTA, 1 mm dithiothreitol, and 0.1 mmphenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The peak fractions were loaded onto a Mono S column (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) and eluted with a 20-ml linear gradient from 0 to 300 mm NaCl in buffer A. The peak of endoG nuclease activity, eluting at ∼80 mm NaCl, was stored at −20 °C in 50% glycerol. Protein purity was assessed by SDS, 15% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Plasmid pWLTR11 DNA (33Widlak P. Gaynor R.B. Garrard W.T. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 17654-17661Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar), ϕX174 virion DNA (New England BioLabs), or high molecular weight RNA from wheat germ (Calbiochem) were employed as non-chromatin substrates. Nuclei were purified from HeLa S3 cells. Cells were lysed in a buffer consisting of 10 mm KCl, 0.25 m sucrose, 4 mm MgCl2, 1 mm dithiothreitol, 20 mm Hepes, pH 7.5, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and CompleteTM (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) protease inhibitors set and then washed two times in the same buffer without Nonidet P-40. One microgram of naked DNA was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with endoG (final concentration: 0.5 α unit/ml) in buffer consisting of 10 mm KCl, 3 mm MgCl2, 0.5 mm dithiothreitol, 20 mm Hepes, pH 7.5 (final volume: 15 μl), if not stated otherwise. Two micrograms of DNA (as nuclei) were incubated for varying times (5–45 min) at 37 °C with either recombinant purified endoG (final concentration 10 units/ml), recombinant purified activated DFF (50 units/ml, Ref. 24Widlak P. Li P. Wang X. Garrard W.T. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 8226-8232Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar), MNase (Worthington, 40 units/ml), or DNase I (Worthington, 10 units/ml) in a buffer consisting of 100 mmKCl, 3 mm MgCl2, 1 mmCaCl2, 0.5 mm dithiothreitol, 20 mmHepes, pH 7.5 (final volume 20 μl). Nuclease reactions were terminated by mixing with one-half volume of stop solution (0.6% SDS, 50 mm EDTA, and 6-mg/ml proteinase K). To non-chromatin substrate reactions gel loading dye buffer was added, and samples were then run on 1.5% SeaKem-agarose gels, using 1× (Tris, acetate-EDTA) as the running buffer and stained with ethidium bromide. Chromatin substrate reactions were incubated for 1 h at 42 °C with proteinase K, and then DNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. DNA was dissolved in Tris-EDTA buffer and incubated with a mixture of RNaseA and RNase T1. DNA was then separated on standard 1.5% agarose gels, two-dimensional (neutral/alkaline) agarose gels (23Liu X. Zou H. Widlak P. Garrard W. Wang X. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 13836-13840Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar), 5% native polyacrylamide gels, or 25-cm long, 3-mm thick, 7.5% polyacrylamide, 7m urea sequencing gels (10:1 proportion of acrylamide and bis-acrylamide), and stained with ethidium bromide. Detailed analysis of sequences at cleavage sites was performed as described (24Widlak P. Li P. Wang X. Garrard W.T. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 8226-8232Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar). Briefly, a 177-base pair fragment of HIV-1 5′-LTR was excised from plasmid pWLTR11, 5′-end-labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase, purified, and then incubated with either purified recombinant activated DFF or endoG. To analyze cleavage sites on both strands, DNA was digested with eitherSca I or Bsa I enzymes. Digestion products were resolved on 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gels with the appropriate Maxam-Gilbert sequencing reactions. Nuclei were incubated with purified recombinant endoG or activated DFF for 5, 15, and 45 min at 37 °C, and the nuclease reactions were terminated by adding aurintricarboxylic acid (final concentration: 0.1 mm). Alternatively, nuclei were incubated for 30 min in the presence of 0.1 mm topo II inhibitor VM-26. Reaction mixtures were embedded in low temperature melting-agarose plugs, and plugs were then incubated for 3 h at 37 °C in lysing solution (0.5% SDS, 20 mm EDTA, and 0.2 mg/ml proteinase K). After washing plugs with Tris-EDTA buffer, the DNA was separated in a CHEF Mapper pulsed-field gel electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad) and then stained with ethidium bromide. Nuclei were incubated with either purified recombinant endoG, purified recombinant activated DFF, or MNase and then DNA was purified. Mononucleosomal DNA was isolated after electrophoresis on a low temperature melting agarose gel. DNA was32P 3′-end-labeled with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Sigma) and resolved on a 5% native polyacrylamide gel. Alternatively, DNA was 5′ end-dephosphorylated with shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), 32P 5′-end-labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and resolved on an 8% polyacrylamide, 7 murea sequencing gel. We utilized a baculovirus expression system to produce a His6-tagged, full-length endoG protein, which was purified to homogeneity and free from insect cell endoG, by stepwise chromatography on nickel affinity columns, Superdex 200, and Mono S-columns, as demonstrated by SDS gel electrophoresis with Coomassie Blue staining (Fig. 1). The apparent molecular mass of the protein was 33.5 kDa, whereas the predicted size for the recombinant protein after targeting to the mitochrondia and removal of the N-terminal leader sequence (29Côté J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. Science. 1993; 261: 765-769Crossref PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar) is 28.6 K (including the His6-tag). However, we found that the leader sequence had been removed from the purified recombinant protein (data not shown), indicating that the mobility in SDS gels is abberant. EndoG has biphasic pH optima for attacking double-stranded DNA at pH 9.0 and pH 7.0 (Fig.2 A). The higher pH optimum is probably accounted for by increased DNA breathing and the fact that endoG has much greater activity on single-stranded nucleic acid substrates (see below). In agreement with previous reports (27Ruiz-Carrillo A. Renaud J. EMBO J. 1987; 6: 401-407Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar, 30Gerschenson M. Houmiel K.L. Low R.L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 88-97Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar), the enzyme requires either Mg2+ or Mn2+ and not Ca2+ as its divalent cation and is inhibited about 15-fold at physiological ionic strengths (Fig. 2, B and C). The presence of Fe2+ or Zn2+ in combination with Mg2+ also inhibits enzyme activity (Fig.2 B). In further agreement with previous publications (29Côté J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. Science. 1993; 261: 765-769Crossref PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar, 30Gerschenson M. Houmiel K.L. Low R.L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 88-97Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar, 31Ikeda S. Ozaki K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997; 235: 291-294Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar), both single-stranded DNA and RNA are preferred substrates over double-stranded DNA (Fig. 2 D). First-hit kinetics indicate that supercoiled plasmids are first relaxed by single-stranded nicking by endoG (not shown). We evaluated the endoG cleavage sequences for naked DNA cleavage in comparison with DFF as a control. The corresponding cleavage products of32P 5′-labeled HIV-1 5′-LTR DNA of the Watson and Crick strands were separated on sequencing gels. We analyzed 22 cleavage sites at the nucleotide level and found that unlike caspase-3-activated DFF, which generates primarily blunt-end DNA cleavages (Fig.3 A, gray arrowheads), endoG made numerous single-stranded nicks, primarily 5′ of G residues (14/22) (Fig. 3 A, black arrowheads), in agreement with a previous report (28Côté J. Renaud J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 3301-3310Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). We also discovered cleavages 5′ of C and A residues, and 3′ of G residues (not shown). In addition, the DNA ends generated by endoG, like caspase-3 activated DFF but unlike those generated by MNase, possessed 3′-hydroxyl groups because they could be extended by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Fig. 3 B), also in agreement with previous studies (28Côté J. Renaud J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 3301-3310Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). In conclusion, our studies on naked nucleic acid substrates reveal that the catalytic properties of the recombinant protein are in general agreement with previous biochemical studies (27Ruiz-Carrillo A. Renaud J. EMBO J. 1987; 6: 401-407Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar, 28Côté J. Renaud J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 3301-3310Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 29Côté J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. Science. 1993; 261: 765-769Crossref PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar, 30Gerschenson M. Houmiel K.L. Low R.L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 88-97Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar, 31Ikeda S. Ozaki K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997; 235: 291-294Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar). We now focus on the previously uncharacterized action of the protein on chromatin substrates. During apoptosis, initial DNA cleavage occurs at intervals the size of chromatin loop domains, ≥50 kb (13Oberhammer F. Wilson J.W. Dive C. Morris I.D. Hickman J.A. Waleling A.E. Walker P.R. Sirorska M. EMBO J. 1993; 12: 3679-3684Crossref PubMed Scopus (1169) Google Scholar). To determine whether endoG could catalyze such higher order cleavage events, we added the protein to isolated HeLa cell nuclei and analyzed the cleavage products by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. For positive controls, nuclei were also individually treated with caspase-3-activated DFF or with the topo II inhibitor VM-26, because each have been shown previously to generate higher order DNA cleavage (13Oberhammer F. Wilson J.W. Dive C. Morris I.D. Hickman J.A. Waleling A.E. Walker P.R. Sirorska M. EMBO J. 1993; 12: 3679-3684Crossref PubMed Scopus (1169) Google Scholar, 17Widlak P. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2000; 5: 373-379Google Scholar). Fig. 4 reveals that endoG also triggers higher order DNA cleavage in nuclei from non-apoptotic cells. To determine the ability of endoG to generate oligonucleosomal DNA cleavage, we compared its action with that of MNase and caspase-3-activated DFF. As shown in Fig.5 A, digestion of isolated HeLa cell nuclei with MNase or DFF resulted in oligonucleosomal DNA ladders much sharper than those generated by endoG, as judged by oligonucleosomal multimer band sharpness and the interband background between successive oligonucleosomal multimers. Furthermore, cleavage within nucleosome core particles was detectable for endoG digestion products, which exhibited subnucleosomal DNA fragments (Fig.5 B). To investigate the degree and pattern of single-stranded nicking, we performed two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. After running the digestion products on a non-denaturing gel in the first dimension, a second dimension of electrophoresis was performed under denaturing conditions. As shown in Fig. 5 C, this analysis revealed that in contrast to caspase-activated DFF, which generates predominantly double-stranded oligonucleosomal DNA fragments lacking internal single-strand nicks, endoG generates oligonucleosomal DNA fragments containing internal single-strand nicks spaced at oligonucleosomal intervals. For example, a significant fraction of fragments migrating as trinucleosomal in length in the first dimension possess nicks in their linker regions, thereby generating under denaturing conditions single-stranded mono- and dinucleosomal-length DNA fragments (Fig. 5 C). To investigate further the action of endoG at the subnucleosomal level, we separated HeLa cell nuclei DNA digestion products on a high resolution sequencing gel. As shown in Fig. 6 A, endoG cuts chromatin with the same periodicity as DNase I, namely at about 10.4 base multiples (34Lutter L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979; 6: 41-56Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar, 35van Holde K.E. Chromatin. Springer, Berlin1988: 27Google Scholar). Proof that this cleavage occurs within the nucleosome core was obtained by first isolating mononucleosomal DNA fragments by non-denaturing electrophoresis and then end-labeling the material for visualization on a sequencing gel. As shown in Fig.6 B, material that was cut with endoG exhibits internal nicks spaced at about 10-base intervals, although such nicks are largely absent from MNase or DFF cut material. A number of observations suggest that other proteins may facilitate the ability of endoG to fragment DNA during apoptosis. First, the activity of the enzyme is quite low at physiological ionic strengths (Fig. 1 C and Refs. 27Ruiz-Carrillo A. Renaud J. EMBO J. 1987; 6: 401-407Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar and 30Gerschenson M. Houmiel K.L. Low R.L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 88-97Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar). Second, the enzyme activity is elevated markedly on single-stranded nucleic acids (Fig.1 D and Refs. 30Gerschenson M. Houmiel K.L. Low R.L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 88-97Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar and 31Ikeda S. Ozaki K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997; 235: 291-294Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar). Third, there is a high internucleosomal DNA background upon endoG digestion of isolated nuclei, not completely characteristic of the DNA laddering pattern seen during apoptosis in DFF knockout cells (9Li L.Y. Xu L. Wang X. Nature. 2001; 412: 95-99Crossref PubMed Scopus (1422) Google Scholar). Fourth, DNase I knockout cells fail to ladder chromatin under apoptotic conditions that block DFF activation (26Oliveri M. Daga A. Cantoni C. Lunardi C. Millo R. Puccetti A. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001; 31: 743-751Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar). Fifth, the ladder generated by DNase I digestion of chromatin also exhibits a high internucleosomal DNA background, which is not nearly as sharp as the reported DNase I-dependent apoptotic ladder (26Oliveri M. Daga A. Cantoni C. Lunardi C. Millo R. Puccetti A. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001; 31: 743-751Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar). Taken together, these observations prompted us to test whether nicks generated by DNase I would be targets for endoG action because of their single-stranded character, and whether exonuclease gapping of nicks generated by endoG or DNase I would also stimulate DNA processing under physiological ionic strengths. Fig. 7 A shows that the DNA digestion products are processed more than additively upon co-digestion of naked DNA with DNase I and endoG. Furthermore, ExoIII stimulates endoG activity by orders of magnitude on a naked DNA substrate (Fig.7 B). Finally, on chromatin substrates co-digestion again leads to more than additive DNA processing. In particular, the ladder of nucleosomal fragments is much sharper when either ExoIII, DNase I, or both were combined with endoG (Fig. 7 C). As expected, ExoIII did not stimulate DNase I digestion (Fig. 7 C), because DNase I does not preferentially attack single-stranded DNA like endoG. In conclusion, these results may provide insight into new molecules that are predicted to participate in DNA processing during apoptosis. EndoG is released from the intermembrane space of mitochondria during apoptosis in a caspase-independent fashion and represents a novel pathway for nuclear DNA breakdown (9Li L.Y. Xu L. Wang X. Nature. 2001; 412: 95-99Crossref PubMed Scopus (1422) Google Scholar, 10Parrish J. Li L. Klotz K. Ledwich D. Wang X. Xue D. Nature. 2001; 412: 90-94Crossref PubMed Scopus (355) Google Scholar). It should be appreciated that the in vitro properties of endoG cleavage largely fit the phenotype of the DNA products generated by apoptosisin vivo. Specifically, first higher order DNA cleavage into fragments >50 kb followed by nucleosomal DNA laddering, with fragments bearing 3′-hydroxyl groups. These features have been routinely used in bioassays for cells undergoing apoptosis. We have found that the action of human recombinant endoG on naked nucleic acid substrates is in close agreement with previous reports (27Ruiz-Carrillo A. Renaud J. EMBO J. 1987; 6: 401-407Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar, 28Côté J. Renaud J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 3301-3310Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 29Côté J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. Science. 1993; 261: 765-769Crossref PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar, 30Gerschenson M. Houmiel K.L. Low R.L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 88-97Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar, 31Ikeda S. Ozaki K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997; 235: 291-294Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar), but in contrast to what might be observed from previous publications (27Ruiz-Carrillo A. Renaud J. EMBO J. 1987; 6: 401-407Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar, 29Côté J. Ruiz-Carrillo A. Science. 1993; 261: 765-769Crossref PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar), we demonstrate that the sequence specificity of endoG cleavage is clearly broad enough to attack essentially any DNA sequence, a feature required for efficient genome breakdown in apoptotic cells. However, the action of endoG on chromatin substrates had not been previously studied and represents the major focus of our investigation. We demonstrate that endoG catalyzes higher order DNA cleavage when added to nuclei isolated from non-apoptotic cells, just like topo II (13Oberhammer F. Wilson J.W. Dive C. Morris I.D. Hickman J.A. Waleling A.E. Walker P.R. Sirorska M. EMBO J. 1993; 12: 3679-3684Crossref PubMed Scopus (1169) Google Scholar, 14Li T.-K. Chen A.Y., Yu, C. Mao Y. Wang H. Liu L.F. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 1553-1560Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar) or DFF (15Sakahira H. Enari M. Ossawa Y. Uchiyama Y. Nagata S. Curr. Biol. 1999; 9: 543-546Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar, 16Zhang J. Lee H. Lou D.W. Bovin G.P. Xu M. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000; 274: 225-229Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar, 17Widlak P. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2000; 5: 373-379Google Scholar). These higher order cleavage events may represent an attack of preformed hypersensitive sites demarcating the boundaries of chromatin domains, such as those associated with domain insulators or locus control regions (36Udvardy A. Maine E. Schedl P. J. Mol. Biol. 1985; 185: 341-358Crossref PubMed Scopus (220) Google Scholar, 37Kellum R. Schedl P. Cell. 1991; 64: 941-950Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (503) Google Scholar, 38Udvardy A. Schedl P. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993; 13: 7522-7530Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar, 39Bonifer C. Trends Genet. 2000; 16: 310-315Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar). Upon further digestion of chromatin, we found that endoG generates single-stranded nicks at nucleosomal (∼190 bases) and subnucleosomal (∼10 bases) intervals. These cleavage patterns are somewhat similar to those of DNase I digestion products (34Lutter L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979; 6: 41-56Crossref PubMed Scopus (157) Google Scholar, 35van Holde K.E. Chromatin. Springer, Berlin1988: 27Google Scholar). However, unlike DNase I, endoG preferentially attacks single-stranded regions, allowing for targeting by single-stranded nicks for adjacent strand cleavage to generate double-stranded nucleosomal length fragments. Two features of the catalytic properties of endoG were not optimized for nucleosomal DNA breakdown: the preferential attack of single-stranded nucleic acids and maximal activity at less than 10 mm monovalent cations. Because these properties are clearly not optimal for physiological double-stranded DNA processing, we reasoned that additional proteins may participate with endoG for facilitating efficient DNA breakdown. Indeed, we demonstrated that exonuclease and DNase I each can cooperate with endoG to facilitate DNA processing. It is significant that DNase I recently has been reported to be required for DNA laddering under certain apoptotic conditions that are DFF independent (26Oliveri M. Daga A. Cantoni C. Lunardi C. Millo R. Puccetti A. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001; 31: 743-751Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar). Taken together with our results, we suggest that endoG may participate with DNase I (and possibly exonucleases) in vivo for apoptotic DNA processing. Perhaps another important in vivo function for endoG is RNA breakdown during apoptosis.

Referência(s)