Program Integrity and the Principles of Gender-Responsive Interventions
2015; Wiley; Volume: 14; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/1745-9133.12131
ISSN1745-9133
Autores Tópico(s)Crime Patterns and Interventions
ResumoCriminology & Public PolicyVolume 14, Issue 2 p. 329-338 Policy Essay Program Integrity and the Principles of Gender-Responsive Interventions Assessing the Context for Sustainable Change Emily J. Salisbury, Corresponding Author Emily J. Salisbury University of Nevada, Las VegasDirect correspondence to Emily J. Salisbury, Department of Criminal Justice, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Box 455009, Las Vegas, NV 89154 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author Emily J. Salisbury, Corresponding Author Emily J. Salisbury University of Nevada, Las VegasDirect correspondence to Emily J. Salisbury, Department of Criminal Justice, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Box 455009, Las Vegas, NV 89154 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author First published: 06 July 2015 https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12131Citations: 8Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Baker Miller, Jean. 1986. Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Blanchette, Kelley and Shelley L. Brown. 2006. The Assessment and Treatment of Women Offenders: An Integrated Perspective. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley. Bloom, Barbara, Stephanie S. Covington, Nena Messina, Kimberly Selvaggi, and Barbara Owen. 2014. Gender-Responsive Policy and Practice Assessment Manual. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Bloom, Barbara, Barbara Owen, and Stephanie S. Covington. 2003. Gender-Responsive Strategies: Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Brennan, Tim, Markus Breitenbach, William Dieterich, Emily J. Salisbury, and Patricia Van Voorhis. 2012. Women's pathways to serious and habitual crime: A person-centered analysis incorporating gender responsive factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39: 1481–1508. Carson, E. Ann. 2014. Prisoners in 2013 (NCJ 247282). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. Covington, Stephanie S. 2008. Women and addiction: A trauma-informed approach. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 40: 377–385. Covington, Stephanie S. and Barbara Bloom. 2006. Gender responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. In ( Elaine J. Leeder, ed.), Inside and Out: Women, Prison, and Therapy. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press. Dane, Andrew V. and Barry H. Schneider. 1998. Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18: 23–45. DeHart, Dana, Shannon Lynch, Joanne Belknap, Priscilla Dais-Brailsford, and Bonnie Green. 2014. Life history models of female offending: The roles of serious mental illness and trauma in women's pathways to jail. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38: 138–151. Durlak, Joseph A. and Emily P. DuPre. 2008. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41: 327–350. Duwe, Grant and Valerie Clark. 2015. Importance of program integrity: Outcome evaluation of a gender-responsive, cognitive-behavioral program for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 14: 301–328. Fixsen, Dean L., Karen Blase, Sandra Naoom, and Michelle Duda. 2015. Implementation Drivers: Assessing Best Practices. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Gehring, Krista S., Patricia Van Voorhis, and Valerie R. Bell. 2010. “What works” for female probationers? An evaluation of the Moving On program. Women, Girls, and Criminal Justice, 11: 6–10. Greenhalgh, Trisha, Glenn Robert, Fraser Macfarlane, Paul Bate, and Olivia Kyriakidou. 2005. Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell. Holtfreter, Kristy and Rhonda Cupp. 2007. Gender and risk assessment: The empirical status of the LSI-R for women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23: 363–382. Kelly, Janice and John Bogue. 2014. Gender differences in criminogenic needs among Irish offenders. Irish Probation Journal, 11: 87–102. Latessa, Edward J. 2012. Evaluating Correctional Programs. Paper presented to the United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (UNAFEI). Retrieved June 12, 2015 from unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No88/No88_11VE_Latessa_Evaluating.pdf. McClean Taylor, Jill, Carol Gilligan, and Amy Sullivan. 1995. Between Voice and Silence: Women and Girls, Race and Relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Millson, Bart, David Robinson, and Marilyn Van Dieten. 2010. Women Offender Case Management Model: The Connecticut Project. Report submitted to the National Institute of Corrections. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Orbis Partners. National Institute of Corrections. n.d. Gender-Informed Practices Assessment. Washington, DC: Author. Owen, Barbara. 1998. In the Mix: Struggle and Survival in a Women's Prison. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Salisbury, Emily J. and Patricia Van Voorhis. 2009. Gendered pathways: An empirical investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36: 541–566. Stith, Sandra, Irene Pruitt, JEMEG Dees, Michael Fronce, Narkia Green, Anurag Som, et al. 2006. Implementing community-based prevention programming: A review of the literature. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27: 599–617. Sundt, Jody L., Emily J. Salisbury, and Breanna Boppre. 2015. Driving the Change: Scaling Up Evidence-Based Practices with High Fidelity. Presentation delivered to the Oregon Association of Community Corrections Directors Meeting. Van Dieten, Marilyn. 2010. Moving On: A Program for At-Risk Women (Program Manual). Center City, MN: Hazelden. Van Voorhis, Patricia. 2012. On behalf of women offenders: Women's place in the science of evidence-based practice. Criminology & Public Policy, 11: 111–145. Van Voorhis, Patricia, Emily M. Wright, Emily J. Salisbury, and Ashley Bauman. 2010. Women's risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34: 261–288. Van Wormer, Katherine. 1999. The strengths-based perspective: A paradigm for correctional counseling. Federal Probation, 63: 51–62. Citing Literature Volume14, Issue2May 2015Pages 329-338 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)