The current status of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty
2005; Wiley; Volume: 60; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.0787d.x
ISSN1742-1241
AutoresKirsten Rose, Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta,
Tópico(s)Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
ResumoInternational Journal of Clinical PracticeVolume 60, Issue 1 p. 6-8 The current status of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty Kirsten Rose, Kirsten Rose Guy's Hospital and GKT School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorShamim Khan, Shamim Khan Guy's Hospital and GKT School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorProkar Dasgupta, Prokar Dasgupta Guy's Hospital and GKT School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this author Kirsten Rose, Kirsten Rose Guy's Hospital and GKT School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorShamim Khan, Shamim Khan Guy's Hospital and GKT School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorProkar Dasgupta, Prokar Dasgupta Guy's Hospital and GKT School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 20 December 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.0787d.xCitations: 5Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References 1 Razdan S, Bagley DH, McGinnis DE. Minimizing minimally invasive surgery: the 5-mm trocar laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2005; 19: 533– 6. 2 Rubinstein M, Finelli A, Moinzadeh A et al. Outpatient laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urology 2005; 66: 41– 3. 3 Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181: 552– 7. 4 Patel V. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 2005; 66: 45– 9. 5 Mendez-Torres F, Woods M, Thomas R. Technical modifications for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2005; 19: 393– 6. 6 Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 453– 7. 7 Peters CA. Robotically assisted paediatric pyeloplasty: cutting edge or expensive toy? BJU Int 2004; 94: 1214– 5. 8 Atug F, Castle EP, Burgess SV, Thomas R. Role of robotics in management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. IJCP 2006; 60: 9– 11. 9 Dasgupta P, Jones A, Gill IS. Robotic urological surgery: a perspective. BJU Int 2005; 95: 20– 3. Citing Literature Volume60, Issue1January 2006Pages 6-8 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)