Carta Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Patient satisfaction: the name of the game?

2013; Wiley; Volume: 41; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/ceo.12042

ISSN

1442-9071

Autores

Andrew White, Ivan Goldberg,

Tópico(s)

Migraine and Headache Studies

Resumo

Clinical & Experimental OphthalmologyVolume 41, Issue 1 p. 1-2 Editorial Patient satisfaction: the name of the game? Andrew White PhD FRANZCO, Andrew White PhD FRANZCO Save Sight Institute and Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorIvan Goldberg AM FRANZCO, Ivan Goldberg AM FRANZCO University of Sydney, Glaucoma Unit, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Eye Associates, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author Andrew White PhD FRANZCO, Andrew White PhD FRANZCO Save Sight Institute and Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorIvan Goldberg AM FRANZCO, Ivan Goldberg AM FRANZCO University of Sydney, Glaucoma Unit, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Eye Associates, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 28 January 2013 https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12042 Competing/conflicts of interest: No stated conflict of interest. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References 1 Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 487–497. 2 Regnault A, Viala-Danten M, Gilet H, Berdeaux G. Scoring and psychometric properties of the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ), an instrument to assess satisfaction and compliance with glaucoma treatment. BMC Ophthalmol 2010; 10: 1. 3 Nordman J, Boudouin C, Renard J et al. Measurement of treatment compliance using a medical device for glaucoma patients associated with intraocular pressure control: a survey. Clin Ophthalmol 2010; 4: 731–739. 4 Kerr NM, Patel HY, Chew SS, Ali NQ, Eady EK, Danesh-Meyer HV. Patient satisfaction with topical ocular hypotensives. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2013; 41: 27–35. Epub 2012 May 18. 5 Beckers HJ, Schouten JS, Webers CA, van der Valk R, Hendrikse F. Side effects of commonly used glaucoma medications: comparison of tolerability, chance of discontinuation, and patient satisfaction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 246: 1485–1490. 6 Ruiz MA, Pardo A, Martinez de la Casa JM, Polo V, Esquiro J, Soto J. Development of a specific questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with glaucoma treatment: glausat. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010; 17: 131–143. 7 Atkinson MJ, Stewart WC, Fain JM et al. A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: the Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 67. 8 Day DG, Sharpe ED, Atkinson MJ, Stewart JA, Stewart WC. The clinical validity of the treatment satisfaction survey for intraocular pressure in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Eye (Lond) 2006; 20: 583–590. Volume41, Issue1January/February 2013Pages 1-2 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)