Governing the social dimension in C anadian federalism and E uropean integration
2013; Wiley; Volume: 56; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/capa.12012
ISSN1754-7121
Autores Tópico(s)Canadian Identity and History
ResumoCanadian Public AdministrationVolume 56, Issue 2 p. 173-184 Introduction Governing the social dimension in Canadian federalism and European integration Amy Verdun, Amy Verdun professor and chair Department of Political Science, Jean Monnet Chair Ad Personam, University of Victoria, Victoria, British ColumbiaThey would like to thank the Canada–Europe Transatlantic Dialogue (funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada), the European Commission (Jean Monnet Chair Ad Personam held by Amy Verdun), the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC Study Team Grant), and the Québec Intergovernmental Affairs Secretariat (Research Support Program on Intergovernmental Affairs and Québec Identity) for their support of this project over the past three years.Search for more papers by this authorDonna E. Wood, Donna E. Wood postdoctoral fellow Department of Political Science, University of VictoriaThey would like to thank the Canada–Europe Transatlantic Dialogue (funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada), the European Commission (Jean Monnet Chair Ad Personam held by Amy Verdun), the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC Study Team Grant), and the Québec Intergovernmental Affairs Secretariat (Research Support Program on Intergovernmental Affairs and Québec Identity) for their support of this project over the past three years.Search for more papers by this author Amy Verdun, Amy Verdun professor and chair Department of Political Science, Jean Monnet Chair Ad Personam, University of Victoria, Victoria, British ColumbiaThey would like to thank the Canada–Europe Transatlantic Dialogue (funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada), the European Commission (Jean Monnet Chair Ad Personam held by Amy Verdun), the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC Study Team Grant), and the Québec Intergovernmental Affairs Secretariat (Research Support Program on Intergovernmental Affairs and Québec Identity) for their support of this project over the past three years.Search for more papers by this authorDonna E. Wood, Donna E. Wood postdoctoral fellow Department of Political Science, University of VictoriaThey would like to thank the Canada–Europe Transatlantic Dialogue (funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada), the European Commission (Jean Monnet Chair Ad Personam held by Amy Verdun), the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC Study Team Grant), and the Québec Intergovernmental Affairs Secretariat (Research Support Program on Intergovernmental Affairs and Québec Identity) for their support of this project over the past three years.Search for more papers by this author First published: 22 May 2013 https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12012Citations: 6 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Banting, Keith. 2005. “ Canada: Nation building in a federal welfare state.” In Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences, edited by Herbert Obinger, Stephan Leibfried, and Francis G. Castles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Begg, Iain, Dermot Hodson, and Imelda Maher. 2003. “Economic policy coordination in the European Union.” National Institute Economic Review 183: 66– 77. Boychuk, Gerard W. 2012. Grey Zones: Emerging Issues at the Boundaries of the Canada Health Act. C.D. Howe Commentary No. 348. Available at http://www.cdhowe.org/grey-zones-emerging-issues-at-the-boundaries-of-the-canada-health-act/17418. Accessed 29 May 2012. Büchs, Milena. 2008. “How legitimate is the open method of coordination?” Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (4): 765– 786. Canada. Parliamentary Budget Office. 2011. Fiscal Sustainability Report 2011. Available at http://www.parl.gc.ca/pbo-dpb/documents/FSR_2011.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2011. Canada. Parliamentary Budget Office. 2012. Renewing the Canada Health Transfer: Implications for Federal and Provincial-Territorial Fiscal Sustainability. Available at http://www.parl.gc.ca/pbo-dpb/documents/Renewing_CHT.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2012. Canadian Council on Learning. 2011. “ What is the future of learning in Canada?” Available at http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/CEOCorner/2010-10-11WhatistheFutureofLearninginCanada.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2012. Cram, Laura. 2009. “ From ‘integration by stealth’ to ‘good governance’ in EU social policy.” In Innovative Governance in the European Union: The Politics of Multilevel Policymaking, edited by Ingeborg Tömmel, and Amy Verdun. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 87– 102. Caroline de la Porte, and Philippe Pochet, eds. 2002. Building Social Europe through the Open Method of Coordination. Brussels: Peter Lang. Caroline de la Porte, and Philippe Pochet. 2012. “Why and how (still) study the OMC?” Journal of European Social Policy 22 (3): 336– 349. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. European Commission. 2007. Progress: the EU programme for employment and social solidarity 2007–2013, Brussels. Hodson, Dermot, and Imelda Maher. 2001. “The open method as a new mode of governance: The case of soft economic policy coordination.” Journal of Common Market Studies 39 (4): 719– 746. Jenson, Jane. 2010. “Ideas and policy: The European Union considers social policy futures.” Paper prepared for the European Studies Association- Canada ECSA-C 8th Biennial Conference, Victoria, BC. 30 April. Inwood, Gregory J., Carolyn M. Johns, and Patricia L. O'Reilly. 2011. Intergovernmental Policy Capacity in Canada: Inside the Worlds of Finance, Environment, Trade and Health. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press. Kröger, Sandra. 2009. “The effectiveness of soft governance in the field of European anti-poverty policy: Operationalization and empirical evidence.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11 (2): 197– 211. Maxwell, Judith. 1996. “Governing Canada's social union.” Canadian Business Economics Fall: 15– 19. McGuinness, N., and C. O'Carroll. 2010. “Benchmarking Europe's lab benches: How successful has the OMC been in research policy?” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (2): 293– 318. McIntosh, Tom. 2004. “Intergovernmental relations, social policy and federal transfers after Romanow.” Canadian Public Administration 47 (1): 27– 51. Noël, Alain, France St-Hilaire, and Sarah Fortin. 2003. “ Learning from the SUFA experience.” In Forging the Canadian Social Union: SUFA and Beyond, edited by Sarah Fortin, Alain Noël, and France St-Hilaire. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy. Preece, Daniel. 2013. “ Convergence through benchmarking and policy learning: The impact of the open method of coordination on social policy within the European Union.” In Overpromising and Underperforming? Understanding and Evaluating New Intergovernmental Accountability Regimes, edited by Peter Graefe, Julie M. Simmons, and Linda White. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Radaelli, C. 2003. The Open Method of Coordination: A New Governance Architect for the European Union? Rapport nr 1. Swedish Institute of European Policy Studies. Sabel, Charles F., and Jonathan Zeitlin. 2010. Experimentalist Governance in the European Union. Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Saint-Martin, Denis. 2004. “ Coordinating interdependence: Governance and social policy re-design in Canada, the European Union and the United Kingdom.” CPRN Social Architecture Papers Research Report F 41. Available at http://rcrpp.org/documents/29040_en.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2012. Scharpf, Fritz W. 2002. “The European social model: Coping with the challenges of diversity.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4): 645– 670. Skogstad, Grace. 2012. “ Conclusion: Taking stock of Canadian federalism.” In Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness and Legitimacy, third ed., edited by Herman Bakvis, and Grace Skogstad. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press. Ingeborg Tömmel, and Amy Verdun, eds. 2009. Innovative Governance in the European Union: The Politics of Multilevel Policymaking. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Townsend, Thomas. 2005. Application of the Open Method of Coordination in Federal/ Provincial/Territorial Policy Forum. Government of Canada: Mission of Canada to the EU. Vanhercke, Bart, and Peter Lelie. 2012. “ Benchmarking social Europe a decade on: Demystifying the OMC's Learning Tools.” Available at http://www.forumfed.org/post/Benchmarking_Social_Europe_V8.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2012. Wood, Donna E., and Amy Verdun. 2011. “Canada-European Union relations: A review of the literature.” International Journal 66 (1): 9– 21. Zeitlin, J. 2005. “ Conclusion – the Open Method of Coordination in action. Theoretical promise, empirical realities and reform strategy.” In The Open Method of Coordination in Action – the European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, edited by Jonathan Zeitlin, Philippe Pochet, and Lars Magnusson. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang, pp. 441– 498. Citing Literature Volume56, Issue2June 2013Pages 173-184 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)