Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Inefficient Dissolutions as a Consequence of Public Goods: The Case of No-Fault Divorce

1993; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 22; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/468174

1537-5366

Martin Zelder,

Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Previous article No AccessInefficient Dissolutions as a Consequence of Public Goods: The Case of No-Fault DivorceMartin ZelderMartin ZelderPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 22, Number 2Jun., 1993 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/468174 Views: 18Total views on this site Citations: 43Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1993 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Carina Keldenich, Christine Luecke Unlucky at work, unlucky in love: job loss and marital stability, Review of Economics of the Household 20, no.11 (Sep 2020): 243–278.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-020-09506-xBruno Jeandidier No-Fault Revolution and Divorce Rate, (Nov 2021): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_678-2Bruno Jeandidier No-Fault Revolution and Divorce Rate, (Apr 2019): 1484–1491.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_678Antony W. Dnes Litigation and Marital Property Rights, (Apr 2019): 1342–1352.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_593Joaquín Andaluz, Miriam Marcén, José Alberto Molina The Effects of Inter-Generational Transfers on the Marital Surplus, The Manchester School 85, no.33 (Apr 2016): 320–338.https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12148Bruno Jeandidier No-Fault Revolution and Divorce Rate, (Aug 2017): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_678-1François Cochard, Hélène Couprie, Astrid Hopfensitz Do spouses cooperate? An experimental investigation, Review of Economics of the Household 14, no.11 (Nov 2014): 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-014-9276-3Jose V. Gallegos, Jan I. Ondrich The effects of the Chilean divorce law on women?s first birth decisions, Review of Economics of the Household 82 (Aug 2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-015-9307-8Pierre-Andre Chiappori, Murat Iyigun, Yoram Weiss THE BECKER–COASE THEOREM RECONSIDERED, Journal of Demographic Economics 81, no.22 (May 2015): 157–177.https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2015.3Antony W. Dnes Litigation and Marital Property Rights, (Sep 2015): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_593-1Thorsten Kneip, Gerrit Bauer, Steffen Reinhold Direct and Indirect Effects of Unilateral Divorce Law on Marital Stability, Demography 51, no.66 (Oct 2014): 2103–2126.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0337-2Leora Friedberg, Steven Stern MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, AND ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION, International Economic Review 55, no.44 (Oct 2014): 1155–1199.https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12086A. Cigno Is Marriage as Good as a Contract?, CESifo Economic Studies 60, no.33 (Jul 2013): 599–612.https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ift010Stefania Marcassa Divorce laws and divorce rate in the US, The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 13, no.11 (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2012-0149Paulius Jurcys, Mark Fenwick Party Autonomy in International Family Law: A Note from an Economic Perspective, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2127081Jason Sorens Designing a Constitutional Right of Secession: Applying Normative Principles and Empirical Findings, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2343878Bruno Jeandidier, Lucile Bodson Revenus féminins et désunion en Europe, Revue économique Vol. 63, no.22 (Mar 2012): 235–260.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.632.0235Alessandro Cigno The Economics of Marriage, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 12, no.SupplementSupplement (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2516.2011.00355.xThorsten Kneip, Gerrit Bauer, Steffen Reinhold Direct and Indirect Effects of Unilateral Divorce Law on Marital Stability, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2487117Eric Langlais, On unilateral divorce and the "selection of marriages? hypothesis, Recherches économiques de Louvain 76, no.33 (Jan 2010): 229.https://doi.org/10.3917/rel.763.0229J.-U. Franck 'So Hedge therefore, Who Join Forever': Understanding the Interrelation of No-fault Divorce and Premarital Contracts, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23, no.33 (Aug 2009): 235–276.https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebp009Thorsten Kneip, Gerrit Bauer Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates in Western Europe?, Journal of Marriage and Family 71, no.33 (Aug 2009): 592–607.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00621.x Niko Matouschek and Imran Rasul The Economics of the Marriage Contract: Theories and Evidence Matouschek/Rasul, The Journal of Law and Economics 51, no.11 (Jul 2015): 59–110.https://doi.org/10.1086/588596Ian Smith Property division on divorce with inequity aversion, International Review of Law and Economics 27, no.22 (Jun 2007): 111–128.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2007.06.006KORNELIUS KRAFT, PIA STEBLER AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT AFTER DIVORCE, International Game Theory Review 08, no.0404 (Dec 2006): 561–579.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198906001119Clarisse Coelho, Nuno Garoupa Do Divorce Law Reforms Matter for Divorce Rates? Evidence from Portugal, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 3, no.33 (Nov 2006): 525–542.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2006.00078.x Vicky Barham , Rose Anne Devlin , and Jie Yang Public Policies and Private Decisions: The Effect of Child Support Measures on Marriage and Divorce Barham/Devlin/Yang, The Journal of Legal Studies 35, no.22 (Jul 2015): 441–474.https://doi.org/10.1086/501093Imran Rasul Marriage Markets and Divorce Laws, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22, no.11 (Nov 2005): 30–69.https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewj008Stéphane Mechoulan "Economic Theory's Stance On No-Fault Divorce", Review of Economics of the Household 3, no.33 (Sep 2005): 337–359.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-005-3461-3Ian Smith Fairness and inefficient divorce, Economics Letters 88, no.22 (Aug 2005): 159–163.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.12.030Clarisse Coelho, Nuno M. Garoupa Do Divorce Law Reforms Matter for Divorce Rates? Evidence from Portugal, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.640501Philip A. Curry No-Fault Divorce and the Division of Marital Assets, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.805326Giulio Fella, Paola Manzini, Marco Mariotti Does Divorce Law Matter?, Journal of the European Economic Association 2, no.44 (Jun 2004): 607–633.https://doi.org/10.1162/1542476041423359Roger Bowles, Nuno Garoupa Household dissolution, child care and divorce law, International Review of Law and Economics 22, no.44 (Dec 2002): 495–510.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(02)00116-3Antony W. Dnes Cohabitation and marriage, (Feb 2002): 118–131.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495328.007Martin Zelder For better or for worse? Is bargaining in marriage and divorce efficient?, (Feb 2002): 157–170.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495328.009Douglas W. Allen The impact of legal reforms on marriage and divorce, (Feb 2002): 191–211.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495328.011Lloyd R. Cohen Marriage as Contract, (Jan 2002): 1276–1281.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_243M. F. Brinig No-Fault Divorce, (Jan 2017): 1337–1342.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_254Antony W Dnes Applications of economic analysis to marital law: concerning a proposal to reform the discretionary approach to the division of marital assets in England and Wales, International Review of Law and Economics 19, no.44 (Dec 1999): 533–552.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(99)00019-8Martin Zelder The Cost of Accosting Coase: A Reconciliatory Survey of Proofs and Disproofs of the Coase Theorem, (Jan 1998): 65–94.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5350-8_4Steven G Medema, Richard O Zerbe Educating Alice: Lessons from the Coase theorem, (): 69–112.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-5895(00)19003-7Margaret F. Brinig, Marsha Garrison, Elizabeth Scott The Division of Household Labor across Time and Generations, (): 54–72.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087568.005