Arbitrary and F^@#$*! Capricious: An Analysis of the Second Circuit's Rejection of the FCC's Fleeting Expletive Regulation in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC (2007)
2008; Volume: 57; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
ISSN
0003-1453
Autores Tópico(s)Intellectual Property Rights and Media
ResumoIntroduction 724 I. Background 725 A. The FCC’s Statutory Authority 725 B. First Amendment Conflict 726 C. The Pacifica Framework: The Court Permits ContextBased Restrictions on Indecent Broadcast Speech 728 D. From Pacifica to 2003: The FCC Expands Indecency Regulation While Exempting Fleeting Expletives 729 II. Changes in the Air . . . Waves 731 A. The Golden Globes Decision 731 B. The Facts of Fox Television: The 2002 & 2003 Billboard Music Awards 733 III. Previous Court Treatment of the FCC’s Indecency Policy Under Arbitrary and Capricious Review 734 A. Brief Overview of Judicial Review Under the Administrative Procedure Act 734 B. Comparison of Judicial Review in Fox Television with Action for Children’s Television v. FCC 736 IV. Other Specific Problems with the Fox Television Court’s Bases for Finding the Policy Change Arbitrary and Capricious 740
Referência(s)