Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Central Sleep Apnea on Commencement of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With a Primary Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea

2007; American Academy of Sleep Medicine; Volume: 03; Issue: 05 Linguagem: Inglês

10.5664/jcsm.8424

1550-9397

Sanaz Lehman, Nick A. Antic, C Thompson, Peter Catcheside, Jeremy Mercer, R. Doug McEvoy,

Respiratory Support and Mechanisms

Free AccessCPAPCentral Sleep Apnea on Commencement of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With a Primary Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Sanaz Lehman, M.B. B.S., Nick A. Antic, M.B. B.S., Courtney Thompson, B.Sc.Eng., Peter G. Catcheside, B.Sc., Ph.D., Jeremy Mercer, B.A., Ph.D., R. Doug McEvoy, M.D. Sanaz Lehman, M.B. B.S. Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia , Nick A. Antic, M.B. B.S. Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia , Courtney Thompson, B.Sc.Eng. Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia , Peter G. Catcheside, B.Sc., Ph.D. Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia , Jeremy Mercer, B.A., Ph.D. Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia , R. Doug McEvoy, M.D. Address correspondence to: R. Doug McEvoy, Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daws Road, Daw Park, South Australia 5041, Australia011 618 8275 7787011 618 8277 6890 E-mail Address: [email protected] Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8424Cited by:85SectionsAbstractPDF ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations AboutABSTRACTIntroduction:Central sleep apnea (CSA) may occur in patients with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea (OSAH) during commencement of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. The presence of CSA may limit the effectiveness of CPAP therapy. The aims of this study were to assess the prevalence of CSA amongst patients starting CPAP for OSAH and to identify possible predictors of this condition.Methods:We reviewed the polysomnograms (PSGs) and clinical records of 99 consecutive patients with a primary diagnosis of OSAH who were referred for an in-laboratory CPAP titration study. Patients with a CSA Index of ≥5 per hour at or near (±1 cm H2O) prescribed CPAP level formed the CSA-CPAP group. The remaining patients made up the noCSA-CPAP group. Demographic, baseline and CPAP titration PSG variables were compared between the 2 two groups.Results:13 subjects (13.1%) had CSA-CPAP. Patients with and without CSA-CPAP did not differ with respect to age or body mass index. 46% of patients with CSA-CPAP had CSA on their baseline PSGs compared with 8% in the noCSA-CPAP group (p <0.01). CSA-CPAP patients also had a higher apnea-hypopnea index (72.1 vs. 52.7 p = 0.02), a higher arousal index (43.3 vs. 29.2 p <0.01), and a higher mixed apnea index (6.8 vs. 1.3 p = 0.03), on their baseline PSGs. Therapeutic CPAP could not be determined in 2 CSA-CPAP patients due to a very high frequency (of severe) central apneas. In the remaining 11, the CPAP prescription to eliminate obstructive events was higher than in the noCSA-CPAP group (11.0 vs. 9.3 p = 0.08). AHI was greater both at or near prescribed CPAP (48.8 vs. 6.7 p <0.01) and overall (47.4 vs. 14.9 p 5/hr on CPAP) to be 15% while primary CSA was rare (0.4%). 16 As with earlier reports of complex sleep apnea syndrome, while CPAP suppressed obstructive episodes, the residual apnea-hypopnea index remained high, due mostly to central apneas. The investigators found no clinical risk factors for complex sleep apnea syndrome apart from male gender. Treatment for CSA in such patients has only recently begun to be systematically investigated. 17Risk factors for OSAHS and CSA are well established. Male gender and body mass index are the main risk factors for OSAHS; whereas male gender, age greater than 65, lower left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiogram, and atrial fibrillation are risk factors for CSA. 18 The early identification of patients with complex sleep apnea is important because this group does not respond well to CPAP. Although the best treatment option is still not known, 17 the early introduction of alternative treatment modalities has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Identifying the clinical profile of patients with complex sleep apnea may help in the understanding of the pathophysiology of this syndrome.There were 2 aims in this study: firstly, to assess the prevalence of CSA upon commencement of CPAP, and secondly, to determine clinical factors that may help predict those at risk of complex sleep apnea.METHODSThe Research and Ethics Committee of the Repatriation General Hospital approved the study protocol. A retrospective review was undertaken of the polysomnographies and clinical records of 99 consecutive patients with a primary diagnosis of OSAH who were referred for an in-laboratory CPAP titration polysomnographic study at the Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital. Separate baseline and titration PSGs as well as split studies were included in the study.Patient characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities and medications, were obtained. Comorbidity data were either obtained from the case notes or reported by patients at the time of sleep study. A history of 3 specific comorbidities of potential relevance to CSA was sought: ischemic heart disease (IHD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). For the diagnosis of CHF, formal echocardiography was not requested, and only reviewed if available. Patient medication histories were specifically reviewed for opioids, benzodiazepines, and antidepressants.Standard PSG montages were used as follows: Electroencephalography (EEG, C3/C4, C2/C5 lead placements), electro-oculograms (EOG), submental electromyogram (EMG), nasal cannula to measure nasal pressure, limb movement sensors, inductive plethysmography for thoraco-abdominal motion, electrocardiography and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2, finger pulse oximetry). The signals were digitized and stored using a Compumedics-E Series sleep system (Melbourne, Australia). Sleep and sleep arousals were scored using standardized methods. Apneas and hypopneas were scored according to internationally agreed criteria. 19 Hypopnea was defined as (i) >50% from baseline reduction in the amplitude of nasal pressure signal, or, if this signal was absent or of poor quality, the sum of noncalibrated thoracic and abdominal plethysmography signals; OR (ii) a clear amplitude reduction in one of these parameters that was 3% or arousal. The central apnea index (CAI) and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were computed as the number of central apnea events, and the number of apneas plus hypopneas, respectively, per hour of sleep. CAI and AHI were also calculated at the closest available pressure to that prescribed by the reporting physician to abolish obstructive breathing events. This was achieved by summing all relevant events for each available epoch of sleep in which the CPAP pressure was closest to prescribed pressure ± 1 cm H2O, and dividing by the corresponding sleep time.Diagnosis of CSA was made on the diagnostic polysomnogram if the central apnea index was ≥5 per hour and at least 50% of all apneas were purely central in origin, that is, without obstructive components. 16 Patients were considered to have emergence or persistence of CSA on CPAP if the residual CAI at or near the prescribed CPAP level was ≥5 per hour. These patients formed the CSA-CPAP group. The remaining patients formed the noCSA-CPAP group.The variables that were compared between CSA-CPAP and noCSA-CPAP groups included anthropomorphic variables, Comorbidities, medications, and characteristics of baseline and titration PSGs. The Student t -test and chi-squared test were used to compare the 2 groups. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Non-normally distributed variables (average awake SpO2 and average desaturation) were compared between the CSA-CPAP and noCSA-CPAP groups using Mann-Whitney U tests.RESULTSOf the 99 patients who had CPAP titration study performed for OSAH, 13 (13.1%) had either emergence or persistence of CSA at or near prescribed CPAP.Baseline CharacteristicsTable 1 summarizes the demographics and physical findings of the patients in the CSA-CPAP and noCSA-CPAP groups. Consistent with previous studies in OSAH populations, 20 , 21 patients were on average middle-aged and obese and were predominantly male. There was no difference between the 2 groups in age or BMI, but the proportion of males was higher in the CSA-CPAP group.Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Sleep Disordered BreathingCharacteristicsCSA-CPAP n = 13noCSA-CPAP n = 86p-valueAge, yr55.2 ± 16.0 *57.4 ± 10.60.53SexMale 12 (92%)Male 68 (79.1%)<0.01BMI, kg/m233.4 ±7.933.1 ±5.80.90Abbreviation: BMI: Body Mass Index*Mean ± Standard deviationDiagnostic PSGsThe findings of the diagnostic PSGs are shown in table 2 . The average AHI in both groups was within the severe range for OSAH. Patients with CSA-CPAP had more severe sleep disordered breathing and disturbed sleep than those in the noCSA-CPAP group. The average frequency of mixed and central apneas during the diagnostic PSGs was higher in the CSA-CPAP group than in the noCSA-CPAP group. Almost half the patients in the CSA-CPAP group had significant CSA (i.e., ≥5 central sleep apneas per hour of sleep) on their diagnostic PSGs, whereas this was the case in <10% of those in the noCSA-CPAP group.Table 2 Diagnostic PolysomnographyVariablesCSA-CPAP n=13noCSA-CPAP n=86p-valueAHI, events per hr72.1 ± 32.052.7 ± 28.10.02Arl, events/hr42.3 ± 20.829.2 ±16.1<0.01MAI, events/hr6.8 ± 19.71.3 ±5.10.03CAI, events/hr12.4 ± 23.91.2 ± 2.3<0.01No of subjects with CSA (proportion of group with CSA)6 (46%)7 (8%)<0.01Abbreviations: AHI: apnea-hypopnea index, ArI: arousal index, MAI: mixed apnea index, CAI: central apnea index.Titration PSGs at or Near Prescribed CPAPThe findings of titration PSGs at or near prescribed CPAP are shown in Table 3 . In 2 patients in the CSA-CPAP group, optimal CPAP pressures were not achieved because of severe persistence of CSA or emergence of CSA. The remaining 11 patients had significantly higher total AHI and CAI at or near prescribed CPAP levels, compared with corresponding results in the noCSA-CPAP group. This finding occurred in spite of a trend toward higher final prescribed CPAP levels.Table 3 Titration Polysomnography At or Near Prescribed CPAPVariablesCSA-CPAP n=11noCSA-CPAP n=86p-valueCPAP11.0 ±2.89.3 ± 2.50.08AHI48.8 ± 32.96.7 ± 7.3<0.01CAI26.2 ±20.30.5 ±1.0<0.01Titration PSGs, OverallTable 4 summarizes the data over the entire CPAP-titration period (i.e., not confined to the optimized CPAP levels). In keeping with the results reported in the previous section, the CSA-CPAP group had significantly higher total AHI and CAI over the entire CPAP-titration PSGs, compared with the noCSA-CPAP group.Table 4 Titration Polysomnography, All PressuresVariablesCSA-CPAP n=11noCSA-CPAP n=86p-valueAHI47.4 ±28.414.9 ±15.9<0.01ArI19.1 ±9.915.5 ±8.80.17CAI17.0 ± 14.80.6 ±1.0<0.01MAI1.5 ±2.50.01 ± 0.05<0.01SpO295.8 ±1.495.5 ± 1.40.5Max O2 desat4.4 ± 2.12.7 ± 0.90.01Abbreviations: SpO2: Average awake oxygen saturation, Max O2 desat: maximum oxygen desaturation during CPAP titration polysomnography.Table 5 ComorbiditiesVariablesCSA-CPAPnoCSA-CPAPp-valueCHF/IHD5 (38%)12 (14%)0.03CVA1 (8%)4 (5%)0.64Opioid/Benzo2 (15%)7 (8%)0.50Anti-depressants6 (46%)20 (23%)0.10Abbreviations: CHF/IHD: congestive heart failure/ischemic heart disease, CVA: cerebrovascular accidents, opioids/benzo: opioids, benzodiazepines.There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to average awake oxygen saturation (SpO2). However, the CSA-CPAP group had significantly higher maximum oxygen desaturation during their titration PSGs, compared with the noCSA-CPAP group.ComorbiditiesA diagnosis of either IHD or CHF was recorded in a higher proportion of patients in the CSA-CPAP group than the noCSA group. No other significant difference for comorbidities or medications was found between the 2 groups.DISCUSSIONIn this retrospective study, the prevalence of either emergent or persistent CSA on CPAP was 13.1%, which is consistent with the only previously reported prevalence of 15%. 16 Three differences were noted when comparing the CSA-CPAP group with the noCSA-CPAP group: a higher proportion of men, more disturbed sleep both on baseline and titration studies and a higher prevalence of CHF and/or IHD.There are a number of potential explanations for CSA-CPAP and the male preponderance of patients manifesting this problem. Ventilatory control instability has been proposed as a mechanism underlying sleep disordered breathing. 22 Loop gain refers to chemoresponsiveness or the hypoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory responses, and a high loop gain system is destabilizing to ventilation. Wellman and colleagues measured both loop gain and passive pharyngeal closing pressures in a group of patients with apnea during stable, supine NREM sleep. 23 Loop gain correlated loosely with apnea severity for the entire group. The relationship was much tighter in patients with moderately collapsible airways. It has been shown that men and patients with cardiac failure have higher loop gain. This could explain ventilatory instability, periodic breathing and CSA on CPAP in these patients. Men have higher awake hypercapnic ventilatory response than women. 24 – 26 They also have higher ventilatory response to brief arousals from NREM sleep and develop greater subsequent hypoventilation on resumption of sleep. 27 This ventilatory response combined with the observation that men appear to require a smaller reduction in PETCO2 than women to develop central sleep apnea, may contribute to the higher male prevalence of CSA. 28 , 29 Men also have more disrupted and lighter sleep than women, and central respiratory events tend to occur during lighter stages of sleep. 30The average SpO2 was the same for CSA-CPAP patients and noCSA-CPAP patients. Thus, it would seem unlikely that lower baseline saturation was driving the respiratory instability observed in CSA-CPAP patients. The deeper nadir of SpO2 observed amongst the CSA-CPAP group while on CPAP is most likely because they experienced many more disordered breathing events.While none of our patients had overt clinical heart failure at the time of their sleep studies, the CSA-CPAP group did have a greater frequency of past IHD and/ or CHF than the noCSA-CPAP group. Moderate to severe sleep disordered breathing is common in patients with CHF. 31 , 32 CSA is present in 25% to 40% of such patients. 18 , 31 , 33 , 34 In cardiac failure, the elevated central CO2 ventilatory response lowers PaCO2 towards the apnea threshold at rest, narrowing the difference between ambient PaCO2 levels and the apnea threshold, thereby predisposing to CSA. 35 – 37 Moreover, the activity of the faster-acting peripheral CO2 ventilatory response then oscillates ventilation, and is responsible for the periodicity and severity of CSA in subjects with heart failure. 35 A long circulation time also increases the loop gain. 36 , 37 Lastly, patients with CHF have hypocapnia secondary to lung edema, which may cause hyperventilation and lead to baseline PaCO2 to be closer to the apneic threshold. A number of the above mechanisms could have been operative in some of our patients who reported a past history of cardiac disease.Our study had several limitations. Firstly, it was a retrospective study. Specific methods such as esophageal balloon recordings were not employed to categorically differentiate between central and obstructive events (especially hypopneas). However, we based the definition of CSA-CPAP on the presence and frequency of central apneas rather than central hypopneas, to minimize the risk of overreporting cases of complex sleep apnea. Despite review of case notes, data availability was limited. Ideally, all patients included in the study would have been interviewed. This would have improved the accuracy of comorbidity data collected and also given insight into subjective experience with CPAP.Documentation of left ventricular function by echocardiography in all subjects would also have enhanced the study.The main implication of this study is that the emergent or persistent CSA on starting CPAP may prevent some patients being successfully treated with CPAP for the obstructive component of their sleep disordered breathing; it may also lead to long-term CPAP failure. Treatment response at best may be suboptimal in view of the underlying CSA. Several questions arise from this study. Are there other predicting factors that will help identify those at risk? In our study, the CSA-CPAP group had significantly higher MAI and CAI on the baseline study. This needs to be verified with a larger patient sample. Also, is emergence of CSA on CPAP a transient or acute phenomenon on first starting CPAP or is it an enduring problem?ConclusionCSA on commencing CPAP amongst patients with a primary diagnosis of OSAH appears to be relatively common. Male sex and past history of cardiac disease are potential risk factors. These patients seem to have more disturbed sleep on their baseline studies, are prescribed somewhat higher CPAP pressures and may become long-term CPAP failures. Further studies in this area are indicated.Disclosure StatementThis is not an industry supported study. Drs. Catcheside, Mercer, McEvoy, Lehman, Antic, and Thompson have indicated no financial conflicts of interest.REFERENCES1 Flemmons WWClinical practice. Obstructive sleep apnea . N Engl J Med ; 2002 ; 347 : 498 - 504, 12181405 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar2 White DPPathogenesis of obstructive and central sleep apnea . Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 2005 ; 172 : 1363 - 70, 16100008 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar3 Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research . Sleep ; 1999 ; 22 : 667 - 89, 10450601 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar4 Bradley T.D. , Phillipson E.A.Central sleep apnea . Clin Chest Med ; 1992 ; 13 : 493 - 505, 1521415 . Google Scholar5 Guilleminault C. , Robinson ACentral sleep apnea . Neurol Clin ; 1996 ; 14 : 611 - 28, 8871979 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar6 Bradley TD , Logan AG , Kimoff Jet al.Continuous positive airway pressure for central sleep apnea and heart failure . N Engl J Med ; 2005 ; 353 : 2025 - 33, 16282177 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar7 Javaheri S , Parker TJ , Wexler L , Liming JD , Lindower P , Roselle GAEffects of theophylline on sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure . N Engl J Med ; 1996 ; 335 : 562 - 722, 8678934 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar8 Javaheri SAcetazolamide improves central sleep apnea in heart failure; a double blind, prospective study . Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 2006 ; 173 : 234 - 7, 16239622 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar9 Garrigue S , Bordier P , Jais Pet al.Benefits of atrial pacing in sleep apnea syndrome . N Engl J Med ; 2002 ; 346 : 404 - 12, 11832528 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar10 Sinha AM , Skobel EC , Breithardt OACardiac resynchronization therapy improves central sleep apnea and cheyne-stokes respiration in patients with chronic heart failure . J Am Coll Cardiol ; 2004 ; 44 : 68 - 71, 15234409 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar11 Thomas RJ , Daly RW , Weis JWLow concentration carbon dioxide is an effective adjunct to positive airway pressure in the treatment of refractory mixed central and obstructive sleep disordered breathing . Sleep ; 2005 ; 28 : 69 - 77, 15700722 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar12 Kohnlein T , Welte T , Tan LB , Elliott MWAssisted ventilation for heart failure patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration . Eur Respir J ; 2002 ; 20 : 934 - 41, 12412686 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar13 Teschler H , Dohring J , Wang YM , Berthon-Jones MAdaptive pressure support servo-ventilation: a novel treatment for Cheyne-Stokes respiration in heart failure . Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 2001 ; 164 : 614 - 9, 11520725 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar14 Gilmartin GS , Daly RW , Thomas RJRecognition and management of complex sleep disordered breathing . Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 2005 ; 11 : 485 - 93, 16217173 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar15 Thomas RJ , Terzano MG , Parrino L , Weiss JWObstructive sleep disordered breathing with a dominant cyclic alternating pattern--a recognizable polysomnographic variant with practical clinical implications . Sleep ; 2004 ; 27 : 229 - 34, 15124715 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar16 Morgenthaler TI , Dagramanov V , Hanak V , Decker PAComplex sleep apnea syndrome: Is it a unique clinical syndrome? Sleep ; 2006 ; 29 : 1203 - 09, 17040008 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar17 Morgenthaler T , Gay P , Gordon Net al.Adaptive servoventilation versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for central, mixed and complex sleep apnea syndromes . Sleep ; 2007 ; 30 : 468 - 75, 17520791 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar18 Sin DD , Fitzgerald F , Parker JD , Newton G , Floras JS , Bradley TDRisk factors for central and obstructive sleep apnea in 450 men and women with congestive cardiac failure . Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 1999 ; 160 : 1101 - 6, 10508793 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar19 The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force. Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research . Sleep ; 1999 ; 22 : 667 - 89, 10450601 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar20 Young T , Palta M , Dempsey J , Skartrud J , Weber S , Badr Sthe