Same Forest, Different Countries
2003; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 17; Issue: 1-2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1300/j091v17n01_10
ISSN1540-756X
Autores Tópico(s)Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
ResumoSUMMARY In the Gran Sabana of Venezuela and the North Rupununi Savannah of Guyana, protected areas have been established primarily for purposes of conservation. However, both Canaima National Park in Venezuela and the Iwokrama International Centre for Rainforest Conservation and Development in Guyana are multiple use areas where a variety of resource use occurs and/or is planned. Shifting cultivation by the indigenous population is currently both the most common use of the forest and the use of longest duration in both areas. Surveys were conducted of paired primary and secondary forests in order to test the hypothesis that traditional, dispersed shifting cultivation with long fallows and no post-cultivation disturbance is sustainable, resulting in the eventual re-establishment of diverse secondary forests. Interviews and observations of agricultural practices and surveys of agricultural fields were conducted to determine the contemporary forest use practices and the extent to which traditional practices have changed. Results indicate that even dispersed, long fallow shifting cultivation requires careful management and several disturbance-free decades before diversity levels in secondary forests approach those in old growth. Further, that the process of integration and cultural “development” has destabilized this traditionally sustainable system in some areas. A central assumption of the paper is that with an understanding of the impacts of shifting cultivation and of the conditions under which it is sustainable, informed decisions about protected area management can be made. The data provide valuable and hitherto missing information on the levels of forest disturbance that can be sustained in the two protected areas while still meeting conservation goals.
Referência(s)