Forensic Misclassification of Ancient Nubian Crania: Implications for Assumptions about Human Variation
2005; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 46; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/428792
ISSN1537-5382
AutoresFrank Williams, Robert L. Belcher, George J. Armelagos,
Tópico(s)Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessReportsForensic Misclassification of Ancient Nubian Crania: Implications for Assumptions about Human VariationFrankLengleWilliams, RobertL.Belcher, and GeorgeJ.ArmelagosFrankLengleWilliamsDepartment of Anthropology and Geography, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3998, Atlanta, GA 30303 ([email protected]) (Williams)/Department of Social Science, Atlanta Metropolitan College, 1630 Metropolitan Parkway, Atlanta, GA 30310 (Belcher)/Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 (Armelagos), U.S.A. 15 xi 04 Search for more articles by this author , RobertL.BelcherDepartment of Anthropology and Geography, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3998, Atlanta, GA 30303 ([email protected]) (Williams)/Department of Social Science, Atlanta Metropolitan College, 1630 Metropolitan Parkway, Atlanta, GA 30310 (Belcher)/Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 (Armelagos), U.S.A. 15 xi 04 Search for more articles by this author , and GeorgeJ.ArmelagosDepartment of Anthropology and Geography, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3998, Atlanta, GA 30303 ([email protected]) (Williams)/Department of Social Science, Atlanta Metropolitan College, 1630 Metropolitan Parkway, Atlanta, GA 30310 (Belcher)/Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 (Armelagos), U.S.A. 15 xi 04 Search for more articles by this author Department of Anthropology and Geography, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3998, Atlanta, GA 30303 ([email protected]) (Williams)/Department of Social Science, Atlanta Metropolitan College, 1630 Metropolitan Parkway, Atlanta, GA 30310 (Belcher)/Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 (Armelagos), U.S.A. 15 xi 04Corrections to this articleErratum: Williams et al.PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Current Anthropology Volume 46, Number 2April 2005 Sponsored by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/428792 Views: 402Total views on this site Citations: 48Citations are reported from Crossref 2005 by The WennerGren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reservedPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Matthew Lee, Karina Gerdau-Radonic An inter- and intra-observer test of the computer program CRANID, Forensic Science International 337 (Aug 2022): 111375.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111375John Albanese, Abegail Dagdag, Carmen Skalic, Stephanie Osley, Hugo Cardoso The Fall and Rise of Identified Reference Collection: It Is Possible and Necessary to Transition from a Typological Conceptualization of Variation to Effective Utilization of Collections, Forensic Sciences 2, no.22 (Jun 2022): 438–454.https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2020033Margaret Maitland Alejandro Jiménez-Serrano and Juan Carlos Sánchez-León: Le Premier Nome du sud de l’Égypte au Moyen Empire, Fouilles de la mission espagnole à Qoubbet el-Haoua (Assouan) 2008–2018, African Archaeological Review 38, no.44 (Aug 2021): 723–725.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-021-09455-5Ann H. Ross, Marin Pilloud The need to incorporate human variation and evolutionary theory in forensic anthropology: A call for reform, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 101 (Aug 2021).https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24384Uroš Matić Talk like an Egyptian? Epistemological problems with the synthesis of a vocal sound from the mummified remains of Nesyamun and racial designations in mummy studies, Archaeological Dialogues 28, no.11 (May 2021): 37–49.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203821000076M. Katherine Spradley Use of craniometric data to facilitate migrant identifications at the United States/Mexico border, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 175, no.22 (Feb 2021): 486–496.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24241Bridget F.B. Algee-Hewitt, Jieun Kim The consecutive inference of ancestry and age from shape measures of the pubic symphysis, (Jan 2021): 179–196.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824370-1.00004-3Uroš Matić Ethnic Identities in the Land of the Pharaohs, 24 (Nov 2020).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108885577Matthew C. Go, Joseph T. Hefner Morphoscopic ancestry estimates in Filipino crania using multivariate probit regression models, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 172, no.33 (Jan 2020): 386–401.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24008Rhian R. Dunn, Micayla C. Spiros, Kelly R. Kamnikar, Amber M. Plemons, Joseph T. Hefner Ancestry estimation in forensic anthropology: A review, WIREs Forensic Science 2, no.44 (Feb 2020).https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1369Eugénia Cunha, Douglas H. Ubelaker Evaluation of ancestry from human skeletal remains: a concise review, Forensic Sciences Research 5, no.22 (Dec 2019): 89–97.https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2019.1697060Bridget Algee-Hewitt, Catarina Coelho, David Navega, Eugénia Cunha Statistical approaches to ancestry estimation: New and established methods for the quantification of cranial variation for forensic casework, (Jan 2020): 227–247.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815764-0.00018-6Laura Manthey, Richard L. Jantz Fordisc: Anthropological software for estimation of ancestry, sex, time period, and stature, (Jan 2020): 275–287.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815764-0.00022-8John Albanese, Hugo F.V. Cardoso Commentary on: Stephan CN , Ross AH . Letter to the Editor—A Code of Practice for the Establishment and Use of Authentic Human Skeleton Collections in Forensic Anthropology. J Forensic Sci 2018;63(5):1604–7., Journal of Forensic Sciences 1 (May 2019).https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14078Nawaporn Techataweewan, Beatrix Dudzik, Amnat Kitkhuandee, Pichayen Duangthongphon, Nancy Tayles Gender and Population Variation in Craniometry and Freehand Pass Ventriculostomy, World Neurosurgery 117 (Sep 2018): e194–e203.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.240K. Scheelen-Nováček, J. Nováček, P. J. Rose A case of a death in the fortress Hisn al-Bab, on the first cataract of the Nile, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 28, no.33 (Mar 2018): 264–273.https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2651Elena F. Kranioti, Julieta G. García-Donas, Ismail Ozgur Can, Oguzhan Ekizoglu Ancestry estimation of three Mediterranean populations based on cranial metrics, Forensic Science International 286 (May 2018): 265.e1–265.e8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.02.014M. Katherine Spradley, Kyra E. Stull Advancements in Sex and Ancestry Estimation, (Jan 2018): 13–21.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805429-1.00003-X References, (Jan 2018): 295–315.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814385-8.00035-5Stephen Ousley, Richard L. Jantz, Joseph T. Hefner From Blumenbach to Howells, (Dec 2017): 65–97.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119226529.ch5Rebecca Gowland Embodied Identities in Roman Britain: A Bioarchaeological Approach, Britannia 48 (Apr 2017): 177–194.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X17000125Marin A. Pilloud, Derek J. Reaux, Geoffrey M. Smith, Kristina M. Wiggins Using Fordisc software to assign obsidian artifacts to geological sources: Proof of concept, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 13 (Jun 2017): 428–434.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.04.023Pamela L. Geller, Christopher M. Stojanowksi The vanishing Black Indian: Revisiting craniometry and historic collections, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 162, no.22 (Oct 2016): 267–284.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23115Efthymia Nikita Sex and Ancestry Assessment, (Jan 2017): 105–134.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804021-8.00003-6Niccolo Leo Caldararo The Concepts of 'Species' and 'Population' in Considering Ancient DNA and Building Phylogenetic Trees of Hominid Evolution, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2939996Rebecca C. Redfern, Darren R. Gröcke, Andrew R. Millard, Victoria Ridgeway, Lucie Johnson, Joseph T. Hefner Going south of the river: A multidisciplinary analysis of ancestry, mobility and diet in a population from Roman Southwark, London, Journal of Archaeological Science 74 (Oct 2016): 11–22.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.07.016J.T. Hefner, M.A. Pilloud, J.E. Buikstra, C.C.M. Vogelsberg A Brief History of Biological Distance Analysis, (Jan 2016): 3–22.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801966-5.00001-9B. Dudzik, A. Kolatorowicz Craniometric Data Analysis and Estimation of Biodistance, (Jan 2016): 35–60.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801966-5.00003-2Ingrid Sierp, Maciej Henneberg Can ancestry be consistently determined from the skeleton?, Anthropological Review 78, no.11 (Mar 2015): 21–31.https://doi.org/10.1515/anre-2015-0002Petra Urbanová, Ann H. Ross, Mikoláš Jurda, Maria-Ines Nogueira Testing the reliability of software tools in sex and ancestry estimation in a multi-ancestral Brazilian sample, Legal Medicine 16, no.55 (Sep 2014): 264–273.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2014.06.002S. Schrader, M. Buzon, J. Irish Illuminating the Nubian ‘Dark Age’: A bioarchaeological analysis of dental non-metric traits during the Napatan Period, HOMO 65, no.44 (Aug 2014): 267–280.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2014.05.001Sarah Wagner The making and unmaking of an unknown soldier, Social Studies of Science 43, no.55 (May 2013): 631–656.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713484646Lauren Kallenberger, Varsha Pilbrow Using CRANID to test the population affinity of known crania, Journal of Anatomy 221, no.55 (Aug 2012): 459–464.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01558.xDawnie Wolfe Steadman The Places we will go: Paths Forward in Forensic Anthropology, (Sep 2012): 131–159.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373880.ch5Stephen D. Ousley, Richard L. Jantz Fordisc 3 and Statistical Methods for Estimating Sex and Ancestry, (Mar 2012): 311–329.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118255377.ch15Pierre Guyomarc’h, Jaroslav Bruzek Accuracy and reliability in sex determination from skulls: A comparison of Fordisc® 3.0 and the discriminant function analysis, Forensic Science International 208, no.1-31-3 (May 2011): 180.e1–180.e6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.03.011Natalie Kerr, Christopher Rynn Race and Ancestry, (May 2011): 119–153.https://doi.org/10.1201/b10727-6Marina Elliott, Mark Collard F ordisc and the determination of ancestry from cranial measurements, Biology Letters 5, no.66 (Dec 2009): 849–852.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0462Stephany Leach, Mary Lewis, Carolyn Chenery, Gundula Müldner, Hella Eckardt Migration and diversity in Roman Britain: A multidisciplinary approach to the identification of immigrants in Roman York, England, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 140, no.33 (Nov 2009): 546–561.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21104Ryan M. Seidemann, Christopher M. Stojanowski, Fredrick J. Rich The Identification of a Human Skull Recovered from an eBay Sale, Journal of Forensic Sciences 54, no.66 (Nov 2009): 1247–1253.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01194.xChristopher M. Stojanowski, William N. Duncan Historiography and forensic analysis of the Fort King George “skull”: Craniometric assessment using the specific population approach, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 140, no.22 (Oct 2009): 275–289.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21067Lyle W. Konigsberg, Bridget F.B. Algee-Hewitt, Dawnie Wolfe Steadman Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology: Sex and race, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 139, no.11 (Feb 2009): 77–90.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20934Stephen Ousley, Richard Jantz, Donna Freid Understanding race and human variation: Why forensic anthropologists are good at identifying race, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 139, no.11 (Feb 2009): 68–76.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21006D. Wescott, D. Srikanta Testing assumptions of the Gilbert and Gill method for assessing ancestry using the femur subtrochanteric shape, HOMO 59, no.55 (Dec 2008): 347–363.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2008.05.002F. Ramsthaler, K. Kreutz, M. A. Verhoff Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc® based on a recent skull collection, International Journal of Legal Medicine 121, no.66 (Sep 2007): 477–482.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-007-0199-x S. O. Y. Keita / Frank L’Engle Williams , Robert L. Belcher , and George J. Armelagos On Meroitic Nubian Crania, Fordisc 2.0, and Human Biological History S. O. Y. Keita, Current Anthropology 48, no.33 (Jul 2015): 425–427.https://doi.org/10.1086/507184 Mark Hubbe and Walter A. Neves / Frank L'Engle Williams and George J. Armelagos On the Misclassification of Human Crania: Are There Any Implications for Assumptions about Human Variation? Hubbe and Neves, Current Anthropology 48, no.22 (Jul 2015): 285–288.https://doi.org/10.1086/512985Walter A. Neves, Mark Hubbe, Luís Beethoven Piló Early Holocene human skeletal remains from Sumidouro Cave, Lagoa Santa, Brazil: History of discoveries, geological and chronological context, and comparative cranial morphology, Journal of Human Evolution 52, no.11 (Jan 2007): 16–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.07.012Related articlesErratum: Williams et al.17 Jul 2015Current Anthropology
Referência(s)