Mastering Supply Chain Management in an Era of Uncertainty at SKF
2015; Wiley; Volume: 34; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/joe.21631
ISSN1932-2062
AutoresMats Abrahamsson, Martin Christopher, Bo-Inge Stensson,
Tópico(s)Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
ResumoGlobal Business and Organizational ExcellenceVolume 34, Issue 6 p. 6-17 Article Mastering Supply Chain Management in an Era of Uncertainty at SKF Mats Abrahamsson , Mats Abrahamsson Search for more papers by this authorMartin Christopher, Martin ChristopherSearch for more papers by this authorBo-Inge Stensson, Bo-Inge StenssonSearch for more papers by this author Mats Abrahamsson , Mats Abrahamsson Search for more papers by this authorMartin Christopher, Martin ChristopherSearch for more papers by this authorBo-Inge Stensson, Bo-Inge StenssonSearch for more papers by this author First published: 04 August 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21631Citations: 9Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract To stay ahead in an increasingly competitive business environment, organizations need agile supply chain systems that are holistically designed and managed. The experiences of SKF, a Swedish multinational firm, point to the benefits of reengineering upstream capabilities to create value downstream. To foster the flexibility, responsiveness, and other dynamic capabilities needed to manage increased supply chain complexity, the company established programs to involve its suppliers in the value creation process, making them an extension of the organization's resource base. The overall objective has been to migrate from a business model based on economies of scale in operations to one that exploits both economies of scope and economies of integration. As a result of its efforts to create a more agile and cost-efficient supply chain, the company has been able to decrease supply risks while improving its value creation process and responsiveness to new customer demands and advancing its sustainability and social responsibility initiatives. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. References Christopher, M., & Holweg, M. (2011). Supply chain 2.0: Managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), pp. 63–82. 10.1108/09600031111101439 Web of Science®Google Scholar Deutsche Post AG. (2009). Delivering tomorrow: Customer needs in 2020 and beyond—A Global Delphi Study. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche Post AG. Google Scholar Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11 3.0.CO;2-E Web of Science®Google Scholar Esper, T., Fugate, B., & Davis-Sramek, B. (2007). Logistics learning capability: Sustaining the competitive advantage gained through logistics leverage. Journal of Business Logistics, 28(2), 57–82. 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2007.tb00058.x Google Scholar Glouberman, S., & Mintzberg, H. (2001). Managing the care of health and the cure of disease—Part I: Differentiation. Health Care Management Review, 26(1), 56 – 69. 10.1097/00004010-200101000-00006 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Håkansson, H., & Persson, G. (2004). Supply chain management: The logic of supply chains and networks. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(1), 11–26. 10.1108/09574090410700202 Google Scholar Lee, H. L. (2004), The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102–112. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Li, C.-F. (2009). Agile supply chain – Competing in volatile markets. Management, Science & Engineering, 3(20), 61–64. Google Scholar Mintzberg, H. 1989. Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar Sandberg, E., & Abrahamsson, M. (2011). Logistics capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 14(1), 61–75. 10.1080/13675567.2010.551110 Web of Science®Google Scholar Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday. Google Scholar SKF Annual Report. (2011), p.7. Retrieved from http://www.skf.com/group/investors/reports/skf-year-end-report-2011, Google Scholar SKF Annual Report. (2013). pp. 2 and 39. Retrieved from http://www.skf.com/group/investors/reports/year-end-report-2013. Google Scholar Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. 10.1002/smj.640 Web of Science®Google Scholar Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7 3.0.CO;2-Z Web of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume34, Issue6September/October 2015Pages 6-17 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)