Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Effect Sizes and the Integrative Understanding of Urban Bird Song

2012; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 180; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/665994

1537-5323

Erwin Nemeth, Sue Anne Zollinger, Henrik Brumm,

Animal Behavior and Reproduction

Previous article No AccessReplyEffect Sizes and the Integrative Understanding of Urban Bird Song (A Reply to Slabbekoorn et al.)Erwin Nemeth, Sue Anne Zollinger, and Henrik Brumm, Associate Editor: Darren Irwin, and Editor: Ruth G. ShawErwin NemethMax Planck Institute for Ornithology, Communication and Social Behaviour Group, Eberhard-Gwinner-Strasse, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany* Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected]n.mpg.de. Search for more articles by this author , Sue Anne ZollingerMax Planck Institute for Ornithology, Communication and Social Behaviour Group, Eberhard-Gwinner-Strasse, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany Search for more articles by this author , and Henrik BrummMax Planck Institute for Ornithology, Communication and Social Behaviour Group, Eberhard-Gwinner-Strasse, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany Search for more articles by this author , Associate Editor: Darren Irwin Search for more articles by this author , and Editor: Ruth G. Shaw Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 180, Number 1July 2012 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/665994 Views: 189Total views on this site Citations: 20Citations are reported from Crossref HistorySubmitted October 14, 2011Accepted February 24, 2012Published online May 23, 2012 Keywordsacoustic communicationbird songenvironmental acousticsLombard effectsignal transmissiontraffic noiseurbanization© 2012 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Matteo Sebastianelli, Daniel T. Blumstein, Alexander N. G. Kirschel Higher-pitched bird song towards the coast supports a role for selection in ocean noise avoidance, Bioacoustics 31, no.11 (Feb 2021): 41–58.https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2021.1879680Gabrielle S. M. Winandy, Rafael P. Félix, Rafaela A. Sacramento, Rilquer Mascarenhas, Henrique Batalha-Filho, Hilton F. Japyassú, Patrícia Izar, Hans Slabbekoorn Urban Noise Restricts Song Frequency Bandwidth and Syllable Diversity in Bananaquits: Increasing Audibility at the Expense of Signal Quality, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9 (Jun 2021).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.570420Elisa Girola, Michael J. Noad, Rebecca A. Dunlop, Douglas H. Cato Source levels of humpback whales decrease with frequency suggesting an air-filled resonator is used in sound production, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, no.22 (Feb 2019): 869–880.https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5090492Longhui Zhao, Xiaoqian Sun, Qinghua Chen, Yue Yang, Jichao Wang, Jianghong Ran, Steven E. Brauth, Yezhong Tang, Jianguo Cui Males increase call frequency, not intensity, in response to noise, revealing no Lombard effect in the little torrent frog, Ecology and Evolution 8, no.2323 (Oct 2018): 11733–11741.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4625Desiree L. Narango, Amanda D. Rodewald Signal information of bird song changes in human-dominated landscapes, Urban Ecosystems 21, no.11 (Aug 2017): 41–50.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0698-6Sue Anne Zollinger, Peter J. B. Slater, Erwin Nemeth, Henrik Brumm Higher songs of city birds may not be an individual response to noise, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284, no.18601860 (Aug 2017): 20170602.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0602Alejandro A. Ríos-Chelén, Ambria N. McDonald, Ayala Berger, Anna C. Perry, Alan H. Krakauer, Gail L. Patricelli Do birds vocalize at higher pitch in noise, or is it a matter of measurement?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71, no.11 (Dec 2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2243-7W. Halfwerk, A.M. Lea, M.A. Guerra, R.A. Page, M.J. Ryan Vocal responses to noise reveal the presence of the Lombard effect in a frog, Behavioral Ecology 27, no.22 (Dec 2015): 669–676.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv204Alejandro A. Ríos-Chelén, Gavin C. Lee, Gail L. Patricelli Anthropogenic noise is associated with changes in acoustic but not visual signals in red-winged blackbirds, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, no.77 (Apr 2015): 1139–1151.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1928-7Marcos R. Rossi-Santos Oil Industry and Noise Pollution in the Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) Soundscape Ecology of the Southwestern Atlantic Breeding Ground, Journal of Coastal Research 31, no.11 (Jan 2015): 184.https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-13-00195.1Xiao-Jing Yang, Hans Slabbekoorn Timing vocal behavior: Lack of temporal overlap avoidance to fluctuating noise levels in singing Eurasian wrens, Behavioural Processes 108 (Oct 2014): 131–137.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.002Kirsten M. Parris and Michael A. McCarthy Predicting the Effect of Urban Noise on the Active Space of Avian Vocal Signals., The American Naturalist 182, no.44 (Jul 2015): 452–464.https://doi.org/10.1086/671906Hans Slabbekoorn Songs of the city: noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds, Animal Behaviour 85, no.55 (May 2013): 1089–1099.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.021Daniel Sol, Oriol Lapiedra, Cesar González-Lagos Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city, Animal Behaviour 85, no.55 (May 2013): 1101–1112.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.023Erwin Nemeth, Nadia Pieretti, Sue Anne Zollinger, Nicole Geberzahn, Jesko Partecke, Ana Catarina Miranda, Henrik Brumm Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280, no.17541754 (Mar 2013): 20122798.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2798Steffen R. Hage, Tinglei Jiang, Sean W. Berquist, Jiang Feng, Walter Metzner Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no.1010 (Feb 2013): 4063–4068.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211533110Henrik Brumm, Sue Anne Zollinger Avian Vocal Production in Noise, (Dec 2013): 187–227.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7_7Sophie Schuster, Sue Anne Zollinger, John A. Lesku, Henrik Brumm On the evolution of noise-dependent vocal plasticity in birds, Biology Letters 8, no.66 (Sep 2012): 913–916.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0676Sue Anne Zollinger, Jeffrey Podos, Erwin Nemeth, Franz Goller, Henrik Brumm On the relationship between, and measurement of, amplitude and frequency in birdsong, Animal Behaviour 84, no.44 (Oct 2012): e1–e9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.026Gonçalo C. Cardoso, Jonathan W. Atwell On amplitude and frequency in birdsong: a reply to Zollinger et al., Animal Behaviour 84, no.44 (Oct 2012): e10–e15.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.012