Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Sleep Disorders in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury

2007; American Academy of Sleep Medicine; Volume: 03; Issue: 04 Linguagem: Inglês

10.5664/jcsm.26856

1550-9397

Arunima Verma, Vivek Anand, Narayan P. Verma,

Sleep and related disorders

Free AccessParasomniasSleep Disorders in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Arunima Verma, A.B., Vivek Anand, M.B., B.S., Narayan P. Verma, M.D. Arunima Verma, A.B. B.G. Tricounty Neurology and Sleep Clinic, Warren, MI , Vivek Anand, M.B., B.S. B.G. Tricounty Neurology and Sleep Clinic, Warren, MI , Narayan P. Verma, M.D. Address correspondence to: Narayan P. Verma, M.D., 31150 Hoover, Suite B, Warren, MI 48093(586) 983-3666(586) 983-3776 E-mail Address: [email protected] B.G. Tricounty Neurology and Sleep Clinic, Warren, MI Published Online:June 15, 2007https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.26856Cited by:152SectionsAbstractPDF ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations AboutABSTRACTStudy Objective:To examine the spectrum of sleep disorders in patients with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI) and determine if the severity of sleep disorder is related to severity of chronic TBI.Methods:Patients who underwent evaluation for sleep disorder/s following a TBI were included in this retrospective analysis. Sixty adult patients with TBI (age 20–69 yr; 38 M and 22 F), who presented with sleep-related complaints 3 months to 2 years following TBI, were studied. None had sleep complaints prior to the TBI. Orophrayngeal, chin, and TMJ examinations were considered benign. The severity of injury was assessed by the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. Polysomnograms (PSGs) were performed on 54 patients (90%), 28 of whom underwent multiple sleep latency tests (MSLTs) because they scored >11 on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale was administered if there was sleep maintenance insomnia, and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS) was administered if there was sleep onset insomnia.Results:The TBI severity was mild in 40%, moderate in 20%, and severe in 40%. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was elevated (>11) in 52%. Hypersomnia was the presenting complaint in 50%, mostly due to sleep apnea, narcolepsy, and periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD). Insomnia was the presenting complaint in 25%, half with sleep maintenance insomnia and high BDI scores, and the remainder with sleep onset insomnia and high HAS scores. Parasomnia was the presenting complaint in 25%; the most frequent parasomnia was REM behavior disorder (RBD). GAF scores were significantly correlated (p <0.05) with some of the measures of sleep disruption (stage 1, sleep efficiency, and wake during sleep), but not with others (wake before sleep, stage-shifts, PLMI, PLMA and AHI) on the PSG. Fifty-three percent (15/28) had a mean sleep onset latency 24 hours, those with skull fractures, or those requiring neurosurgical intervention. Kauffman et al14 reached similar conclusions in adolescents with minor head injury and found that sleep disturbances may be long-term. This study was undertaken to extend these systematic observations in the evolving knowledge of sleep disorders in TBI survivors, as the sleep disorders make an impact on the rehabilitation of these patients15,16 and can exacerbate other symptoms such as pain, cognitive deficits, fatigue, and irritability. 16METHODSStudy populationPatients with chronic TBI (defined as 3 months to 2 years after the injury) were evaluated by a board-certified neurologist who is also a board-certified sleep specialist. Evaluation included a detailed medical history supplemented with standard sleep-wake questionnaire, neurological examination, neck size, chin size and position, jaw alignment, and oropharyngeal examination. A flow-volume loop, considered a reflection of upper airway obstruction, was also measureSleepiness was measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Those with predominant sleep onset insomnia were administered the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS).17 The HAS is a self-administered scale that quantifies anxiety with 14 items and a possible score of from 0–4 for each item. Those with predominant sleep maintenance insomnia were administered the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).18 The BDI is a self-administered scale that quantifies depression with 21 items; the score varies from 0–3 for each item. 18 None of the patients had sleep related symptoms prior to the TBI. Classes of medications were anxiolytics, antidepressants, antiepileptic agents (used for their psychotropic action), stimulants, and pain medications. The medication effect and pain was not measured in this study, however. The medication dosages were not changed or discontinued prior to the testing. The severity of head injury was determined by the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale,23 administered by a board-certified psychiatrist. A score of 100 on GAF means superior functioning whereas a score of 40 or below means some impairment in reality testing and communication or major impairment in several areas, such as work or school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood. 23Polysomnography (PSG) and Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT)Single overnight PSGs were performed on 54 patients utilizing the AASM guidelines19 prior to those most recently updated in 2005. A 12-channel montage was utilized recording EEG, EOG, EKG, chin and lower extremity EMG, naso-oral airflow, thoracic and abdominal effort, and oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter. An expanded EEG montage was used when parasomnia was evaluated. Sandman Elite hardware and software were utilized. The patients were evaluated in an accredited sleep laboratory in sound attenuated rooms, monitored by an infra-red camera. The records were scored by the method of Rechtschaffen and Kales. 20 However, sleep stages 3 and 4 were scored together as delta sleep, and movement time was scored as an arousal (2–15 sec) or awakening (>15 sec). Various indices of sleep architecture analyzed were sleep efficiency, number of awakenings, number of stage shifts, percentage of sleep stages, wake before sleep (i.e. latency to 3 consecutive epochs of stage 1 or first epoch of stage 2, REM, or delta sleep), wake during sleep, latency to first REM period, and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Apneas and hypopneas were scored according to guidelines prevalent at that time and reproduced in Table 3. Statistical cutoffs used in Table 4 were derived from age-matched normal controls in the laboratory.The MSLTs were done utilizing the AASM guidelines21,22 prior to those most recently updated in 2005, in a total of 28 patients whose ESS score was >11. A fifth nap was obtained only if SOREMP occurred in 1 of the first 4 naps. The mean sleep onset latency and the presence or absence of the SOREMP/s were computed.Statistical techniques included the calculations of Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients, 95% confidence intervals, and p values (2-tailed t tests) of the GAF scores with individual measures of sleep disruption i.e. stage 1, stage shifts, sleep efficiency, total number of awakenings, wake before and during sleep, AHI, ESS, PLMI, and PLMA.RESULTSDuring a 2-year period, 60 patients with sleep related complaints following TBI were studied. All had TBI at least 3 months but no more than 2 years prior to evaluation. Most cases were motor vehicle accident related; a few were work-related. Thirty-eight male and 22 female patients were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients had BMI >30 kg/m2. Eight patients had neck circumferences >18 inches. The oropharyngeal, chin, and TMJ examination was deemed benign in all patients. Flow-volume loop, a measure of upper airway obstruction, showed significant plateauing in only 7 patients. The GAF scores were mild (score>60) in 24, moderate (51–60) in 11, and severe ( 60)24 Moderate (51–60)11 Severe (<50)25Excessive daytime somnolence was the presenting symptom in 50%. The ESS was scored as mild (1–11), moderate (12–15), severe (16–24), or unreliable (patient or caregiver unable to quantify) in 33%, 17%, 35%, and 15%, respectively. Thus 52% of all patients were moderately to severely sleepy during the day time.Insomnia was present in 25%. Half of these had sleep onset insomnia and HAS scores ranging from 10 to 56 (mean 22.75). The remainder had sleep maintenance insomnia and BDI scores ranging 14 to 43 (mean 24.5).Overnight PSG was performed in 54 patients. The sleep efficiency ranged from 31% to 99% (mean 73.2%). The number of awakenings ranged from 3–81 (mean 24). The number of times a patient shifts between various stages of sleep is also a measure of sleep disruption. It varied from 11–244 (mean 91.2). The percentage of stage 1 sleep varied from 1%–55% (mean 14.7%). The wake period before sleep onset was 0–86.4 minutes (mean 18.3 min), and wake period during sleep was 2.5–293 min (mean 79.5 min). Table 4 lists the percentage of patients with abnormal values for each of these measures of sleep disruption.The GAF score correlated with stage 1 percentage (r = −0.285, df 50, p <0.05), sleep efficiency (r = 0.316, df 50, p<0.05) and wake during sleep (r = −0.328, df 50, p <0.05), i.e. a lower GAF score was more likely to be associated with increased stage 1 percentage, impaired sleep efficiency, and wake during sleep (Figure 1–3). However, it did not correlate with other measures of sleep disruption such as stage shifts and wake before sleep (Table 5).Figure 1 Scatter diagram showing that a lower GAF score is associated with higher stage 1 percentage. These results were significant at the alpha level of 0.05.Download FigureFigure 2 Scatter diagram showing that a lower GAF score is associated with lower sleep efficiency. These results were significant at the alpha level of 0.05.Download FigureFigure 3 Scatter diagram showing that a lower GAF score is associated with increased wake period during sleep. These results were significant at the alpha level of 0.05.Download FigureStage 2 sleep ranged from 20%–85% (mean 52.7%). Delta sleep stage ranged from 0%–50% (mean 20.6%). Latency to first REM period ranged from 0–352.5 min (mean 129.6 min). Sleep onset REM ( 90%Continued/Increased-≥10 secHypopnea>50%, 30%, 90%Reduced >90%-≥10 secMixed apnea>90%Reduced >90% for ≥5 seconds prior to continued or increased effort-≥10 secTable 4 PSG ResultsPolysomnographic dataN=54Impaired sleep efficiency ( 6)92.5%Excessive stage shifts (>60)83.3%Excessive stage 1 (>5%)78.0%Delayed sleep onset (>25 min)22.0%Significant sleep maintenance insomnia (>30 min)75.9%Reduced REM percentage (<15%)24.0%Shortened REM latency (<67.5 min)13.0%Increased EMG tone/frank RBD13.0%SOREMP ( 60%)26.0%Reduced delta percentage ( 10/hr)30.0%Significant hypoxia ( 10/hr)35.0%Increased PLM arousal index (>5/hr)9.0%Twenty percent had snoring and/or pauses in breathing by history, and 30% had an AHI >10/hr. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) varied from 0–75.7/hr (mean 9.26/hr). Apneas and hypopneas were predominantly obstructive in 74%. Thirty-eight patients (70%) were found to have lowest oxygen saturation of below 90%. The periodic limb movement index varied from 0–169/hr (mean 10/hr); the PLM arousal index varied from 0–32/hr (Table 4). GAF scores did not correlate with these indices (Table 5).Table 5 GAF Scores Versus Measures of Sleep Disruption.Response variablePearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (r)P value (two- tailed t test)95% Confidence IntervalWake before sleep (min)–0.03780.7817–0.2979 to 0.2274Wake during sleep (min)–0.3280.0136*–0.5440 to –0.0711Stage 1 (%)–0.2850.0327*–0.5105 to –0.0247Sleep efficiency (%)0.3160.0174*0.0585 to 0.5351Number of stage changes–0.07630.5758–0.3327 to 0.1904Number of awakenings–0.0930.4943–0.3477 to 0.1740ESS0.06210.6619–0.2145 to 0.3295PLM index–0.08890.5146–0.3438 to 0.1782PLMA Index–0.01260.9265–0.2747 to 0.2512AHI0.05260.7000–0.2133 to 0.3113*p <0.05.df:50,In the MSLT, the sleep onset latency ranged from 0.6–20 min (mean 5.7 min). Fifty-three percent (15/28) had a mean sleep onset latency <5 min, and 32% (9/28) had this finding and ≥2 sleep onset REM ( 11 in 52% of all patients). Daytime somnolence was severe (mean sleep onset latency <5 min on MSLT) in 53% (15/28) of all patients who underwent MSLT. The etiology of this daytime somnolence was multifactorial. An increased PLM arousal index was responsible in a minority of patients. Medication used to treat TBI or its consequences may be directly or indirectly responsible for EDS, but was not evaluated in this study because of its retrospective nature. The most common reason for daytime somnolence appeared to be nocturnal sleep disruption (excessive stage 1, excessive awakenings, excessive stage shifts, reduced delta and REM sleep, and decreased sleep efficiency in various combinations in 24%–92.5% of all patients). Thirty percent of patients had clinically significant sleep related breathing disorders, likely contributing to daytime sleepiness. Our results are consistent with the results obtained by Webster et al, in a study to investigate the nature and occurrence of sleep related breathing disorders in adults with TBI. The authors found that the rate of sleep apnea in their study population was significantly higher than would be predicted based on population norms.32 Clinically definite narcolepsy likely secondary to TBI contributed to daytime somnolence in 32% patients who had MSLT. Hormonal and traumatic factors have long been considered as responsible for development of narcoleptic symptoms at or around puberty in patients who are genetically predisposed to have narcolepsy. Baumann et al, in a prospective study described low levels of CSF hypocretin-1 in acute traumatic brain injury patients. The authors also suggested that the deficiency may be responsible for increased frequency of sleep disturbances in traumatic brain injury survivors as well.33 Lankford et al10 theorized that even mild to moderate head trauma may unmask a genetic propensity to develop narcolepsy, similar to at least 2 patients in our study.Insomnia was the second most common presenting symptom in our study. It was present in 20 patients (33%) and was the presenting complaint in 15 patients (25%). Parcell et al, in a retrospective study to explore the sleep complaints in patients in the chronic stages of TBI, found a significantly higher frequency of reported sleep changes after TBI.34 The authors also reported more nighttime awakenings and longer sleep onset latency in TBI survivors. In another study, using questionnaires in patients with prior TBI, Ouellet et al found that half of the patients had insomnia symptoms and 29.4% of the participants satisfied the criteria for a diagnosis of insomnia syndrome.35 Half of all our TBI patients with insomnia had sleep onset insomnia; heightened anxiety scores on Hamilton anxiety scale (range 14–43, mean Hamilton anxiety scale score 24.5), appeared to a factor in its causation, secondary to either post-traumatic stress disorder or to posttraumatic anxiety disorder. It was verified on overnight polysomnography in 22% percent as delayed sleep onset. Sleep maintenance insomnia was the complaint in the other half of patients presenting with insomnia. Objectively, it was prevalent in far higher number, in 76% of all cases, although the first-night effect was not excluded. Posttraumatic mood disorder, as suggested by high Beck Depression Inventory scores (score range 10–57, mean BDI score 22.75), was obviously a factor, but it was also influenced by factors such as sleep disordered breathing, periodic limb movements, narcolepsy and other parasomnias such as RBD. Collateral damage elsewhere as a contributing factor, such as neck and back pain, has been emphasized by Guilleminault et al 13 but was not measured in our study.Parasomnias were a presenting complaint in about 25% (15/60) of our patients. An increase in EMG tone and/or frank REM behavior disorder was diagnosed in 13% (7/54) of those who had polysomnography. REM behavior disorder, characterized by acting out of dreams and with potential to injure self or others in the process, is also most likely due to the damage to brainstem mechanisms (peri-locus coeruleus area sending excitatory impulses to nucleus reticularis magnocellularis in the medulla via the tegmentoreticular tract, and the latter hyperpolarizing the spinal motoneurones via the ventrolateral reticulospinal tract during normal REM sleep). This disorder was first described in experimental animals36 and was predicted to occur in human beings and since then has been described in TBI, in addition to Parkinsonism, alcoholism, and in response to medications.37 All of these may have indirectly contributed to RBD in our patients. These factors were not quantified however. Regardless, none had symptoms of it prior to head trauma and thus, head trauma contributed to the development of RBD directly or indirectly.Weight gain is another variable that can contribute to or cause sleep disorder by restricting the chest expansion in sleep, compromising normal or previously abnormal upper airways, or causing general lethargy. It is far more common to gain weight than to lose weight in chronic TBI. In our patient population, 45% of the patients exceeded a BMI of 30kg/m2 and most of them indicated that they gained significant weight in the time period following TBI. Possible mechanisms for weight gain after traumatic brain injury include direct injury to hypothalamic feeding and satiety centers; inactivity secondary to pain or neurological handicap; as a feature of posttraumatic mood disorder; or due to antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, and psychotropic drugs used to treat post-traumatic complications.Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, and lack of exclusion of the first-night effect and the possible effects of medication and pain. Also, HAS and BDI were not obtained in all patients regardless of whether they had sleep onset or sleep maintenance insomnia. In addition, the sample size may have been inadequate, masking the relationship between severity of TBI and some of the measures of sleep disruption. Finally, GAF scores may not be the best measure of severity of chronic TBI; alternative scales such as Rancho Los Amigos Scale38 may be better indicators and were not used in this study.ConclusionSleep disorders are a common finding after the acute phase of TBI. They result in daytime somnolence which in turn may lead to poor daytime performance, altered sleep-wake schedule, heightened anxiety, and poor individual sense of well being, insomnia and depression. The results of this study confirm that sleep changes and deranged sleep architecture are common in chronic TBI patients. The sleep disorders seen in this population are similar to those seen in the general population. GAF scores correlated with some, but not all measures of sleep disruption, indicating a complex and multifactorial pathogenesis.Regardless of the limitations noted previously, this study is an important contribution. It identifies and describes the spectrum of sleep disorders in chronic TBI. Sleep disturbances can compromise the rehabilitation process and the ability to return to work. 16 A high index of suspicion may lead to a diagnosis and subsequent treatment of these disorders and contribute to physical and cognitive rehabilitation of these patients.Disclosure StatementThis was not an industry supported study. Drs. Verma, Anand, and Verman have indicated no financial conflicts of interest.REFERENCES1 Parker F, Andrews PJD, Azouvi P, Aghakhani N, Perrouin-Verbe BAcute Traumatic brain injuryContinuum20017731 Google Scholar2 Gill AWIdiopathic and traumatic narcolepsyLancet194114746 CrossrefGoogle Scholar3 Amico G, Pasquali F, Pittaluga EPickwickian-narcoleptic disorders after brain concussionRiv Sper Freniatr Med Leg Alien Ment1972297485, 4337776 Google Scholar4 Guilleminault C, Faull K, Miles L, Van den Hoed JPost-traumatic excessive daytime sleepiness: a review of 20 patientsNeurology19823315849, 6685831 CrossrefGoogle Scholar5 Prigatano GP, Stahl ML, Orr WC, Zeiner HKSleep and dreaming disturbances in closed head injury patientsJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1982457880, 7062076 CrossrefGoogle Scholar6 Parsons LC, Ver Beek DSleep-awake patterns following cerebral concussionNurs Res1982312604, 6922465 CrossrefGoogle Scholar7 Drake MEJactitio nocturna after head injuryNeurology1986368678, 3703299 CrossrefGoogle Scholar8 Patten SB, Lauderdale WMDelayed sleep disorder after traumatic brain injuryJ Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry1992311002, 1537759 CrossrefGoogle Scholar9 Biary N, Singh B, Bahou Y, al Deeb SM, Sharif HPost-traumatic paroxysmal nocturnal hemidystoniaMov Disord19949989, 8139612 CrossrefGoogle Scholar10 Lankford DA, Wellman JJ, O'Hara CPost-traumatic narcolepsy in mild to moderate closed head injurySleep199417suppl 8S25S28, 7701196 CrossrefGoogle Scholar11 Perlis ML, Artiola L, Giles DESleep complaints in post concussion syndromePercept Mot Skills1997845959, 9106853 CrossrefGoogle Scholar12 Clinchot DM, Bogner J, Mysiw WJ, Fugate L, Corrigan JDefining sleep disturbance after brain injuryAm J Phys Med Rehabil1998772915, 9715917 CrossrefGoogle Scholar13 Guilleminault C, Yuen KM, Gulevich BA, Karadeniz D, Leger D, Philip PHypersomnia after head-neck trauma-a medicolegal dilemmaNeurology1999546539, 10680799 CrossrefGoogle Scholar14 Kaufman Y, Tzischinsky O, Epstein R, Etzioni A, Lavie P, Piller GLong-term sleep disturbances in adolescents after minor head injuryPediatr Neurol20012412934, 11275462 CrossrefGoogle Scholar15 Worthington AD, Melia YRehabilitation is compromised by arousal and sleep disorders: results of a survey of rehabilitation centresBrain Inj20062032732, 16537274 CrossrefGoogle Scholar16 Ouellet MC, Savard J, Morin CMInsomnia following traumatic brain injury: a reviewNeurorehabil Neural Repair20041818798, 15669131 CrossrefGoogle Scholar17 Hamilton MCHamilton anxiety scale [HAMA]1959 Google Scholar18 Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh JAn inventory for measuring depressionArch Gen Psychiatry1961456171, 13688369 CrossrefGoogle Scholar19 Chesson AL, Ferber RA, Fry JM, et al.Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related proceduresSleep19972040622, 9302725 CrossrefGoogle Scholar20 Rechtschaffen A, Kales AManual of standardized terminology: Technique and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects1968Los AngelesUCLA Brain Information Service/Brain Rearch Institute Google Scholar21 Carskado