Accountability of Foreign Language Programs
2015; Wiley; Volume: 99; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/modl.12234_6
ISSN1540-4781
Autores Tópico(s)EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
ResumoThe Modern Language JournalVolume 99, Issue 2 p. 412-415 The Commentary Accountability of Foreign Language Programs CATHERINE J. DOUGHTY, CATHERINE J. DOUGHTY University of MarylandSearch for more papers by this author CATHERINE J. DOUGHTY, CATHERINE J. DOUGHTY University of MarylandSearch for more papers by this author First published: 28 July 2015 https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12234_6Citations: 6Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Bachman, L. F. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19, 453–476. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Blake, R. (2009). The use of technology for second language distance learning. Modern Language Journal, 93, 822–835. Chapelle, C. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal, 93, 741–753. Clark, M., Bonilla, C., Tare, M., Doughty, C., & Linck, J. (2014). Advancing LanguageNation. College Park, MD: Technical Report of the University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language. Clark, M., Golonka, E., Bonilla, C., & Tare, M. (2014). Stickiness and online language learning: Pedagogical suggestions for LanguageNation. College Park, MD: Technical Report of the University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language. Clark, M., Green, C., Miller, C., Vatz, K., Tare, M., Bonilla, C., Prado, T., & Jones, E. (2013). Assessment challenges in online instruction: Appropriate assessment in online learning. College Park, MD: Technical Report of the University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language. Doughty, C., & Long, M. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 50–80. Gottlieb, M. H., & Nguyen, D. (2007). Assessment and accountability in language education programs. Philadelphia: Caslon Publishing. Long, M. H. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell Publishers. Mislevy, R. J. (2007). Validity by design. Educational Researcher, 36, 463–469. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2002). Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19, 477–496. Norris, J. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second language teaching (pp. 578–594). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Tarone, E. (2013). Perspectives. Modern Language Journal, 97, 528–560. A. Valdman (Ed.). (1988). The assessment of foreign language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition Special Issue, 10, 2. Citing Literature Volume99, Issue2Summer 2015Pages 412-415 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)