Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Artigo Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

BIBTEX RIS

Conventional and Modified Veneered Zirconia vs. Metalloceramic: Fatigue and Finite Element Analysis

2012; Wiley; Volume: 21; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1532-849x.2012.00861.x

1532-849X

Nelson R.F.A. Silva, Estevam A. Bonfante, Brian T. Rafferty, Ricardo Alexandre Zavanelli, Leandro Luís Martins, E. Dianne Rekow, Van P. Thompson, Paulo G. Coehlo,

Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that all-ceramic crown core-veneer system reliability is improved by modifying the core design and as a result is comparable in reliability to metal-ceramic retainers (MCR). Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to verify maximum principal stress distribution in the systems.A first lower molar full crown preparation was modeled by reducing the height of proximal walls by 1.5 mm and occlusal surface by 2.0 mm. The CAD-based preparation was replicated and positioned in a dental articulator for specimen fabrication. Conventional (0.5 mm uniform thickness) and modified (2.5 mm height, 1 mm thickness at the lingual extending to proximals) zirconia (Y-TZP) core designs were produced with 1.5 mm veneer porcelain. MCR controls were fabricated following conventional design. All crowns were resin cemented to 30-day aged composite dies, aged 14 days in water and either single-loaded to failure or step-stress fatigue tested. The loads were positioned either on the mesiobuccal or mesiolingual cusp (n = 21 for each ceramic system and cusp). Probability Weibull and use level probability curves were calculated. Crack evolution was followed, and postmortem specimens were analyzed and compared to clinical failures.Compared to conventional and MCRs, increased levels of stress were observed in the core region for the modified Y-TZP core design. The reliability was higher in the Y-TZP-lingual-modified group at 100,000 cycles and 200 N, but not significantly different from the MCR-mesiolingual group. The MCR-distobuccal group showed the highest reliability. Fracture modes for Y-TZP groups were veneer chipping not exposing the core for the conventional design groups, and exposing the veneer-core interface for the modified group. MCR fractures were mostly chipping combined with metal coping exposure.FEA showed higher levels of stress for both Y-TZP core designs and veneer layers compared to MCR. Core design modification resulted in fatigue reliability response of Y-TZP comparable to MCR at 100,000 cycles and 200 N. Fracture modes observed matched with clinical scenarios.