Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

2015; American Medical Association; Volume: 1; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639

ISSN

2374-2445

Autores

Amylou C. Dueck, Tito R. Mendoza, Sandra A. Mitchell, Bryce B. Reeve, Kathleen M. Castro, Lauren J. Rogak, Thomas M. Atkinson, Antonia V. Bennett, Andrea Denicoff, Ann M. O’Mara, Yuelin Li, Steven B. Clauser, Donna Bryant, James D. Bearden, Theresa A. Gillis, Jay K. Harness, Robert D. Siegel, Diane Β. Paul, Charles S. Cleeland, Deborah Schrag, Jeff A. Sloan, Amy P. Abernethy, Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lori M. Minasian, Ethan Basch,

Tópico(s)

Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Resumo

To integrate the patient perspective into adverse event reporting, the National Cancer Institute developed a patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Ver no editor

Altmetric

PlumX

Entrar

Lembrar minha senha

Receber meu e-mail de confirmação

Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)