The role of seating position in determining the injury pattern among unrestrained children involved in motor vehicle collisions presenting to a level I trauma center
2012; King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre; Volume: 32; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.5144/0256-4947.2012.502
ISSN0975-4466
AutoresAyman Al‐Jazaeri, Mohammed Zamakhshary, Abdulrahma Al-Omair, Yasser Al-Haddab, Othman Jarallah Al Jarallah, Raied Al-Qahtani,
Tópico(s)Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Resumooriginal articleThe role of seating position in determining the injury pattern among unrestrained children involved in motor vehicle collisions presenting to a level I trauma center Ayman Al-Jazaeri, Mohammad Zamakhshary, Abdulrahma Al-Omair, Yasser Al-Haddab, Othman Al-Jarallah, and Raied Al-Qahtani Ayman Al-Jazaeri Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Search for more papers by this author , Mohammad Zamakhshary Department of Surgery, King Saud University for Health Specialties, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Search for more papers by this author , Abdulrahma Al-Omair Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Search for more papers by this author , Yasser Al-Haddab Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Search for more papers by this author , Othman Al-Jarallah Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Search for more papers by this author , and Raied Al-Qahtani Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Search for more papers by this author Published Online:4 Oct 2012https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2012.502SectionsPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AboutAbstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Seating position in motor vehicle collisions (MVC) plays a major role in determining the injury pattern in mainly restrained children. However, compliance with child seating and restraint laws is still suboptimal. The role of seating position in predicting injury patterns among unrestrained children has not been previously studied.DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review based on the trauma registry of a level I trauma center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data collection was restricted to unrestrained children involved in MVC.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2001 and March 2010, 274 records were identified. Detailed information about the collision, child seating position and the use of restraints was cross-verified using parental phone interviews.RESULTS: Of the 274 identified records, cross-verification was possible for 89 (32.4%) unrestrained children, 64 boys and 25 girls, with a mean (SD) age of 83 (40) months. Of these children, 41 (46.1%) were front seated (FS), and 48 (53.9%) were back seated (BS). There were higher rates of rollover (52.1% vs 24.4%, P=.02), ejection (41.7% vs 22%, P=.05), and occupant death ratio (14.8 vs 4, P=.04) among BS children. However, the two groups did not differ in pediatric trauma scores, Glascow coma scale score, or age distribution. FS children were more likely to present with isolated head, neck or facial injuries (HNFI) (51.2% vs 25%, P=.01), whereas BS children were more likely to suffer long bone or pelvic fractures (LPF) (60.4% vs 36.6%, P=.025).CONCLUSION: Injury pattern can vary according to seating position among unrestrained children presenting at trauma centers after MVC. While FS children are more likely to present with HNFI, BS children more often sustain LPF. BS children had similar trauma severity compared with FS children despite the higher-impact nature of their MVCs. While highlighting the value of proper restraints use and seating position, these results can be valuable in the initial assessment of traumatized children involved in MVC.IntroductionGuidelines and legislation for child restraint systems and child seating position have significantly minimized the incidence of injuries among children involved in motor vehicle collisions (MVC).1–3 Current worldwide standards recommend rear seating for all children younger than 13 years, regardless of the child restraint system used.1 However, compliance remains suboptimal in many developing countries where such legislation does not exist or is weakly implemented.4–6 Even in developed traffic systems, compliance with these recommendations can vary widely across different ages7 and ethnic groups.8The nonuse of restraints is very common among those who are referred to a trauma center and those who die or are badly injured in MVCs. In 2008, the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported that 23% of all children younger than 14 years involved in MVCs were unrestrained. And of those who died, 46% were unrestrained.9 Similarly, compared with back-seated (BS) children, front-seated (FS) children are at a higher risk of injury10,11, which tends to be more severe12 and leads to higher fatality.13 Despite the advances in automotive safety features, seating position continues to play an important role in determining the risk of injury to children.10 Moreover, the introduction of the passenger airbag toward the end of the last century had a significant impact on the variations in injury patterns between FS and BS passengers,14 particularly for younger children who are susceptible to indirect trauma caused by rapid airbag deployment.15–17 While there is sufficient evidence supporting the protective effect of rear seating for both adults and children, the difference in injury patterns for children involved in MVC based on their seating position has not been previously studied, particularly among unrestrained children who are at the highest risk of injury and are therefore more likely to present to trauma centers.PATIENTS AND METHODSAfter obtaining the necessary institutional review board approval, data for all unrestrained children younger than 13 years of age involved in MVCs between 2001 and 2010 were retrospectively collected from a level I trauma center registry. The registry is a prospectively recorded database of all trauma patients admitted to the center and has an internal auditing process to ensure data integrity. The selected ages represent the recommended group for rear seating.9 Detailed information about the nature of the collisions, the child seating position and the use of restraints was cross-verified using standardized parental phone interviews. The interview included questions about the nature of the MVC, whether it involved rollover or child ejection, the child seating position, restraint use, total number of occupants, and the number of deaths among occupants. Only those children whose information could be crossverified by phone interview were included. Children were assigned to either the FS or BS group based on their seating position during the MVC. Trauma was grouped into two main patterns: a pattern of isolated head, neck or facial injuries (HNFIs), which included children with documented injury that was confined to the brain, cervical spine injury or facial fractures, and a pattern of pelvic or long bone injury (LPF), which included patients with documented fractures of the pelvis, upper or lower extremities with or without HNFIs. The severity of the MVC impact was indirectly predicted by crash features, such as vehicle rollover, patient ejection, and the occupant death rate (ODR). ODR is the percentage of deaths among the total number of occupants at the time of the MVC. A chi-square test was used to analyze categorical data, and a t test was used for continuous variable analysis. P values <.05 were considered significant.RESULTSOf the 274 identified unrestrainted children, crossverification was possible in 89 of the cases. The group included 64 boys and 25 girls, with a mean (SD) age of 83 (40) months. Of these children, 41 (46.1%) were FS and 48 (53.9%) were BS. Boys were more likely to be FS than girls (54.7% vs. 24%, P=.009). There were higher rates of rollover 25 (52.1%) vs. 10 (24.4%) (P=.02), ejection 17 (41.7%) vs. 10 (21%), P=.05, and ODR (14.8% vs. 4%, P=.04) among BS children. However, FS and BS children did not differ in their mean pediatric trauma scores, 9.9 (2.3) vs. 10.1 (1.9), P=.7, Glascow coma scale scores, 13 (3.4) vs. 13 (3.4), P=.9, or age distribution 74.2 (41.7) vs. 90.4 (37.8) months, P=.06. Although the list of injuries did not show a major difference (Table 1), analysis of the injury pattern groups revealed a significant difference (Table 2). After a relatively lower-impact MVC, FS children were more likely to sustain injuries limited to the head, neck or face without other associated injuries 21 (51.2%) vs. 12 (25%), P=.01, whereas BS children were likely to present with multiple injuries that included LPF, 29 (60.4%) vs 15 (36.6%) (P=.025).Table 1 Injury distribution based on seating position.Injury listBack seat (n=48)Front seat (n=41)Traumatic brain injury23 (47.9)24 (58.5)Pelvic fracture6 (12.5)1 (2.4)Facial fracture8 (16.7)2 (4.9)Chest trauma8 (16.7)4 (9.8)Abdominal trauma6 (12.5)8 (19.5)Upper extremities fracture12 (25)8 (19.5)Lower extremities fracture13 (27.1)7 (17.1)C-spine injury3 (6.3)3 (7.3)Values are n (%).Table 2 Crash characteristics and injury pattern.Back seat (n=48)Front seat (n=41)PCrash Characteristics Rollover25 (52.1)10 (24.4).02 Ejection17 (41.5)10 (21).05 Occupant death ratio14.8%4%.04Injury pattern Isolated HNFI12 (25)21 (51.2).01 LPF29 (60.4)15 (36.6).025Values are n (%).HNFI: head, neck or facial injuries), LPF: long bones or pelvic fractures) with or without HNFI.DISCUSSIONAccording to a WHO report published in 2004, road traffic injury is the second leading cause of death among children worldwide and is responsible for more than 130 000 deaths per year for children aged 5–14 years.18 In developed countries, injury is the principal cause of death among children, and transport-related injuries account for almost 41% of these deaths.19 Unrestrained children are the most vulnerable to injury and death, and both front seating and the nonuse of child restraints are very frequent among those killed in MVCs.9,20 Furthermore, FS and unrestrained children are at higher risk of more severe injuries, longer hospitalization and higher costs of trauma care compared to properly seated and restrained children.21Unfortunately, restraint use among children still varies worldwide. In the United States, between 84% and 87% of children use proper restraint systems.22 The reported rate of restraint use is significantly lower in less-developed countries, such as Oman (3.7%),23 Nigeria (0.7%)6 and Malaysia (0.6%).5 Compliance with seating position guidelines is another persistent problem. In 2008, 94% of children under the age of 8 years and 99% of those under the age of 1 year sat in the rear seat in the US.22 However, in a recent US survey, Greenspan et al24 estimated that more than one million children rode in the front seat some of the time during the previous 30 days. In other countries, a larger proportion, up to 34.6% of children under 5 years old, were seated in the front.23 Among our group of injured patients, nearly half (46.1%) were seated in the front. Considering the relatively large number of unrestrained children and persistent variations in seating position worldwide, particularly among injured children, analyzing injury patterns for this population based on seating position could be of a significant value to trauma care providers.Another important determinant of injury rate, severity and fatality is the type of crash impact. Ejection and occupant death are among the high-risk auto crash criteria published by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in their field triage decision scheme to assess injury severity during prehospital triage.25 In a mainly restrained child population, ejection and rollover are rare. However, fatalities are frequent among those who are ejected (29%) or are involved in rollovers (28%).26 While rollover can be considered as another crash criterion that is associated with increased injury severity, 27 it is not clear whether the increased injury severity is an independent factor or is related to rollover.25 Unlike the findings of most published studies, our cohort of BS children sustained injury severities similar to FS children, despite the higher-impact nature of their crashes, as evidenced by the high rates of ejection, rollover, and ODR. This finding can be explained by the variation in data sources. While most reports of the role of seating position in MVC injuries are more like a population-based analysis, data based on a trauma center registry tend to be selective and follow the center’s preset referral criteria for injured children. We expect that, unlike BS children, FS children who sustained higher impact MVC might have either died at the scene or been referred to the nearest non-trauma center with severe brain injury. In both cases they are less likely to be good candidates for further management at level I trauma centers. In 1995, a CDC report described 8 deaths of child occupants involving airbag deployment that were of special concern because they involved low-speed crashes, in which the children otherwise should have survived.28 Due to the protective nature of back seating, unrestrained BS children involved in higher-impact MVC are likely to survive13 and because they are less likely to sustain severe TBI relative to other injuries, they are considered better candidates for trauma center transfer and are therefore likely to be included in the center’s trauma registry.This phenomenon can also partially explain the variation in injury patterns. However, this difference can be better attributed to the presence of passenger airbags. It is known that rapid airbag deployment is very traumatic and can be lethal for young children, even at minor impact force. This fact explains the similar pediatric trauma and Glascow coma scales scores between the two groups despite the relatively higher MVC impact among BS children. Prior to the wide implementation of airbags, Mucci et al29 reported similar injury patterns between FS and BS individuals. However, the introduction of airbags caused a major shift in the pattern and rate of injuries among FS occupants, particularly younger children. In 1997, Braver et al30 demonstrated that airbags were generally protective for FS, unrestrained passengers, leading to a 23% fatality reduction. However, among FS children younger than 10 years, airbags were responsible for a 34% increase in the risk of death in frontal crashes. Similarly, in their study of FS children, Quinones-Hinojosa et al31 reported that head injuries were the most frequent injury associated with airbag deployment, followed by spinal injuries. Similarly, a higher incidence of facial and C-spine injuries among frontseated and inappropriately restrained children has been reported by others.16,17Despite the improvement in implementing seating position and child restraints system guidelines, limiting the study to unrestrained children population is relevant particularly from a specialized trauma center perspective as unrestrained children represent the larger proportion of referred children. In 2007, Rangel et al32 reported that in a group of 1268 patients who presented at a level I trauma center, 44.8% were restrained, and only 20.3% were properly restrained. Moreover, the identification of possible injury patterns based on seating position could help trauma care providers to perform the necessary radiological evaluation that would minimize the rate of missed injuries. Soundappan et al33 estimated that missed injuries, particularly skeletal injuries, in children occur in up to 16% of patients admitted to trauma centers, mainly after MVC.Although there are controversies concerning the validity of self reported injury data,34,35 cross verification of some MVC data particularly seating patterns and occupants death of restraints use via phone interview is often necessary.11 These data, unlike the injuries, are not always clearly documented in registries. Another limitation is the relatively small sample size which is a consequence of our very specific inclusion criteria. Although larger sample size is preferable, our P values in the difference in injury patterns are remarkably smaller than .05 making type II errors less likely.In conclusion, among the unrestrained population presenting at trauma centers, FS children may sustain significant injuries to the head, face and neck after a relatively minor impact MVC. However, because of the protective role of back seating, BS children are more likely to present to trauma centers after a relatively higher impact MVC with widely distributed injuries that frequently involve the long bones and pelvis. These results can be utilized in identifying the possible injuries based on the seating pattern among unrestrained children presenting to trauma centers.ARTICLE REFERENCES:1. Segui-Gomez M, Wittenberg E, Glass R, Levenson S, Hingson R, Graham JD. "Where children sit in cars: the impact of Rhode Island’s new legislation" . Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(2):311PubMed -3. Google Scholar2. Winston FK, Kallan MJ, Elliott MR, Xie D, Durbin DR. "Effect of booster seat laws on appropriate restraint use by children 4 to 7 years old involved in crashes" . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007; 61(3):270-5. Google Scholar3. Wittenberg E, Goldie SJ, Graham JD. "Predictors of hazardous child seating behavior in fatal motor vehicle crashes: 1990 to 1998" . Pediatrics. 2001; 108(2):438PubMed -42. Google Scholar4. Bendak S. "Seat belt utilization in Saudi Arabia and its impact on road accident injuries" . Accid Anal Prev. 2005; 37(2):367PubMed -71. Google Scholar5. Lee LK. "A study on the use of car occupant restraint in Selangor" . Med J Malaysia. 2002; 57(3):266PubMed -77. Google Scholar6. Sangowawa AO, Alagh BT, Ekanem SE, Ebong IP, Faseru B, Adekunle BJ, Uchendu OC. "An observational study of seatbelt use among vehicle occupants in Nigeria" . Inj Prev. 2010; 16(2):85PubMed -9. Google Scholar7. Child Restraint Use in 2008: Overall Results. Washington: US Department of Transport. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis; 2009. DOT HS 811 135: Traffic Safety Facts, Research Note. Available: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811135.pdfaccessed June 27, 2011. Google Scholar8. Garcia AN, Patel KV, Guralnik JM. "Seat belt use among American Indians/Alaska Natives and non-Hispanic whites" . Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(3):200PubMed -6. Google Scholar9. Traffic Safety Facts 2008 Data, Children. Washington: US Department of Transport, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2008. Available: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811157.pdfaccessed 2011 June 27. Google Scholar10. Arbogast KB, Kallan MJ, Durbin DR. "Front versus rear seat injury risk for child passengers: evaluation of newer model year vehicles" . Traffic Inj Prev. 2009; 10(3):297PubMed -301. Google Scholar11. Durbin DR, Chen I, Smith R, Elliott MR, Winston FK. "Effects of seating position and appropriate restraint use on the risk of injury to children in motor vehicle crashes" . Pediatrics. 2005; 115(3) PubMede305-9. Google Scholar12. Ehrlich PF, Brown JK, Sochor MR, Wang SC, Eichelberger ME. "Factors influencing pediatric Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Scale in pediatric automobile crashes: results from the Crash Injury Research Engineering Network" . J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41(11):1854PubMed -8. Google Scholar13. Braver ER, Whitfield R, Ferguson SA. "Seating positions and children’s risk of dying in motor vehicle crashes" . Inj Prev. 1998; 4(3):181PubMed -7. Google Scholar14. Chong M, Broome G, Mahadeva D, Wang S. "Upper extremity injuries in restrained front-seat occupants after motor vehicle crashes" . J Trauma. 2011; 70(4):838PubMed -44. Google Scholar15. Estrada LS, Alonso JE, McGwin G, Metzger J, Rue LW. "Restraint use and lower extremity fractures in frontal motor vehicle collisions" . J Trauma. 2004; 57(2):323-8. Google Scholar16. Arbogast KB, Durbin DR, Kallan MJ, Menon RA, Lincoln AE, Winston FK. "The role of restraint and seat position in pediatric facial fractures" . J Trauma. 2002; 52(4):693-8. Google Scholar17. Giguere JF, St-Vil D, Turmel A, Di Lorenzo M, Pothel C, Manseau S, Mercier C. "Airbags and children: a spectrum of C-spine injuries" . J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33(6):811PubMed -6. Google Scholar18. Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, Mohan D, Hyder A, Jarawan E, Mathers C. "World report on road traffic injury prevention" . WHO Library Cataloguingin-Publication Data. 2004. Available: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/world_report/en/index.htmlaccessed 22 June 2011. Google Scholar19. "A League Table of Child Deaths by Injury in Rich Nations" . UNICEF. Innocenti Report Card. 2001;1Available: http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/repcard2e.pdfaccessed 28 June, 2011. Google Scholar20. "Motor-vehicle occupant fatalities and restraint use among children aged 4–8 years--United States, 1994–1998" . "MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep" . 2000; 49(7):135-7. Google Scholar21. Chan L, Reilly KM, Telfer J. "Odds of critical injuries in unrestrained pediatric victims of motorvehicle collision" . Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006; 22(9):626-9. Google Scholar22. Occupant restraint use in 2009, results from the national occupant protection use survey controlled intersection studyUS Department of Transport, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS 811 414 Available: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811414.pdfaccessed June 27, 2011. Google Scholar23. McIlvenny SAMF, Al Busaidi T, Al Nabhani A, Al Hikmani F, Al Kharousi Z, Al Mammari S, Al Hoti A, Al Shihi A, Al Lawati A, Al Kharousi I. "Rear seat belt use as an indicator of safe road behaviour in a rapidly developing country" . J R Soc Promot Health. 2004; 124(6):280-3. Google Scholar24. Greenspan AI, Dellinger AM, Chen J. "Restraint use and seating position among children less than 13 years of age: Is it still a problem?" J Safety Res. 2010; 41(2):183-5. Google Scholar25. Sasser SM, Hunt RC, Sullivent EE, Wald MM, Mitchko J, Jurkovich GJ, Henry MC, Salomone JP, Wang SC, Galli RL, Cooper A, Brown LH, Sattin RW. National Expert Panel on Field Triage, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). "Guidelines for field triage of injured patients. Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage" . MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009; 58(RR-1):1-35. Google Scholar26. Howard A, McKeag AM, Rothman L, Comeau JL, Monk B, German A. "Ejections of young children in motor vehicle crashes" . J Trauma. 2003; 55(1):126PubMed -9. Google Scholar27. Singleton M, Qin H, Luan J. "Factors associated with higher levels of injury severity in occupants of motor vehicles that were severely damaged in traffic crashes in Kentucky, 2000–2001" . Traffic Inj Prev. 2004; 5(2):144PubMed -50. Google Scholar28. Prevention. CfDCa. "Air-bag-associated fatal injuries to infants and children riding in front passenger seats: United States" . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995; 44(45):845-47. Google Scholar29. Mucci SJ, Eriksen LD, Crist KA, Bernath LA, Chaudhuri PK. "The pattern of injury to rear seat passengers involved in automobile collisions" . J Trauma. 1991; 31(10):1329PubMed -31. Google Scholar30. Braver ER, Ferguson SA, Greene MA, Lund AK. "Reductions in deaths in frontal crashes among right front passengers in vehicles equipped with passenger air bags" . JAMA. 1997; 278(17):1437PubMed -9. Google Scholar31. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Jun P, Manley GT, Knudson MM, Gupta N. "Airbag deployment and improperly restrained children: a lethal combination" . J Trauma. 2005; 59(3):729PubMed -33. Google Scholar32. Rangel SJ, Martin CA, Brown RL, Garcia VF, Falcone RA. "Alarming trends in the improper use of motor vehicle restraints in children: implications for public policy and the development of race-based strategies for improving compliance" . J Pediatr Surg. 2008; 43(1):200PubMed -7. Google Scholar33. Soundappan SV, Holland AJ, Cass DT. "Role of an extended tertiary survey in detecting missed injuries in children" . J Trauma. 2004; 57(1):114PubMed -8; discussion 18. Google Scholar34. Harel Y, Overpeck MD, Jones DH, Scheidt PC, Bijur PE, Trumble AC, Anderson J. "The effects of recall on estimating annual nonfatal injury rates for children and adolescents" . Am J Public Health. 1994Apr 84(4):599-605. Google Scholar35. Begg D, Langley J, Williams S. "Validity of self reported crashes and injuries in a longitudinal study of young adults" . Inj Prev. 1999; 5(2):142-144. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byAlghnam S, Alkelya M, Al-Bedah K and Al-Enazi S (2019) Burden of traumatic injuries in Saudi Arabia: lessons from a major trauma registry in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Annals of Saudi Medicine , 34:4, (291-296), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014. Volume 32, Issue 5September-October 2012 Metrics History Published online4 October 2012 InformationCopyright © 2012, Annals of Saudi MedicineThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.PDF download
Referência(s)