Houston … We Have a Problem! Measurement of Parenting
2013; Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; Volume: 9; Issue: s1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1089/chi.2013.0040
ISSN2153-2176
AutoresTom Baranowski, Teresia M. O’Connor, Sheryl O. Hughes, Ester F. C. Sleddens, Alicia Beltran, Leslie A. Frankel, Jason A. Mendoza, Janice Baranowski,
Tópico(s)Infant Development and Preterm Care
ResumoChildhood ObesityVol. 9, No. s1 Parenting Measurement: Current Status and Consensus ReportsEditorialOpen AccessHouston … We Have a Problem! Measurement of ParentingTom Baranowski, Teresia O'Connor, Sheryl Hughes, Ester Sleddens, Alicia Beltran, Leslie Frankel, Jason A. Mendoza, and Janice BaranowskiTom BaranowskiUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.Search for more papers by this author, Teresia O'ConnorUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.Search for more papers by this author, Sheryl HughesUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.Search for more papers by this author, Ester SleddensDepartment of Health Promotion, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.Search for more papers by this author, Alicia BeltranUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.Search for more papers by this author, Leslie FrankelUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.Search for more papers by this author, Jason A. MendozaUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.Search for more papers by this author, and Janice BaranowskiUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:14 Aug 2013https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2013.0040AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Obesity is a dominant child health problem in the United States1 and virtually worldwide.2 Obesity in childhood is associated with a number of negative health outcomes,3,4 with substantially increased risk of adult obesity.5 The energy balance model indicates obesity is the result of overconsumption of calories, low levels of physical activity, and high levels of sedentary behavior, mostly high screen time (TV, videos, and videogames).6Considerable evidence indicates that parents shape children's behaviors7 by influencing the behavior directly, the predisposing psychological variables, or by controlling the child's environment.8 Concern has been expressed that one factor contributing to the low efficacy of obesity treatment9 has been interventions not predicated on an informed understanding of how parents influence child behavior."Parenting" is the term generally used to explain how a parent influences a child's behaviors and development.10 Confusion exists regarding the impact of different aspects of parenting on children's dietary outcomes. Most studies linking parent–child interactional processes to children's dietary intake/weight status have focused on either (1) highly controlling food parenting practices (e.g., restriction, pressure to eat) or (2) parenting styles that are considered to be a more stable and overarching description of the approach to parenting.11 Research on individual food parenting behaviors has largely failed to consider the larger context of their use, i.e., parenting styles. Alternatively, research focusing on parenting styles alone has been limited by a vague understanding of the processes or mechanisms through which global dimensions of parenting shape children's dietary intake. These problems are compounded by poor theoretical development and inconsistent measurement of feeding constructs. A limitation in this line of research is almost complete reliance on the self-report of personal behavior. The literature on parenting in regard to physical activity12–14 and sedentary behaviors15,16 is less ample, but also problematic. As a result, a conference of leading investigators and practitioners was held. The specific aims were to: (1) Have presenters identify innovative approaches to measurement and the strengths and weaknesses in the existing literature on measures of parenting styles and parenting practices in regard to diet, physical activity, and sedentary behavior (screen media use); (2) convene four writing groups to write reports that summarize their considerations in regard to advancing measurement of each category of parenting (general style, food, physical activity, screen media); and (3) establish links among investigators to collaboratively develop and validate new measures.To mitigate confusion, the coordinators, presenters and workshop leaders agreed to the following definitions: Parenting style is a constellation of parental attitudes and beliefs toward childrearing, creating an emotional climate through which parental practices are expressed,11,17 including the quality of parent–child interactions. Parenting style has two independent dimensions: (1) Demandingness/control, defined as claims that parents make on children to become integrated into society by behavior regulation, direction confrontation, and maturity demand (behavioral control) and supervision of the child's activities17; and (2) responsiveness/nurturance, defined as the extent to which parents foster individuality and self-assertion by being attuned, supportive, and acquiescent to children's requests including autonomy support and reasoned communication.17,18 Crossing the first two dimensions yields four categories of parenting style: (1) Authoritative (high demanding, high responsive) characterized by parental involvement, nurturance, and expectations with monitoring; (2) authoritarian (high demanding, low responsive) characterized by restrictive, punitive, and power-assertive behaviors; (3) indulgent (low demanding and high responsive) characterized by warmth and acceptance in conjunction with a lack of monitoring of child behavior; and (4) uninvolved (low demanding, low responsive), characterized by little control, nurturance, or involvement with the child.19 Child overweight was most prevalent in those with authoritarian parents (highly demanding, but not very responsive),20 but was also associated with permissive parenting style.20–22 Some researchers have conceptualized a third dimension, structure, defined as the ways in which parents organize their children's environment to achieve their desired childrearing goals, and that includes aspects of parent behavior such as consistency, organization, and proactive strategies, such as providing opportunities and modeling.23,24 Structured homes are characterized by an organized environment in which parents provide clear rules, boundaries, and support and guidance for following the rules, which are consistently enforced.24Feeding styles are a derivative of parenting style based on two dimensions related to the feeding context.25 Responsiveness refers to how the parents encourage eating, i.e., the level of nurturance parents use in directing their children's eating. Demandingness refers to how much the parent encourages eating (i.e., how demanding they are during the eating experience). Four types of feeding styles have been proposed to correspond to those from parenting style. Positive associations were detected between indulgent feeding styles and children's weight status25,26; however, among low-income African-American and Hispanic families, authoritarian feeding styles were negatively related to children's weight status.25,26Parenting practices are specific goal-directed parent actions or behaviors designed to influence children's behaviors.11 Controlling food parenting practices were linked to lower self-regulation in eating27 and higher child weight status across laboratory, cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies.28–31 Parental influences were correlates of children's physical activity (PA)32–42 and screen media use.16,43–46 Parenting practices that effectively influence child behaviors likely vary by age and culture,47 and perhaps over generations, but little research has addressed these variations. Some parenting practices are more effective in getting children to comply with their desires, whereas others may be less effective, not influence the child, or even increase the undesired behavior.48 It is not clear how important these physical activity and food parenting practices may be in influencing a child's behavior versus the parent's skill at general parenting.49There are substantial limitations and problems of measurement in most of the existing scales of parenting style,50 and food,51 physical activity,52 and media53 parenting practices. To advance this area of research, major advances are needed in measurement. New measures must be based on the latest theory54 and use state-of-the-art, cutting-edge approaches to ensure we move toward the most promising, valid, reliable, sensitive to change, and least burdensome measurement procedures.42 Basic improvements are needed in how the questions are asked and correcting for possible response biases.42 Innovations should be considered in using implicit measurement procedures, ecological momentary assessment, item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, item banks, observational recording with pattern recognition technology, and simulations of parent–child interactions.42 The new measures must reflect a firm understanding of what has been attempted in the past, especially the limitations.55 Developing the new measures will require qualitative research to identify new items and perhaps new levels of measurement.56 The scales and items used to measure food related parenting are likely very different from those to measure physical activity52 or sedentary behavior53 parenting.Investigators will want to know what measures they can confidently use today. Recent research has indicated that there may be differences in the use of the items primarily by age of the child, but also by parental education and ethnic group.47 While future research should clarify these issues, investigators who can't wait need to select from the various existing scales that measure the constructs most relevant to their research and have the best psychometric characteristics in samples most comparable to theirs.In summary, a fundamental reconsideration is needed of the foundational knowledge of parenting in regard to energy balance behaviors in light of the poor functioning of existing measures and inconsistencies in the findings to date. More qualitative and observational research is needed because key dimensions of parenting may yet be discovered. Investigators need to adhere to consistent definitions to enhance consistency of findings and to better understand when and why the inconsistencies occurred. It seems unlikely that the dimensions or mechanisms of influence of parenting on different child behaviors (diet, physical activity, screen media use) will differ substantially at the conceptual level, therefore more transdisciplinary research is needed among these investigators so the research on physical activity and screen media parenting practices can benefit from the advances in general parenting and food parenting practices. New methods are needed to minimize the likely socially desirable responses to existing methods, relieve respondent burden, and better understand the functioning of scales and items. Attendees rightly identified inadequate attention to the role of the child (e.g., temperament and other characteristics) in the selection or use of types of parenting. The extent to which different measures are needed for different genders, ages of children, child temperament, or different cultures (e.g., across ethnic groups, countries)57 requires serious attention.The publication of the articles emanating from the presentations and working group reports are an indication of early progress, but the longer-term success will be evident from more collaborations, enhanced conceptual development, additional formative research, and new scales with documented validity and reliability using the latest psychometric procedures. We look forward to the day when the younger attendees can say, "Houston, we have landed!"AcknowledgmentsThis work was funded by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (HL114262) and from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA/ARS) (2012-68001-19285) to the first author. This work is also a publication of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA/ARS) Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and had been funded in part with federal funds from the USDA/ARS under Cooperative Agreement No. 58-6250-6001. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the USDA, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement from the US government.Author Disclosure StatementNo competing financial interests exist.References1 Ogden CLCarroll MDKit BKet al.Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010JAMA2012307483490.1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010. JAMA 2012;307:483–490. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Wang YLobstein TWorldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesityInt J Pediatr Obes200611125.2. Wang Y, Lobstein T. Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes 2006;1:11–25. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Bray GAMedical consequences of obesityJ Clin Endocrinol Metab20048925832589.3. Bray GA. Medical consequences of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:2583–2589. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Barlow SEExpert CommitteeExpert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: Summary reportPediatrics2007120Suppl 4S164S192.4. Barlow SE, Expert Committee. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: Summary report. Pediatrics 2007;120 (Suppl 4):S164–S192. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Whitaker RCWright JAPepe MSet al.Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesityN Engl J Med1997337869873.5. Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, et al. Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity. N Engl J Med 1997;337:869–873. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Guyenet SJSchwartz MWClinical review: Regulation of food intake, energy balance, and body fat mass: Implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of obesityJ Clin Endocrinol Metab201297745755.6. Guyenet SJ, Schwartz MW. Clinical review: Regulation of food intake, energy balance, and body fat mass: Implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:745–755. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 National Research CouncilToward an Integrated Science of Research on Families: Workshop ReportOlson SThe National Academies PressWashington, DC2011.7. National Research Council. Toward an Integrated Science of Research on Families: Workshop Report. Olson S (ed). The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2011. Google Scholar8 Jago RBaranowski TBaranowski JCObserved, GIS, and self-reported environmental features and adolescent physical activityAm J Health Promot200620422428.8. Jago R, Baranowski T, Baranowski JC. Observed, GIS, and self-reported environmental features and adolescent physical activity. Am J Health Promot 2006;20:422–428. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Skelton JABuehler CIrby MBet al.Where are family theories in family-based obesity treatment?: Conceptualizing the study of families in pediatric weight managementInt J Obes (Lond)201236891900.9. Skelton JA, Buehler C, Irby MB, et al. Where are family theories in family-based obesity treatment?: Conceptualizing the study of families in pediatric weight management. Int J Obes (Lond) 2012;36:891–900. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Bornstein MHHandbook of ParentingLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ2002.10. Bornstein MH. Handbook of Parenting. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, 2002. Google Scholar11 Darling NSteinberg LParenting style as context: An integrative modelPsychol Bull1993113487496.11. Darling N, Steinberg L. Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychol Bull 1993;113:487–496. Crossref, Google Scholar12 Davison KKLi KBaskin MLet al.Measuring parental support for children's physical activity in white and African American parents: The Activity Support Scale for Multiple Groups (ACTS-MG)Prev Med2011523943.12. Davison KK, Li K, Baskin ML, et al. Measuring parental support for children's physical activity in white and African American parents: The Activity Support Scale for Multiple Groups (ACTS-MG). Prev Med 2011;52:39–43. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Jago RDavison KKBrockman Ret al.Parenting styles, parenting practices, and physical activity in 10- to 11-year oldsPrev Med2011524447.13. Jago R, Davison KK, Brockman R, et al. Parenting styles, parenting practices, and physical activity in 10- to 11-year olds. Prev Med 2011;52:44–47. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Sleddens EFKremers SPHughes SOet al.Physical activity parenting: A systematic review of questionnaires and their associations with child activity levelsObes Rev20121310151033.14. Sleddens EF, Kremers SP, Hughes SO, et al. Physical activity parenting: A systematic review of questionnaires and their associations with child activity levels. Obes Rev 2012;13:1015–1033. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Hoyos Cillero IJago RSebire SIndividual and social predictors of screen-viewing among Spanish school childrenEur J Pediatr201117093102.15. Hoyos Cillero I, Jago R, Sebire S. Individual and social predictors of screen-viewing among Spanish school children. Eur J Pediatr 2011;170:93–102. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Hoyos Cillero IJago RSystematic review of correlates of screen-viewing among young childrenPrev Med201051310.16. Hoyos Cillero I, Jago R. Systematic review of correlates of screen-viewing among young children. Prev Med 2010;51:3–10. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 Baumrind DCurrent patterns of parental authorityDev Psychol197141103.17. Baumrind D. Current patterns of parental authority. Dev Psychol 1971;41–103. Google Scholar18 Baumrind DPatterns of parental authority and adolescent autonomyNew Dir Child Adolesc Dev20051086169.18. Baumrind D. Patterns of parental authority and adolescent autonomy. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev 2005;108:61–69. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Maccoby EMartin JSocialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interactionHetherington EMHandbook of Child Psychology: Socialization, Personality and Social DevelopmentWileyNew York19831101.19. Maccoby E, Martin J. Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In: Hetherington EM (ed), Handbook of Child Psychology: Socialization, Personality and Social Development. Wiley: New York, 1983, pp. 1–101. Google Scholar20 Rhee KELumeng JCAppugliese DPet al.Parenting styles and overweight status in first gradePediatrics200611720472054.20. Rhee KE, Lumeng JC, Appugliese DP, et al. Parenting styles and overweight status in first grade. Pediatrics 2006;117:2047–2054. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Chen JLKennedy CFactors associated with obesity in Chinese-American childrenPediatr Nurs200531110115.21. Chen JL, Kennedy C. Factors associated with obesity in Chinese-American children. Pediatr Nurs 2005;31:110–115. Medline, Google Scholar22 Wake MNicholson JMHardy Pet al.Preschooler obesity and parenting styles of mothers and fathers: Australian national population studyPediatrics2007120e1520e1527.22. Wake M, Nicholson JM, Hardy P, et al. Preschooler obesity and parenting styles of mothers and fathers: Australian national population study. Pediatrics 2007;120:e1520–e1527. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Slater MAPower TGMultidimensional assessment of parenting in single-parent familiesVincent JPAdvances in Family Intervention, Assessment and TheoryJAI PressGreenwich, CT1987197228.23. Slater MA, Power TG. Multidimensional assessment of parenting in single-parent families. In: Vincent JP (ed). Advances in Family Intervention, Assessment and Theory. JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1987, pp. 197–228. Google Scholar24 Hughes SOO'Connor TMPower TGParenting and children's eating patterns: Examining control in a broader contextInt J Child Adolesc Health20081323330.24. Hughes SO, O'Connor TM, Power TG. Parenting and children's eating patterns: Examining control in a broader context. Int J Child Adolesc Health 2008;1:323–330. Google Scholar25 Hughes SOPower TGFisher JOet al.Revisiting a neglected construct: Parenting styles in a child-feeding contextAppetite2005448392.25. Hughes SO, Power TG, Fisher JO, et al. Revisiting a neglected construct: Parenting styles in a child-feeding context. Appetite 2005;44:83–92. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Hughes SOShewchuk RMBaskin MLet al.Indulgent feeding style and children's weight status in preschoolJ Dev Behav Pediatr200829403410.26. Hughes SO, Shewchuk RM, Baskin ML, et al. Indulgent feeding style and children's weight status in preschool. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2008;29:403–410. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Birch LLFisher JODavison KKLearning to overeat: Maternal use of restrictive feeding practices promotes girls' eating in the absence of hungerAm J Clin Nutr200378215220.27. Birch LL, Fisher JO, Davison KK. Learning to overeat: Maternal use of restrictive feeding practices promotes girls' eating in the absence of hunger. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78:215–220. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Fisher JOBirch LLRestricting access to palatable foods affects children's behavioral response, food selection and intakeAm J Clin Nutr19996912641272.28. Fisher JO, Birch LL. Restricting access to palatable foods affects children's behavioral response, food selection and intake. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:1264–1272. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar29 Fisher JOBirch LLRestricting access to foods and children's eatingAppetite199932405419.29. Fisher JO, Birch LL. Restricting access to foods and children's eating. Appetite 1999;32:405–419. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Clark HRGoyder EBissell Pet al.How do parents' child-feeding behaviours influence child weight? Implications for childhood obesity policyJ Public Health (Oxf )200729132141.30. Clark HR, Goyder E, Bissell P, et al. How do parents' child-feeding behaviours influence child weight? Implications for childhood obesity policy. J Public Health (Oxf ) 2007;29:132–141. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Faith MSScanlon KSBirch LLet al.Parent-child feeding strategies and their relationships to child eating and weight statusObes Res20041217111722.31. Faith MS, Scanlon KS, Birch LL, et al. Parent-child feeding strategies and their relationships to child eating and weight status. Obes Res 2004;12:1711–1722. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar32 Klesges RCMalott JMBoschee PFet al.The effects of parental influences on children's food intake, physical activity, and relative weightInt J Eat Disord19865335345.32. Klesges RC, Malott JM, Boschee PF, et al. The effects of parental influences on children's food intake, physical activity, and relative weight. Int J Eat Disord 1986;5:335–345. Crossref, Google Scholar33 Sallis JFProchaska JJTaylor WCA review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescentsMed Sci Sports Exerc200032963975.33. Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:963–975. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Davison KKCutting TMBirch LLParents' activity-related parenting practices predict girls' physical activityMed Sci Sports Exerc20033515891595.34. Davison KK, Cutting TM, Birch LL. Parents' activity-related parenting practices predict girls' physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1589–1595. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar35 Hennessy EHughes SOGoldberg JPet al.Parent-child interactions and objectively measured child physical activity: A cross-sectional studyInt J Behav Nutr Phys Act2010771.35. Hennessy E, Hughes SO, Goldberg JP, et al. Parent-child interactions and objectively measured child physical activity: A cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:71. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar36 Sallis JFAlcaraz JEMcKenzie TLet al.Predictors of change in children's physical activity over 20 months: Variations by gender and level of adiposityAm J Prev Med199916222229.36. Sallis JF, Alcaraz JE, McKenzie TL, et al. Predictors of change in children's physical activity over 20 months: Variations by gender and level of adiposity. Am J Prev Med 1999;16:222–229. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar37 Stucky-Ropp RCDiLorenzo TMDeterminants of exercise in childrenPrev Med199322880889.37. Stucky-Ropp RC, DiLorenzo TM. Determinants of exercise in children. Prev Med 1993;22:880–889. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar38 Sallis JFNader PRBroyles SLet al.Correlates of physical activity at home in Mexican-American and Anglo-American preschool childrenHealth Psychol199312390398.38. Sallis JF, Nader PR, Broyles SL, et al. Correlates of physical activity at home in Mexican-American and Anglo-American preschool children. Health Psychol 1993;12:390–398. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar39 Baranowski TThompson WODuRant RHet al.Observations on physical activity in physical locations: Age, gender, ethnicity and month effectsRes Q Exerc Sport199364127133.39. Baranowski T, Thompson WO, DuRant RH, et al. Observations on physical activity in physical locations: Age, gender, ethnicity and month effects. Res Q Exerc Sport 1993;64:127–133. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar40 Klesges RCEck LHHanson CLet al.Effects of obesity, social interactions, and physical environment on physical activity in preschoolersHealth Psychol19909435449.40. Klesges RC, Eck LH, Hanson CL, et al. Effects of obesity, social interactions, and physical environment on physical activity in preschoolers. Health Psychol 1990;9:435–449. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar41 Sallis JFAlcaraz JEMcKenzie TLet al.Parental behavior in relation to physical activity and fitness in 9-year-old childrenAm J Dis Child199214613831388.41. Sallis JF, Alcaraz JE, McKenzie TL, et al. Parental behavior in relation to physical activity and fitness in 9-year-old children. Am J Dis Child 1992;146:1383–1388. Medline, Google Scholar42 Mâsse LCWatts AWStimulating innovations in the measurement of parenting constructsChild Obes20139S1S-5S-13.42. Mâsse LC, Watts AW. Stimulating innovations in the measurement of parenting constructs. Child Obes 2013;9(S1):S-5–S-13. Abstract, Google Scholar43 Barradas DTFulton JEBlanck HMet al.Parental influences on youth television viewingJ Pediatr2007151369373.e1-4.43. Barradas DT, Fulton JE, Blanck HM, et al. Parental influences on youth television viewing. J Pediatr 2007;151:369–373.e1-4. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar44 Valkenburg PMKrcmar MPeeters ALet al.Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: "instructive mediation," "restrictive mediation," and "social coviewing."J Broadcast Electron Media1999435266.44. Valkenburg PM, Krcmar M, Peeters AL, et al. Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: "instructive mediation," "restrictive mediation," and "social coviewing." J Broadcast Electron Media 1999;43:52–66. Crossref, Google Scholar45 Buijzen MValkenburg PMParental mediation of undesired advertising effectsJ Broadcast Electron Media200549153165.45. Buijzen M, Valkenburg PM. Parental mediation of undesired advertising effects. J Broadcast Electron Media 2005;49:153–165. Crossref, Google Scholar46 Springer AEKelder SHBarroso CSet al.Parental influences on television watching among children living on the Texas-Mexico borderPrev Med201051112117.46. Springer AE, Kelder SH, Barroso CS, et al. Parental influences on television watching among children living on the Texas-Mexico border. Prev Med 2010;51:112–117. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar47 Chen T-AO'Connor TMHughes SOet al.TV parenting practices: Is the same scale appropriate for parents of children of different ages?Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act20131041.47. Chen T-A, O'Connor TM, Hughes SO, et al. TV parenting practices: Is the same scale appropriate for parents of children of different ages? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2013;10:41. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar48 Baranowski TChen TAO'Connor Tet al.Dimensions of vegetable parenting practices among preschoolersAppetite2013in press.48. Baranowski T, Chen TA, O'Connor T, et al. Dimensions of vegetable parenting practices among preschoolers. Appetite 2013;in press. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar49 Brotman LMDawson-McClure SHuang KYet al.Early childhood family intervention and long-term obesity prevention among high-risk minority youthPediatrics2012129e621e628.49. Brotman LM, Dawson-McClure S, Huang KY, et al. Early childhood family intervention and long-term obesity prevention among high-risk minority youth. Pediatrics 2012;129:e621–e628. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar50 Sleddens EFGerards SMThijs Cet al.General parenting, childhood overweight and obesity-inducing behaviors: A reviewInt J Pediatr Obes20116e12e27.50. Sleddens EF, Gerards SM, Thijs C, et al. General parenting, childhood overweight and obesity-inducing behaviors: A review. Int J Pediatr Obes 2011;6:e12–e27. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar51 Vaughn AETabak RGBryant MJet al.Measuring parent food practices: A systematic review of existing measures and examination of instrumentsInt J Behav Nutr Phys Act2013in press.51. Vaughn AE, Tabak RG, Bryant
Referência(s)