Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Box C/D snoRNP catalysed methylation is aided by additional pre-rRNA base-pairing

2011; Springer Nature; Volume: 30; Issue: 12 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1038/emboj.2011.148

1460-2075

Rob W. van Nues, Sander Granneman, Grzegorz Kudla, Katherine E. Sloan, Matthew Chicken, David Tollervey, Nicholas J. Watkins,

RNA Research and Splicing

Article10 May 2011Open Access Box C/D snoRNP catalysed methylation is aided by additional pre-rRNA base-pairing Robert Willem van Nues Robert Willem van Nues Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Search for more papers by this author Sander Granneman Sander Granneman Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Search for more papers by this author Grzegorz Kudla Grzegorz Kudla Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Search for more papers by this author Katherine Elizabeth Sloan Katherine Elizabeth Sloan Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Search for more papers by this author Matthew Chicken Matthew Chicken Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Search for more papers by this author David Tollervey David Tollervey Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Search for more papers by this author Nicholas James Watkins Corresponding Author Nicholas James Watkins Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Search for more papers by this author Robert Willem van Nues Robert Willem van Nues Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Search for more papers by this author Sander Granneman Sander Granneman Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Search for more papers by this author Grzegorz Kudla Grzegorz Kudla Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Search for more papers by this author Katherine Elizabeth Sloan Katherine Elizabeth Sloan Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Search for more papers by this author Matthew Chicken Matthew Chicken Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Search for more papers by this author David Tollervey David Tollervey Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Search for more papers by this author Nicholas James Watkins Corresponding Author Nicholas James Watkins Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Search for more papers by this author Author Information Robert Willem van Nues1,‡, Sander Granneman2,‡, Grzegorz Kudla2, Katherine Elizabeth Sloan1, Matthew Chicken1, David Tollervey2 and Nicholas James Watkins 1 1Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 2Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK ‡These authors contributed equally to this work *Corresponding author. Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK. Tel.: +44 191 222 6991; Fax: +44 191 222 7424; E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2011)30:2420-2430https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.148 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. Peer ReviewDownload a summary of the editorial decision process including editorial decision letters, reviewer comments and author responses to feedback. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info 2′-O-methylation of eukaryotic ribosomal RNA (r)RNA, essential for ribosome function, is catalysed by box C/D small nucleolar (sno)RNPs. The RNA components of these complexes (snoRNAs) contain one or two guide sequences, which, through base-pairing, select the rRNA modification site. Adjacent to the guide sequences are protein-binding sites (the C/D or C′/D′ motifs). Analysis of >2000 yeast box C/D snoRNAs identified additional conserved sequences in many snoRNAs that are complementary to regions adjacent to the rRNA methylation site. This 'extra base-pairing' was also found in many human box C/D snoRNAs and can stimulate methylation by up to five-fold. Sequence analysis, combined with RNA–protein crosslinking in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, identified highly divergent box C′/D′ motifs that are bound by snoRNP proteins. In vivo rRNA methylation assays showed these to be active. Our data suggest roles for non-catalytic subunits (Nop56 and Nop58) in rRNA binding and support an asymmetric model for box C/D snoRNP organization. The study provides novel insights into the extent of the snoRNA–rRNA interactions required for efficient methylation and the structural organization of the snoRNPs. Introduction Three of the four eukaryotic ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), the 18S, 5.8S and 25/28S rRNAs, are co-transcribed as a single precursor rRNA (pre-rRNA) in the nucleolus (Henras et al, 2008). The rRNAs undergo extensive covalent modification, including 54 2′-O-methylation and 45 pseudouridylation events in yeast. Modified nucleotides are clustered at functionally important sites in the rRNA, such as the peptidyl transferase domain, and are important for rRNA folding and ribosome function (Decatur and Fournier, 2002). The two major classes of small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA), H/ACA and C/D, guide the pseudouridylation and 2′-O-methylation of rRNA, respectively (Kiss, 2002). A few snoRNAs, including U3 and U17/snR30, do not direct modification but are important for rRNA processing and may aid rRNA folding (Hughes, 1996; Fayet-Lebaron et al, 2009). Each box C/D snoRNA contains highly conserved boxes C and D, generally located at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the RNA, respectively (Reichow et al, 2007). Boxes C and D interact forming a stem-internal loop-stem structure known as a kink-turn (k-turn) motif. Most box C/D snoRNAs contain a second, less well-conserved copy of the C/D motif, termed the C′/D′ motif. To guide rRNA methylation, the region adjacent to the D or D′ box in the snoRNA base-pairs with the rRNA and the nucleotide 5 base-pairs from the D or D′ box is targeted for modification (Kiss-Laszlo et al, 1996, 1998). Box C/D snoRNAs function as small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein particles (snoRNPs) and are associated with four common core proteins, Snu13 (15.5K), Nop56, Nop58 (Nop5) and the methyltransferase Nop1 (fibrillarin) (Reichow et al, 2007). Snu13 binds directly to the box C/D motif, recognizing highly conserved G:A base-pairs, and is the primary RNA-binding protein that triggers recruitment of the remaining snoRNP proteins (Watkins et al, 2000, 2002). The human orthologue of Snu13, 15.5K, directly binds the C/D motif but not the C′/D′ motif in vitro even though the motifs share the same consensus sequence (Cahill et al, 2002; Szewczak et al, 2002). It is thought that many C′/D′ motifs cannot form the k-turn structure. An asymmetric distribution of core proteins was revealed through the use of a site-specific crosslinker, 4-thiouridine, inserted at specific sites in the box elements (Cahill et al, 2002). It was proposed that Snu13/15.5K, Nop58 and one copy of fibrillarin/Nop1 bound the C/D motif, while the C′/D′ motif was contacted by Nop56 and a second copy of fibrillarin/Nop1 (Cahill et al, 2002; Szewczak et al, 2002). Box C/D snoRNP-like complexes (sRNPs) are also present in Archaea, but have symmetrical structures (Dennis and Omer, 2005). Both the sRNA C/D and C′/D′ motifs in archaeal sRNAs form k-loops, and each bind one molecule of the Snu13 orthologue, L7Ae, fibrillarin and the Nop56/58 orthologue, Nop5 (Kuhn et al, 2002; Omer et al, 2002; Tran et al, 2003). Three structural models have recently been proposed for in vitro assembled archaeal box C/D sRNPs. One, based on a crystal structure, proposes a monomeric complex containing a single sRNA and two copies of the proteins, L7Ae, Nop5 and fibrillarin (Ye et al, 2009). The other models, based on a single-particle electron microscopy structure (Bleichert et al, 2009), and another crystal structure (Xue et al, 2010), propose that the sRNP is a dimer, containing two molecules of sRNA and four molecules each of the three proteins. Unfortunately, the RNA was not visible in the single-particle electron microscopy structure and both crystal structures used partial sRNAs. Therefore, the structural organization of these complexes has not been completely resolved. Furthermore, it is also unclear at present how this information relates to the eukaryotic complex. In yeast, 36 of the 54 2′-O-methylation events are directed by sequences adjacent to a C′/D′ motif, several of which diverge significantly from the consensus (Kiss-Laszlo et al, 1996; Lowe and Eddy, 1999). Initial identification of the C′ box was predominantly based on analyses of the primary sequence and in most cases the accuracy of these predictions has not been tested. It was generally assumed that the only conserved elements in the snoRNA are the guide regions and box motifs, but we considered that other conserved, functional elements might exist in the snoRNAs. To address these points, we have taken a global approach to examine the sequence conservation and RNA–protein interactions within the S. cerevisiae box C/D snoRNPs. Results Identification of unusual C′/D′ motifs in yeast box C/D snoRNAs It has been proposed that snoRNA C′/D′ and C/D motifs are based on the same core consensus sequences, even though C′/D′ elements are generally less well conserved (Kiss-Laszlo et al, 1998). Surprisingly, analysis of the primary sequence failed to clearly identify C′ and/or D′ boxes in many S. cerevisiae box C/D snoRNAs. We, therefore, compared the sequence of each S. cerevisiae box C/D snoRNA across multiple yeast species (Figure 1A; Supplementary Figure S1). This enabled the identification of C′/D′ motifs in all snoRNAs (Figure 1B; Supplementary Figure S1). There was a surprising amount of variation in C′/D′ sequences between individual snoRNAs; ranging from poorly (e.g., snR51) to highly conserved (e.g., snR53) motifs. Some snoRNAs harbour sequences that are highly conserved in yeast evolution but quite distinct from the accepted consensus, for both D′ (e.g., snR73, snR70, snR51 and snR87) and C′ (e.g., snR68 and U24). Surprisingly, nine C′ boxes in S. cerevisiae aligned better to the consensus with between one or two nucleotide insertions (Figure 1B; e.g., snR50 and snR69). In some cases, insertions were present in a subset of the orthologues of a single snoRNA (e.g., snR71) and in some snoRNAs there could be up to nine nucleotides inserted in the split C′ boxes (Supplementary Figure S1; snR190 and snR76). One or two nucleotide insertions were apparent in C′ boxes from vertebrate snoRNAs (e.g., rodent U15B, HBII-234, HBII-82 and mgh28S-2411; data not shown), indicating that this is not specific to yeast. C′/D′ motifs were also highly conserved in snoRNAs that do not appear to use this motif to direct methylation (Figure 1B); the 'guide' region adjacent to the D′ motif in each of these RNAs was not conserved and no target has been identified (Supplementary Figure S1). Indeed, some of these 'inactive' motifs show better sequence conservation than active motifs, suggesting that the C′/D′ motif has a key role in the overall architecture of the snoRNP. The identification of many unusual C′/D′ motif sequences raised questions about the validity of the original consensus sequence. Re-evaluation of the C′ and D′ sequences confirmed that, while the original consensus sequence was correctly identified, significant divergence is tolerated in this motif (Figure 1C). The alignments also identified highly conserved regions present in several snoRNAs (e.g., snR75 and snR70; Figure 1A; Supplementary Figure S1), which do not correspond to either the box or guide regions. We speculated that these could assist in snoRNA function through providing a protein-binding site or additional base-pairing potential (see below). Figure 1.Sequence alignments of box C/D snoRNAs. (A) Homologues for each of the S. cerevisiae box C/D snoRNAs were retrieved from the fungal genomic sequence databases and aligned. Two example alignments, using a limited subset of the sequences for snR74 and snR75, are shown. The sequence is shown 5′–3′ and the position of the box sequences are indicated, with the consensus sequence shown at the bottom. The rRNA target (3′–5′) is shown in white on a red background. The extra base-pairing target of snR75 is shown in white with a blue background. Identical sequences: white with a black background; conserved sequences: black with a grey background. Brackets indicate possible intra-molecular base-pairing. Scer: Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Cgla: Candida glabrata; Klac: Kluyveromyces lactis; Lelo: Lodderomyces elongisporus; Wano: Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Pichia anomala); Sjap: Schizosaccharomyces japonicas; Tree: Trichoderma reesei (Hypocrea jecorina); Tsti: Talaromyces stipitatus; Acla: Aspergillus clavatus; Nfis: Neosartorya fischeri; Cpos: Coccidioides posadasii; Pans: Podospora anserine. (B) The D′ and C′ sequences of the S. cerevisiae box C/D snoRNAs are shown. Insertions in the C′ boxes are indicated in red. The snoRNAs containing box C′/D′ motifs that do not appear to direct methylation are indicated in grey. (C) A schematic representation of the conservation of the sequences of the C, D, C′ and D′ boxes of the S. cerevisiae box C/D. The diagram was prepared using the WebLogo software (Crooks et al, 2004). Download figure Download PowerPoint Asymmetric distribution of proteins in box C/D snoRNPs We were next interested in defining how the core box C/D proteins contact the box C/D snoRNAs. In particular, we were interested in how the proteins interacted with some of the more divergent C′/D′ motifs and with the additional conserved regions. We therefore performed CRAC, an RNA–protein crosslinking approach, followed by Illumina/Solexa sequencing, with Nop56, Nop58 and Nop1 to identify sites within the snoRNAs that crosslink to the core box C/D proteins (Granneman et al, 2009). Briefly, snoRNP proteins were C-terminal tagged with a His6-TEV-Protein A (HTP) tag (Granneman et al, 2009) and the fusion proteins were expressed from the genome under control of the endogenous promoter. Cells were UV irradiated at 254 nm to induce RNA–protein crosslinks. RNAs associated with HTP-tagged proteins were partially fragmented, purified and identified by linker ligation, cDNA synthesis and Illumina/Solexa sequencing. Analysis of the derived data revealed that 70–90% of the reads for each protein corresponded to box C/D snoRNA sequences. Reads were identified for every snoRNA, but U3 (snR17), U14 (snR128) and snR4 sequences were particularly enriched (Figure 2A). The different proteins showed significant variation in the number of reads recovered for each individual box C/D snoRNA (Figure 2A). Low-level hits were also recovered for the H/ACA snoRNAs. The highest number of hits for this class of snoRNA were recovered for snR37, which was used as a baseline for background hits (Figure 2A). Note, however, that these reads may reflect genuine interactions taking place within pre-ribosomes. Figure 2.Asymmetric distribution of core snoRNP proteins on box C/D snoRNAs. (A) Box C/D snoRNAs are substantially enriched in core snoRNP protein CRAC Solexa data sets. Total hits for H/ACA and C/D snoRNAs were calculated in each data set, log transformed, clustered and displayed as a heatmap. Box C/D and H/ACA snoRNAs are indicated by brackets. (B) Heatmaps of average read densities along box C/D snoRNAs. The positions of C, D, C′ and D′ boxes (black), and the two guide regions (red), are indicated at the top. (C) Distribution of reads smaller than 20 nucleotides along individual snoRNAs is shown as plots. The Nop1 hits are shown in red, Nop56 hits are shown in green and the Nop58 hits are shown in blue. The number of hits for Nop58 for both snR57 and snR39 were below those recorded for the H/ACA snoRNA snR37, the baseline for these experiments, and were therefore represented using a dashed line. snoRNA genes and location of conserved sequences (blue), guide sequences (red) or C/D snoRNP boxes (black) are indicated below the x axis. Coverage (y axis) indicates a fraction and was calculated by dividing the number of times a nucleotide in a gene was found in a read by the total number of hits for the gene. Download figure Download PowerPoint For each of the proteins, many reads were mapped to 3′ regions of the snoRNAs, near box D, presumably reflecting protein organization on the snoRNA (see Discussion). The average sequence length of the reads in the Solexa data was between 22 and 33 nts, resulting in significant overlap of individual reads. To better localize the binding sites, we generated heatmaps (Figure 2B) and graphs (Figure 2C) of reads smaller than 19 nucleotides. Comparison of the read distribution revealed differential protein localization. Nop58 primarily crosslinked to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the snoRNA, which include boxes C and D (Figure 2B). Nop56 preferentially crosslinked to the C′/D′ motif and the guide regions, in addition to binding near the 3′ end of the snoRNA. Nop1 frequently crosslinked to the guide adjacent to the D box and, occasionally, to the C′/D′ motif and associated guide (Figure 2B). The proteins, in particular Nop56, also make contacts outside the C/D and C′/D′ motifs. The data also indicate an asymmetric distribution of the three proteins on the snoRNAs. The snoRNAs use either the guide adjacent to the D or D′ box to direct methylation, with some using both guide regions (Lowe and Eddy, 1999). However, no clear differences were observed between snoRNAs with one active guide region or two (Figure 2C; data not shown). The snoRNA sequence alignments revealed some unusual C′/D′ motifs. Several contained C′ and/or D′ boxes that, while evolutionarily highly conserved, differed substantially from the consensus. CRAC data confirmed that these unusual C′/D′ motifs are contacted by core box C/D snoRNP proteins (Figure 2C; e.g., snR70, snR79 and snR51). The same is true for the snoRNAs in which the C′ motif contains an insertion or have poorly conserved C′/D′ motifs (Figure 2C; e.g., snR69). The CRAC data further showed that several snoRNAs with conserved C′/D′ motifs but inactive adjacent guides (e.g., snR39, snR57, snR72 and snR79) are also bound by core proteins. Several snoRNAs contain conserved regions that do not correspond to the box elements or the methylation guides (Figure 1A; Supplementary Figure S1). As CRAC data resolution is roughly 15–20 nucleotides, we could not unambiguously determine whether core proteins bound these additional conserved regions in most snoRNAs. The conserved regions within snR70 and snR190 are, however, well over 20 nts away from either the guide regions or the box motifs. Analysis of the crosslinking data revealed that Nop1 crosslinked to these conserved regions (Figure 2C), suggesting that these conserved elements are recognized by at least Nop1. Divergent C′/D′ motifs are capable of directing efficient methylation Since many C′/D′ motifs diverge from the consensus, we next compared the activity of several such motifs in directing rRNA methylation. To perform this, we developed an expression system for an artificial snoRNA designed to target methylation of nucleotide S1316 in the 18S rRNA (Figure 3A) and expressed under the control of a GAL promoter. This site is not naturally methylated but its modification does not affect growth (Decatur and Fournier, personal communication; data not shown). We used the human U24 C′/D′ sequence as a standard in the artificial snoRNA as this motif matches the consensus sequence and was previously used to characterize C′/D′ sequence function in yeast (Kiss-Laszlo et al, 1998; Qu et al, 2011). Several C′/D′ motifs were cloned into this snoRNA construct, including the divergent motifs from snR47, snR51 and snR70, the 'split' motif from snR78 and 'inactive' C′/D′ motifs from snR39, snR50, snR55 and snR57, that are not naturally adjacent to a guide sequence. The resulting plasmids were transformed into S. cerevisiae grown on galactose medium to induce snoRNA expression, and RNA was extracted. Methylation status was determined by primer extension (Figure 3B; Figure 5B (snR70)) and snoRNA levels were monitored by northern blotting (Supplementary Figure S2). Figure 3.Methylation activity of C′/D′ motifs. (A) Schematic representation of the galactose-inducible snoRNA expression cassette. The positions of the GAL promoter (GALp), ADH terminator sequence (ADHt) and exons 1 and 2 of the actin gene (E1 and E2) are shown. The positions of the Nhe I and Mlu I restriction sites, used in the cloning of the various C′/D′ fragments, are indicated. The C′/D′ sequences cloned into this cassette are shown in Supplementary Figure S10. (B, C) snoRNAs containing wild-type and mutant C′ boxes (as indicated above each lane) were transformed into yeast cells. RNA was extracted from the cells and analysed by primer extension, using primer Map1316 (upper panel), to detect rRNA methylation, and by northern hybridization (Supplementary Figure S2) to detect the expression of the snoRNA. The position of the stop corresponding to methylation of the target nucleotide, S1316 in the 18S rRNA, is indicated on the right. The snoRNA containing the C′/D′ motif from hU24 was used in all experiments to enable the comparison of the relative methylation activity of the various C′/D′ motifs. Download figure Download PowerPoint Expression of the artificial snoRNA containing the consensus hU24 C′/D′ motif resulted in methylation of S1316 (Figure 3B and C). This was not observed in the absence of the artificial snoRNA. The artificial snoRNAs, containing the C′/D′ motifs from snR51, snR78, snR50 and snR55, all methylated the rRNA to approximately the same level as seen with the hU24 C′/D′ motif. Slightly lower (50%) and higher (180%) methylation was seen, relative to the consensus motif, with the C′/D′ motifs of snR57 and snR47. This indicated that divergent C′/D′ motifs, including those with insertions in the C′ box (snR78), are roughly as active as the consensus C′/D′ motif (hU24). In contrast, a snoRNA carrying the C′/D′ motif of snR39 did not direct detectable methylation activity. The C′/D′ motif of snR39, although very conserved within the gene family, does not appear to naturally direct methylation and may be inactive. The data on the 'split' C′ motifs predict that between 1 and 3 nt insertions in the C′ box will not block the function of the C′/D′ motif. Insertion of a U or G into the hU24 C′/D′ motif (Figure 3C) directed methylation at site S1316 to 85 and 140% of the levels seen with the wild-type motif. Insertion of 2 nts reduced methylation activity of the snoRNA to 60%. Therefore, inserting 1 or 2 nts into the C′ motif did not significantly affect the activity of the snoRNA. Several C′ boxes contain only half of the C′ consensus sequence, suggesting that only one half of the sequence element may be sufficient for methylation, potentially explaining why insertions are tolerated. However, mutation of either the first or second GA dinucleotide in the C′ box (Figure 3C) reduced methylation at site S1316 by 5- and 10-fold, respectively. Thus, both halves of box C′ used in the artificial snoRNA are essential for modification. Many box C/D snoRNAs contain conserved elements that are complementary to sequences adjacent to the rRNA target site We have found that many snoRNAs contain conserved regions that do not correspond to C/D or C′/D′ box elements, or to methylation guides (Figure 1A; Supplementary Figure S1). In some cases, part or all of the conserved sequence appears to support secondary structures in the snoRNA (Supplementary Figure S1; e.g., snR66, snR70 and snR74). However, highly conserved regions identified in 13 yeast snoRNAs (snR13, snR39, snR47, snR48, snR61, snR64, snR70, snR73, snR75, snR76, snR87, snR190 and U18) are complementary to sequences immediately upstream or downstream of the rRNA methylation site (Figure 4A and B; Supplementary Figures S3 and S4). A further 11 yeast snoRNAs (snR38, snR40, snR54, snR55, snR56, snR60, snR62, snR68, snR69, snR71 and snR79) contained complementarity to regions flanking the rRNA methylation site, which was present in most but not all yeasts. Interestingly, these regions were mainly located either between the D′ and C′ boxes (e.g., snR70), or, where there is only one guide, in the second guide region (e.g., snR75; Figure 4B; Supplementary Figures S3 and S4). With one exception (snR69), however, the conserved regions were not found adjacent to a D or D′ box and would not be predicted to guide methylation. Occasionally, the regions were found in the spacer region between the guide and C or C′ box (e.g., snR47 and snR60). The potential base-pairing interactions ranged from 4 to 11 base pairs (Figure 4A). While some of these interactions are relatively short, these regions are likely functioning as an extension of the normal guide region. For snR87, this potential interaction is highly conserved in evolution and the human orthologue, U16 could form 11 consecutive base pairs with the rRNA (Figure 4C). Further analysis revealed an additional 17 potential snoRNA–rRNA base-pairing interactions for human box C/D snoRNAs that were evolutionarily conserved in higher eukaryotes (Figure 4C; Supplementary Figures S5–S7; U15, U21, U46, U49, U56, U103, snR39b, HBII-180, HBII-202, HBII-429, HBII-142, HBII-210, HBII-99, HBII-296, HBII-316, HBII-82 and mgh28S-2411). Interestingly, in both yeast and human snoRNAs, some of the extra potential base-pairing interactions overlap with the canonical target-snoRNA interaction by one or two nucleotides. In the case of HBII-316, however, the overlap is five nucleotides (Supplementary Figure S6). The data, therefore, suggest that the additional base-pairing might either enhance or regulate rRNA methylation. Figure 4.Extra conserved snoRNA sequences are complementary to rRNA target sites. (A) rRNA (upper) and snoRNA (lower) sequences, with both conventional guide-rRNA interactions (red) and novel extra base-pairing (blue) interactions for S. cerevisiae snoRNAs, are shown. Where sequences are shaded both red and blue, this indicates an overlap between the conventional and extra base-pairing. The D or D′ sequences are shown in white with a black background. (B) Schematic representations of S. cerevisiae snoRNA secondary structures with rRNA target sequence interactions. The regions base-paired to the guide and the extra base-pairing region are indicated using a red and blue background, respectively. Conserved boxes are indicated and the sequence shown in white on a black background. (C) Human snoRNA–rRNA interactions are schematically represented as in (A). Download figure Download PowerPoint Extra base-pairing stimulates rRNA methylation The proximity of the base-pairing to the methylation target site suggests a role in rRNA methylation, either stabilizing or facilitating formation of snoRNA–rRNA interactions. To test this possibility, we generated a yeast strain in which the snR72–snR78 cluster was deleted. This strain was then transformed with a plasmid expressing the wild-type snoRNA cluster, or a cluster in which the additional base-pairing region of either snR75 or snR76 was mutated (Figure 5A). RNA was extracted from each strain and the methylation levels were monitored by site-specific RNase H cleavage (Yu et al, 1997) directed by chimeric 2′-O-methyl RNA/DNA oligonucleotides to sites L2288 (snR75) and L2197 (snR76). This approach was used as primer extension analysis of methylation at site L2197 proved unreliable. The snoRNA expression levels were analysed by northern blotting (Supplementary Figure S2). In the absence of snR75 and snR76, both oligonucleotides directed RNase H-mediated cleavage of >90% of the 25S rRNA (Figure 5B). Each oligonucleotide also resulted in the non-specific cleavage of 18S rRNA (Figure 5B; asterisk). Importantly, this was not affected by the presence or absence of the snoRNAs. Expression of wild-type snR75 and snR76 rendered the 25S rRNA resistant to RNase H cleavage at the two methylation sites (<5% cleaved). In contrast, significant levels of cleavage were seen at sites L2288 and L2197 in 25S rRNA derived from cells expressing mutant snR75 (snR75mut) and snR76 (snR76mut), respectively. Mutation of the conserved extra base-pairing region of snR76 resulted in a 2–3-fold reduction in methylation (35–50% 25S rRNA uncleaved). Similarly, mutation of the conserved region of snR75 resulted in a 4–5-fold reduction in methylation (20–25% 25S rRNA uncleaved). A similar reduction in rRNA methylation was observed for the snR75mut, relative to the wild-type snoRNA, when the RNA was analysed by primer extension (Supplementary Figure S8). The data, therefore, indicate that the putative extra base-pairing regions in both snR75 and snR76 are important for efficient methylation activity. Figure 5.Extra base-pairing sequences are important for efficient methylation. (A) snR75 and snR76 interactions with the 25S rRNA are shown. The regions bound by the guide and extra base-pairing sequence are indicated using a red and blue background, respectively. Conserved boxes are indicated and shown in white on a black background. The sequence of the mutated extra base-pairing regions is shown in lower case. (B) A S. cerevisiae strain, in which the snR72–snR78 cluster was deleted, was transformed with plasmids expressing the snR72–snR78 cluster containing the wild-type (wt) or mutant (mut) snR75 and snR76 snoRNA-coding sequences or the vector alone (−). RNA was extracte