Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Comparative study of combined bevacizumab/targeted photocoagulation vs bevacizumab alone for macular oedema in ischaemic branch retinal vein occlusions

2015; Wiley; Volume: 94; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/aos.12721

ISSN

1755-3768

Autores

Yoko Tomomatsu, Takeshi Tomomatsu, Yoshihiro Takamura, Makoto Gozawa, Shogo Arimura, Yuji Takihara, Masaru Inatani,

Tópico(s)

Retinal and Macular Surgery

Resumo

Abstract Purpose To investigate whether targeted retinal photocoagulation ( TRP ) of peripheral non‐perfused areas ( NPA s) could prevent the recurrence of macular oedema ( ME ) due to branch retinal vein occlusion ( BRVO ) after intravitreal bevacizumab injection ( IVB ). Methods Eyes received 1.25 mg IVB only ( IVB group) or combined with TRP ( IVB + TRP group) of NPA s, more than 5 disc areas identified by fluorescein angiography in the patients with ME secondary to BRVO . Best‐corrected visual acuity ( BCVA ) and central retinal thickness ( CRT ) determined by optical coherence tomography were measured every month for 6 months. Results Thirty‐eight patients were enrolled and randomized to IVB group ( n = 19) and IVB + TRP group ( n = 19). Both groups showed similar thinning in CRT at 1 week after IVB , IVB + TRP group maintained thinner retina at 2 (p = 0.0072) and 3 (p = 0.0086) months compared with IVB group in whom turned to thickened almost back to baseline at 3 months. The number of reinjections in IVB group (1.58 ± 0.69) was significantly greater (p = 0.0025) than that in IVB + TRP group (0.83 ± 0.62). BCVA significantly improved at 6 month in IVB + TRP group (p = 0.015), but not in IVB group. Conclusion TRP of NPA s reduced the amount of ME recurrence following IVB compared to IVB alone.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX