Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Evaluation of the routine use of amoxicillin as part of the home-based treatment of severe acute malnutrition

2010; Wiley; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02580.x

1365-3156

Indi Trehan, Rachel E. Amthor, Kenneth Maleta, Mark Manary,

Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Objective To determine whether the inclusion of amoxicillin correlates with better recovery rates in the home-based treatment of severe acute malnutrition with ready-to-use therapeutic food. Methods This retrospective cohort study compared data from the treatment of two groups of children in Malawi aged 6–59 months with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition. The standard protocol group received a 7-day course of amoxicillin at the onset of treatment. The alternate protocol group received no antibiotics. All children were treated with the same ready-to-use therapeutic food. The primary outcome was nutritional recovery, defined as achieving a weight-for-height Z-score > −2 without oedema. Results Four hundred and ninety-eight children were treated according to the standard protocol with amoxicillin, and 1955 were treated under the alternate protocol without antibiotics. The group of children treated with amoxicillin was slightly older and more stunted at baseline. The recovery rate for children who received amoxicillin was worse at 4 weeks (40%vs. 71%) but similar after up to 12 weeks of therapy (84%vs. 86%), compared to the children treated without antibiotics. Regression modelling indicated that this difference at 4 weeks was most strongly associated with the receipt of amoxicillin. Conclusions This review of two therapeutic feeding programmes suggests that children with severe acute malnutrition who were treated without amoxicillin did not have an inferior rate of recovery. Given the limitations of this retrospective analysis, a prospective trial is warranted to determine the effect of antibiotics on recovery from uncomplicated malnutrition with home-based therapy. Evaluation de l'utilisation en routine de l'amoxicilline dans le cadre du traitement à domicile de la malnutrition aiguë sévère Objectif: Déterminer si l'inclusion de l'amoxicilline est en corrélation avec de meilleurs taux de rétablissement dans le traitement à domicile de la malnutrition aiguë sévère avec des aliments thérapeutiques prêts à l' emploi. Méthodes: Cette étude de cohorte rétrospective a comparé les données provenant du traitement de deux groupes d'enfants au Malawi âgés de 6 à 59 mois avec une malnutrition aiguë sévère sans complications. Le groupe de protocole standard a reçu un régime de 7 jours d'amoxicilline. Le groupe de protocole alternatif n'a pas reçu d'antibiotique. Tous les enfants ont été traités avec le même aliment thérapeutique prêt à l'emploi. Le critère principal était le rétablissement nutritionnel, définie comme l'atteinte d'un score Z du poids pour la taille > -2 sans œdème. Résultats: 498 enfants ont été traités selon le protocole standard avec l'amoxicilline et 1955 ont été traités dans le cadre du protocole alternatif sans antibiotiques. Le groupe d'enfants traités par amoxicilline était légèrement plus âgés et avec plus de retard de croissance au départ. Le taux de rétablissement chez les enfants qui ont reçu l'amoxicilline était pire à 4 semaines (40% vs 71%), mais similaire après 12 semaines de traitement (84% vs 86%), comparéà celui chez les enfants traités sans antibiotiques. La modélisation de régression a indiqué que cette différence à 4 semaines était plus fortement associée à l'administration de l'amoxicilline. Conclusions: Cette analyse de deux programmes d'alimentation thérapeutique suggère que les enfants souffrant de malnutrition aiguë sévère qui ont été traités sans de l'amoxicilline n'ont pas un taux de rétablissement inférieur. Étant donné les limites de cette analyse rétrospective, une étude prospective est justifiée afin de déterminer l'effet des antibiotiques sur le rétablissement de la malnutrition sans complication traitée à domicile. Evaluación del uso rutinario de la amoxicilina como parte del tratamiento de la malnutrición aguda severa en el hogar Objetivo: Determinar si el incluír amoxicilina en un tratamiento para la desnutrición aguda severa basado en el hogar utilizando comida terapéutica lista para usar, se correlaciona con una mejora en las tasas de recuperación. Métodos: Estudio restrospectivo de cohortes que comparó datos de dos grupos de tratamiento en niños con desnutrición severa no complicada de Malawi y edades comprendidas entre los 6-59 meses. El grupo con protocolo estándar recibió amoxicilina durante 7 días al comienzo del tratamiento. El grupo con protocolo alternativo no recibió antibióticos. Todos los niños fueron tratados con la misma comida terapéutica lista para usar. El resultado primario fue la recuperación nutricional, definida como alcanzar el Z-score de peso-por-altura > -2 sin edema. Resultados: 498 niños recibieron tratamiento según el protocolo estándar con amoxicilina y 1955 fueron tratados con el protocolo alternativo sin antibióticos. El grupo de niños que recibió antibióticos era un poco mayor y al comienzo del estudio estaba más afectado. La tasa de recuperación de los niños que recibieron amoxicilina era peor a las 4 semanas (40% vs. 71%) pero similar hasta después de 12 semanas de terapia (84% vs. 86%), comparada con los niños tratados sin antibióticos. Un modelo de regresión indicaba que esta diferencia a las 4 semanas estaba principalmente asociada con el haber recibido amoxicilina. Conclusiones: Esta revision de dos programas terapéuticos de nutrición sugiere que los niños con desnutrición severa aguda que fueron tratados sin amoxicilina no tuvieron una peor tasa de recuperación. Dadas las limitaciones de este análisis retrospectivo, se requiere de un ensayo prospectivo para determinar el efecto de los antibióticos en la recuperación de una desnutrición severa no complicada tratada en el hogar. Malnutrition contributes to more than half of the 10 million child deaths worldwide (Bryce et al. 2005), many of which occur after an acute infectious insult. Children hospitalized with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) are traditionally treated with empiric antibiotics as part of their routine case management. The World Health Organization (WHO) codified this practice with their recommendation that 'Nearly all severely malnourished children have bacterial infections when first admitted to hospital. Many have several infections caused by different organisms … Children with no apparent signs of infection and no complications should be given co-trimoxazole … orally twice daily for 5 days.' (World Health Organization 1999) In fact, numerous recent studies have indeed confirmed this concern of severe bacterial infections in malnourished children who are hospitalized (Berkley et al. 2005; Noorani et al. 2005; Babirekere-Iriso et al. 2006; Bachou et al. 2006; Brent et al. 2006; Maitland et al. 2006; Hill et al. 2007; Hossain et al. 2009). Over the last several years, a revolution in the case management of SAM has occurred with the introduction and widespread acceptance of ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) that allow for the management of uncomplicated cases of SAM in the child's home (Collins et al. 2006; Manary & Sandige 2008). After initial screening at a local health centre, children diagnosed with uncomplicated SAM who demonstrate an adequate appetite can be provided a supply of RUTF for rehabilitation at home with scheduled follow-up in 1–2 weeks. The vast majority of children with uncomplicated SAM can now be managed this way without the need for inpatient therapy. Recent consensus recommendations have recognized this transition as well (World Health Organization et al. 2007), based in no small part on the appreciation that recovery rates with home-based management are as good or better than those in hospital (Ciliberto et al. 2005, 2006; Linneman et al. 2007). International guidelines also recommend antibiotics as part of the case management of SAM for outpatients: 'In addition to the provision of RUTF, children need to receive a short course of basic oral medication to treat infections.' (World Health Organization et al. 2007) In Malawi, national guidelines recommend the use of 7 days of amoxicillin for this indication. However, the use of antibiotics in therapeutic feeding programmes has not been uniform in its implementation, and the need for these oral antibiotics has been questioned. We therefore sought to compare outcomes from two very similar therapeutic feeding programmes in Malawi whose treatment protocols differed only in that one routinely included 1 week of amoxicillin while the second group did not. Anonymized patient records from two very similar projects which operate therapeutic feeding programmes for SAM in rural Malawi were obtained from the same time period. Both projects use locally produced peanut-based RUTF in an identical feeding regimen. The projects differ only in that one includes amoxicillin during the first 7 days of treatment ('standard protocol'), whereas the second programme does not provide antibiotics or a prescription for antibiotics as part of the treatment ('alternate protocol'). All children aged 6–59 months with uncomplicated SAM who qualified for outpatient treatment (World Health Organization et al. 2007; Manary & Sandige 2008) and who presented to one of the malnutrition treatment clinics administered by the two organizations in Malawi's Dowa, Chiradzulu, and Machinga districts between 2003 and 2005 were included in this study. These children were from rural, subsistence farming villages that consume monotonous maize-based diets. SAM was defined according to standard WHO guidelines consisting of weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) ≤ −3 and/or the presence of bilateral pitting oedema (World Health Organization 1999). Children were only enroled if they demonstrated a good appetite by direct observation of a test dose of approximately 30 g of RUTF by the clinical staff. Children who presented with poor appetite, altered mental status, compromised perfusion or respiratory distress were excluded from home-based therapy and referred to an inpatient facility for care. Children who were being transferred to outpatient therapy after an initial inpatient phase of therapy were excluded from the analysis as well. Both groups followed nearly identical data collection and treatment protocols. When a child first presented to a malnutrition clinic, nurses and trained health assistants collected basic demographical and anthropometric information from caregivers. Length, weight and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) were measured. Pedal oedema was identified as present or absent by pressing a thumb on the dorsa of both feet for 5 s and looking for visible pitting. If a child was found to be severely malnourished with a good appetite, the caregiver was educated about the child's illness, instructed on optimal feeding practices and provided with a supply of RUTF providing approximately 175 kcal/kg/day. This included children with any amount of oedema, even cases that would be considered to have moderate or severe oedema. Children in the standard protocol group were also provided with a 7-day supply of amoxicillin at a dose of approximately 60 mg/kg/day. Children treated under the alternate protocol were not given any antibiotics. No additional vitamins, micronutrients or antiparasitic treatments were routinely administered to children in either group. Caretakers were referred to their local health providers if there were any concerns for an acute illness such as malaria or diarrhoea. Children returned at 1- or 2-week intervals for follow-up clinical and anthropometric assessments. Treatment with RUTF continued until the child's WHZ was at least −2 and no peripheral oedema was present. A minimum of 4 weeks of treatment was given; those that had recovered at the 4-week visit were discharged from the treatment programme, whereas the others were continued in the programme for up to a total of 12 weeks. If the child's clinical condition worsened significantly or if the child had not improved by the end of 12 weeks, the child was referred to an inpatient facility for care. At the end of 4 and 12 weeks, children were classified as recovered, defined as reaching WHZ > −2 and without oedema; remained malnourished if WHZ continued to be ≤−2 throughout the course of therapy or if oedema persisted or if the child's clinical condition warranted transfer to an inpatient facility; defaulted if the child missed two follow-up visits; or died. The primary outcome of interest for this retrospective study was the rate of nutritional recovery in each protocol group. A sample size of at least 400 children in each group was calculated to detect a difference in the recovery rate of at least 5%. Statistical analyses were carried out using Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For continuous variables, the mean and standard deviation were calculated; for dichotomous variables, number and per cent were determined. Weight-for-age Z-scores (WAZ), height-for-age Z-scores (HAZ) and WHZ were calculated with WHO Anthro 2005 (WHO, Geneva, Switzerland) using the US National Center for Health Statistics/WHO International Growth Reference standards (National Center for Health Statistics 1977). To convert length measurements to height measurements for children over 2 years in the calculation of HAZ and WHZ, 0.5 cm was subtracted from the length measurements over 85 cm and this value was used as the height (World Health Organization 1999). Comparison of enrolment and recovery characteristics was made using Student's t-test for continuous parameters and using Fisher's exact test for dichotomous parameters. To compare recovery rates while controlling for baseline differences between the groups, logistic regression modelling was performed. Receipt of amoxicillin was the independent variable assessed, with age, WHZ, HAZ, WAZ and the presence of oedema included as covariates in the model. Two thousand four hundred and fifty-three children with uncomplicated SAM were treated in two therapeutic feeding groups; 498 were in the standard protocol with amoxicillin group and 1955 were in the alternate protocol group without antibiotics. The baseline characteristics of the children in the two groups were noted to be slightly different (Table 1): children enroled in the standard protocol group were older, more stunted (lower HAZ) and more underweight (lower WAZ). However, the rates of oedematous malnutrition and the average WHZ were similar between the two groups. After 4 weeks of therapy, the children treated under the alternate protocol without routine antibiotics had better rates of recovery; of those with oedema 77% recovered in the alternative protocol and 44% in the standard protocol (P < 0.001) and of those without oedema 47% recovered in the alternative protocol and 26% in the standard protocol (P < 0.001, Table 2). By the end of therapy at up to 12 weeks, the proportion of children treated with the standard protocol with amoxicillin who recovered (84%) was similar to the proportion of those treated with the alternate protocol without an antibiotic (86%). The rates of death and defaulting were similar between the two groups at both time points. Considering only the children who recovered after 4 weeks, the WHZ was significantly higher for children in the alternate protocol group than for those in the standard protocol group (−0.37 vs.−0.75, P < 0.0001). This difference was noted despite the fact that the baseline WHZ of these children was similar at enrolment (−1.63 vs.−1.59). To account for the slightly different baseline characteristics of the two groups, multiple logistical regression modelling of enrolment variables related to the likelihood of nutritional recovery at 4 weeks and at up to 12 weeks was performed (Table 3). The 4-week model demonstrated that older age was minimally predictive of recovery and that a higher enrolment WHZ was also predictive of recovery. The receipt of amoxicillin was strongly correlated with failure to recover at 4 weeks with an odds ratio for recovery of 0.22 (P < 0.001). Regression modelling for recovery at up to 12 weeks demonstrated that none of these baseline factors were significantly predictive of recovery. Specifically, the effects of age, enrolment WHZ and amoxicillin usage seen at 4 weeks were no longer significant. This retrospective analysis demonstrates that a cohort of children with SAM treated with amoxicillin as part of their home-based therapy regimen did not have a higher rate of recovery than children who did not receive routine antibiotics. The primary limitation of this study is its retrospective design: baseline differences between the two cohorts may have contributed to the study's primary finding. While habitual diet, socio-economic status and overall living environments are very similar in the areas studied, those children treated with amoxicillin presented at an older age and with greater degrees of stunting and underweight, suggesting that the two populations may have been in different physiological states at the time of enrolment. The greater degree of stunting and underweight among the children receiving amoxicillin may have been indicative of a higher prevalence of a chronic process such as HIV infection. However, the HIV rates in the Dowa district of Malawi, where children were treated by the standard protocol with amoxicillin, are reported to be 7.0% through inference from mortality rate, whereas HIV rates are reported to be 15.0% and 16.5%, in Malawi's Chiradzulu and Machinga districts, respectively, where children were treated without antibiotics (Oster 2007). Unfortunately, at the time these children were being treated, routine HIV testing was not readily available. Although the two feeding programmes studied are designed and operated very similarly (with the exception of the use of antibiotics in the standard protocol group), the different baseline characteristics of the two cohorts would suggest that there were some recruitment differences between the two groups. It is possible that the children treated without antibiotics presented earlier in the course of their illness or attended treatment sites in closer proximity to their villages, improving their chances of recovery. The local health aides serving these sites may have been more proactive in recruiting caretakers in the community to bring children to the clinic for screening and treatment, thereby including less severe cases in this group. As the two feeding programmes operated independently, other unquantifiable variances in the teaching and nutritional counselling provided by the programmes' staff may also have developed over time and contributed to the differences seen in the outcomes between the two groups. Most of severely malnourished children in this study had kwashiorkor, and most were with mild oedema, so the findings should not be generalized to populations where the predominant form of severe malnutrition is marasmus. In spite of this limitation, when children with kwashiorkor and marasmus were considered to have distinctly different forms of malnutrition, the recovery rates were significantly greater among children that did not receive amoxicillin for both kwashiorkor and marasmus. Nevertheless, despite these baseline differences between the two groups of children, regression modelling showed home-based therapy without antibiotics to be associated with a higher rate of recovery at 4 weeks and a similar rate at 12 weeks, compared to the group of children who all received amoxicillin for 1 week. This finding that the recovery rate with amoxicillin therapy is delayed has biological plausibility when considering the clinical problem of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and the emerging knowledge of the way antibiotics disrupt the intestinal microbiome (Dethlefsen et al. 2008; Preidis & Versalovic 2009). The marked difference in WHZ seen in the 4-week graduates also suggests that amoxicillin usage may be associated with delayed recovery. By 12 weeks, it is more likely that enough time had passed such that any adverse effect of the antibiotics would have resolved. There are good reasons to limit unnecessary use of antibiotics in this setting. Foremost is that routine inclusion of antibiotics as part of the therapy for SAM poses a burden on therapeutic feeding programmes in terms of cost and complexity, which adds to the already difficult task of identifying and providing these children RUTF. Any simplification or cost reduction that can be made to the therapeutic feeding protocol (without leading to decreased rates of recovery) may lead to an expanded ability to provide home-based therapy to more children in more areas. Even if the final recovery rates are similar, our analysis would suggest that children who do not receive antibiotics may recover more quickly, saving further expenditures on clinical staff and the on the amount of RUTF needed to achieve recovery. Additionally, antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide and can be particularly problematic in developing countries where treatment options against resistant organisms are more limited (Nys et al. 2004; Okeke et al. 2005, 2007). In the gut, resistant organisms rapidly develop when exposed to broad-spectrum antibiotics, often causing secondary infections that are difficult to treat; one of the primary routes of bacterial invasion in severe malnutrition is thought to be translocation of enteric flora across the compromised intestinal mucosa. Moreover, resistant bacteria may exhibit enhanced virulence (Dancer 2004), further complicating a malnourished child's chances for recovery. Amoxicillin was used in the standard protocol group because of its relatively broad spectrum of activity, low cost and current usage by several national protocols in Africa, including Malawi. Evidence is mounting, however, that both amoxicillin and co-trimoxazole, the other commonly used antibiotic for this purpose, are becoming ineffective against the strains of bacteria that are found to be causing severe infections in this population of malnourished children (Manary & Brewster 2000; Madanitsa et al. 2009). Thus, while the constraints on the choice of antibiotics in resource-limited settings should not be underestimated, it is possible that a different routine antibiotic may have been of more benefit to these malnourished children. Home-based therapy for acute malnutrition is robust partly because children who live far from health care facilities still have access to care. Routine antibiotic use for SAM, a hold-over from when treatment primarily took place in crowded hospital wards (World Health Organization 1999), may be complicating care in the home-based setting (World Health Organization et al. 2007), even without any definitive evidence that this is a necessary component of treatment (Alcoba & Kerac 2009; Bailey et al. 2009). The findings of this study must be considered preliminary; caution should be exercised in extrapolating these retrospective results to other settings. But these findings, together with growing evidence that the practice of administering routine antibiotics to vulnerable populations is ineffective and perhaps detrimental, highlight the need for a randomized prospective trial to determine with certainty the necessity of routine antibiotics in the treatment of children with uncomplicated SAM. Prospective trials should include settings where kwashiorkor is the predominant form of SAM, as well as marasmus. We thank Marko Kerac, Kate Sadler and Paluku Bahwere for sharing their patient data and for insightful discussions related to this topic. Indi Trehan is supported by the NIH under Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award T32 HD049338. Preliminary data from this work were presented at the 10th Commonwealth Association of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Conference on Diarrhoea and Malnutrition, held in Blantyre, Malawi, in August 2009.