Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Point of Care Testing in the Accident and Emergency Department: A Cost Analysis and Exploration of Financial Incentives to use the Technology within the Hospital

1999; SAGE Publishing; Volume: 4; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1177/135581969900400109

1758-1060

Jason Kendall, Gwyn Bevan, Michael Clancy,

Healthcare Policy and Management

Objectives: To compare the costs of current arrangements for testing emergency blood samples from patients attending an accident and emergency (A&E) department in a large teaching hospital in England with point of care testing (POCT). Methods: Estimates were made of the fixed and variable costs of two options: a supplemental option, in which POCT was introduced to A&E only; and a replacement option, in which POCT was introduced to A&E and the intensive therapy unit (ITU), thereby entirely replacing an existing process. Results: For the supplemental option, current arrangements cost £68 466 in total per year; average costs per test were £5.53 (venous in the central laboratory) and £3.60 (arterial on the ITU). Introducing POCT would increase total hospital costs by £35 929, and average costs per test would be £5.32 (venous) and £4.28 (arterial). For the replacement option, current arrangements cost £132 630 in total, and average cost per test (for all tests) was £4.06. Introducing POCT would make hospital savings ranging from £8332 to £20 000, and average cost per test would be £3.78. Conclusions: Introducing POCT results in lower average costs per test. The supplemental option will result in significantly increased costs to the hospital. The replacement option can lead to significant savings. The internal cross-charging arrangements between departments that exist in this hospital may mean that supplemental implementation of POCT could be potentially ‘profitable’ for the A&E department, but would result in higher expenditure for the hospital as a whole.