Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Clinical validity of consultant technical skills assessment in the English National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

2015; Oxford University Press; Volume: 102; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/bjs.9828

1365-2168

H Mackenzie, Melody Ni, Danilo Mišković, R W Motson, Mark Gudgeon, Zulfiqar Ali Khan, R J Longman, Mark Coleman, George B. Hanna,

Innovations in Medical Education

Abstract Background The English National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery introduced a validated objective competency assessment tool to accredit surgeons before independent practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether this technical skills assessment predicted clinical outcomes. Methods Established consultants, training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, were asked to submit two operative videos for evaluation by two blinded assessors using the competency assessment tool. A mark of 2·7 or above was considered a pass. Clinical and oncological outcomes were compared above and below this mark, including regression analysis. Results Eighty-five consultant surgeons submitted 171 videos. Of these, 44 (25·7 per cent) were in the fail group (score less than 2·7). This low scoring group had more postoperative morbidity (25 versus 8·7 per cent; P = 0·005), including surgical complications (18 versus 6·3 per cent; P = 0·020) and fewer lymph nodes harvested (median 13 versus 18; P = 0·004). A score of less than 2·7 was an independent predictor of surgical complication, lymph node yield and distal resection margin clearance. Consultants with higher scores had performed similar numbers of laparoscopic colorectal operations (median 37 versus 40; P = 0·373) but more structured training operations (18 versus 9; P < 0·001). Conclusion An objective technical skills assessment provided a discriminatory tool with which to accredit laparoscopic colorectal surgeons.