Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

EARLINET instrument intercomparison campaigns: overview on strategy and results

2016; Copernicus Publications; Volume: 9; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.5194/amt-9-1001-2016

1867-8548

Ulla Wandinger, Volker Freudenthaler, Holger Baars, Aldo Amodeo, Ronny Engelmann, Ina Mattis, Silke Groß, Gelsomina Pappalardo, Aldo Giunta, Giuseppe D’Amico, Anatoli Chaikovsky, Fiodor Osipenko, Alexander Slesar, Doina Nicolae, Livio Belegante, Camelia Talianu, Ilya Serikov, Holger Linnè, Friedhelm Jansen, Arnoud Apituley, Keith M. Wilson, Martin de Graaf, Thomas Trickl, H. Giehl, Mariana Adam, Adolfo Comero︠n, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Francesc Rocadenbosch, Michaël Sicard, S. Tomás, Diego Lange, Dhiraj Kumar, Manuel Pujadas, Francisco Molero, Alfonso Fernández, Lucas Alados‐Arboledas, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Francisco Navas-Guzmán, Juan Luís Guerrero-Rascado, María José Granados-Muñoz, Jana Preißler, Frank Wagner, M. Gausa, Иван Григоров, Dimitar V. Stoyanov, Marco Iarlori, V. Rizi, Nicola Spinelli, Antonella Boselli, Xuan Wang, Teresa Lo Feudo, M. R. Perrone, Ferdinando De Tomasi, P. Burlizzi,

Atmospheric Ozone and Climate

Abstract. This paper introduces the recent European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) quality-assurance efforts at instrument level. Within two dedicated campaigns and five single-site intercomparison activities, 21 EARLINET systems from 18 EARLINET stations were intercompared between 2009 and 2013. A comprehensive strategy for campaign setup and data evaluation has been established. Eleven systems from nine EARLINET stations participated in the EARLINET Lidar Intercomparison 2009 (EARLI09). In this campaign, three reference systems were qualified which served as traveling standards thereafter. EARLINET systems from nine other stations have been compared against these reference systems since 2009. We present and discuss comparisons at signal and at product level from all campaigns for more than 100 individual measurement channels at the wavelengths of 355, 387, 532, and 607 nm. It is shown that in most cases, a very good agreement of the compared systems with the respective reference is obtained. Mean signal deviations in predefined height ranges are typically below ±2 %. Particle backscatter and extinction coefficients agree within ±2 × 10−4 km−1 sr−1 and ± 0.01 km−1, respectively, in most cases. For systems or channels that showed larger discrepancies, an in-depth analysis of deficiencies was performed and technical solutions and upgrades were proposed and realized. The intercomparisons have reinforced confidence in the EARLINET data quality and allowed us to draw conclusions on necessary system improvements for some instruments and to identify major challenges that need to be tackled in the future.