Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision
2011; Wiley; Volume: 10; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00761.x
ISSN1745-9133
AutoresJeffery T. Ulmer, Michael T. Light, John H. Kramer,
Tópico(s)Homelessness and Social Issues
ResumoCriminology & Public PolicyVolume 10, Issue 4 p. 1077-1118 RESEARCH ARTICLE Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision An alternative analysis to the USSC's 2010 report Jeffery T. Ulmer, Jeffery T. Ulmer The Pennsylvania State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorMichael T. Light, Michael T. Light The Pennsylvania State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorJohn H. Kramer, John H. Kramer The Pennsylvania State UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Jeffery T. Ulmer, Jeffery T. Ulmer The Pennsylvania State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorMichael T. Light, Michael T. Light The Pennsylvania State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorJohn H. Kramer, John H. Kramer The Pennsylvania State UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 20 November 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00761.xCitations: 51 We thank D. Wayne Osgood and Shawn Bushway for their helpful input on earlier drafts of this article. Direct correspondence to Jeffery T. Ulmer, Department of Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802 (e-mail: [email protected]). Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References American Bar Association. 2005. ABA Criminal Justice Section, report and recommendation on Booker. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 17: 335–340. Albonetti, Celesta A. 1997. Sentencing under the federal sentencing Guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991–1992. Law & Society Review, 31: 789–822. Albonetti, Celesta A. 1998. The role of gender and departures in the sentencing of defendants convicted of a white collar offense under the federal sentencing Guidelines. In ( Jeffery T. Ulmer, ed.), Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, Vol. 1. Greenwich , CT : JAI Press. Anderson, Amy and Cassia Spohn. 2010. Lawlessness in the federal sentencing process: A test for uniformity and consistency in sentencing practices. Justice Quarterly, 27: 362–393. Berman, Douglas A. 2005. Assessing federal sentencing after Booker. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 17: 291–294. Bowman, Frank O. III. 2003. Only Suckers Pay the Sticker Price: The Effect of "Fast Track" Programs on the Future of the Sentencing Guidelines as a Principled Sentencing System. Testimony before the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Sept. 23, 2003, Washington , DC . Bowman, Frank O. III. 2005. Letter from Frank Bowman concerning H.R. 1528. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 17: 311–314. Bushway, Shawn D., Brian D. Johnson, and Lee Ann Slocum. 2007. Is the magic still there? The relevance of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23: 151–178. Bushway, Shawn D. and Anne Morrison Piehl. 2001. Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review, 35: 733–764. Clogg, Clifford C., Eva Petkova, and Adamantios Haritou. 1995. Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100: 1261–1293. Doerner, Jill K. and Stephen Demuth. 2009. The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27: 1–27. Engen, Rodney. 2009. Assessing determinate and presumptive sentencing: Making research relevant. Criminology and Public Policy, 8: 323–335. Engen, Rodney and Randy R. Gainey. 2000. Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: the rules have changed. Criminology, 38: 1207–1230. Feldmeyer, Ben and Jeffery T. Ulmer. 2011. Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48: 238–270. Frase, Richard. 2007. The Apprendi-Blakely cases: Sentencing reform counter-revolution?Criminology & Public Policy, 6: 403–432. Gonzales, Alberto. 2005. Federal sentencing guidelines speech by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 17: 324–326. Hartley, Richard, Sean Maddan, and Cassia Spohn. 2007. Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24: 382–407. Hofer, Paul J. 2007. United States v. Booker as a natural experiment: Using empirical research to inform the federal sentencing policy debate. Crime & Public Policy, 6: 433–460. Holder, Eric. 2009. Remarks for the Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice and Congressional Black Caucus Symposium "Rethinking Federal Sentencing Policy 25th Anniversary of the Sentencing Reform Act." June 24, 2009. Washington , DC . Johnson, Brian D. 2006. The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge and county level influences in the study of courtroom decision making. Criminology, 44: 259–298. Johnson, Brian D. and Sara Betsinger. 2009. Punishing the 'model minority': Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47: 1045–1090. Johnson, Brian D., Jeffery T. Ulmer, and John H. Kramer. 2008. The social context of Guideline circumvention: the case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46: 711–783. Kautt, Paula M. 2002. Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19: 633–671. Kempf-Leonard, Kimberly and Lisa Sample. 2001. Have federal sentencing guidelines reduced severity? An examination of one circuit. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17: 111–144. Kramer, John H. 2009. Mandatory sentencing guidelines: The framing of justice. Criminology & Public Policy, 8: 313–321. Kramer, John H. and Jeffery T. Ulmer. 2009. Sentencing Guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Boulder , CO : Lynne Rienner. Kurlychek, Megan and Brian D. Johnson. 2004. The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile and young adult sentencing outcomes in adult criminal court. Criminology, 42: 485–517. Maxfield, Linda D. and Keri Burchfield. 2002. Immigration offenses involving unlawful entry: Is federal practice comparable across districts? Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14: 260–266. Maxfield, Linda D. and John H. Kramer. 1998. Substantial assistance: An empirical yardstick for gauging equity in current federal policy and practice. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 11: 6–12. Mitchell, Ojmarrh and Doris L. MacKenzie. 2004. The Relationship Between Race, Ethnicity, and Sentencing Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Sentencing Research: Final Report. Submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Washington , DC . Mustard, David. 2001. Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44: 285–314. Paternoster, Raymond, Robert Brame, Paul Mazzerolle, and Alex R. Piquero. 1998. Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36: 859–866. Peterson, Ruth D. and John Hagan. 1984. Changing conceptions of race: Towards an account of anomalous findings in sentencing research. American Sociological Review, 49: 56–70. Reitz, Kevin R. 1998. Modeling discretion in American sentencing systems. Law and Policy, 20: 389–428. Reitz, Kevin R. 2005. The enforceability of sentencing guidelines. Stanford Law Review, 58: 155–174. Richter, John C. 2008. Deja vu all over again: How post-Booker sentencing threatens equal justice under the law. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 20: 340–342. Shermer, Lauren O'Neill and Brian D. Johnson. 2010. Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in U.S. federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27: 394–430. Spohn, Cassia. 2000. Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In Policies, Processes and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System. Vol. 3, Criminal Justice 2000. Washington , DC : U.S. Department of Justice. Spohn, Cassia and David Holleran. 2000. The imprisonment penalty paid by young unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38: 281–306. Steffensmeier, Darrell and Stephen Demuth. 2000. Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65: 705–729. Steffensmeier, Darrell, John H. Kramer, and Cathy Streifel. 1993. Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31: 411–446. Steffensmeier, Darrell, Jeffery T. Ulmer, and John H. Kramer. 1998. The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36: 763–798. Stith, Kate. 2008. The arc of the pendulum: Judges, prosecutors, and the exercise of discretion. The Yale Law Journal, 117: 1420–1497. Stith, Kate and Jose Cabranes. 1998. Fear of Judging. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press. Stolzenberg, Ross M. and Daniel A. Relles. 1997. Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. American Sociological Review, 62: 494–507. Thompson, Sandra G. 2006. The Booker project: The future of federal sentencing. Houston Law Review, 43: 269–278. Ulmer, Jeffery T. 1997. Social Worlds of Sentencing: Court Communities Under Sentencing Guidelines. Albany : State University of New York Press. Ulmer, Jeffery T. 2005. The localized uses of federal sentencing guidelines in four U.S. district courts: Evidence of processual order. Symbolic Interaction, 28: 255–279. Ulmer, Jeffery T., James Eisenstein, and Brian D. Johnson. 2010. Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27: 560–592. Ulmer, Jeffery T. and Brian D. Johnson. 2004. Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42: 137–177. U.S. Sentencing Commission. 2004. Fifteen Years of Guidelines Sentencing: An Assessment of How Well the Federal Criminal Justice System Is Achieving the Goals of Sentencing Reform. Washington , DC : Author. U.S. Sentencing Commission. 2006. Final Report on the Impact of United States v. Booker on Federal Sentencing. Washington , DC : Author. U.S. Sentencing Commission. 2010. Demographic Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices: An Update of the Booker Report's Multivariate Regression Analysis. Washington , DC : Author. Zatz, Marjorie. 2000. The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. In Policies, Processes and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System, Vol. 3, Criminal Justice 2000. Washington , DC : U.S. Department of Justice. Citing Literature Volume10, Issue4November 2011Pages 1077-1118 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)