Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of the NAD+-dependent Histone Deacetylase SIRT1
2007; Elsevier BV; Volume: 282; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.m609554200
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresMasaya Tanno, Jun Sakamoto, Tetsuji Miura, Kazuaki Shimamoto, Yoshiyuki Horio,
Tópico(s)Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
ResumoSir2 (silent information regulator 2) is an NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase that contributes to longevity in yeast. SIRT1, a mammalian Sir2 ortholog, deacetylates histones and various transcription factors, including p53, FOXO proteins, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ. We found that its subcellular localization varied in different tissues of the adult mouse. Some subsets of neurons predominantly expressed SIRT1 in the cytoplasm, but ependymal cells expressed it in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. On the other hand, spermatocytes expressed SIRT1 only in the nucleus. Cardiomyocytes in the day 12.5 mouse embryo expressed SIRT1 exclusively in the nucleus, but in the adult heart, they expressed it in both the cytoplasm and nucleus. C2C12 myoblast cells expressed SIRT1 in the nucleus, but it localized to the cytoplasm after differentiation. LY294002, an inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-hydroxykinase, strongly inhibited the nuclear localization of SIRT1 in undifferentiated C2C12 cells. In a heterokaryon assay, SIRT1 shuttled between the nucleus and cytoplasm, and leptomycin B, an inhibitor of CRM1-mediated nuclear exportation, inhibited this shuttling. Two nuclear localization signals and two nuclear export signals were identified by deletion and site-directed mutation analyses. Overexpressed nuclear (but not cytoplasmic or dominant-negative) SIRT1 enhanced the deacetylation of histone H3 in C2C12 cells. Moreover, only the nuclear form suppressed the apoptosis of C2C12 cells induced by antimycin A, an oxidative stressor. These findings indicate that nucleocytoplasmic shuttling is a novel regulatory mechanism of SIRT1, which may participate in differentiation and in inhibition of cell death. Sir2 (silent information regulator 2) is an NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase that contributes to longevity in yeast. SIRT1, a mammalian Sir2 ortholog, deacetylates histones and various transcription factors, including p53, FOXO proteins, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ. We found that its subcellular localization varied in different tissues of the adult mouse. Some subsets of neurons predominantly expressed SIRT1 in the cytoplasm, but ependymal cells expressed it in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. On the other hand, spermatocytes expressed SIRT1 only in the nucleus. Cardiomyocytes in the day 12.5 mouse embryo expressed SIRT1 exclusively in the nucleus, but in the adult heart, they expressed it in both the cytoplasm and nucleus. C2C12 myoblast cells expressed SIRT1 in the nucleus, but it localized to the cytoplasm after differentiation. LY294002, an inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-hydroxykinase, strongly inhibited the nuclear localization of SIRT1 in undifferentiated C2C12 cells. In a heterokaryon assay, SIRT1 shuttled between the nucleus and cytoplasm, and leptomycin B, an inhibitor of CRM1-mediated nuclear exportation, inhibited this shuttling. Two nuclear localization signals and two nuclear export signals were identified by deletion and site-directed mutation analyses. Overexpressed nuclear (but not cytoplasmic or dominant-negative) SIRT1 enhanced the deacetylation of histone H3 in C2C12 cells. Moreover, only the nuclear form suppressed the apoptosis of C2C12 cells induced by antimycin A, an oxidative stressor. These findings indicate that nucleocytoplasmic shuttling is a novel regulatory mechanism of SIRT1, which may participate in differentiation and in inhibition of cell death. The Sir2 (silent information regulator 2) proteins are a family of class III histone deacetylases found in organisms from bacteria to humans (1Blander G. Guarente L. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004; 73: 417-435Crossref PubMed Scopus (1290) Google Scholar). Unlike class I and II histone deacetylases, the Sir2 family requires the cofactor NAD+ for catalytic activity (2Imai S. Armstrong C.M. Kaeberlein M. Guarente L. Nature. 2000; 403: 795-800Crossref PubMed Scopus (2740) Google Scholar). In yeast, Sir2 participates in heterochromatic silencing at mating-type loci (3Rine J. Herskowitz I. Genetics. 1987; 116: 9-22Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Sir2 extends the life span of yeast by suppressing recombination in the rDNA region and consequently reducing the formation of extrachromosomal rDNA circles (4Kaeberlein M. McVey M. Guarente L. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 2570-2580Crossref PubMed Scopus (1737) Google Scholar), a cause of senescence (5Sinclair D.A. Guarente L. Cell. 1997; 91: 1033-1042Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1162) Google Scholar). Caloric restriction extends the life span in organisms ranging from yeast to mammals, and the Sir2 family plays an essential role in this effect (6Lin S.J. Defossez P.A. Guarente L. Science. 2000; 289: 2126-2128Crossref PubMed Scopus (1469) Google Scholar, 7Cohen H.Y. Miller C. Bitterman K.J. Wall N.R. Hekking B. Kessler B. Howitz K.T. Gorospe M. de Cabo R. Sinclair D.A. Science. 2004; 305: 390-392Crossref PubMed Scopus (1657) Google Scholar).In mammals, there are seven members of the Sir2 family, termed sirtuins, of which SIRT1 is the closest homolog of yeast Sir2. SIRT1 regulates metabolic responses in adipocytes and liver. It promotes fat mobilization in white adipocytes by repressing peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (8Picard F. Kurtev M. Chung N. Topark-Ngarm A. Senawong T. Machado De Oliveira R. Leid M. McBurney M.W. Guarente L. Nature. 2004; 429: 771-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (1636) Google Scholar). SIRT1 deacetylates the transcription coactivator PGC1α, thereby inducing the expression of gluconeogenic genes and the repression of glycolytic genes (9Rodgers J.T. Lerin C. Haas W. Gygi S.P. Spiegelman B.M. Puigserver P. Nature. 2005; 434: 113-118Crossref PubMed Scopus (2524) Google Scholar). SIRT1 contributes to cell survival by deacetylating and thereby repressing the activity of the tumor suppressor p53 (10Luo J. Nikolaev A.Y. Imai S. Chen D. Su F. Shiloh A. Guarente L. Gu W. Cell. 2001; 107: 137-148Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1873) Google Scholar, 11Vaziri H. Dessain S.K. Ng Eaton E. Imai S.I. Frye R.A. Pandita T.K. Guarente L. Weinberg R.A. Cell. 2001; 107: 149-159Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2267) Google Scholar, 12Langley E. Pearson M. Faretta M. Bauer U.M. Frye R.A. Minucci S. Pelicci P.G. Kouzarides T. EMBO J. 2002; 21: 2383-2396Crossref PubMed Scopus (744) Google Scholar). The transcriptional activation of stress-resistance genes by FOXO proteins is also regulated by SIRT1, i.e. SIRT1 enhances the induction of manganese superoxide dismutase by FOXO4 (13van der Horst A. Tertoolen L.G.J. de Vries-Smits L.M.M. Frye R.A. Medema R.H. Burgering B.M.T. J. Biol. Chem. 2004; 279: 28873-28879Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (463) Google Scholar) and of GADD45 by FOXO3 (14Brunet A. Sweeney L.B. Sturgill J.F. Chua K.F. Greer P.L. Lin Y. Tran H. Ross S.E. Mostoslavsky R. Cohen H.Y. Hu L.S. Cheng H.L. Jedrychowski M.P. Gygi S.P. Sinclair D.A. Alt F.W. Greenberg M.E. Science. 2004; 303: 2011-2015Crossref PubMed Scopus (2598) Google Scholar). SIRT1 also affects differentiation: it deacetylates and inhibits MyoD, a transcription factor that induces muscle differentiation, thereby suppressing the differentiation of skeletal myoblast cells (15Fulco M. Schiltz R.L. Iezzi S. King M.T. Zhao P. Kashiwaya Y. Hoffman E. Veech R.L. Sartorelli V. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 51-62Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (503) Google Scholar). Fetal mice express a high level of SIRT1 (16Sakamoto J. Miura T. Shimamoto K. Horio Y. FEBS Lett. 2004; 556: 281-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar), and SIRT1-null mice have abnormalities in various tissues, including sperm, heart, and eye (17McBurney M.W. Yang X. Jardine K. Hixon M. Boekelheide K. Webb J.R. Lansdorp P.M. Lemieux M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003; 23: 38-54Crossref PubMed Scopus (520) Google Scholar, 18Cheng H.L. Mostoslavsky R. Saito S. Manis J.P. Gu Y. Patel P. Bronson R. Appella E. Alt F.W. Chua K.F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 10794-10799Crossref PubMed Scopus (921) Google Scholar), suggesting an important role for SIRT1 in differentiation.SIRT1 has been believed to be a nuclear protein. For example, it is localized exclusively to the nucleus in male germ cells and in COS-7 cells transfected with SIRT1 cDNA (16Sakamoto J. Miura T. Shimamoto K. Horio Y. FEBS Lett. 2004; 556: 281-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar, 17McBurney M.W. Yang X. Jardine K. Hixon M. Boekelheide K. Webb J.R. Lansdorp P.M. Lemieux M. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003; 23: 38-54Crossref PubMed Scopus (520) Google Scholar). However, the cytoplasmic localization of SIRT1 has been reported recently in murine pancreatic β-cells and neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (19Moynihan K.A. Grimm A.A. Plueger M.M. Bernal-Mizrachi E. Ford E. Cras-Meneur C. Permutt M.A. Imai S. Cell Metab. 2005; 2: 105-117Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (540) Google Scholar, 20Chen I.Y. Lypowy J. Pain J. Sayed D. Grinberg S. Alcendor R.R. Sadoshima J. Abdellatif M. J. Biol. Chem. 2006; 281: 19369-19377Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar). Dynamic changes in the subcellular localization of Drosophila Sir2 during embryonic development have also been reported (21Rosenberg M.I. Parkhurst S.M. Cell. 2002; 109: 447-458Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar). Thus, the subcellular localization of SIRT1 may change during development and in response to physiological and pathological stimuli. Because SIRT1 deacetylates histones and various transcription factors, its subcellular localization must affect its function.Proteins of up to 40 kDa passively diffuse into and out of the nucleus, whereas larger proteins that exceed the diffusion limit of the nuclear membrane are actively transported via specific pathways. Nuclear importation of a protein is usually directed by a nuclear localization signal (NLS) 2The abbreviations used are: NLS, nuclear localization signal; NESs, nuclear export signals; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-hydroxykinase; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor-1; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; LMB, leptomycin B; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling.2The abbreviations used are: NLS, nuclear localization signal; NESs, nuclear export signals; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-hydroxykinase; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor-1; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; LMB, leptomycin B; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling. in the protein's amino acid sequence (22Robbins J. Dilworth S.M. Laskey R.A. Dingwall C. Cell. 1991; 64: 615-623Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1240) Google Scholar). The classical NLS is a cluster of basic amino acid residues, and a second type is the bipartite NLS, consisting of two stretches of basic amino acids separated by a spacer of 10-12 amino acid residues (23Mattaj I.W. Englmeier L. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998; 67: 265-306Crossref PubMed Scopus (1002) Google Scholar). The exportation of proteins from the nucleus is mediated by nuclear export signals (NESs) (24Wen W. Meinkoth J.L. Tsien R.Y. Taylor S.S. Cell. 1995; 82: 463-473Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (996) Google Scholar). The most common type of NES motif is a short stretch of amino acids containing closely spaced large hydrophobic residues such as leucine and isoleucine (25Bogerd H.P. Fridell R.A. Benson R.E. Hua J. Cullen B.R. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996; 16: 4207-4214Crossref PubMed Scopus (321) Google Scholar). Post-translational modifications can control the subcellular localization of a protein by modifying the function of the NLSs and/or NESs. In particular, phosphorylation is known to play an important role in this kind of modification (26Xu L. Massague J. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004; 5: 209-219Crossref PubMed Scopus (213) Google Scholar).In this study, we demonstrate that the subcellular localization of SIRT1 differs in various tissues and cells. Differentiation affects the cellular distribution of SIRT1 in cardiomyocytes. Consistent with this, SIRT1 is transported to the cytoplasm upon the differentiation of C2C12 myoblast cells. We found that the phosphoinositide 3-hydroxykinase (PI3K)-Akt pathway affects the subcellular localization of SIRT1. LY294002, an inhibitor of PI3K, induced the cytoplasmic localization of SIRT1 in C2C12 cells, whereas insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) attenuated the nuclear exclusion of SIRT1 by LY294002. We also used a heterokaryon shuttling assay to show that SIRT1 is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein. We identified two NLS and two NES motifs in SIRT1 by deletion and site-directed mutation analyses. The overexpression of nuclear (but not cytoplasmic) SIRT1 significantly inhibited apoptosis induced by antimycin A, a generator of reactive oxygen species. Thus, the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of SIRT1 seems to play a crucial role in regulating the function of SIRT1.EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESImmunohistochemistry—ddY male mice (3 months old) were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital (100 mg/ml) and perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 m sodium phosphate. Tissues were removed and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde, transferred to 30% sucrose overnight, mounted in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek, catalog no. 4583, Sakura Finetek), and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were sliced into 10-μmthick sections on a cryostat, mounted onto clean MAS-coated slides (Matsunami adhesive silane), air-dried, and stored at -80 °C until processing. For staining with a VECTASTAIN ABC kit (Vector Laboratories), sections were pretreated with 3% H2O2 for 30 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 30 min, and then incubated overnight with anti-SIRT1 antibody (16Sakamoto J. Miura T. Shimamoto K. Horio Y. FEBS Lett. 2004; 556: 281-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). The bound antibodies were labeled using the VECTASTAIN ABC kit or Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Molecular Probes) and examined by light microscopy (Olympus) or confocal microscopy (Radiance 2100, Bio-Rad).Subcellular Fractionation and Immunoblot Analysis—Adult (3 months old) and fetal (embryonic day 12.5) ddY mouse hearts were excised under anesthesia. The hearts were washed and homogenized in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. The fractionation of the heart cells into cytosolic and nuclear fractions was performed using a nuclear/cytosol fractionation kit (BioVision). Whole cell lysates were obtained using CelLytic M mammalian cell lysis/extraction reagent (Sigma). For immunoblotting, anti-SIRT1 (16Sakamoto J. Miura T. Shimamoto K. Horio Y. FEBS Lett. 2004; 556: 281-286Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar), anti-p300 (Upstate), anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Chemicon), anti-Akt or anti-phospho-Akt (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-total histone H3 (Upstate), or anti-acetylated or anti-non-acetylated histone H3 (Calbiochem) antibody was used.Cell Culture and Transfection—COS-7, C2C12, and L929 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Differentiation of the C2C12 cells was induced by supplementing DMEM with 2% horse serum. Transient transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) or a Nucleofector kit (Amaxa) following the manufacturers’ instructions. The cells received one of the following treatments: (i) 2% horse serum for 24 h, (ii) 10 nm leptomycin B (LMB) for 3 h, (iii) 10 or 30 μm LY294002 and/or 30 nm IGF1 for 24 h, or (iv) 100 μm antimycin A for 12 h. The cells were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with Hoechst 33342, and observed by confocal microscopy.Heterokaryon Shuttling Assays—Semiconfluent COS-7 cell monolayers were transfected with full-length SIRT1-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), its site-directed mutants, or p53-EGFP using Lipofectamine 2000 and then incubated for 24 h in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Untransfected L929 cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 for 15 min, washed, and then incubated in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum. Twenty-four hours later, the L929 cells were harvested. L929 cells (5 × 105) were then added to the transfected COS-7 cells in a 12-well dish and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The co-cultures were incubated with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide for 1 h, and the cells were fused by the addition of 5% polyethylene glycol 4000 for 3 min and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline. The fused cells were further incubated with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide in the presence or absence of LMB (10 nm) for 3 h before analysis.Plasmid Construction—To construct the SIRT1-EGFP fusion protein, the coding region of mouse SIRT1 cDNA lacking its stop codon was cloned into the vector pEGFP-N3 (Clontech) at the XhoI and SalI sites and in-frame with the EGFP coding region. The deletion mutants were constructed with PCR-derived SIRT1 fragments and pEGFP-N3 using the XhoI and SalI sites. Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out using a QuikChange XL mutagenesis kit (Stratagene).Assays for Apoptosis and Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity—Apoptotic cells were detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining using an apoptosis in situ detection kit (Wako). The lactate dehydrogenase activity of the culture medium was assayed in a spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad) using CytoTox 96 (Promega Corp.).Statistical Analysis—Differences in the data were tested by one-way analysis of variance. The Student-Newman-Keuls method was used for the post hoc test.RESULTSSubcellular Localization of SIRT1—We first examined the subcellular localization of SIRT1 in adult mouse brain and testis. Positive staining with anti-SIRT1 antibody was identified in some neuron-like cells of the striatum, where SIRT1 was expressed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1A, panel a), and in ependymal cells, where it was expressed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus (panel b). On the other hand, spermatocytes and round spermatids expressed SIRT1 only in their nuclei (Fig. 1A, panel c). We next examined whether differentiation alters the subcellular localization of SIRT1. SIRT1 was localized exclusively to the nucleus in the cardiomyocytes of day 12.5 embryos (Fig. 1B). In contrast, the myocytes of adult hearts showed diffuse cytoplasmic and nuclear staining for SIRT1 (Fig. 1B). To verify the difference in SIRT1 localization, subcellular fractions of hearts from fetal (embryonic day 12.5) and adult mice were analyzed by Western blotting. The 120-kDa SIRT1 band was detected only in the nuclear fraction in the embryonic hearts. In contrast, the intensity of the band was ∼8 times higher in the cytoplasmic fraction than in the nuclear fraction in the adult hearts (Fig. 1, C and D).We next examined whether SIRT1 might translocate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm in association with differentiation in the myoblast cell line C2C12. Transfected SIRT1-EGFP was expressed only in the nucleus in >90% of the cells. However, after differentiation induced by 2% horse serum, ∼40% of the cells expressed SIRT1-EGFP in the cytoplasm alone (n = 300 for each group) (Fig. 2A, left panels). Immunostaining of endogenous SIRT1 also indicated that SIRT1 was translocated from the nucleus to the cytoplasm in response to the differentiation stimulus (Fig. 2A, right panels). These data suggest that SIRT1 might be a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein.FIGURE 2A, localization of transfected SIRT1-EGFP (left panels) and endogenous SIRT1 (right panels) in C2C12 cells. Differentiation was induced by 2% horse serum. The expression of SIRT1-EGFP and endogenous SIRT1, nuclear staining with Hoechst 33342, and merged images are shown. B, panel a, effect of LY294002 and IGF1 on the subcellular distribution of SIRT1-EGFP. C2C12 cells were incubated with LY294002 (10 μm) and/or IGF-1 (30 nm) for 24 h. Note that LY294002 caused the cytoplasmic translocation of SIRT1, which was strongly inhibited by IGF1. Panel b, Western blot analysis of C2C12 cell lysates after treatment with IGF-1 and/or LY294002 (LY). Staining of Akt and phospho-Akt (P-Akt) is shown. C, heterokaryon shuttling assay with SIRT1-EGFP (panel a) and p53-EGFP (panel b). SIRT1-EGFP, p53-EGFP, Hoechst 33342 staining, and phase-contrast and merged images are shown. Arrows and arrowheads indicate the nuclei of L929 cells in the absence and presence of LMB, respectively.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Because other nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins such as p53 and the FOXO proteins are regulated by phosphorylation, we thought that the subcellular distribution of SIRT1 might also be controlled by kinases. We examined the effect of various kinase inhibitors on the localization of SIRT1-EGFP in C2C12 cells and found that LY294002, an inhibitor of PI3K, excluded SIRT1-EGFP from the nucleus dose-dependently (Fig. 2B, panel a) (data not shown). In control cells, the nuclear distribution of SIRT1-EGFP was not affected by IGF1, an upstream signal of the PI3K cascade. When IGF1 was added to cells treated with LY294002, SIRT1-EGFP was located in the nucleus of many of them (Fig. 2B). The effect of IGF1 and LY294002 on the PI3K cascade was confirmed by analyzing the phosphorylation of Akt, a downstream target of PI3K. Indeed, LY294002 inhibited the phosphorylation of Akt dose-dependently, which was partially reversed by co-administration of IGF1 (Fig. 2B, panel b). These results indicate that the subcellular localization of SIRT1 may be regulated by the PI3K signal cascade.To detect the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of SIRT1, we next performed a heterokaryon shuttling assay using COS-7 and L929 cells, both of which express SIRT1 exclusively in the nucleus. COS-7 cells transfected with SIRT1-EGFP were fused with untransfected L929 cells, which were stained with Hoechst 33342. If SIRT1 shuttled between the nucleus and the cytoplasm in the heterokaryon, SIRT1-EGFP should be found not only in the COS-7 nucleus, but also in the L929 nucleus. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 2C (panel a), SIRT1-EGFP was detected in L929 nuclei (indicated by arrows); quantitative analysis showed that L929 nuclei were positive for SIRT1-EGFP in >90% of the 51 heterokaryons examined. Because the L929 cells were not transfected with SIRT1-EGFP, it must have reached the L929 nucleus via the heterokaryon cytoplasm.CRM1, a member of the exportin family, mediates the exportation of proteins containing an NES (26Xu L. Massague J. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004; 5: 209-219Crossref PubMed Scopus (213) Google Scholar), and this exportation function is specifically inhibited by LMB (27Wolff B. Sanglier J.J. Wang Y. Chem. Biol. 1997; 4: 139-147Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (573) Google Scholar). LMB inhibited the translocation of SIRT1-EGFP from the COS-7 nucleus to the L929 nucleus in all the heterokaryons examined (n = 54) (Fig. 2C, panel a, arrowheads). The specificity of LMB in our experiments was examined by its effect on p53, a well known nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein, the nuclear exportation of which depends on CRM1 (28Stommel J.M. Marchenko N.D. Jimenez G.S. Moll U.M. Hope T.J. Wahl G.M. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 1660-1672Crossref PubMed Scopus (601) Google Scholar). LMB abolished the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of p53-EGFP (Fig. 2C, panel b), confirming that LMB actually inhibits CRM1-dependent nuclear exportation. These observations suggest that SIRT1 is exported by an NES-dependent mechanism.Identification of the NLSs in SIRT1—NLS-containing proteins are transported into the nucleus. We screened the amino acid sequence of SIRT1 to identify potential NLSs, which consist of a cluster of basic amino acids. Two were found in amino acids 31-38 and 223-230 (hereafter referred to as NLS1 and NLS2, respectively) (Fig. 3A). To determine whether NLS1 and NLS2 are functional, we constructed a series of SIRT1-EGFP deletion mutants and expressed them in COS-7 cells (Fig. 3A). Wildtype SIRT1-EGFP and the deletion mutants containing both NLS1 and NLS2 (SIRT1-(1-230) and SIRT1-(31-737)) were expressed exclusively in the nucleus (Fig. 3A, panels a, c, and d, respectively). However, the deletion of either NLS1 (SIRT1-(223-737) and SIRT1-(223-277)) (Fig. 3A, panels e and f, respectively) or NLS2 (SIRT1-(1-38)) (panel b) resulted in the distribution of the EGFP signal to both the cytoplasm and nucleus. When both NLS1 and NLS2 were deleted (SIRT1-(231-737)), the SIRT1-EGFP mutant was localized mostly to the cytoplasm (Fig. 3A, panel g). These results demonstrate that both NLS1 and NLS2 are functional and that the complete nuclear localization of the protein requires both NLSs.FIGURE 3Identification of the NLS. A, mapping the SIRT1 NLSs using deletion mutant constructs. Schematic diagrams of the EGFP fusion constructs used to map the NLSs are shown on the left. Theblueboxesdenotetheamino acid sequences of NLS1 and NLS2. COS-7 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding the fusion proteins. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 and analyzed. B, identification of NLS1 and NLS2 by site-directed mutagenesis. Schematic diagrams of the EGFP fusion constructs are shown on the left. The blue and light-blue boxes represent the wild-type (wt) and mutant (mtNLS1 and mtNLS2) NLSs, respectively. COS-7 cells were transfected with the corresponding plasmids and analyzed 48 h later. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. EGFP, Hoechst 33342 staining, and merged images are shown.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)We confirmed these findings using site-directed mutations introduced into NLS1 and/or NLS2 in full-length SIRT1-EGFP. Mutating the two adjacent arginines in NLS1 (amino acids 37 and 38) to alanine residues (mtNLS1) produced a protein that was equally distributed to the nucleus and cytoplasm (Fig. 3B, panel b). Similarly, mutating the four basic amino acids in NLS2 (amino acids 227-230) to alanines (mtNLS2) yielded an equal distribution of SIRT1-EGFP to the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 3B, panel c). The combination of mtNLS1 and mtNLS2 (mtNLS) resulted in the complete cytoplasmic localization of the protein (Fig. 3B, panel d). Thus, both NLS1 and NLS2 are involved in the nuclear importation of SIRT1.Identification of the NESs in SIRT1—Because LMB inhibited the nuclear exportation of SIRT1 (Fig. 2C), SIRT1 is likely to contain an NES, which consists of a largely hydrophobic leucine-rich sequence (29Nakielny S. Dreyfuss G. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1997; 9: 420-429Crossref PubMed Scopus (192) Google Scholar). To map the location of the NES(s) in SIRT1, another series of SIRT1-EGFP deletion mutants was constructed and introduced into COS-7 cells (Fig. 4). Because SIRT1 deletion clones that contained the two NLSs showed exclusively nuclear localization (Fig. 3A), it was difficult to analyze the exportation activity of an NES. Hence, we used deletion clones containing only NLS2, which had much less nuclear importation activity than did both NLSs together (Fig. 4A).FIGURE 4Mapping the SIRT1 NESs. A, shown are schematic diagrams of the EGFP fusion constructs used to map the NESs. B, COS-7 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding the fusion proteins diagrammed in A. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 and analyzed. The percentages of cells expressing SIRT1-EGFP in the nucleus alone (n), in both the nucleus and cytoplasm (n+c), and in the cytoplasm alone (c) are indicated. At least 200 cells were counted for each group. Representative microscopic images of EGFP and Hoechst 33342 staining and the merged panels are shown. C, shown are quantitative data from three separate series of experiments in which at least 200 cells were examined for each mutant. *, p < 0.05 versus cytoplasmic in SIRT1-(223-737); #, p < 0.05 versus cytoplasmic in SIRT1-(136-262).View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)In this series of experiments, several mutants showed considerable cell-to-cell variability in their subcellular distributions. Therefore, we divided the expression patterns of mutant clones into three groups: cells expressing mutant SIRT1-EGFP in the nucleus alone, in both the nucleus and cytoplasm, and in the cytoplasm alone; and the percentage of each group in the total number of transfected cells was compared (Fig. 4). When the C-terminal region of SIRT1 was sequentially deleted, SIRT1-(223-737), SIRT1-(223-489), SIRT1-(223-474), and SIRT1-(223-445) all exhibited similar subcellular distributions, with ∼15% of the cells expressing the protein in the cytoplasm alone (Fig. 4B, panels b-e, respectively). However, SIRT1-(223-354) was not detected in the cytoplasm alone in any cell (Fig. 4B, panel f), indicating that the nuclear exportation activity of this mutant is very weak. Thus, amino acids 355-445 might contain an NES. Because SIRT1-(223-277) showed a similar subcellular distribution compared with SIRT1-(223-354) (Fig. 4B, panel g), amino acids 278-354 are unlikely to contain an NES.We next examined whether there is another NES domain in the N-terminal region by sequential deletion of the N t
Referência(s)