Darwin's Theory of Sexual Selection and the Data Subsumed by it, in the Light of Recent Research
1938; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 72; Issue: 742 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/280795
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Avian ecology and behavior
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessDarwin's Theory of Sexual Selection and the Data Subsumed by it, in the Light of Recent ResearchJulian S. HuxleyJulian S. Huxley Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 72, Number 742Sep. - Oct., 1938 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/280795 Views: 59Total views on this site Citations: 87Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Allen J. Moore, Joel W. McGlothlin, Jason B. Wolf, David Westneat Runaway evolution from male‐male competition, Ecology Letters 25, no.22 (Nov 2021): 295–306.https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13921John O Martin, Nancy Tyler Burley, Marc Naguib Elucidating mutual mate choice: effects of trial design on preferences of male zebra finches, Behavioral Ecology 32, no.66 (Aug 2021): 1306–1320.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab097David M Shuker, Charlotta Kvarnemo, Leigh Simmons The definition of sexual selection, Behavioral Ecology 32, no.55 (Aug 2021): 781–794.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab055Amber M. Makowicz, Mitchel J. Daniel, Blake C. Jones, Pearl R. Rivers, Mysia Dye, Meredith R. Kuzel, Alexa G. Guerrera, Sarah Kettelkamp, Courtney Whitcher, Emily H. DuVal Foundations and Frontiers in Mate Choice Review of: Rosenthal, G. 2017. Mate Choice: The Evolution of Sexual Decision Making from Microbes to Humans. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 648 pp. ISBN: 978‐0‐691‐15067‐3; $US55.00 HB, Evolution 74, no.77 (May 2020): 1575–1583.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14018Miguel A Bedoya-Pérez, Emilio A Herrera, Elizabeth R Congdon, Loren Hayes , Journal of Mammalogy 101, no.33 ( 2020): 718.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyaa032Maria R. Servedio, John M. Powers, Russell Lande, Trevor D. Price Evolution of sexual cooperation from sexual conflict, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no.4646 (Oct 2019): 23225–23231.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904138116Michael J. Ryan, Karin L. Akre, Alexander T. Baugh, Ximena E. Bernal, Amanda M. Lea, Caitlin Leslie, Meghan B. Still, Dennis C. Wylie, and A. Stanley Rand Nineteen Years of Consistently Positive and Strong Female Mate Preferences despite Individual Variation, The American Naturalist 194, no.22 (Jun 2019): 125–134.https://doi.org/10.1086/704103Simon C. Griffith , Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7 ( 2019).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00455Willow R. Lindsay, Staffan Andersson, Badreddine Bererhi, Jacob Höglund, Arild Johnsen, Charlotta Kvarnemo, Erica H. Leder, Jan T. Lifjeld, Calum E. Ninnes, Mats Olsson, Geoff A. Parker, Tommaso Pizzari, Anna Qvarnström, Rebecca J. Safran, Ola Svensson, Scott V. Edwards Endless forms of sexual selection, PeerJ 7 (Nov 2019): e7988.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7988Katharina Weiss, Gudrun Herzner, Erhard Strohm Sexual selection and the evolution of male pheromone glands in philanthine wasps (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae), BMC Evolutionary Biology 17, no.11 (Jun 2017).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0963-6Tim Clutton-Brock Reproductive competition and sexual selection, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372, no.17291729 (Jul 2017): 20160310.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0310Michael T. Ghiselin What is sexual selection? A rent-seeking approach, Journal of Bioeconomics 18, no.22 (May 2016): 153–158.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-016-9223-xAgustina Birba, Martín Roberto Ramallo, Fabiana Lo Nostro, Renata Guimarães Moreira, Matías Pandolfi Reproductive and parental care physiology of Cichlasoma dimerus males, General and Comparative Endocrinology 221 (Sep 2015): 193–200.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.02.004Laurel B. Symes and Trevor D. Price Sexual Stimulation and Sexual Selection, The American Naturalist 185, no.44 (Jun 2015): iii–iv.https://doi.org/10.1086/680414Mary Jane West-Eberhard Darwin's forgotten idea: The social essence of sexual selection, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 46 (Oct 2014): 501–508.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.015Leonida Fusani, Julia Barske, Lainy D. Day, Matthew J. Fuxjager, Barney A. Schlinger Physiological control of elaborate male courtship: Female choice for neuromuscular systems, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 46 (Oct 2014): 534–546.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.07.017Thanh-Lan Gluckman Pathways to elaboration of sexual dimorphism in bird plumage patterns, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 111, no.22 (Dec 2013): 262–273.https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12211Christine W. Miller, Erik I. Svensson Sexual Selection in Complex Environments, Annual Review of Entomology 59, no.11 (Jan 2014): 427–445.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162044Jenni E Pettay, Anna Rotkirch, Alexandre Courtiol, Markus Jokela, Virpi Lummaa Effects of remarriage after widowhood on long-term fitness in a monogamous historical human population, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68, no.11 (Oct 2013): 135–143.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1630-6T. H. Clutton-Brock, E. Huchard Social competition and selection in males and females, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368, no.16311631 (Dec 2013): 20130074.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0074Tory H. Williams, Tamra C. Mendelson Male and female responses to species-specific coloration in darters (Percidae: Etheostoma), Animal Behaviour 85, no.66 (Jun 2013): 1251–1259.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.012Maria R. Servedio, Trevor D. Price, Russell Lande Evolution of displays within the pair bond, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280, no.17571757 (Apr 2013): 20123020.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.3020Joseph A. Tobias, Robert Montgomerie, Bruce E. Lyon The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, no.16001600 (Aug 2012): 2274–2293.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0280Kimberly A. Rosvall Intrasexual competition in females: evidence for sexual selection?, Behavioral Ecology 22, no.66 (Sep 2011): 1131–1140.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr106M. A. Potapov, V. I. Evsikov Evolutionary ecology of animal fertility: Factors of epigamic sexual selection in rodents, Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research 1, no.44 (Aug 2011): 264–273.https://doi.org/10.1134/S207905971104006X Laura K. Weir , James W. A. Grant , Jeffrey A. Hutchings , The Influence of Operational Sex Ratio on the Intensity of Competition for Mates, The American Naturalist 177, no.22 (Jul 2015): 167–176.https://doi.org/10.1086/657918Juan Luis Parra COLOR EVOLUTION IN THE HUMMINGBIRD GENUS COELIGENA, Evolution 64, no.22 (Feb 2010): 324–335.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00827.xBy Mark V. Lomolino[email protected] and James H. Brown[email protected] The Reticulating Phylogeny of Island Biogeography Theory Mark V. Lomolino and James H. Brown, The Quarterly Review of Biology 84, no.44 (Jul 2015): 357–390.https://doi.org/10.1086/648123By Tim Clutton-Brock and [email protected]Katherine McAuliffe[email protected] Female Mate Choice in Mammals Tim Clutton-Brock, The Quarterly Review of Biology 84, no.11 (Jul 2015): 3–27.https://doi.org/10.1086/596461Tim Clutton-Brock Sexual selection in females, Animal Behaviour 77, no.11 (Jan 2009): 3–11.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.026JOHN HUNT, CASPER J. BREUKER, JENNIFER A. SADOWSKI, ALLEN J. MOORE Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22, no.11 (Jan 2009): 13–26.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01633.xKrushnamegh Kunte Mimetic butterflies support Wallace's model of sexual dimorphism, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275, no.16431643 (Apr 2008): 1617–1624.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0171Cécile Vanpé, Petter Kjellander, Maxime Galan, Jean-François Cosson, Stéphane Aulagnier, Olof Liberg, A. J. Mark Hewison Mating system, sexual dimorphism, and the opportunity for sexual selection in a territorial ungulate, Behavioral Ecology 19, no.22 (Dec 2007): 309–316.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm132Joan Roughgarden, Meeko Oishi, Erol Akçay Reproductive Social Behavior: Cooperative Games to Replace Sexual Selection, Science 311, no.57635763 (Feb 2006): 965–969.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110105Joseph N. Abraham Insect Choice and Floral Size Dimorphism: Sexual Selection or Natural Selection?, Journal of Insect Behavior 18, no.66 (Nov 2005): 743–756.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-8737-1Tim H. Clutton-Brock What is sexual selection?, (May 2004): 24–36.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542459.004Jeanne A. Zeh, David W. Zeh Toward a New Sexual Selection Paradigm: Polyandry, Conflict and Incompatibility (Invited Article), Ethology 109, no.1212 (Dec 2003): 929–950.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00945.xCaroline C Curtis, Philip K Stoddard Mate preference in female electric fish, Brachyhypopomus pinnicaudatus, Animal Behaviour 66, no.22 (Aug 2003): 329–336.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2216Uta Skamel Beauty and Sex Appeal: Sexual Selection of Aesthetic Preferences, (Jan 2003): 173–200.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07142-7_6KEN YASUKAWA Female Song Sparrows Prefer Males That Learn Well, BioScience 52, no.1212 (Jan 2002): 1064.https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[1064:FSSPMT]2.0.CO;2Mariko Hiraiwa-Hasegawa The sight of the peacock’s tail makes me sick: The early arguments on sexual selection, Journal of Biosciences 25, no.11 (Mar 2000): 11–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985176Eric Post, Rolf Langvatn, Mads C. Forchhammer, Nils Chr. Stenseth Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96, no.88 (Apr 1999): 4467–4471.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.8.4467Melanie K. Hunt, Caroline S. Crean, Roger J. Wood, André S. Gilburn Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection in the Mediterranean fruitfly (Diptera, Tephritidae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64, no.33 (Jan 2008): 385–396.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1998.tb00339.xThomas H. Day, André S. Gilburn Sexual Selection in Seaweed Flies, (Jan 1997): 1–57.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60376-9R. Haven Wiley, Joe Poston PERSPECTIVE: INDIRECT MATE CHOICE, COMPETITION FOR MATES, AND COEVOLUTION OF THE SEXES, Evolution 50, no.44 (May 2017): 1371–1381.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03911.xDaniel D. Wiegmann, Jeffrey R. Baylis, Michael H. Hoff SEXUAL SELECTION AND FITNESS VARIATION IN A POPULATION OF SMALLMOUTH BASS, MICROPTERUS DOLOMIEUI (PISCES: CENTRARCHIDAE), Evolution 46, no.66 (May 2017): 1740–1753.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01166.x The evolution of bird song: comparative analyses, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 338, no.12841284 (Jan 1997): 165–187.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1992.0137Bryan N. Danforth The morphology and behavior of dimorphic males in Perdita portalis (Hymenoptera : Andrenidae), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29, no.44 (Nov 1991): 235–247.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163980Michael J. Ryan, A. Stanley Rand THE SENSORY BASIS OF SEXUAL SELECTION FOR COMPLEX CALLS IN THE TÚNGARA FROG, PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS (SEXUAL SELECTION FOR SENSORY EXPLOITATION), Evolution 44, no.22 (May 2017): 305–314.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05200.xMeredith F. Small Female choice in nonhuman primates, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 32, no.S10S10 (Jan 1989): 103–127.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330320506Milo Keynes, G. Ainsworth Harrison Sir Julian Huxley, FRS — Select Bibliography, (Jan 1989): 243–247.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09958-0_16John R. Durant Julian Huxley and the Development of Evolutionary Studies, (Jan 1989): 26–40.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09958-0_3Kenneth Y. Kaneshiro Speciation via sexual selection versus adaptive evolution in Hawaiian Drosophila, International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 8, no.4-5-64-5-6 (Sep 2011): 447–452.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400022463Kenneth Y. Kaneshiro The dynamics of sexual selection and its pleiotropic effects, Behavior Genetics 17, no.66 (Nov 1987): 559–569.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065532Yoshinori Hibino Female choice for male gregariousness in a Stink bug,Megacopta punctissimum (Montandon) (Heteroptera, Plataspidae), Journal of Ethology 4, no.22 (Dec 1986): 91–95.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348110Michael E.N. Majerus The genetics and evolution of female choice, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1, no.11 (Jul 1986): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(86)90056-XS. J. Arnold Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection, Experientia 41, no.1010 (Oct 1985): 1296–1310.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01952072 Randy Thornhill Cryptic Female Choice and Its Implications in the Scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps, The American Naturalist 122, no.66 (Oct 2015): 765–788.https://doi.org/10.1086/284170JERRAM L. BROWN Intersexual selection, Nature 302, no.59085908 (Apr 1983): 472–472.https://doi.org/10.1038/302472c0Ronald E. Thresher, Jack T. Moyer Male success, courtship complexity and patterns of sexual selection in three congeneric species of sexually monochromatic and dichromatic damselfishes (Pisces: Pomacentridae), Animal Behaviour 31, no.11 (Feb 1983): 113–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80179-1Linda Marie Fedigan Dominance and reproductive success in primates, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 26, no.S1S1 (Oct 2012): 91–129.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330260506Kazuo Hirai Directional flow of male scent released byPseudaletia separata walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its repellent effect on adults and larvae of four noctuid and one phycitine moth, Journal of Chemical Ecology 8, no.1010 (Oct 1982): 1263–1270.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987759 Eliot B. Spiess Do Female Flies Choose Their Mates?, The American Naturalist 119, no.55 (Oct 2015): 675–693.https://doi.org/10.1086/283942Michael J. Wade, Stevan J. Arnold The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedence, Animal Behaviour 28, no.22 (May 1980): 446–461.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80052-2Randy Thornhill MATE CHOICE IN HYLOBITTACUS APICALIS (INSECTA: MECOPTERA) AND ITS RELATION TO SOME MODELS OF FEMALE CHOICE, Evolution 34, no.33 (May 2017): 519–538.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04841.x The evolution of bird coloration, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences 287, no.10181018 (Jan 1997): 63–130.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1979.0053William A. Searcy SEXUAL SELECTION AND BODY SIZE IN MALE RED‐WINGED BLACKBIRDS, Evolution 33, no.22 (May 2017): 649–661.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04718.xErnst Mayr Geschlechtliche und natürliche Auslese, (Jan 1979): 59–79.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67110-4_5Daniel Otte HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF SEXUAL SELECTION THEORY, (Jan 1979): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-108750-0.50007-0W.D. Hamilton WINGLESS AND FIGHTING MALES IN FIG WASPS AND OTHER INSECTS, (Jan 1979): 167–220.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-108750-0.50011-2Gordon Gordh, Paul DeBach Courtship behavior in the Aphytis lingnanensis group, its potential usefulness in taxonomy, and a review of sexual behavior in the parasitic Hymenoptera (Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae), Hilgardia 46, no.22 (Feb 2014): 37–75.https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v46n02p037Stephen T. Emlen, Lewis W. Oring Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating Systems, Science 197, no.43004300 (Jul 1977): 215–223.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.327542Richard Haas SEXUAL SELECTION IN NOTHOBRANCHIUS GUENTHERI (PISCES: CYPRINODONTIDAE), Evolution 30, no.33 (May 2017): 614–622.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00938.xJ.H. Crook, J.E. Ellis, J.D. Goss-Custard Mammalian social systems: Structure and function, Animal Behaviour 24, no.22 (May 1976): 261–274.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80035-8George A. Bartholomew A MODEL FOR THE EVOLUTION OF PINNIPED POLYGYNY, Evolution 24, no.33 (May 2017): 546–559.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1970.tb01790.xPriscille Touraille Bibliographie, (): 357–412.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsmsh.9717Geoff A. Parker, Ian C. W. Hardy, Mark Briffa Foreword, (): xi–xx.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051248.001Austin P. Platt, Lincoln P. Brower MIMETIC VERSUS DISRUPTIVE COLORATION IN INTERGRADING POPULATIONS OF LIMENITIS ARTHEMIS AND ASTYANAX BUTTERFLIES, Evolution 22, no.44 (May 2017): 699–718.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1968.tb03471.xE. Bösiger Sur le rôle de la sélection sexuellen dans l'évolution, Experientia 16, no.66 (Jun 1960): 270–273.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02157668Alexander F. Skutch THE INCUBATION PATTERNS OF BIRDS., Ibis 99, no.11 (Apr 2008): 69–93.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1957.tb01934.xUli Weidmann Verhaltensstudien an der Stockente (Anas platyrhynchos L.), Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 13, no.22 (Apr 2010): 208–271.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1956.tb01672.xJulian Huxley Morphism and evolution, Heredity 9, no.11 (Apr 1955): 1–52.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1955.1E. E. Leppik Some viewpoints on the origin and evolution of flowering plants, Acta Biotheoretica 11, no.22 (Jan 1955): 45–56.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01602631 E. E. Leppik The Ability of Insects to Distinguish Number, The American Naturalist 87, no.835835 (Sep 2015): 229–236.https://doi.org/10.1086/281778A J Bateman Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila, Heredity 2, no.33 (Dec 1948): 349–368.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1948.21LESTER R. ARONSON SECTION OF BIOLOGY: PROBLEMS IN THE BEHAVIOR AND PHYSIOLOGY OF A SPECIES OF AFRICAN MOUTHBREEDING FISH*, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences 11, no.2 Series II2 Series II (Apr 2012): 33–42.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1948.tb00956.xN. Tinbergen Die Übersprungbewegung, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 4, no.11 (Apr 2010): 1–40.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1940.tb00616.x
Referência(s)