Voltar
Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares
BIBTEX RIS

The Selection of Disputes for Litigation

1984; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 13; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/467732

ISSN

1537-5366

Autores

George L. Priest, Benjamin Klein,

Tópico(s)

Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Resumo

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Selection of Disputes for LitigationGeorge L. Priest and Benjamin KleinGeorge L. Priest Search for more articles by this author and Benjamin Klein Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 13, Number 1Jan., 1984 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467732 Views: 163Total views on this site Citations: 732Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1984 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nikolaos Papageorgiadis, Andreas Procopiou, Wolfgang Sofka Unintended consequences of outcome based compensation – How CEO bonuses, stocks and stock options affect their firms' patent litigation, Research Policy 52, no.88 (Oct 2023): 104816.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104816Keith N. Hylton Mutual Optimism and Risk Preferences in Litigation, International Review of Law and Economics 15 (Aug 2023): 106157.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2023.106157Shay Lavie Stepwise liability: Between the preponderance rule and proportional liability, The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 63 (Jul 2023).https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127231185887Jianhua Hou, Xiucai Yang, Haoyang Song, Haiyue Yao Will patent family be dormant? Research on the identification and characteristics of sleeping beauty’s patent family, Scientometrics 92 (Jul 2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04784-5Jennifer K. Robbennolt, Jessica Bregant, Verity Winship Settlement schemas: How laypeople understand civil settlement, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 71 (Jun 2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12360Daniel L. Chen Judicial compliance in district courts, International Review of Law and Economics 74 (Jun 2023): 106122.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2022.106122Marius Zipf, Johannes Glückler, Tamar Khuchua, Emmanuel Lazega, François Lachapelle, Jakob Hoffmann The Judicial Geography of Patent Litigation in Germany: Implications for the Institutionalization of the European Unified Patent Court, Social Sciences 12, no.55 (May 2023): 311.https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12050311Vadim Volkov, Dmitriy Skougarevskiy, Ruslan Kuchakov Whither repeat players? Litigation experience and success in court: Evidence from Russian commercial courts, Social Science Research 112 (May 2023): 102875.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102875Murali Jagannathan, Venkata Santosh Kumar Delhi Decoding a construction organisation's tendency to litigate: an understanding through financial statements, Built Environment Project and Asset Management 166 (Apr 2023).https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2022-0128Ling Wang, Yujia Zhang, Yushan Yan Offensive patent litigation strategic choice: An organizational routine perspective, Technovation 122 (Apr 2023): 102663.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102663Fridrik Mar Baldursson, Richard Portes, Eirikur Elis Thorlaksson Capital controls as a bargaining device: The case of Iceland, Review of International Economics 79 (Mar 2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12668Todd A. Collins, Matthew E. Baker From Roadside Stops to the Courthouse Stairs: Defendant Race and the Attorney’s Role in Routine Cases, Journal of Law and Courts 80 (Mar 2023): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2023.1Roberta Troisi, Gaetano Alfano Is “justice hurried actually justice buried”? An organisational perspective of the Italian criminal justice, International Journal of Public Sector Management 36, no.11 (Jan 2023): 94–109.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2022-0159Rudi Bekkers, Christian Catalini, Arianna Martinelli, Cesare Righi, Timothy Simcoe Disclosure rules and declared essential patents, Research Policy 52, no.11 (Jan 2023): 104618.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104618Erik Hovenkamp and Steven C. Salop Litigation with Inalienable Judgments, The Journal of Legal Studies 52, no.11 (May 2023): 1–50.https://doi.org/10.1086/721979Jennifer K. Robbennolt, Jessica Bregant, Verity Winship Settlement Schemas: How Laypeople Understand Civil Settlement, SSRN Electronic Journal 71 (Jan 2023).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4425805Dhruv Aggarwal, Lubomir P. Litov Corruption and Cash Policy: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, SSRN Electronic Journal 38 (Jan 2023).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4348485Keith N Hylton Information Costs and the Civil Justice System, American Law And Economics Review 24, no.22 (Mar 2023): 407–448.https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahac009Ben Depoorter, Jef De Mot Optimism & Expenditures: The Effect on Settlements, Review of Law & Economics 18, no.22 (Oct 2022): 199–221.https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0075David K Hausman, Daniel E Ho, Mark S Krass, Anne McDonough Executive Control of Agency Adjudication: Capacity, Selection, and Precedential Rulemaking, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 21 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewac012Sultan Mehmood The Impact of Presidential Appointment of Judges: Montesquieu or the Federalists?, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 14, no.44 (Oct 2022): 411–445.https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20210176Monika Stachowiak-Kudła, Janusz Kudła Path dependence in administrative adjudication: the role played by legal tradition, Constitutional Political Economy 33, no.33 (Oct 2021): 301–325.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-021-09352-8Yun-chien Chang, Daniel Klerman Settlement Around the World: Settlement Rates in the Largest Economies, Journal of Legal Analysis 14, no.11 (Apr 2023): 80–175.https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laac006Jessica E. Hickle Case Sensitive: Lawyers and the Formation of Legal Arguments in Tanzania, Law & Social Inquiry 47, no.33 (Dec 2021): 857–884.https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2021.40Lawrence J. White Antitrust policy for the 2020s: Some sensible ways forward, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 31 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13313Yu. D. Rodionova Conflict resolution in public procurement: The cases of Russia and Kazakhstan, Voprosy Ekonomiki , no.77 (Jul 2022): 85–103.https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-7-85-103 Bibliography, (Apr 2022): 125–134.https://doi.org/10.7767/9783205212935.125Ryan Hübert and Ryan Copus Political Appointments and Outcomes in Federal District Courts, The Journal of Politics 84, no.22 (Feb 2022): 908–922.https://doi.org/10.1086/716947Christopher A. Whytock Transnational Litigation in U.S. Courts: A Theoretical and Empirical Reassessment, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 19, no.11 (Feb 2022): 4–59.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12306Roy Baharad, Chen Cohen, Shmuel Nitzan Litigation with adversarial efforts, International Review of Law and Economics 69 (Mar 2022): 106042.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2021.106042Anastasia Antsygina, Madina Kurmangaliyeva Settlements under unequal access to justice, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 193 (Jan 2022): 237–268.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.11.020Elisabetta Ottoz Patent Litigation, (Jul 2022): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_585-2Patricio Nazareno Profiling the American Judge: A Comparative Argument About Ideological Conceptions of Judging, (Jan 2022): 117–140.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87718-7_9Huiyan Zhang Characteristics of litigated patents in weak intellectual property rights regimes: Evidence from China, SSRN Electronic Journal 92 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4196569Erik Hovenkamp, Steven C. Salop Litigation with Inalienable Judgments, SSRN Electronic Journal 67 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072927Yun-chien Chang, William Hubbard New Empirical Tests for Classic Litigation Selection Models: Evidence from a Low Settlement Environment, American Law and Economics Review 23, no.22 (Oct 2021): 348–394.https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahab008Thomas J. Miceli, Kathleen Segerson The Role of Bias in Economic Models of Law, Review of Law & Economics 17, no.22 (Nov 2021): 419–452.https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0043Christoph Engel The Impact of Behavioral Economics on the Law: Introduction, Review of Law & Economics 17, no.22 (Nov 2021): 241–251.https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0068Alexandre Samy de Castro Judicial attitudes under shifting jurisprudence: Evidence from Brazil’s new drug law of 2006, International Review of Law and Economics 68 (Dec 2021): 106006.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2021.106006Enrico Böhme, Jonas Severin Frank, Wolfgang Kerber Optimal Incentives for Patent Challenges in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Review of Industrial Organization 59, no.33 (May 2021): 503–528.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-021-09815-0Cento Veljanovski The Impact of Employers' Liability on 19 th ‐Century U.K. Coalmining Fatalities, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 18, no.33 (Sep 2021): 660–683.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12293Naomi Gershoni Individual vs. group decision-making: Evidence from a natural experiment in arbitration proceedings, Journal of Public Economics 201 (Sep 2021): 104479.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104479Mary R. Rose, Nisa R. Sheikh Examining Value-Added: Jury-Trial Rights in Termination of Parental Rights Cases, Justice System Journal 77 (Aug 2021): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2021.1967232Christian Helmers, Yassine Lefouili, Brian J Love, Luke McDonagh The Effect of Fee Shifting on Litigation: Evidence from a Policy Innovation in Intermediate Cost Shifting, American Law and Economics Review 23, no.11 (Mar 2021): 56–99.https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahab001Julian Schumacher, Christoph Trebesch, Henrik Enderlein Sovereign defaults in court, Journal of International Economics 131 (Jul 2021): 103388.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103388Margaret E. Slade Vertical Mergers: A Survey of Ex Post Evidence and Ex Ante Evaluation Methods, Review of Industrial Organization 58, no.44 (Oct 2020): 493–511.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-020-09795-7Benoit Pierre Freyens, Paul Oslington The impact of unfair dismissal regulation: Evidence from an Australian natural experiment, LABOUR 35, no.22 (Apr 2021): 264–290.https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12193Shivaram Devarakonda, Elko Klijn, Jeffrey Reuer, Valérie Duplat Institutional differences and arbitration mechanisms in international joint ventures, Global Strategy Journal 11, no.22 (Jun 2019): 125–155.https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1351Ryan Hübert Biased Judgments without Biased Judges: How Legal Institutions Cause Errors, The Journal of Politics 83, no.22 (Apr 2021): 753–766.https://doi.org/10.1086/710323Joshua B Fischman How Many Cases Are Easy?, Journal of Legal Analysis 13, no.11 (Dec 2021): 595–656.https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa010Colleen Honigsberg, Sharon P. Katz, Sunay Mutlu, Gil Sadka State contract law and the use of accounting information in debt contracts, Review of Accounting Studies 26, no.11 (Aug 2020): 124–171.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09559-4Vicki T. Huang An Empirical Analysis of the Fashion Design Case Law of Australia, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 52, no.33 (Feb 2021): 242–264.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01013-5Daniel H. Cole, Elizabeth Baldwin, Katie Meehan Goldilocks Deference?, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 18, no.11 (Feb 2021): 167–188.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12278Deli Yang Global Piracy and Strategic Responses, (Apr 2021): 259–294.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54034-0_11Bryan C. McCannon Debundling accountability: prosecutor and public defender elections in Florida, Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.1332/251569121X16219290616762Sílvio Sobral Garcez Júnior, Bruno Ramos Eloy, João Antonio Belmino dos Santos A QUALIDADE DOS PRIVILÉGIOS PATENTÁRIOS CONCEDIDOS NO BRASIL SOB A ÓTICA DAS AÇÕES JUDICIAIS DE NULIDADE DE PATENTES, Revista Direito GV 17, no.11 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202116Yun-chien Chang, Daniel M. Klerman Settlement Around the World: Settlement Rates in the Largest Economies, SSRN Electronic Journal 7 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793078Jeffrey Macher, John W. Mayo, David E. M. Sappington, Mark Whitener The Evolution of Judicial Standards: Evidence from Litigated Merger Trials, SSRN Electronic Journal 24 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3809174Cento Veljanovski The Impact of Employers’ Liability on 19th Century UK Coalmining Fatalities, SSRN Electronic Journal 25 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3907977Stephanie Denis, Matthew Kozora, Minwen Li, Jonathan Sokobin The Selection of Claims in Securities Arbitration for Settlement: A Text-Based Analysis, SSRN Electronic Journal 131 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3995556Rameshwor Bhandari, Junu Paudel Public Trust and Confidence towards Judiciary of Nepal: A Study based on Nepal National Governance Survey 2017/18, Journal of Governance and Development (JGD) , no.Number 2Number 2 (Dec 2020): 85–101.https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2020.16.2.5Erya Yang Optimism and pessimism in bargaining and contests, International Review of Law and Economics 64 (Dec 2020): 105935.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105935Benoit Pierre Freyens, Xiaodong Gong Judicial arbitration of unfair dismissal cases: The role of peer effects, International Review of Law and Economics 64 (Dec 2020): 105947.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105947Samantha Bielen, Peter Grajzl, Wim Marneffe The resolution process and the timing of settlement of medical malpractice claims, Health Economics, Policy and Law 15, no.44 (Apr 2019): 509–529.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133119000185Chang-Ching Lin, Yun-chien Chang, Kong-Pin Chen Knowledge in youth is wisdom in age: an empirical study of attorney experience in torts litigation, International Review of Law and Economics 63 (Sep 2020): 105913.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105913Giovanni Maggi, Robert W. Staiger Learning by ruling and trade disputes, Journal of International Economics 126 (Sep 2020): 103351.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103351Adam M. Samaha, Michael Heise, Gregory C. Sisk Inputs and Outputs on Appeal: An Empirical Study of Briefs, Big Law, and Case Complexity, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 17, no.33 (Aug 2020): 519–555.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12263Raphael Zingg, Erasmus Elsner Protection heterogeneity in a harmonized European patent system, European Journal of Law and Economics 50, no.11 (May 2020): 87–131.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09651-9Claudine Desrieux, Romain Espinosa La barémisation des indemnités pour licenciement abusif : quelques éléments d’analyse empirique, Revue économique Vol. 71, no.33 (Jun 2020): 527–556.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.713.0527Jorge Lemus, Emil Temnyalov Pay-for-Delay with Follow-On Products, Review of Industrial Organization 56, no.44 (Feb 2020): 697–714.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-020-09750-6Alan Dignam, Peter Oh Rationalising corporate disregard, Legal Studies 40, no.22 (May 2020): 187–208.https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2020.7Eun Young Song Divided we stand: How contestation can facilitate institutionalization, Journal of Management Studies 57, no.44 (Oct 2019): 837–866.https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12532Eldar Maksymov, Jeffrey Pickerd, D. Jordan Lowe, Mark E. Peecher, Andrew Reffett, Dain C. Donelson The Settlement Norm in Audit Legal Disputes: Insights from Prominent Attorneys, Contemporary Accounting Research 174 (May 2020).https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12569Ruben Jacobo-Rubio, John L. Turner, and Jonathan W. Williams The Distribution of Surplus in the US Pharmaceutical Industry: Evidence from Paragraph iv Patent-Litigation Decisions, The Journal of Law and Economics 63, no.22 (Sep 2020): 203–238.https://doi.org/10.1086/707407Leshui He A theory of pre-filing settlement and patent assertion entities, International Journal of Industrial Organization 70 (May 2020): 102618.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102618Claire B. Wofford “Why Try? Comparing the Aims of Parties and Amici in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation”, Justice System Journal 41, no.22 (Apr 2020): 81–97.https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2020.1743799Juan F. Jimeno, Marta Martínez-Matute, Juan S. Mora-Sanguinetti Employment protection legislation, labor courts, and effective firing costs, IZA Journal of Labor Economics 9, no.11 (Mar 2020).https://doi.org/10.2478/izajole-2020-0002Yun-chien Chang, Su-hao Tu Two-way selection between flat-fee attorneys and litigants: theoretical and empirical analyses, European Journal of Law and Economics 49, no.11 (Sep 2017): 131–164.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-017-9566-3Peter Grajzl, Shikha Silwal The functioning of courts in a developing economy: evidence from Nepal, European Journal of Law and Economics 49, no.11 (Nov 2017): 101–129.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-017-9570-7C.N.V. Krishnan, Steven Davidoff Solomon, Randall S. Thomas How do legal standards matter? An empirical study of special litigation committees, Journal of Corporate Finance 60 (Feb 2020): 101543.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101543Brishti Guha Pretrial Beliefs and Verdict Accuracy: Costly Juror Effort and Free Riding, The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 20, no.22 (Feb 2020).https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2018-0020Kenneth Ayotte Disagreement and Capital Structure Complexity, The Journal of Legal Studies 49, no.11 (Jun 2020): 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1086/708671Aurélie Ouss and John Rappaport Is Police Behavior Getting Worse? Data Selection and the Measurement of Policing Harms, The Journal of Legal Studies 49, no.11 (Jun 2020): 153–198.https://doi.org/10.1086/708705Christian Adam, Michael W. Bauer, Miriam Hartlapp, Emmanuelle Mathieu Motivations: When Conflict Leads to Litigation, (Sep 2019): 83–125.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21629-0_5Adam M. Samaha, Michael Heise, Gregory C. Sisk Inputs and Outputs on Appeal: An Empirical Study of Briefs, Big Law, and Case Complexity, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555841Erik Hovenkamp, Steven C. Salop Asymmetric Stakes in Antitrust Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3563843Michael B. Abramowicz Modeling Settlement Bargaining with Algorithmic Game Theory, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3709964Christopher Fernandez, Andrew Fernandez, Mladen I. Vidovich Medicolegal Characteristics of Cardiac Tamponade Litigation: A Review of the LexisNexis Academic Database, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 21, no.11 (Jan 2020): 122–126.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2019.08.018Vadim Volkov, Dmitriy Skougarevskiy, Ruslan Kuchakov Whither repeat players?, SSRN Electronic Journal 62 (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3744017Yun-chien Chang Introduction, (Dec 2019): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694469.001Michael D. Frakes, Melissa F. Wasserman Do Patent Law Suits Target Invalid Patents?, (Dec 2019): 6–29.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694469.002J.J. Prescott, Alexander Sanchez Platform Procedure, (Dec 2019): 30–72.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694469.003Yun-chien Chang, William H. J. Hubbard Speedy Adjudication in Hard Cases and Low Settlement Rates in Easy Cases, (Dec 2019): 73–109.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694469.004Anthony Niblett How Lower Courts Respond to a Change in a Legal Rule, (Dec 2019): 110–131.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694469.005Michael Heise When Winning Is Not Enough, (Dec 2019): 179–203.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694469.008Florencia Marotta-Wurgler The Evolution of Case Influence in Modern Consumer Standard Form Contracts, (Dec 2019): 204–222.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694469.009John P. Connolly, Lewis M. Wasserman Free Speech in Public Employment: Has the Supreme Court Clarified Matters? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Lane v Franks, Review of Law & Economics 16, no.22 (Dec 2019).https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2019-0030Talia Bar, Jesse Kalinowski Patent validity and the timing of settlements, International Journal of Industrial Organization 67 (Dec 2019): 102535.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2019.102535Eric Helland The Role of Ideology in Judicial Evaluations of Experts, The Journal of Law and Economics 62, no.44 (Feb 2020): 579–611.https://doi.org/10.1086/705838Jussi Heikkilä, Mirva Peltoniemi Great expectations: Learning the boundaries of design rights, Research Policy 48, no.99 (Nov 2019): 103795.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.004Joachim Henkel, Hans Zischka How many patents are truly valid? Extent, causes, and remedies for latent patent invalidity, European Journal of Law and Economics 48, no.22 (Aug 2019): 195–239.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-019-09627-4Deli Yang Patent Litigation Strategy and Its Effects on the Firm, International Journal of Management Reviews 21, no.44 (Apr 2019): 427–446.https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12202António Osório, Barbara Luppi Argumentation quantity and quality: A litigation success function, International Review of Law and Economics 59 (Sep 2019): 21–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2019.05.001Paul Pecorino, Mark Van Boening An empirical analysis of litigation with discovery: The role of fairness, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 81 (Aug 2019): 172–184.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.06.009Ryan Hübert Getting Their Way: Bias and Deference to Trial Courts, American Journal of Political Science 63, no.33 (May 2019): 706–718.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12434Julian Nyarko We’ll See You in . . . Court! The lack of arbitration clauses in international commercial contracts, International Review of Law and Economics 58 (Jun 2019): 6–24.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2018.12.004Svenja Hippel, Sven Hoeppner Biased judgements of fairness in bargaining: A replication in the laboratory, International Review of Law and Economics 58 (Jun 2019): 63–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2019.02.001Bronwyn H Hall Is there a role for patents in the financing of new innovative firms?, Industrial and Corporate Change 28, no.33 (Feb 2019): 657–680.https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty074Shoshana Vasserman, Muhamet Yildiz Pretrial negotiations under optimism, The RAND Journal of Economics 50, no.22 (Apr 2019): 359–390.https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12273Kathryn E. Spier, J.J. Prescott Contracting on litigation, The RAND Journal of Economics 50, no.22 (Apr 2019): 391–417.https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12274Audra Boone, Brian Broughman, and Antonio J. Macias Merger Negotiations in the Shadow of Judicial Appraisal, The Journal of Law and Economics 62, no.22 (Aug 2019): 281–319.https://doi.org/10.1086/704146Lars Hornuf, Lars Klöhn Do judges hate speculators?, European Journal of Law and Economics 47, no.22 (Jan 2019): 147–169.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-018-09608-zYan Cai, Eunmi Kim Sustainable Development in World Trade Law: Application of the Precautionary Principle in Korea-Radionuclides, Sustainability 11, no.77 (Apr 2019): 1942.https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071942Svetlana Avdasheva, Svetlana Golovanova, Yannis Katsoulacos The Impact of Performance Measurement on the Selection of Enforcement Targets by Competition Authorities: The Russian Experience in an International Context, Public Performance & Management Review 42, no.22 (Apr 2018): 329–356.https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1441036Daniel L. Chen Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law, Artificial Intelligence and Law 27, no.11 (Dec 2018): 15–42.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9237-xS. Avdasheva, S. Golovanova, Y. Katsoulacos Optimal Institutional Structure of Competition Authorities Under Reputation Maximization: A Model and Empirical Evidence from the Case of Russia, Review of Industrial Organization 54, no.22 (Jun 2018): 251–282.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-018-9640-1Marta Katarzyna KOŁACZ, Alberto QUINTAVALLA, Orlin YALNAZOV Who Should Regulate Disruptive Technology?, European Journal of Risk Regulation 10, no.11 (May 2019): 4–22.https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2019.22MICHAEL BERLEMANN, ROBIN CHRISTMANN Determinants of in-court settlements: empirical evidence from a German trial court, Journal of Institutional Economics 15, no.11 (Jan 2018): 143–162.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000637Alan C. Marco, Richard D. Miller Patent Examination Quality and Litigation: Is There a Link?, International Journal of the Economics of Business 26, no.11 (Mar 2019): 65–91.https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2018.1553286Frederick Schauer Friedrich Waismann and the Distinctive Logic of Legal Language, (Sep 2019): 261–277.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25008-9_12J. Ryan Lamare, David B. Lipsky Resolving Discrimination Complaints in Employment Arbitration: An Analysis of the Experience in the Securities Industry, ILR Review 72, no.11 (Jan 2018): 158–184.https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917747520Aurelie Ouss, John Rappaport Is Police Behavior Getting Worse? The Importance of Data Selection in Evaluating the Police, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3325382Jorge Lemus, Emil Temnyalov Pay-for-delay with Follow-on Products, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3349376Daniel Bonneau, Bryan C. McCannon Bargaining in the Shadow of the Trial? Deaths of Law Enforcement Officials and the Plea Bargaining Process, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3457809Saleem Gul Alternative and Indigenous Dispute Resolution, (Jan 2019): 17–38.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8516-9.ch002Rachel L. Wellhausen International Investment Law and Foreign Direct Reinvestment, International Organization 73, no.44 (Oct 2019): 839–858.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000225Shay Lavie Asymmetric Information in Litigation, (Apr 2019): 78–81.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_704Elisabetta Ottoz Patent Litigation, (Apr 2019): 1559–1566.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_585Samantha Bielen, Wim Marneffe, Wim Vereeck Litigation Decision, (Apr 2019): 1352–1360.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_589Claudio Fassio, Aldo Geuna, Federica Rossi Which governance of university–industry interactions increases the value of industrial inventions?, Industrial and Corporate Change 78 (Dec 2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty058Michael McBride, Stergios Skaperdas, Pi-Han Tsai Why go to court? Bargaining failure under the shadow of trial with complete information, European Journal of Political Economy 55 (Dec 2018): 151–168.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.12.001Daniel Klerman, Yoon-Ho Alex Lee, Lawrence Liu Litigation and Selection with Correlated Two-Sided Incomplete Information, American Law and Economics Review 17 (Oct 2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahy005Emmanuelle Mathieu, Michael W. Bauer Domestic resistance against EU policy implementation: member states motives to take the Commission to Court, Journal of European Integration 40, no.66 (Dec 2018): 667–682.https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1503656Steffen Juranek Investing in legal advice, Information Economics and Policy 44 (Sep 2018): 28–46.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2018.06.002Benito Arruñada Evolving practice in land demarcation, Land Use Policy 77 (Sep 2018): 661–675.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.050Kent Barnett, Christina L. Boyd, Christopher J. Walker The Politics of Selecting Chevron Deference, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 15, no.33 (Aug 2018): 597–619.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12187Claudine Desrieux, Romain Espinosa Case selection and judicial decision-making: evidence from French labor courts, European Journal of Law and Economics 3 (Jul 2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-018-9594-7Matthew Knepper When the Shadow Is the Substance: Judge Gender and the Outcomes of Workplace Sex Discrimination Cases, Journal of Labor Economics 36, no.33 (Apr 2018): 623–664.https://doi.org/10.1086/696150Raphaël Franck Judicial impartiality in politically charged cases, Constitutional Political Economy 29, no.22 (Oct 2017): 193–229.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-017-9252-zMichael L. Barnett, Julia Hartmann, Robert M. Salomon Have You Been Served? Extending the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Lawsuits, Academy of Management Discoveries 4, no.22 (Jun 2018): 109–126.https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2015.0030Magnus Söderberg, Flavio M. Menezes, Miguel Santolino Regulatory behaviour under threat of court reversal: Theory and evidence from the Swedish electricity market, Energy Economics 71 (Mar 2018): 302–310.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.006Axel Haus, Steffen Juranek Non-practicing entities: Enforcement specialists?, International Review of Law and Economics 53 (Mar 2018): 38–49.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.09.005Hiroko Okudaira The economic costs of court decisions concerning dismissals in Japan: Identification by judge transfers, International Review of Law and Economics 53 (Mar 2018): 60–75.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.09.006Mark Broom, David Collins, Trung Hieu Vu, Philip Thomas The four regions in settlement space: a game-theoretical approach to investment treaty arbitration. Part II: cases, Law, Probability and Risk 17, no.11 (Dec 2017): 79–98.https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgx019Jonah B. Gelbach The Reduced Form of Litigation Models and the Plaintiff's Win Rate, The Journal of Law and Economics 61, no.11 (Sep 2018): 125–157.https://doi.org/10.1086/699151Michael Hellwig, Kai Hüschelrath, Ulrich Laitenberger Settlements and Appeals in the European Commission’s Cartel Cases: An Empirical Assessment, Review of Industrial Organization 52, no.11 (Feb 2017): 55–84.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-017-9572-1Rogelio Alicor L. Panao, Bea Xandra De Leon Balancing the interests of labor and capital: an empirical analysis of Philippine Supreme Court labor cases from 1987 to 2016, Philippine Political Science Journal 39, no.11 (Jul 2018): 24–46.https://doi.or

Referência(s)