Antinuclear antibodies in recurrent idiopathic pericarditis: Prevalence and clinical significance
2008; Elsevier BV; Volume: 136; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.05.020
ISSN1874-1754
AutoresMassimo Imazio, Antonio Brucato, Andrea Doria, Giovanni Brambilla, Anna Ghirardello, Alessandra Romito, Giuseppe Natale, G. Palmieri, Rita Trinchero, Yehuda Adler,
Tópico(s)Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
ResumoA positive result for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), often as a fortuitous observation, may be cause for concern in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP), nevertheless data are lacking on their prevalence and clinical significance. This study is sought to investigate the prevalence and clinical significance of ANA in IRP.ANA titres were assessed in consecutive patients with recurrent pericarditis, and matched healthy controls. Baseline and follow-up data were recorded and compared according to ANA results.A total of 145 consecutive patients with recurrent pericarditis were studied: 122 patients with IRP, 23 patients with pericarditis due to known etiologies (rheumatologic diagnoses and postpericardiotomy syndrome), and 122 healthy controls. ANA were detected in 53 of 122 (43.4%) patients with IRP, and in only 12 of 122 (9.8%) controls (p or =1/640) were not recorded. Women were at increased risk for ANA (OR 2.22 95%CI 1.07-4.60; p=0.033). During a mean follow-up of 32 months, complications and new diagnoses were similar in patients with or without ANA positivity.Low-positive titres are more common in patients with IRP than in controls, suggesting a possible autoimmune pathogenesis. Nevertheless, they are often a clinically non-specific finding. Routine serologic testing for ANA suggests a source for recurrent pericarditis in less than 10% of cases, and in these cases other evidence typically suggests the underlying disease.
Referência(s)