Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Natural Selection and Sex Change in Pandalid Shrimp: Test of a Life-History Theory

1979; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 113; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/283428

1537-5323

Eric L. Charnov,

Marine and fisheries research

Previous articleNext article No AccessNatural Selection and Sex Change in Pandalid Shrimp: Test of a Life-History TheoryEric L. CharnovEric L. Charnov Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 113, Number 5May, 1979 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283428 Views: 11Total views on this site Citations: 93Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1979 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Susanna Pla, Chiara Benvenuto, Isabella Capellini, Francesc Piferrer Switches, stability and reversals in the evolutionary history of sexual systems in fish, Nature Communications 13, no.11 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30419-zNora Villamil, Xinji Li, Emily Seddon, John R Pannell Simulated herbivory enhances leaky sex expression in the dioecious herb Mercurialis annua, Annals of Botany 129, no.11 (Oct 2021): 79–86.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab129Ricardo Sousa, Paulo Henriques, Joana Vasconcelos, Graça Faria, Rodrigo Riera, Ana Rita Pinto, João Delgado, Stephen J. Hawkins First observations of hermaphroditism in the patellid limpet Patella piperata Gould, 1846, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 99, no.77 (Jun 2019): 1615–1620.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315419000559T. Mariella Canales, Rodrigo Wiff, Juan Carlos Quiroz, Dante Queirolo Estimation of natural mortality in two demersal squat lobster species off Chile, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 99, no.77 (Sep 2019): 1639–1650.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315419000717Daniel Nettle, Willem E. Frankenhuis The evolution of life-history theory: a bibliometric analysis of an interdisciplinary research area, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286, no.18991899 (Mar 2019): 20190040.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0040Robin S. Waples, Stefano Mariani, Chiara Benvenuto Consequences of sex change for effective population size, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285, no.18931893 (Dec 2018): 20181702.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1702Ingibjörg G Jónsdóttir, Gudrún G Thórarinsdóttir, Jónas P Jonasson, Mikko Heino Influence of decreased biomass on the ogive of sex change of northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis), ICES Journal of Marine Science 75, no.33 (Nov 2017): 1054–1062.https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx211Yuuya Tachiki and Itsuro Koizumi Absolute versus Relative Assessments of Individual Status in Status-Dependent Strategies in Stochastic Environments, The American Naturalist 188, no.11 (May 2016): 113–123.https://doi.org/10.1086/686899Abigail E. Cahill, Alia Rehana Juman, Aaron Pellman-Isaacs, and William T. Bruno Physical and Chemical Interactions with Conspecifics Mediate Sex Change in a Protandrous Gastropod Crepidula fornicata, The Biological Bulletin 229, no.33 (Sep 2016): 276–281.https://doi.org/10.1086/BBLv229n3p276Sachi Yamaguchi, Yoh Iwasa Phenotype adjustment promotes adaptive evolution in a game without conflict, Theoretical Population Biology 102 (Jun 2015): 16–25.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2015.03.004Eric L Charnov, Henrik Gislason, John G Pope Evolutionary assembly rules for fish life histories, Fish and Fisheries 14, no.22 (Apr 2012): 213–224.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00467.xA Brante, C Vilches, A Quiñones Role of population traits and local social interactions in sex-change plasticity of the protandric marine gastropod Crepidula coquimbensis, Marine Ecology Progress Series 458 (Jul 2012): 123–132.https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09739J. Matthew Hoch, Abigail E. Cahill Variation in size at sex-change among natural populations of the protandrous hermaphrodite, Crepidula fornicata (Gastropoda, Calyptraeidae), Marine Biology 159, no.44 (Jan 2012): 897–905.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1867-4Lisa E. Schwanz, Fredric J. Janzen, Stephen R. Proulx SEX ALLOCATION BASED ON RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE CONDITION, Evolution 11 (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00916.xStephen M. Shuster Sexual selection and mating systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, no.supplement_1supplement_1 (Jun 2009): 10009–10016.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901132106Cecelia M. Miles, Marta L. Wayne Life history trade-offs and response to selection on egg size in the polychaete worm Hydroides elegans, Genetica 135, no.33 (May 2008): 289–298.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-008-9277-3Stephen M. Shuster The expression of crustacean mating strategies, (Mar 2008): 224–250.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542602.010PHILLIP B. FENBERG, KAUSTUV ROY Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know?, Molecular Ecology 17, no.11 (Jan 2008): 209–220.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03522.xSUSUMU CHIBA A review of ecological and evolutionary studies on hermaphroditic decapod crustaceans, Plankton and Benthos Research 2, no.33 (Jan 2007): 107–119.https://doi.org/10.3800/pbr.2.107Rachel Collin SEX RATIO, LIFE-HISTORY INVARIANTS, AND PATTERNS OF SEX CHANGE IN A FAMILY OF PROTANDROUS GASTROPODS, Evolution 60, no.44 (Apr 2006): 735–745.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01152.xD. J. Allsop, S. A. West Constant relative age and size at sex change for sequentially hermaphroditic fish, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16, no.55 (Sep 2003): 921–929.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00590.xRaymond T. Bauer REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY OF A PROTANDRIC SIMULTANEOUS HERMAPHRODITE, THE SHRIMP LYSMATA WURDEMANNI (DECAPODA: CARIDEA: HIPPOLYTIDAE), Journal of Crustacean Biology 22, no.44 (Nov 2002): 742–749.https://doi.org/10.1651/0278-0372(2002)022[0742:REOAPS]2.0.CO;2Yuta Onishi, Susumu Chiba, Seiji Goshima Reproductive Cycle of the Protandric Shrimp Pandalus latirostris in Saroma Lagoon, BENTHOS RESEARCH 56, no.11 (Jan 2001): 9–20.https://doi.org/10.5179/benthos1996.56.1_9Karin L. Decker, Diana Pilson Biased sex ratios in the dioecious annual Croton texensis (Euphorbiaceae) are not due to environmental sex determination, American Journal of Botany 87, no.22 (Feb 2000): 221–229.https://doi.org/10.2307/2656909B.I. Bergström The biology of Pandalus, (Jan 2000): 55–245.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2881(00)38003-8 Colette M. St. Mary Sequential Patterns of Sex Allocation in Simultaneous Hermaphrodites: Do We Need Models That Specifically Incorporate This Complexity? Mary, The American Naturalist 150, no.11 (Jul 2015): 73–97.https://doi.org/10.1086/286057J. Stamps, V.V. Krishnan Sexual bimaturation and sexual size dimorphism in animals with asymptotic growth after maturity, Evolutionary Ecology 11, no.11 (Jan 1997): 21–39.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018479312191Eric L. Charnov Sperm competition and sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites, Evolutionary Ecology 10, no.55 (Sep 1996): 457–462.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237878Akihisa Hattori, Norio Yamamura Co-existence of subadult males and females as alternative tactics of breeding post acquisition in a monogamous and protandrous anemonefish, Evolutionary Ecology 9, no.33 (May 1995): 292–303.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237775Gordon A. Fox The effect of time-varying mortality and carbon assimilation on models of carbon allocation in annual plants, Evolutionary Ecology 6, no.66 (Nov 1992): 500–518.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270694François M. Wernerus, Valentina Tessari The Influence of Population Density on the Mating System of Thalassoma pavo, a Protogynous Mediterranean Labrid Fish, Marine Ecology 12, no.44 (Dec 1991): 361–368.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.1991.tb00264.xEric L. Charnov Pure numbers, invariants and symmetry in the evolution of life histories, Evolutionary Ecology 5, no.33 (Jul 1991): 339–342.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214237 Dimensionless numbers and the assembly rules for life histories, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 332, no.12621262 (Jan 1997): 41–48.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1991.0031Anders Berglund To change or not to change sex: A comparison between twoOphryotrocha species (Polychaeta), Evolutionary Ecology 5, no.22 (Apr 1991): 128–135.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270829Eric L. Charnov, David Berrigan Evolution of life history parameters in animals with indeterminate growth, particularly fish, Evolutionary Ecology 5, no.11 (Jan 1991): 63–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02285246Eiichiro Kinoshita, Yasushi Harada Sex Change and Population Dynamics in Arisaema (Araceae) II. An Examination on the Evolutionary Stability of Sex Changing Schedule of A. serratum (Thunb.) Schott, Plant Species Biology 5, no.22 (Dec 1990): 225–234.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1990.tb00182.xEric L. Charnov, David Berrigan Dimensionless numbers and life history evolution: Age of maturity versus the adult lifespan, Evolutionary Ecology 4, no.33 (Jul 1990): 273–275.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214335Anders Berglund Sequential hermaphroditism and the size-advantage hypothesis: an experimental test, Animal Behaviour 39, no.33 (Mar 1990): 426–433.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80405-1 Eric L. Charnov , and Todd E. Dawson Environmental Sex Determination with Overlapping Generations, The American Naturalist 134, no.55 (Oct 2015): 806–816.https://doi.org/10.1086/285012Eric L. Charnov, James J. Bull The primary sex ratio under environmental sex determination, Journal of Theoretical Biology 139, no.44 (Aug 1989): 431–436.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80063-3Eric L. Charnov Natural selection on age of maturity in shrimp, Evolutionary Ecology 3, no.33 (Jul 1989): 236–239.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270724Eric L. Charnov, J. J. Bull Non-fisherian sex ratios with sex change and environmental sex determination, Nature 338, no.62116211 (Mar 1989): 148–150.https://doi.org/10.1038/338148a0Steven A. Frank, Ian R. Swingland Sex ratio under conditional sex expression, Journal of Theoretical Biology 135, no.33 (Dec 1988): 415–418.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80256-XDouglas Y. Shapiro Behavioral influences on gene structure and other new ideas concerning sex change in fishes, Environmental Biology of Fishes 23, no.44 (Dec 1988).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005240Robert R. Warner Sex change and the size-advantage model, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 3, no.66 (Jun 1988): 133–136.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(88)90176-0Robert R. Warner Sex change in fishes: hypotheses, evidence, and objections, Environmental Biology of Fishes 22, no.22 (Jun 1988).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001539Ronald W. Davies, R. N. Singhal Cosexuality in the Leech, Nephelopsis obscura (Erpobdellidae), International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 13, no.11 (Jan 1988): 55–64.https://doi.org/10.1080/01688170.1988.10510342Eric L. Charnov, Bo Bergstrom Alternative life histories in sex changing shrimp: a phenotype limited ESS, Evolutionary Ecology 1, no.22 (Apr 1987): 107–111.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02067394Steven A. Frank Individual and population sex allocation patterns, Theoretical Population Biology 31, no.11 (Feb 1987): 47–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(87)90022-0T. G. Forrest Insect size tactics and developmental strategies, Oecologia 73, no.22 (Jan 1987): 178–184.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377505F. JOHN VERNBERG Crustacea, (Jan 1987): 301–372.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-544791-1.50013-3 Denise L. Breitburg Effect of Variability in Recruitment on Selection for Protogynous Sex Change, The American Naturalist 128, no.44 (Oct 2015): 551–560.https://doi.org/10.1086/284587Eiichiro Kinoshita Size-sex relationship and sexual dimorphism in Japanese Arisaema (Araceae), Ecological Research 1, no.22 (Nov 2018): 157–171.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347018Eric L. Charnov Size advantage may not always favor sex change, Journal of Theoretical Biology 119, no.33 (Apr 1986): 283–285.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80141-2E. G. Leigh, E. A. Herre, E. A. Fischer Sex allocation in animals, Experientia 41, no.1010 (Oct 1985): 1265–1276.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01952069A. Fleminger Dimorphism and possible sex change in copepods of the family Calanidae, Marine Biology 88, no.33 (Sep 1985): 273–294.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00392589Steven G. Hoffman, Mark P. Schildhauer, Robert R. Warner THE COSTS OF CHANGING SEX AND THE ONTOGENY OF MALES UNDER CONTEST COMPETITION FOR MATES, Evolution 39, no.44 (May 2017): 915–927.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00432.xPaulette Bierzychudek Determinants of gender in Jack-in-the-pulpit: the influence of plant size and reproductive history, Oecologia 65, no.11 (Dec 1984): 14–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384456Robert M. May Sexual systems: When to be which sex, Nature 301, no.58955895 (Jan 1983): 16–17.https://doi.org/10.1038/301016a0Wolfgang Wickler, Uta Seibt Monogamy in Crustacea and Man, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 57, no.3-43-4 (Apr 2010): 215–234.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1981.tb01924.xE. L. Charnov, R. L. Los-den Hartogh, W. T. Jones, J. van den Assem Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment, Nature 289, no.57935793 (Jan 1981): 27–33.https://doi.org/10.1038/289027a0John H. Werren Sex Ratio Adaptations to Local Mate Competition in a Parasitic Wasp, Science 208, no.44484448 (Jun 1980): 1157–1159.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.208.4448.1157Donald Symons Précis of The evolution of human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 171–181.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000412XJohn Alcock Beyond the sociobiology of sexuality: predictive hypotheses, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 181–182.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004131Irwin S. Bernstein Motives, intentions, science, and sex, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 182–183.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004143Donald A. Dewsbury Methods in the two sociobiologies, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 183–184.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004155Milton Diamond The biosocial evolution of human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 184–186.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004167H. J. Eysenck Sociobiology - standing on one leg, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 186–186.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004179Ted L. Huston, Gilbert Geis Forcible rape and human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 186–187.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004180Michael T. Ghiselin Is sex sufficient?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 187–189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004192Jack P. Hailman Fitness, function, fidelity, fornication, and feminine philandering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 189–189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004209Julia R. Heiman Selecting for a sociobiological fit, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 189–190.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004210Mark R. Hoffman An interactionist perspective on human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 190–191.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004222Glenn E. King Pair bonding and proximal mechanisms, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 191–192.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004234Michael E. Lamb On the origins and implications of sex differences in human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 192–193.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004246J. B. Lancaster, C. S. Lancaster The division of labor and the evolution of human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 193–193.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004258W. C. McGrew The proper study of sociobiological mankind is sex, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 193–194.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000426XDiane McGuinness Male and female choice in human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 194–195.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004271G. Mitchell Sex differences and intent, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 195–196.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004283Mark Ridley Konrad Lorenz and Humpty Dumpty: some ethology for Donald Symons, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 196–196.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004295Michael Ruse Is science sexist?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 197–198.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004301Donald Stone Sade Human sexuality: hints for an alternative explanation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 198–199.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004313H.D. Steklis Problems of comparative primate sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 199–200.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004325Dorothy Tennov The clarification of proximate mechanisms, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 200–200.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004337J. Richard Udry Female sexual adaptability: a consequence of the absence of natural selection among females, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 201–202.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004350Shirley Weitz Sex differences in sexuality: what is their relevance to sex roles?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 202–202.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004362Richard E. Whalen Evolutionary causation: how proximate is ultimate?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 202–203.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004374Donald Symons The evolution of human sexuality revisited, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 203–214.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004386Robert R. Warner, Steven G. Hoffman LOCAL POPULATION SIZE AS A DETERMINANT OF MATING SYSTEM AND SEXUAL COMPOSITION IN TWO TROPICAL MARINE FISHES ( THALASSOMA SPP.), Evolution 34, no.33 (May 2017): 508–518.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04840.xDouglas Y. Shapiro, Roger Lubbock Group sex ratio and sex reversal, Journal of Theoretical Biology 83, no.33 (Apr 1980): 411–426.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(80)90048-XD. C. Freeman, K. T. Harper, E. L. Charnov Sex change in plants: Old and new observations and new hypotheses, Oecologia 47, no.22 (Jan 1980): 222–232.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346825David G. Lloyd Parental strategies of angiosperms, New Zealand Journal of Botany 17, no.44 (Dec 1979): 595–606.https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1979.10432573 Richard Shine , and J. J. Bull The Evolution of Live-Bearing in Lizards and Snakes, The American Naturalist 113, no.66 (Oct 2015): 905–923.https://doi.org/10.1086/283444