Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The research–implementation gap: how practitioners and researchers from developing countries perceive the role of peer-reviewed literature in conservation science

2014; Cambridge University Press; Volume: 49; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1017/s0030605313001634

1365-3008

Céline Gossa, Martin Fisher, E.J. Milner‐Gulland,

Animal and Plant Science Education

Abstract Conservation research has a poor record of translating science into action. Previous surveys have investigated the lack of information exchange between researchers and practitioners by focusing on the uptake of peer-reviewed literature by practitioners from developed countries. They largely ignore conservation practitioners and researchers from developing countries, for whom accessing scientific data may be more difficult. This survey investigates how practitioners and researchers from developing countries access the scientific information needed in their work, and the place of peer-reviewed literature in this process. Our results suggest that practitioners access and use peer-reviewed literature; however, both practitioners and researchers mainly obtain information from open-access journals and do not base their choice on a journal's Impact Factor. Furthermore, researchers and practitioners in developing countries appear to be looking for more direct collaboration to ensure research is relevant to their needs, as well as more open-access journals and new ways to disseminate information.