Artigo Revisado por pares

The Logic of Econometric Business-Cycle Research

1941; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 49; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/255695

ISSN

1537-534X

Autores

Tjalling C. Koopmans,

Tópico(s)

Market Dynamics and Volatility

Resumo

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Logic of Econometric Business-Cycle ResearchTjalling KoopmansTjalling KoopmansPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 49, Number 2Apr., 1941 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/255695 Views: 5Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Robert W. Dimand, Sylvie Rivot From "science as measurement" to "measurement and theory": the Cowles Commission and contrasting empirical methodologies at the University of Chicago, 1943 to 1955, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28, no.66 (Aug 2021): 940–964.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2021.1963799, A. O. Moscardini, K. Lawler, , T. Vlasova, THE IMPACT OF THE LUCAS CRITIQUE ON MACROECONOMICS: A BRAIDING OF ECONOMIC AND CYBERNETIC INSIGHTS, Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics 6, no.216216 (Jan 2021): 34–43.https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2021/216-3/4Robert W. Dimand Macroeconomic dynamics at the Cowles Commission from the 1930s to the 1950s, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27, no.44 (May 2020): 564–581.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2020.1766524Thomas Rahlf Statistical Inference, (Aug 2019): 1519–1556.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00181-0_16Amanar Akhabbar Bibliographie de Wassily Leontief (sélection), (Jan 2019): 211–226.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.enseditions.11407Marcel Boumans Methodological institutionalism as a transformation of structural econometrics, Review of Political Economy 28, no.33 (Jul 2016): 417–425.https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2016.1154752Thomas Rahlf Statistical Inference, (Jun 2015): 471–507.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40406-1_16Olav Bjerkholt TRYGVE HAAVELMO AT THE COWLES COMMISSION, Econometric Theory 31, no.11 (Jun 2014): 1–84.https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646661400019XThomas Rahlf Statistical Inference, (Apr 2014): 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_16-1Thomas Rahlf Statistical Inference, (Dec 2014): 1–31.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_16-2Olav Bjerkholt WRITING "THE PROBABILITY APPROACH" WITH NOWHERE TO GO: HAAVELMO IN THE UNITED STATES, 1939–1944, Econometric Theory 23, no.0505 (May 2007): 775.https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646660707034XDeborah A. Redman Karl Popper's Theory of Science and Econometrics: The Rise and Decline of Social Engineering, Journal of Economic Issues 28, no.11 (Jan 2016): 67–99.https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1994.11505520Renzo Orsi Testing in econometrics: Are economic theories testable?, Journal of the Italian Statistical Society 2, no.33 (Dec 1993): 365–380.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02589070 Bibliography, (Jan 1987): 229–247.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-70267-8.50015-1Robert Batemarco Positive economics and praxeology: The clash of prediction and explanation, Atlantic Economic Journal 13, no.22 (Jul 1985): 31–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02304177Günter Menges Zur Geschichte und zum Wesen der Ökonometrie, (Jan 1961): 9–25.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-19008-0_1Richard Stone MODEL BUILDING AND THE SOCIAL ACCOUNTS: A SURVEY, Review of Income and Wealth 4, no.11 (Mar 1955): 27–77.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1955.tb01064.x

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX