Revisão Revisado por pares

Robotic urological surgery: a perspective

2004; Wiley; Volume: 95; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.05241.x

ISSN

1464-410X

Autores

Prokar Dasgupta, Adam Jones, Inderbir S. Gill,

Tópico(s)

Ureteral procedures and complications

Resumo

BJU InternationalVolume 95, Issue 1 p. 20-23 Robotic urological surgery: a perspective Prokar Dasgupta, Prokar Dasgupta Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals and GKT School of Medicine, London,Search for more papers by this authorAdam Jones, Adam Jones Royal Berkshire and Battle Hospitals, Reading, andSearch for more papers by this authorInderbir S. Gill, Corresponding Author Inderbir S. Gill Section of Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USAInderbir S. Gill, Head, Section of Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Glickman Urological Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue/A100, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Prokar Dasgupta, Prokar Dasgupta Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals and GKT School of Medicine, London,Search for more papers by this authorAdam Jones, Adam Jones Royal Berkshire and Battle Hospitals, Reading, andSearch for more papers by this authorInderbir S. Gill, Corresponding Author Inderbir S. Gill Section of Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USAInderbir S. Gill, Head, Section of Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Glickman Urological Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue/A100, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 20 December 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05241.xCitations: 32Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL REFERENCES 1 Bluethmann W, Ambose R, Diftler M et al. Robonaut: a robot designed to work with humans in space. Auton Robots 2003; 14: 179– 97 2 Shah J, Mackay S, Rockall T, Vale J, Darzi A. 'Urobotics': robots in urology. BJU Int 2001; 88: 313– 20 3 Guillonneau B. What robotics in urology? A current point of view. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 103– 5 4 Gettman MT, Blute ML, Peschel R, Bartsch G. Current status of robotics in urologic laparoscopy. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 106– 12 5 Dasgupta P, Challacombe B. Robotics in urology. BJU Int 2004; 93: 247– 8 6 Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB et al. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 1995; 154: 2134– 6 7 Cadeddu JA, Stoianovici D, Kavoussi LR. Robotic surgery in urology. Urol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 75– 85 8 Bowersox JC, Cornum RL. Remote operative urology using a surgical telemanipulator system: preliminary observations. Urology 1998; 52: 17– 22 9 Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. Urology 1999; 53: 1099– 103 10 Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery. a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. J Urol 2001; 58: 893– 8 11 Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q et al. The Probot-an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 1997; 211: 317– 25 12 Su LM, Stoianovici D, Jarrett TW et al. Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: comparison with standard manual access. J Endourol 2002; 16: 471– 5 13 Desai MM, Gill IS, Kaouk JH et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology 2002; 60: 1104– 7 14 Horgan S, Vanuno D, Sileri P, Cicalese L, Benedetti E. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2002; 73: 1474– 9 15 Hoznek A, Zaki SK, Samadi DB et al. Robotic assisted kidney transplantation: an initial experience. J Urol 2002; 167: 1604– 6 16 Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the da Vinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 453– 8 17 Menon M. Robotic radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2003; 91: 175– 6 18 Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 189– 202 19 Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 58– 61 20 Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, and members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 205– 10 21 Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Bhandari A. The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2004; 93: 715– 9 22 Lepor H, Nieder AM, Fraiman MC. Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable. Urology 2001; 58: 425– 9 23 Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002; 167: 528– 34 24 Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 337– 9 25 Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003; 92: 232– 6 26 Kaouk JH, Desai MM, Abreu SC, Papay F, Gill IS. Robotic assisted laparoscopic sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy: initial experience. J Urol 2003; 170: 909– 12 27 Link RE, Schulam PG, Kavoussi LR. Telesurgery. Remote monitoring and assistance during laparoscopy. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 177– 88 28 Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001; 413: 379– 80 29 Challacombe BJ, Kavoussi LR, Dasgupta P. Trans-oceanic telerobotic surgery. BJU Int 2003; 92: 678– 80 30 Rodriguez G, Weisbin CR. A new method to evaluate human-robot system performance. Auton Robots 2003; 14: 165– 78 31 Satava RM. Biomedical, ethical and moral issues being forced by advanced medical technologies. Proc Am Philos Soc 2003; 147: 246– 58 32 Dasgupta P. Robotics in urology. BJU Int 2001; 88: 300 33 Gallagher AG, Smith CD. From the operating room of the present to the operating room of the future. Human-factors lessons learned from the minimally invasive surgery revolution. Semin Laparosc Surg 2003; 10: 127– 39 Citing Literature Volume95, Issue1January 2005Pages 20-23 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX