Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Patch Choice Model: No Alternative to Balancing

1985; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 125; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/284344

1537-5323

Manfred Milinski,

Economic and Environmental Valuation

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsThe Patch Choice Model: No Alternative to BalancingManfred MilinskiManfred Milinski Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 125, Number 2Feb., 1985 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284344 Views: 15Total views on this site Citations: 14Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1985 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Bjørn Snorre Andersen, Christian Jørgensen, Sigrunn Eliassen, Jarl Giske The proximate architecture for decision‐making in fish, Fish and Fisheries 17, no.33 (Dec 2015): 680–695.https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12139Jessica L Sanchez, Joel C Trexler The adaptive evolution of herbivory in freshwater systems, Ecosphere 7, no.77 (Jul 2016).https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1414Sigrunn Eliassen, Bjørn Snorre Andersen, Christian Jørgensen, Jarl Giske From sensing to emergent adaptations: Modelling the proximate architecture for decision-making, Ecological Modelling 326 (Apr 2016): 90–100.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.001Jing'an Cui, Yasuhiro Takeuchi, Zhenshan Lin Permanence and extinction for dispersal population systems, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 298, no.11 (Oct 2004): 73–93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.02.059Lisa A Leaver, Martin Daly Effect of predation risk on selectivity in heteromyid rodents, Behavioural Processes 64, no.11 (Aug 2003): 71–75.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00108-6H. Turesson, A. Persson, C. Brönmark Prey size selection in piscivorous pikeperch ( Stizostedion lucioperca ) includes active prey choice, Ecology of Freshwater Fish 11, no.44 (Nov 2002): 223–233.https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0633.2002.00019.xJingan Cui The effect of dispersal on permanence in a predator-prey population growth model, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 44, no.8-98-9 (Oct 2002): 1085–1097.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(02)00217-1 Garry J. Scrimgeour , Joseph M. Culp , and Frederick J. Wrona Feeding while Avoiding Predators: Evidence for a Size-Specific Trade-off by a Lotic Mayfly, Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13, no.33 (Nov 2015): 368–378.https://doi.org/10.2307/1467366Tony J. Pitcher, Julia K. Parrish Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts, (Jan 1993): 363–439.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1578-0_12Manfred Milinski Predation risk and feeding behaviour, (Jan 1993): 285–305.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1578-0_9Carl Safina, Joanna Burger Population interactions among free-living bluefish and prey fish in an ocean environment, Oecologia 79, no.11 (Apr 1989): 91–95.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378244T. J. Pitcher, S. H. Lang, J. A. Turner A risk-balancing trade off between foraging rewards and predation hazard in a shoaling fish, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22, no.33 (Mar 1988): 225–228.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300573Edoardo Beretta, Fortunata Solimano, Yasuhiro Takeuchi Global stability and periodic orbits for two-patch predator-prey diffusion-delay models, Mathematical Biosciences 85, no.22 (Aug 1987): 153–183.https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(87)90051-4Manfred Milinski A predator's costs of overcoming the confusion-effect of swarming prey, Animal Behaviour 32, no.44 (Nov 1984): 1157–1162.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80232-8