Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Noise Considerations for PET Quantification Using Maximum and Peak Standardized Uptake Value

2012; Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging; Volume: 53; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2967/jnumed.111.101733

ISSN

1535-5667

Autores

Martin A. Lodge, Muhammad Chaudhry, Richard L. Wahl,

Tópico(s)

Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

Resumo

In tumor response monitoring studies with 18 F-FDG PET, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) is commonly applied as a quantitative metric. Although it has several advantages due to its simplicity of determination, concerns about the influence of image noise on single-pixel SUV max persist. In this study, we measured aspects of bias and reproducibility associated with SUV max and the closely related peak SUV (SUV peak ) using real patient data to provide a realistic noise context. Methods: List-mode 3-dimensional PET data were acquired for 15 min over a single bed position in twenty 18 F-FDG oncology patients. For each patient, data were sorted so as to form 2 sets of images: respiration-gated images such that each image had statistical quality comparable to a 3 min/bed position scan, and 5 statistically independent (ungated) images of different durations (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min). Tumor SUV max and SUV peak (12-mm-diameter spheric region of interest positioned so as to maximize the enclosed average) were analyzed in terms of reproducibility and bias. The component of reproducibility due to statistical noise (independent of physiologic and other variables) was measured using paired SUVs from 2 comparable respiration-gated images. Bias was measured as a function of scan duration. Results : Replicate tumor SUV measurements had a within-patient SD of 5.6% ± 0.9% for SUV max and 2.5% ± 0.4% for SUV peak . SUV max had average positive biases of 30%, 18%, 12%, 4%, and 5% for the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min images, respectively. SUV peak was also biased but to a lesser extent: 11%, 8%, 5%, 1%, and 4% for the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-min images, respectively. Conclusion: The advantages of SUV max are best exploited when PET images have a high statistical quality. For images with noise properties typically associated with clinical whole-body studies, SUV peak provides a slightly more robust alternative for assessing the most metabolically active region of tumor.

Referência(s)