Structure of the 12-Subunit RNA Polymerase II Refined with the Aid of Anomalous Diffraction Data
2009; Elsevier BV; Volume: 284; Issue: 19 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.m809199200
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresPeter Meyer, Ping Ye, Man-Hee Suh, Mincheng Zhang, Jianhua Fu,
Tópico(s)Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
ResumoRNA polymerase II (Pol II) is the central enzyme of eukaryotic gene expression machinery. Complete definition of the three-dimensional structure of Pol II is essential for understanding the mechanisms that regulate transcription via protein-protein interactions within the Pol II apparatus. To date a series of Pol II-related crystal structures have been reported. However, certain peptide regions, including several that are implicated to interact with regulatory factors, remain obscure. Here we describe conformations for two such regions that are close to the Pol II surface and assume seemingly flexible loop structures. One is located in the TFIIF-interacting Protrusion domain, whereas the other is in the TFIIE-interacting Clamp domain. This structural definition was aided by the application of an advanced crystallographic refinement approach that utilizes the single anomalous diffraction (SAD) from zinc ions bound intrinsically in Pol II. The SAD-based strategy allowed the 12-subunit Pol II model to be fully refined up to 3.8 Å with excellent stereochemical properties, demonstrating the effectiveness of the SAD approach for the refinement of large structures at low-to-moderate resolutions. Our results also define additional components of the free Pol II, including the functionally critical Fork Loop-1 and Fork Loop-2 elements. As such, this refined Pol II model provides the most complete structural reference for future analyses of complex structures formed between Pol II and its regulatory factors. RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is the central enzyme of eukaryotic gene expression machinery. Complete definition of the three-dimensional structure of Pol II is essential for understanding the mechanisms that regulate transcription via protein-protein interactions within the Pol II apparatus. To date a series of Pol II-related crystal structures have been reported. However, certain peptide regions, including several that are implicated to interact with regulatory factors, remain obscure. Here we describe conformations for two such regions that are close to the Pol II surface and assume seemingly flexible loop structures. One is located in the TFIIF-interacting Protrusion domain, whereas the other is in the TFIIE-interacting Clamp domain. This structural definition was aided by the application of an advanced crystallographic refinement approach that utilizes the single anomalous diffraction (SAD) from zinc ions bound intrinsically in Pol II. The SAD-based strategy allowed the 12-subunit Pol II model to be fully refined up to 3.8 Å with excellent stereochemical properties, demonstrating the effectiveness of the SAD approach for the refinement of large structures at low-to-moderate resolutions. Our results also define additional components of the free Pol II, including the functionally critical Fork Loop-1 and Fork Loop-2 elements. As such, this refined Pol II model provides the most complete structural reference for future analyses of complex structures formed between Pol II and its regulatory factors. RNA polymerase II (Pol II) 2The abbreviations used are: Pol II, polymerase II; SAD, single anomalous scattering; FL-1, Fork Loop-1; TLS, translation libration screw-rotation. 2The abbreviations used are: Pol II, polymerase II; SAD, single anomalous scattering; FL-1, Fork Loop-1; TLS, translation libration screw-rotation. and its associated factors form an elaborate protein machinery that transcribes DNA sequences into pre-mRNAs to carry out the first step of gene expression in eukaryotic cells (1Roeder R.G. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1996; 21: 327-335Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (718) Google Scholar). Pol II is a dodecameric protein assembled from a tightly associated 10-subunit core and a heterodimeric subcomplex of subunits Rpb4 and Rpb7 (2Edwards A.M. Kane C.M. Young R.A. Kornberg R.D. J. Biol. Chem. 1991; 266: 71-75Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Although the 10-subunit core harbors the central transesterase activity that catalyzes RNA-chain polymerization, the Rpb4/7 heterodimer enables promoter-dependent initiation by the polymerase and supports yeast growth under stress conditions (3Woychik N.A. Young R.A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989; 9: 2854-2859Crossref PubMed Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 4Rosenheck S. Choder M. J. Bacteriol. 1998; 180: 6187-6192Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). An x-ray crystallographic breakthrough (5Fu J. Gnatt A.L. Bushnell D.A. Jensen G.J. Thompson N.E. Burgess R.R. David P.R. Kornberg R.D. Cell. 1999; 98: 799-810Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (112) Google Scholar) combined with biochemical characterizations of the Pol II system using materials from Baker's yeast has led to a high resolution structure of the 10-subunit core (6Cramer P. Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Science. 2001; 292: 1863-1876Crossref PubMed Scopus (961) Google Scholar) and the complete 12-subunit structure at moderate resolutions (7Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 6969-6973Crossref PubMed Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 8Armache K.J. Kettenberger H. Cramer P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 6964-6968Crossref PubMed Scopus (195) Google Scholar). These structural results have shed new light on the molecular mechanism that underlies the enzymatic process of pre-mRNA synthesis (9Westover K.D. Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Science. 2004; 303: 1014-1016Crossref PubMed Scopus (212) Google Scholar, 10Westover K.D. Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Cell. 2004; 119: 481-489Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (220) Google Scholar, 11Brueckner F. Cramer P. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008; 15: 811-818Crossref PubMed Scopus (190) Google Scholar) and, together with structural information on related factors, provided a three-dimensional framework for integrating and rationalizing volumes of biochemical and genetic data accumulated over the past four decades (12Woychik N.A. Hampsey M. Cell. 2002; 108: 453-463Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (206) Google Scholar, 13Trinh V. Langelier M.F. Archambault J. Coulombe B. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006; 70: 12-36Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar, 14Kornberg R.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007; 104: 12955-12961Crossref PubMed Scopus (284) Google Scholar). The success of this line of structural work along with the techniques and precautions developed during the process (5Fu J. Gnatt A.L. Bushnell D.A. Jensen G.J. Thompson N.E. Burgess R.R. David P.R. Kornberg R.D. Cell. 1999; 98: 799-810Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (112) Google Scholar, 15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar) has opened the door to elucidating the structures of Pol II-factor complexes and understanding the regulatory mechanisms that govern class II transcription activities in the nucleus. Structural refinement is an important step in establishing crystallographic models for macromolecules, and its feasibility is traditionally determined by the resolution limit of diffraction datasets collected from macromolecular crystals in question. More explicitly, refinement feasibility depends on whether there are a sufficient number of observations per atomic parameter to be refined. In general, refinement for macromolecules is greatly helped by the fact that amino or nucleic acid residues in the biopolymers obey their standard stereochemistry, thus imposing additional restraints on the atomic coordinate space (16Hendrickson W.A. Methods Enzymol. 1985; 115: 252-270Crossref PubMed Scopus (585) Google Scholar). As a rule-of-thumb, data to 3 Å are minimally required for the full refinement of a coordinate set, and higher resolutions give greater ratios of observations/parameters and, hence, finer refinement results. Based on this crystallographic guidelines, the 10-subunit Pol II core whose crystals diffracted to as high as 2.3 Å has been fully refined with sound atomic geometrical properties (10Westover K.D. Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Cell. 2004; 119: 481-489Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (220) Google Scholar). However, refinement of the 12-subunit Pol II has been hampered by the fact that the related crystals diffracted to no better than 3.4 Å (7Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 6969-6973Crossref PubMed Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 8Armache K.J. Kettenberger H. Cramer P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 6964-6968Crossref PubMed Scopus (195) Google Scholar, 11Brueckner F. Cramer P. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008; 15: 811-818Crossref PubMed Scopus (190) Google Scholar, 15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar, 17Kettenberger H. Armache K.J. Cramer P. Mol. Cell. 2004; 16: 955-965Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (344) Google Scholar). A compromise strategy was used for the refinement at 3.8 Å where a separately refined Rpb4/7 heterodimer was combined with a refined 10-subunit core to produce the 12-subunit Pol II, and a few rounds of further iteration were performed (18Armache K.J. Mitterweger S. Meinhart A. Cramer P. J. Biol. Chem. 2005; 280: 7131-7134Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (176) Google Scholar). Here, we describe a full refinement of the 12-subunit Pol II structure at 3.8 Å using a newly developed algorithm that is capable of parameter refinement for crystals that diffract to moderate resolutions (e.g. 3–4 Å). This technique utilizes the diffraction signals from anomalous scatters in the crystal and incorporates this additional information into a multivariate likelihood target function (19Skubak P. Murshudov G.N. Pannu N.S. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004; 60: 2196-2201Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar, 20Skubak P. Ness S. Pannu N.S. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2005; 61: 1626-1635Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar) to increase the number of observations, thus improving the ratio of observations to parameters. When this technique was applied to make use of single anomalous diffraction (SAD) from the zinc ions bound intrinsically in Pol II, a Pol II structure was obtained with significant improvements as judged by comparison to available models of the 12-subunit Pol II with regard to stereochemical properties. Also as a result, we have been able to determine the structures of three segments of polypeptide chains that have not been seen in free Pol II models published to date. Two of these regions map to the surface locations that have been shown to interact with general transcription factors TFIIF and TFIIE (21Chen H.T. Warfield L. Hahn S. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007; 14: 696-703Crossref PubMed Scopus (137) Google Scholar). Furthermore, the refined model provides supporting evidence for movement of the Fork Loop-2 element, which has been implicated in DNA unwinding (11Brueckner F. Cramer P. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008; 15: 811-818Crossref PubMed Scopus (190) Google Scholar, 22Wang D. Bushnell D.A. Westover K.D. Kaplan C.D. Kornberg R.D. Cell. 2006; 127: 941-954Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (359) Google Scholar), and helps visualize the range of conformational fluctuation of Fork Loop-1 during its engagement with the template and transcript. Our results demonstrate the utility of the SAD-based crystallographic refinement technique in structural determination of large multiprotein complexes whose crystals often diffract to limited resolutions (e.g. lower than 3.5 Å) and reveal elusive information such as the conformation of those Pol II elements involved in interactions with transcription initiation factors. Our fully refined Pol II provides the most up-to-date and effective model for difference Fourier analyses of novel Pol II-factor(s) complexes in the future. Purification of Pol II from yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its crystallization, x-ray diffraction data collection, and experimental phasing have been described previously (15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar). X-ray datasets from the best diffracting crystal (A3X7 in the previous work) were re-indexed and integrated with HKL2000 (23Otwinowski Z. Minor W. Methods Enzymol. 1997; 276: 307-326Crossref PubMed Scopus (38453) Google Scholar), resulting in preservation of both normal and SAD data to 3.8 Å. To begin the process for refining the polymerase model against the SAD data, the anomalous scatterers (the eight intrinsic sites of zinc) were first refined with the BP3 program (24Pannu N.S. Read R.J. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004; 60: 22-27Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar) against the zinc SAD data. Next, the previous unrefined 12-subunit model (15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar) was subjected to geometry regularization, and thermal parameters (B-factors) of the model were reset to a uniform value of 77 Å2 according to the value from Wilson statistics. Refinement then proceeded using standard cycles of iteration between reciprocal space optimization using REFMAC5D (19Skubak P. Murshudov G.N. Pannu N.S. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004; 60: 2196-2201Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar) and manual rebuilding in real-space. The SAD phase information was included into the refinement target by invoking REFMAC5D with inputs of the anomalous-scatterer model (8 zinc sites), scattering factors (f′=-6.4306, f″= 3.8873), and column label for SAD amplitudes in the data file. During initial iterations, only the positional parameters of the polymerase were refined. Once this had converged, further iterations were carried out with TLS groups (described below) in addition the positional parameters. The positional parameters of the anomalous scatterers were refined in concert with the polymerase model during both stages, allowing for simultaneous updating of the SAD phase information. The constant used for the relative weighting of x-ray and geometrical terms in REFMAC was manually adjusted because the weighting determined automatically by the program produced severe stereochemical distortions, although with lower R-factor values. Weighting terms for real-space refinement in COOT (25Emsley P. Cowtan K. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004; 60: 2126-2132Crossref PubMed Scopus (23040) Google Scholar) were adjusted similarly. In the final stages of refinement, problematic regions were identified using ADIT (work station version) (26Berman H.M. Westbrook J. Feng Z. Gilliland G. Bhat T.N. Weissig H. Shindyalov I.N. Bourne P.E. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28: 235-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (26989) Google Scholar), MOLPROBITY (27Lovell S.C. Davis I.W. Arendall III, W.B. de Bakker P.I. Word J.M. Prisant M.G. Richardson J.S. Richardson D.C. Proteins. 2003; 50: 437-450Crossref PubMed Scopus (3818) Google Scholar), and COOT (25Emsley P. Cowtan K. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004; 60: 2126-2132Crossref PubMed Scopus (23040) Google Scholar). Refinement of individual B-factors would not be feasible at this resolution (28Ten Eyck L.F. Watenpaugh K.D. Rossmann M.G. Arnold E. International Tables for Crystallography (F). 1st Ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, Netherlands2001: 369-374Google Scholar), even with the increased number of observations from including the SAD information. Therefore, the approach was taken to describe thermal motions of groups within the Pol II molecule using the TLS method (29Schomaker V. Trueblood K.N. Acta Crystallogr. 1968; 24: 63-76Crossref Google Scholar, 30Howlin B. Moss D.S. Harris G.W. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A. 1989; 45: 851-861Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar) instead. Two approaches were tested to define initial TLS groups; the first was to use previously known rigid-body domains of Pol II (6Cramer P. Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Science. 2001; 292: 1863-1876Crossref PubMed Scopus (961) Google Scholar, 15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar), and the second was to derive TLS groups for each subunit by conducting several cycles of atomic B-factor refinement without positional refinement and submitting output to the TLSMD (31Painter J. Merritt E.A. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2006; 62: 439-450Crossref PubMed Scopus (1100) Google Scholar) server, which produced suggested TLS groups for each subunit. Possibly due to the restriction of TLS groups to individual peptides, the second approach did not perform better than the first. Therefore, the TLS groups based on the known rigid-body domains were chosen for subsequent refinement. During the course of refinement, these groups were subdivided as needed to account for regions of the model that showed increased mobility not accounted for by the existing groups. For example, a modification to the TLS groups was made when (i) atoms with negative displacements were indicated in the log file and (ii) negative Fo-Fc density was observed following a region of the model that showed otherwise good density. B-factor sharpening, as described in DeLaBarre and Brunger (32DeLaBarre B. Brunger A.T. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2006; 62: 923-932Crossref PubMed Scopus (63) Google Scholar), was tested but did not improve map quality. The root-mean-square deviations from standard amino acid stereochemistry in supplemental Table S1B were calculated using REFMAC5 (33Murshudov G.N. Vagin A.A. Dodson E.J. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1997; 53: 240-255Crossref PubMed Scopus (13822) Google Scholar) and ADIT. β-Carbon (Cβ) deviations and Ramachandran statistics in supplemental Table S1B were calculated using MOLPROBITY. Omit maps were calculated using the program OMIT in the CCP4 suite (34CCP4Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 1994; 50: 760-763Crossref PubMed Scopus (19734) Google Scholar). Figures were generated using PyMol (DeLano Scientific). Refined Structure of Complete Pol II—We found that the 12-subunit Pol II structure could be fully refined at 3.8 Å resolution with the multivariate-likelihood strategy of Pannu and co-workers (19Skubak P. Murshudov G.N. Pannu N.S. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004; 60: 2196-2201Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar, 20Skubak P. Ness S. Pannu N.S. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2005; 61: 1626-1635Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar). We describe the crystallographic performance in the supplemental information. As a result of applying this technique and using the intrinsic zinc SAD data as additional observations, the quality of 12-subunit Pol II structure is significantly improved in comparison with the models published previously. As a demonstration of such improvement, Fig. 1 shows three structural regions (A, B, and C) where our data reveal side-chain densities (left panels) which have not been seen in the previous results (1WCM, center panel, and 2VUM, right panels). Additional examples of such improvement are shown in supplemental Fig. S1. Throughout the refinement process we observed density in 2Fo-Fc omit maps for a good number of residues that were not visible in the previously published 12-subunit models and built the amino acid structures accordingly. These included structural regions named Rpb2 Protrusion, Rpb1 Clamp Top, Fork Loop-1 (Fig. 2, A–C, respectively) and Fork Loop-2 (supplemental Fig. S2A), following the nomenclature for the 10-subunit Pol II. The former three regions were covered by density in both the omit (Fig. 2, right panels) and experimentally phased zinc multiwavelength anomalous diffraction (Fig. 2, left panels) maps, whereas Fork Loop-2 and 12 other residues were defined only in the model-based omit map (supplemental Fig. S2; Table 1). Altogether, 56 residues have been built throughout the refinement/rebuilding process. We discuss the functional relevance of these newly modeled regions below.TABLE 1Newly revealed regions of yeast Pol II The total number of residues modeled was 56.SubunitResiduesFunctional commentsShown inDensity observed in experimental and 2Fo-Fc omit mapsRpb271, 437–446Protrusion, TFIIF interactionFig. 2ARpb1187–195Clamp top, TFIIE interactionFig. 2BRpb2467–477Fork Loop-1, DNA/RNA hybrid interactionsFig. 2CDensity observed only in 2Fo-Fc omit mapRpb2502–510Fork Loop-2, DNA unwindingFig. S2ARpb11115Fig. S2BRpb3269Fig. S2CRpb81, 64, 75Fig. S2DRpb4117Fig. S2ERpb2336Fig. S2FRpb11091Fig. S2GRpb2720–722, 714–716Fig. S2HRpb2669Fig. S2IRpb1224Fig. S2J Open table in a new tab Conformation of the TFIIF-Interacting Rpb2 Protrusion— The earlier structures of Pol II had lacked a model for 10 amino acid residues in the protrusion domain of subunit Rpb2 (residues 437–446). A polyalanine chain was placed for this loop in an unrefined 12-subunit structure (15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar). We have now been able to build a starting model for this region based on the experimental zinc multiwavelength anomalous diffraction density (Fig. 2A, left) and adjust the model during the cycle of refinement with SAD information. The Protrusion adopts a loop-like conformation (Fig. 3A, yellow) consistent with its electron densities in both the experimental and omitted 2Fo-Fc maps (Fig. 2A). The Protrusion Loop might be considered as partially disordered under the solution condition of the 10-subunit crystal because it was not visible in high resolution maps of the 10-subunit Pol II (6Cramer P. Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Science. 2001; 292: 1863-1876Crossref PubMed Scopus (961) Google Scholar, 35Cramer P. Bushnell D.A. Fu J. Gnatt A.L. Maier-Davis B. Thompson N.E. Burgess R.R. Edwards A.M. David P.R. Kornberg R.D. Science. 2000; 288: 640-649Crossref PubMed Scopus (467) Google Scholar). The Protrusion Loop connects the gap from Glu-437 to Leu-446 at one end of the two-helix coil in Rpb2. The protrusion domain has recently been shown to interact with the general transcription factor TFIIF in the context of transcription pre-initiation complex (21Chen H.T. Warfield L. Hahn S. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007; 14: 696-703Crossref PubMed Scopus (137) Google Scholar). The newly modeled loop sits at the apex of the helical coil (Fig. 3, A and B, yellow) and is bracketed in space by two TFIIF-cross-linking sites, one marked by Tyr-57 and Thr-68 of Rpb2 and the other by Gln-469 of Rpb2, the blue sites near Protrusion (Fig. 3B). The shortest distances from residues in Protrusion Loop to Tyr-57, Thr-68, and Gln-469 are 28, 18, and 25 Å, respectively. We observed density for yet another un-modeled region in the protrusion domain, Leu-71 through Ile-90 (Fig. 3C, red cages). The density shows that this region runs side-by-side with the protrusion loop. The strength of this density in our current map was not sufficient to allow model building, suggesting that this region is more mobile than Protrusion Loop. Based on the peptide chain directions before and after the break, we would expect this region to be hairpin-like if the structure should be stabilized. This region includes Leu-74 that is cross-linked to TFIIF in the pre-initiation complex (21Chen H.T. Warfield L. Hahn S. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007; 14: 696-703Crossref PubMed Scopus (137) Google Scholar). Although Leu-74 has not been modeled, it is likely located within the bounds of the density. Because the Protrusion Loop is situated close to both Leu-74 and the above-mentioned TFIIF-interacting residues, it may be envisaged to interact with TFIIF upon approaching by the proteins. It is reasonable to expect this loop structure to undergo conformational changes when interacting with TFIIF, and such flexibility would be consistent with the aforementioned suggestion that it is partially disordered in the crystal lattice of 10-subunit Pol II. The peptide segment between Lys-134 and Lys-164 in the same region (Fig. 3C) remains disordered, as no density could be seen for it. Conformation of the TFIIE-Interacting Clamp Top—The newly modeled Rpb1 region from Lys-187 to Asp-195 completes a gap at the top of Rpb1 Clamp domain (Fig. 3D, red). The Clamp interacts extensively with both DNA and RNA in the transcription elongation complex (17Kettenberger H. Armache K.J. Cramer P. Mol. Cell. 2004; 16: 955-965Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (344) Google Scholar, 36Gnatt A.L. Cramer P. Fu J. Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Science. 2001; 292: 1876-1882Crossref PubMed Scopus (744) Google Scholar) and cross-links with TFIIE in assembled pre-initiation complex (21Chen H.T. Warfield L. Hahn S. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007; 14: 696-703Crossref PubMed Scopus (137) Google Scholar). This loop structure is delineated in space by two TFIIE-cross-linking sites, Asn-169 and Leu-199 of Rpb1, the blue sites next to the Clamp Top (Fig. 3B). The shortest distances from residues in Clamp Top to Asn-169 and Leu-199 are 11 and 13 Å, respectively. The loop folds over by ∼90°. Similar to the other protrusion loops, the Clamp Top structure is expected to interact with TFIIE and possibly undergo conformational alterations when doing so. Conformational Movement and Dynamics of Fork Loop-1—We have observed electron density for Fork Loop-1 (Rpb2 461–480) in the 12-subunit Pol II uncomplexed with nucleic acids and placed a main-chain model for the loop (15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar). We are now able to refine a complete model of Fork Loop-1 in free Pol II. After refinement with SAD data, the 2Fo-Fc omit map showed well defined density for the loop (Fig. 2C, right), whereas the previous 2Fo-Fc map based on unrefined model failed to do so (15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar). This is an indication of improvement of the current model as a result of the refinement performed in this work. In the ternary complex with DNA/RNA, Fork Loop-1 (FL-1) interacts with both the RNA and the loop structure named "Rudder" (Rpb1 310–324), which is a part of the Rpb1 clamp domain (9Westover K.D. Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Science. 2004; 303: 1014-1016Crossref PubMed Scopus (212) Google Scholar). In the refined structure of free Pol II, FL-1 also contacts Rudder. Solvent-accessible surfaces of the two loop structures merge at their closest point of interaction (Fig. 4A, surfaces). A distance of 3.9 Å is found between the amide of Lys-470 in Fork Loop-1 and the carbonyl of Gly-319 in Rudder (Fig. 4A, pink dashed line), suggesting that the main-chain groups may potentially serve as a pair of hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor or candidates for water-mediated hydrogen-bond interaction. The two loop structures approach one another from opposite sides of the nucleic acid binding cleft, forming a gate-like barrier that separates the cleft into two compartments, the DNA/RNA hybrid binding tunnel behind the gate of Fork Loop-1/Rudder and the downstream DNA duplex binding channel that lies perpendicularly down the hybrid binding tunnel as described previously (15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar). Although Rudder maintains the same conformation in all of the reported structures (Fig. 4B, gray), Fork Loop-1 adopts one of the two main conformations observed in each of the crystals of Pol II-DNA/RNA ternary complexes, differing primarily in their distance to Rudder. Compared with its conformations in representative structures that contained DNA/RNA (Fig. 4B, yellow and red models), Fork Loop-1 in unengaged Pol II (cyan) shifts toward the floor of the downstream-DNA cleft by ∼7 Å at its tip. Identities of the facing residues from each loop vary accordingly (Table 2). Together, these structures define the range at which the Fork Loop-1 conformation may fluctuate when engaging the single-stranded DNA or DNA/RNA hybrid during transcription initiation or elongation, respectively. Transient opening of the gate by Fork Loop-1 changing its conformation was first pointed out in our earlier work as a necessary step involved in the formation of open promoter complex and the process of transcription initiation (15Meyer P.A. Ye P. Zhang M. Suh M.H. Fu J. Structure. 2006; 14: 973-982Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar). Based on the structural information from both the free and DNA/RNA bound Pol IIs, we suggest that the basic residues Lys-470 and Lys-471 of Rpb2, which are located at the edge of Fork Loop-1 facing Rudder, play important roles in engaging template DNA during initiation and in stabilizing DNA/RNA hybrid during elongation. In particular, we suggest that the gate of Fork Loop-1/Rudder may "lock" into a more stable interaction after the formation of the nascent RNA (longer than eight bases); the non-coding DNA strand may, thus, be kept separate from the coding strand to prevent collapse of the transcription bubble (9Westover K.D. Bushnell D.A. Kornberg R.D. Science. 2004; 303: 1014-1016Crossref PubMed Scopus (212) Google Scholar). This mechanism is consistent with the observation that deletion of the two residues in the Fork Loop-1 edge of mammalian Pol II that face Rudder (equivalent to Lys-471—Ala-472 in yeast Pol II) results in a loss of transcription activity (37Jeronimo C. Langelier M.F. Zeghouf M. Cojocaru M. Bergeron D. Baali D. Forget D. Mnaimneh S. Davierwala A.P. Pootoolal J. Chandy M. Canadien V. Beattie B.K. Richards D.P. Workman J.L. Hughes T.R. Greenbla
Referência(s)