Artigo Revisado por pares

Unilateral Norm Breaking in a Presidential Debate: Lech Walesa Versus Aleksander Kwasniewski

2000; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 33; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1207/s15327973rlsi3303_4

ISSN

1532-7973

Autores

Adam Jaworski, Dariusz Galasiński,

Tópico(s)

Linguistic research and analysis

Resumo

This study analyzes the 1995 television presidential debate between Lech Walesa and Aleksander Kwasniewski. We show that the debate's institutional nature was subverted by the former candidate's use of an informal register characterized by jocular tenor, use of marked forms of address, and disparaging metapragmatic comments. Walesa's casual style appeared to the other participants in the debate (his opponent, the journalists in the studio, the media, and the viewing public) as a bid to conduct the debate on his own terms, not as a "formal, public" event but as an "informal, personal" one. Such appropriation of the debate was resisted, and ultimately Walesa was held accountable for his actions and his style was judged nega-tively. According to the media reports of the election results, the negative perception of Walesa's debating style was largely responsible for tipping the electoral balance in favor of the other candidate.

Referência(s)