Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Discovering theoretical models to explain mediated influences on language

2014; Wiley; Volume: 18; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/josl.12075

1467-9841

Barrie Gunter,

Gender Studies in Language

Journal of SociolinguisticsVolume 18, Issue 2 p. 262-271 Debate: Media and Language Change Discovering theoretical models to explain mediated influences on language Barrie Gunter, Barrie Gunter University of Leicester, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this author Barrie Gunter, Barrie Gunter University of Leicester, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this author First published: 07 May 2014 https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12075 Address correspondence to: Barrie Gunter Department of Media & Communication University of Leicester Bankfield House 132 New Walk Leicester LE1 7JA United Kingdom [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Anderson, Craig A. and Brad J. Bushman. 2002. Media violence and societal violence. Science 295: 2377–2378. Baird, Sarah. 2001. How ‘to be like’ a Kiwi: Verbs of quotation in New Zealand English. New Zealand English Journal 15: 6–19. Bandura, Albert. 1965. Influences of model's reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1: 589–595. Bandura, Albert. 1983. Psychological mechanisms of aggression. In Russell Geen and Edward Donnerstein (eds.) Aggression: Theoretical and Empirical Reviews, Volume 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. New York: Academic Press. 1–40. Berkowitz, Leonard. 1965. Some aspects of observed aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2: 359–369. Berkowitz, Leonard. 1984. Some effects of thoughts on anti- and pro-social influences of media events: A cognitive-neoassociation analysis. Psychological Bulletin 95: 410–427. Berkowitz, Leonard and Joseph Alioto. 1973. The meaning of an observed event as a determinant of its aggressive consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28: 206–217. Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2004. The sociolinguistic constraints on the quotative system: US English and British English compared. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Edinburgh, U.K.: University of Edinburgh. Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006a. Social stereotypes, personality traits and regional perception displaced: Attitudes towards the ‘new’ quotatives in the U.K. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10: 362–381. Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006b. Diagnostics of age-graded linguistic behaviour: The case of the quotative system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10: 3–30. Buchstaller, Isabelle and Alexandra D'Arcy. 2009. Localized globalization: A multi-local, multivariate investigation of quotative be like. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13: 291–331. Chambers, Jack. 1993. Sociolinguistic dialectology. In Dennis R. Preston (ed.) American Dialect Research. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins. 133–164. Charkova, Krassimira D. 2007. A language without borders: English slang and Bulgarian learners of English. Language Learning 57: 369–416. Dion, Nathalie and Shana Poplack. 2007. Linguistic mythbusting: The role of the media in diffusing change. Paper presented to New Ways of Analysing Variation 36, 11–14 October, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Feshbach, Seymour. 1976. The role of fantasy in response to television. Journal of Social Issues 32: 71–85. Gerbner, George, Larry Gross, Michael Morgan and Nancy Signorielli. 1980. The ‘Mainstreaming of America’: Violence profile No.11. Journal of Communication 30: 10–29. Gerbner, George, Larry Gross, Michael Morgan, Nancy Signorielli and James Shanahan. 2002. Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In Jennings Bryant and Dolf Zillmann (eds.) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (2nd edition). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. 43–67. Giles, David. 2002. Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology 4: 279. Gunter, Barrie. 1985. Dimensions of Television Violence. Aldershot, U.K.: Gower. Gunter, Barrie. 2000. Media Research Methods. London: Sage. Gunter, Barrie. 2002. Media Sex: What Are The Issues? Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. 1982. The psychology of preferences. Science 246: 136–142. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. 1984. Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist 39: 341–350. Katz, Elihi and David Foulkes. 1963. On the use of the mass media as ‘escape’: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 377–388. Macauley, Ronald. 2001. You're like ‘why not?’: The quotative expressions of Glasgow adolescents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5: 3–21. Maltby, John, David Giles, Louise Barber and Lynn E. McCutcheon. 2005. Intense-personal celebrity worship and body image: Evidence of a link among female adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology 10: 17–32. Potter, W. James. 2003. The 11 Myths of Media Violence. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. Risager, Karen. 2006. Language and Culture: Global Flows and Local Complexities. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters. Rubin, Rebecca and Michael P. McHugh. 1987. Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 31: 279–292. Shrum, Lawrence. 1996. Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects: Further tests of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research 22: 482–509. Shrum, Lawrence and Thomas O'Guinn. 1993. Processes and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research 20: 436–471. Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2011. The view from the couch: Changing perspectives on the role of the television in changing language ideologies and use. In Tore Kristiansen and Nikolas Coupland (eds.) Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe. Oslo, Norway: Novus. 223–239. Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2012. English and the media: Television. In Alexander Bergs and Laurel J. Brinton (eds.) English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. 1075–1088. Stuart-Smith, Jane and Claire Timmins. 2007. ‘Aye, I watch it but’: Individuals, television and language change. Paper presented to U.K. Language Variation and Change, 11–13 September, University of Lancaster, U.K. Stuart-Smith, Jane and Claire Timmins. 2009. The role of the individual in language variation and change. In Carmen Llamas and Dominic Watt (eds.) Language and Identities. Edinburgh, U.K.: Edinburgh University Press. 39–54. Stuart-Smith, Jane, Claire Timmins, Gwilym Pryce and Barrie Gunter. 2013. Television can also be a factor in language change. Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 89: 501–536. Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131. Winter, Joanne. 2002. Discourse quotatives in Australian English: Adolescents’ performing voices. Australian Journal of Linguistics 22: 5–21. Wright, Charles. 1960. Functional analysis and mass communication. Public Opinion Quarterly: 60: 5–620. Volume18, Issue2April 2014Pages 262-271 ReferencesRelatedInformation