Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Comparison of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and oral montelukast for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms

2006; Elsevier BV; Volume: 96; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61349-x

1534-4436

Bruce G. Martin, Charles P. Andrews, Julius H. van Bavel, Frank C. Hampel, Kristofer C. Klein, Barbara A. Prillaman, Melissa Faris, E. Philpot,

Respiratory and Cough-Related Research

Background Few studies have directly compared the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroids with that of leukotriene receptor antagonists for the treatment of daytime and nighttime symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Objective To compare fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, 200 μg daily, with oral montelukast, 10 mg daily, for the relief of SAR symptoms. Methods Patients with SAR 15 years or older were randomized to receive either fluticasone propionate (n = 367) or montelukast (n = 369) in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The primary efficacy measure was the mean change from baseline in daytime total nasal symptom scores (TNSSs) (the sum of 4 daytime individual nasal symptom scores [INSSs] assessing nasal congestion, itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing), averaged across weeks 1 and 2. Secondary efficacy measures included the 4 daytime INSSs, nighttime TNSSs (the sum of 3 nighttime INSSs assessing congestion on awakening, difficulty going to sleep, and nighttime awakenings), and the 3 nighttime INSSs averaged across weeks 1 and 2. Results Mean changes from baseline in daytime TNSSs ( P < .001), all daytime INSSs ( P < .001), nighttime TNSSs ( P < .001), and all nighttime INSSs ( P ≤ .02) showed significant differences favoring fluticasone propionate over montelukast across 2 weeks of treatment. Conclusion Compared with montelukast, fluticasone propionate provided significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime SAR symptoms.