Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N. J.) Case
1958; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 1; Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/466547
ISSN1537-5285
Autores Tópico(s)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessPredatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N. J.) CaseJohn S. McGeeJohn S. McGee Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 1Oct., 1958 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/466547 Views: 135Total views on this site Citations: 217Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1958 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jonathan M. Karpoff Unlikely sabotage: Comment on Bloomfield, Marvão, and Spagnolo, Journal of Accounting and Economics 25 (May 2023): 101606.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101606Kenneth G. Elzinga In the Beginning: The Creation of the Economic Expert in Antitrust, The Journal of Law and Economics 65, no.S2S2 (Mar 2023): S519–S542.https://doi.org/10.1086/721265Peter T. Leeson A normal market, European Economic Review 145 (Jun 2022): 104117.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104117Robert Van Horn Aaron Director (1901–2004), (Jan 2023): 383–399.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01775-9_16Chao Hu, Jianping Tao, Donghao Zhang, Damian Adams Price Signal of Tilled Land in Rural China: An Empirically Oriented Transaction Costs Study Based on Contract Theory, Land 10, no.88 (Aug 2021): 837.https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080837Craig Freedman, Luke R. Nottage Revisiting Ramseyer: The Chicago School of Law and Economics Comes to Japan, SSRN Electronic Journal 19 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3868698Richard S. Markovits Predatory Conduct, (Oct 2021): 293–357.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79812-3_10William Gochberg, Victor A. Menaldo Political Economy and the Three Sources of Rents, SSRN Electronic Journal 11 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3758351William Franklin Shughart Antitrust Agonistes, SSRN Electronic Journal 11 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3947104Ivana Rakic Monopolization Standards in US Competition Law: Evolution and Evaluation, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu , no.44 (Dec 2020): 98–110.https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFUB_20405AThinh Duy Tran, Long Bao Le Resource Allocation for Multi-Tenant Network Slicing: A Multi-Leader Multi-Follower Stackelberg Game Approach, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 69, no.88 (Aug 2020): 8886–8899.https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2020.2996966 Antitrust, (Jun 2020): 419–465.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119648055.ch11Vincent Geloso Collusion and combines in Canada, 1880–1890, Scandinavian Economic History Review 68, no.11 (Oct 2019): 66–84.https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.2019.1679246Joao Felipe Rodrigues Lanza, Thomas J. DiLorenzo As origens do movimento antitruste, MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics 7, no.22 (Aug 2019).https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1177Frédéric Marty, Thierry Kirat Les mutations du néolibéralisme américain quant à l’articulation des libertés économiques et de la démocratie, Revue internationale de droit économique t. XXXII, no.44 (Apr 2019): 471–498.https://doi.org/10.3917/ride.324.0471Cédric Argenton Colluding on excluding, European Economic Review 113 (Apr 2019): 194–206.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.01.006Alex Becheru, Costin Bădică Augmenting Multi-agent Negotiation in Interconnected Freight Transport Using Complex Networks Analysis, (Jun 2019): 434–448.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22741-8_31Ulrich Schwalbe Industrieökonomik, (Mar 2019): 149–369.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21777-8_2D. Daniel Sokol Rethinking the Efficiency of the Common Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3328025Igor Wysocki, Walter Block , Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 21, no.44 ( 2019): 398.https://doi.org/10.35297/qja.010004Jun Yeong Lee Price Competition with Cheap Talk (Proposal), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3423707Jeremy Walker, Matthew Johnson On mineral sovereignty: Towards a political theory of geological power, Energy Research & Social Science 45 (Nov 2018): 56–66.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.005Robert Van Horn Corporations and the rise of Chicago law and economics, Economy and Society 47, no.33 (Oct 2018): 477–499.https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2018.1528077Vincent Barnett Thorstein Veblen, the evolution of the predatory instinct, and the origins of agriculture, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 15, no.11 (Aug 2017): 49–71.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-017-0082-5Pietro Crocioni ON THE RELEVANT COST STANDARD FOR PRICE–COST TEST IN ABUSES OF DOMINANCE, Journal of Competition Law & Economics 14, no.22 (Jul 2018): 262–291.https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhy007Michael Funk, Christian Jaag THE MORE ECONOMIC APPROACH TO PREDATORY PRICING, Journal of Competition Law & Economics 14, no.22 (Jul 2018): 292–310.https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhy008Darren Grant Vernacular Knowledge, (Jan 2019): 39–52.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01734-7_4Peter Lothian Nelson, Walter E. Block Asteroids, Comets, and Other Non-Planetary Objects, (Jul 2018): 99–118.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74651-7_9Yıldız İlhami, Craig MacEachern 1.2 Historical Aspects of Energy, (Jan 2018): 24–48.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809597-3.00102-4Justin Tumlinson , ( 2018): 1320.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_505Myong-Hun Chang , ( 2018): 293.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_757Janusz A. Ordover Predatory Pricing, (Feb 2018): 10600–10609.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1778Steven G. Medema Director, Aaron (1901–2004), (Feb 2018): 2908–2910.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2769David Friedman Law and Economics, (Feb 2018): 7642–7649.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_693Richard N. Langlois Hunting the Big Five: Twenty-First Century Antitrust in Historical Perspective, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124356William J. Carney, Keith Sharfman Appraisal in Delaware: Possible Improvement From the Bottom Up?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3138251Pietro Crocioni On the Relevant Cost Standard for Price-Cost Test in Abuses of Dominance, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188372Vincent Geloso Collusion and Combines in Canada, 1880–1890, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3279262Svetlana Avdasheva, Svetlana Golovanova Oil explains all: desirable organisation of the Russian fuel markets (on the data of three waves of antitrust cases against oil companies), Post-Communist Economies 29, no.22 (Feb 2017): 198–215.https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2016.1267971Pietro Crocioni On the Relevant Cost Standard for Price-Cost Test in Abuses of Dominance, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2926977Jan U. Becker, Michel Clement, Markus Nöth Start-ups, incumbents, and the effects of takeover competition, Journal of Business Research 69, no.1212 (Dec 2016): 5925–5933.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.005Ralph M. Braid Potential merger-forcing entry reduces maximum spacing between firms in spatial competition, Papers in Regional Science 95, no.33 (Oct 2014): 653–669.https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12142Vivek Ghosal, D. Daniel Sokol Policy Innovations, Political Preferences, and Cartel Prosecutions, Review of Industrial Organization 48, no.44 (Apr 2016): 405–432.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-016-9516-1Jenny R Hawkins Predatory Pricing in Antitrust Law and Economics: A Historical Perspective, Eastern Economic Journal 42, no.33 (Sep 2015): 491–493.https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.72Richard Arena, Véronique Dutraive La théorie des jeux peut-elle aider à comprendre l’évolution des politiques de la concurrence et des politiques industrielles depuis la fin des années 1970 ?, Revue économique Vol. 67, no.HS1HS1 (Jan 2016): 9–24.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.hs01.0009Vincent Geloso, Germain Belzile Electricity in Quebec Before Nationalization, 1920 to 1939, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847108Robert W. McGee, Yeomin Yoon Antidumping Laws Should Be Consigned to the History Books, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2861270Robert W. McGee Ethics in International Trade, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2861293Myong-Hun Chang Competition Policy, (Jul 2016): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_757-1Justin Tumlinson Predatory Pricing, (Jun 2016): 1–2.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_505-1 Antitrust, (Oct 2015): 407–446.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119204381.ch11William S. Comanor, H. E. Frech Economic Rationality and the Areeda–Turner Rule, Review of Industrial Organization 46, no.33 (Mar 2015): 253–268.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-015-9457-0Professor Masudul Alam Choudhury, Joseph Bahun, Walter E. Block Land management in the Conata Basin: a free market approach, Humanomics 31, no.11 (Feb 2015): 2–17.https://doi.org/10.1108/H-08-2013-0054Sayed A. Hussain Predatory Pricing, (Jan 2015): 1–2.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom080236Nicola Giocoli Old lady charm: explaining the persistent appeal of Chicago antitrust, Journal of Economic Methodology 22, no.11 (Mar 2015): 96–122.https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1005394Paul Sergius Koku Which Laws Do Your Marketers Know? Some Legal Issues on Price Discrimination, (Jan 2015): 395–399.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18687-0_145Alison Jones Distinguishing Legitimate Price Competition from Unlawful Exclusionary Behaviour: Reconciling and Rationalising the Case-Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2614413Peter J. Boettke, Rosolino Antonio Candela Price Theory as Prophylactic Against Popular Fallacies, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2710201Roger D. Blair and Christina DePasquale “Antitrust's Least Glorious Hour”: The Robinson-Patman Act, The Journal of Law and Economics 57, no.S3S3 (Jun 2015): S201–S216.https://doi.org/10.1086/675783George L. Priest Bork's Strategy and the Influence of the Chicago School on Modern Antitrust Law, The Journal of Law and Economics 57, no.S3S3 (Jun 2015): S1–S17.https://doi.org/10.1086/676462Kenneth G. Elzinga and David E. Mills Antitrust Predation and The Antitrust Paradox, The Journal of Law and Economics 57, no.S3S3 (Jun 2015): S181–S200.https://doi.org/10.1086/676517Jin-Hyuk Kim Employee Poaching: Why It Can Be Predatory, Managerial and Decision Economics 35, no.55 (Aug 2013): 309–317.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2637Pedro Bento Competition as a Discovery Procedure: Schumpeter Meets Hayek in a Model of Innovation, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 6, no.33 (Jul 2014): 124–152.https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.6.3.124Ryan Safner 'Public Goods,' or 'Good for the Public?' Endogenizing Public Goods, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2488655Chiara Fumagalli and Massimo Motta A Simple Theory of Predation, The Journal of Law and Economics 56, no.33 (Jul 2015): 595–631.https://doi.org/10.1086/672951Helder Vasconcelos Can the failing firm defence rule be counterproductive?, Oxford Economic Papers 65, no.22 (Sep 2012): 567–593.https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gps034Stefano Colombo Predation in Space, Spatial Economic Analysis 8, no.11 (Sep 2012): 9–22.https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2012.722667Jason E. Taylor, Mona Moldoveanu, Jerry L. Taylor Product Characteristics and the Effectiveness of Dow’s Countermeasure for Predatory Pricing, International Journal of the Economics of Business 20, no.11 (Feb 2013): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2012.750043Y. H. Venus Lun, Olli-Pekka Hilmola, Alexander M. Goulielmos, Kee-hung Lai, T. C. Edwin Cheng Oil Tanker Economics: A Case of Oligopsony or of Perfect Competition?, (Jul 2012): 27–62.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2921-9_3J.R. Boyce Externality Regulation in Oil and Gas, (Jan 2013): 154–168.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375067-9.00056-5Sandeep Vaheesan Reconsidering Brooke Group: Predatory Pricing and the Empirical Learning, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2336700George L. Priest Bork's Strategy, Price Fixing, and the Influence of the Chicago School on Modern Antitrust Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2367028Yutian Chen, Wei Tan A Theory on Predatory Advertising After a Demand-Reducing Shock, Eastern Economic Journal 38, no.44 (Dec 2011): 460–478.https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2011.24Cesaltina Pacheco Pires, Sílvia Ferreira Jorge Limit pricing under third-degree price discrimination, International Journal of Game Theory 41, no.33 (Nov 2011): 671–698.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-011-0310-xGeorge Selgin Mere quibbles: Bagus and Howden’s critique of the theory of free banking, The Review of Austrian Economics 25, no.22 (May 2011): 131–148.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-011-0154-4Walter E. Block Micro‐finance: a critique, Humanomics 28, no.22 (May 2012): 92–117.https://doi.org/10.1108/08288661211228870Nicola Giocoli Old Lady Charm: Explaining the Persistent Appeal of Chicago Antitrust, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2070666Victor J. Tremblay, Carol Horton Tremblay Antitrust Law and Regulation, (Apr 2012): 587–646.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3241-8_20Hanna Trojanowska Wpływ nauki na etykę życia gospodarczego na podstawie sporu o ceny drapieżne, Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym 15 (Jan 2012): 231–238.https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.15.20Nicola Giocoli When low is no good: Predatory pricing and U.S. antitrust law (1950–1980), The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18, no.55 (Dec 2011): 777–806.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2011.616596Steven G. Medema Chicago Price Theory and Chicago Law and Economics, (Oct 2011): 151–179.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004077.012Juan José Ganuza, María Fernanda Viecens Deployment of high-speed broadband infrastructures during the economic crisis. The case of Xarxa Oberta, Telecommunications Policy 35, no.9-109-10 (Oct 2011): 857–870.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.06.011Abel M Mateus Predatory Pricing: A Proposed Structured Rule of Reason, European Competition Journal 7, no.22 (May 2015): 243–267.https://doi.org/10.5235/174410511797248261Robert Van Horn, Matthias Klaes Chicago neoliberalism versus Cowles planning: Perspectives on patents and public goods in Cold War Economic Thought, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 47, no.33 (Jul 2011): 302–321.https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20512Luca Mazzone, Alberto Mingardi INNOVATION, COMPETITION AND ANTITRUST: AN EXAMINATION OF THE INTEL CASE, Economic Affairs 31, no.22 (Jun 2011): 68–75.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2011.02083.xMichael Reksulak, William F. Shughart Of Rebates and Drawbacks: The Standard Oil (N.J.) Company and the Railroads, Review of Industrial Organization 38, no.33 (Feb 2011): 267–283.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-011-9279-7James A. Dalton, Louis Esposito Standard Oil and Predatory Pricing: Myth Paralleling Fact, Review of Industrial Organization 38, no.33 (Feb 2011): 245–266.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-011-9280-1John Howard Brown Introduction: The Centennial of the Standard Oil of New Jersey Decision, Review of Industrial Organization 38, no.33 (Feb 2011): 223–224.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-011-9284-xJohn Howard Brown Contracts Versus Price Discrimination: Evidence From the SONJ Case, Review of Industrial Organization 38, no.33 (Mar 2011): 235–243.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-011-9285-9Cristián A. Banfi DEFINING THE COMPETITION TORTS AS INTENTIONAL WRONGS, The Cambridge Law Journal 70, no.11 (Mar 2011): 83–112.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197311000183George Selgin Mere Quibbles: Bagus and Howden's Critique of The Theory of Free Banking, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1800813David Mayer-Foulkes Vulnerable Markets, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1878683Stefano Colombo Discriminatory Prices, Predation and Signal-Jamming in a Horizontal Differentiation Model, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 10, no.22 (Sep 2009): 87–104.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-009-0058-1Joseph Hung Kit Lai Operation and maintenance budgeting for commercial buildings in Hong Kong, Construction Management and Economics 28, no.44 (Apr 2010): 415–427.https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903365665Federico Etro Endogenous market structures and antitrust policy, International Review of Economics 57, no.11 (Jan 2010): 9–45.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-009-0088-3CHIARA FUMAGALLI, MASSIMO MOTTA, LARS PERSSON ON THE ANTICOMPETITIVE EFFECT OF EXCLUSIVE DEALING WHEN ENTRY BY MERGER IS POSSIBLE, The Journal of Industrial Economics 57, no.44 (Dec 2009): 785–811.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00401.xStefano Colombo On the Effects of Selective Below-Cost Pricing in a Vertical Differentiation Model, Economics 3, no.11 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2009-33Sung-Hwan Kim Predatory reputation in US airline markets, International Journal of Industrial Organization 27, no.55 (Sep 2009): 592–604.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.02.002Nithum Thain, Adrian Vetta Computational Aspects of Multimarket Price Wars, (Jan 2009): 304–315.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10841-9_28Robert W. McGee Ethical Aspects of Using Government to Subvert Competition: Antidumping Laws as a Case Study of Rent Seeking Activity, Journal of Business Ethics 83, no.44 (Jan 2008): 759–771.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9663-xThomas Gorin, Peter Belobaba Assessing predation in airline markets with low-fare competition, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42, no.55 (Jun 2008): 784–798.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.016Robert W. McGee Antidumping Laws as Weapons of Protectionism: Case Studies from Asia, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1081965Lawrence J. White The Growing Influence of Economics and Economists on Antitrust: An Extended Discussion, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1091531Lawrence J. White The Role of Competition Policy in the Promotion of Economic Growth, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1129833Nicola Giocoli Three Alternative (?) Stories on the Late 20th-Century Rise of Game Theory, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1140111Daniel J. Gifford, Robert T. Kudrle The Law and Economics of Price Discrimination in Modern Economies: Time for Reconciliation?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1188722Janusz A. Ordover Predatory Pricing, (Mar 2017): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1778-2Steven G. Medema Director, Aaron (1901–2004), (Dec 2016): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2769-1Vivek Ghosal, Joseph E. Harrington, Johan Stennek Chapter 1 Issues in Antitrust Enforcement, (Jan 2007): 1–23.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0573-8555(06)82001-8Timothy J. Brennan Chapter 16 Saving Section 2: Reframing U.S. Monopolization Law, (Jan 2007): 417–451.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0573-8555(06)82016-XLouis Kaplow, Carl Shapiro Chapter 15 Antitrust, (Jan 2007): 1073–1225.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)02015-4Louis Kaplow, Carl Shapiro Antitrust, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.961264Steven M. Shugan Editorial —Does Good Marketing Cause Bad Unemployment?, Marketing Science 26, no.11 (Jan 2007): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0265William A. Kerr Dumping: Trade Policy in Need of a Theoretical Make Over*, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie 54, no.11 (Mar 2006): 11–31.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2006.00036.xRobert W. McGee Ethical Aspects of Using Government to Subvert Competition: Antidumping Laws as a Case Study of Rent Seeking Activity, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.932992Robert W. McGee Antidumping, Business Ethics and International Relations, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.947929Arthur M. Diamond Measurement, incentives and constraintsin Stigler's economics of science, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12, no.44 (Aug 2006): 635–661.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560500370292 Sam Peltzman Aaron Director’s Influence on Antitrust Policy Lastname, The Journal of Law and Economics 48, no.22 (Jul 2015): 313–330.https://doi.org/10.1086/497527Daniel G. Arce M Subgame perfection and the ethics of competition, Managerial and Decision Economics 26, no.66 (Jan 2005): 397–405.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1239Gary D. Libecap Chinatown: Transaction Costs in Water Rights Exchanges. The Owens Valley Transfer to Los Angeles, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.761764Tim Brennan Saving Section 2: Reframing Monopolization Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.867106Justus Haucap, Jörn Kruse Verdrängungspreise auf Telekommunikationsmärkten?, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 5, no.33 (Aug 2004): 337–361.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2516.2004.00155.xThomas Gorin, Peter Belobaba Impacts of entry in airline markets: effects of revenue management on traditional measures of airline performance, Journal of Air Transport Management 10, no.44 (Jul 2004): 257–268.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2004.03.002Jorge Fernández-Ruiz Predation due to adverse selection in financial markets, International Journal of Industrial Organization 22, no.55 (May 2004): 715–733.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2003.08.002Thomas W. Ross Viewpoint: Canadian competition policy: progress and prospects, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d`Economique 37, no.22 (May 2004): 243–268.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.00001.xLars Persson Predation and mergers: Is merger law counterproductive?, European Economic Review 48, no.22 (Apr 2004): 239–258.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00051-5Aron A. Gottesman The Strategic use of Convertible Debt in “Deep Pocket” Predatory Games, The American Economist 48, no.11 (Jul 2016): 50–60.https://doi.org/10.1177/056943450404800104Robert W Crandall, Clifford Winston Does Antitrust Policy Improve Consumer Welfare? Assessing the Evidence, Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, no.44 (Nov 2003): 3–26.https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003772034871Robin Lindsey, Douglas S. West Predatory pricing in differentiated products retail markets, International Journal of Industrial Organization 21, no.44 (Apr 2003): 551–592.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(02)00089-9William L. Anderson Pounding square pegs into round holes: Another look at the neoclassical theory of predatory pricing, The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6, no.11 (Mar 2003): 23–40.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-003-1011-5Anthony M. Marino, Jan Zabojnik Merger, Ease of Entry, and Entry Deterrence in a Dynamic Model, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.398080Harumi Ito, Darin Lee Incumbent Responses to Lower Cost Entry: Evidence from the U.S. Airline Industry, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.724161R. H. Coase Director, Aaron (1901-), (Jan 2002): 601–605.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_114Kyle Bagwell, Asher Wolinsky Chapter 49 Game theory and industrial organization, (Jan 2002): 1851–1895.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0005(02)03012-6Martina Lauk Econometric Analysis of the Decisions of the German Cartel Office, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.315921Edmund W. Kitch Chicago school of law and economics, (Jan 2017): 227–233.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_49Richard Gilbert, Oliver Williamson Antitrust Policy, (Jan 2017): 82–88.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_19Janusz A. Ordover Predatory Pricing, (Jan 2017): 1477–1484.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_283Shelby D. Hunt, Dennis B. Arnett Competition as an Evolutionary Process and Antitrust Policy, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 20, no.11 (Oct 2018): 15–26.https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.20.1.15.17296C.Monica Capra, Jacob K. Goeree, Rosario Gomez, Charles A. Holt Predation, asymmetric information and strategic behavior in the classroom: an experimental approach to the teaching of industrial organization, International Journal of Industrial Organization 18, no.11 (Jan 2000): 205–225.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00040-5Kyle Bagwell, Asher Wolinsky Game Theory and Industrial Organization, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.239431Robert W. McGee The Ethics of Using Government to Subvert Competition: The Case of the Antidumping Laws, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.242411D. P. O'Brien Four detours, Journal of Economic Methodology 5, no.11 (Jun 1998): 23–41.https://doi.org/10.1080/13501789800000002Peter Newman P, (Jan 1998): 1–198.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_1Dennis C. Mueller A Global Competition Policy for a Global Economy, (Jan 1998): 211–235.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72210-3_9Robert W. McGee Antidumping Laws: A Bright Future for a Bad Idea, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.73991Robert W. McGee, Yeomin Yoon Antidumping and the People's Republic of China: Five Case Studies, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.87811Robert W. McGee Antidumping Laws as Protectionist Trade Barriers: The Case for Repeal, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.91268Coldwell Daniel The antitrust laws: A primer John H. Shenefield and Irwin M. Stelzer AEI Press, 1993, xi, 118 pp., Atlantic Economic Journal 25, no.44 (Dec 1997): 420–426.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298351Brad Kamp, Christopher R. Thomas Faux Predation in Markets with Imperfect Information on Product Quality, Southern Economic Journal 64, no.22 (Oct 1997): 555–566.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.1997.tb00073.xTara J. Schleicher The U.S. Supreme Court's Use of Post-Chicago Antitrust Theory in Eastman Kodak v. Image Technical Services: Implications for Marketing Practice, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 16, no.22 (Dec 2018): 310–318.https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569701600211Toshikazu Kawakami, Yoshida Yoshihiro Collusion under financial constraints: Collusion or predation when the discount factor is near one?, Economics Letters 54, no.22 (Feb 1997): 175–178.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00913-0James A. Sundali, Amnon Rapoport Induction vs. Deterrence in the Chain Store Game: How Many Potential Entrants are Needed to Deter Entry?, (Jan 1997): 403–417.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_31Farid Gasmi, Wendy L. Hansen, Jean Jacques Laffont Une analyse empirique des décisions en matière d’antidumping aux États-Unis, L'Actualité économique 73, no.1-2-31-2-3 (Feb 2009): 423–456.https://doi.org/10.7202/602235arRobert W. McGee Some thoughts on anti‐dumping laws: utilitarianism, human rights and the case for repeal, European Business Review 96, no.55 (Oct 1996): 27–33.https://doi.org/10.1108/09555349610127968Dennis C. Mueller Lessons from the United States's antitrust history, International Journal of Industrial Organization 14, no.44 (Jun 1996): 415–445.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(95)00490-4 Elizabeth Granitz , and Benjamin Klein Monopolization by "Raising Rivals' Costs": The Standard Oil Case, The Journal of Law and Economics 39, no.11 (Oct 2015): 1–47.https://doi.org/10.1086/467342 William J. Baumol Predation and the Logic of the Average Variable Cost Test, The Journal of Law and Economics 39, no.11 (Oct 2015): 49–72.https://doi.org/10.1086/467343Susan Gates, Paul Milgrom, John Roberts Deterring predation in telecommunications: Are line-of-business restraints needed?, Managerial and Decision Economics 16, no.44 (Jul 1995): 427–438.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090160412John R. Lott Are government or private enterprises more likely to engage in dumping? Some international evidence, Managerial and Decision Economics 16, no.33 (May 1995): 185–204.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090160302William E. Kovacic The Application of Legal Safeguards Against Predation to the Postal Services Industry, (Jan 1995): 45–65.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2784-8_3Manfred Neumann Competition Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany, (Jan 1995): 95–131.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0387-9_5Yoram Barzel The capture of wealth by monopolists and the protection of property rights, International Review of Law and Economics 14, no.44 (Dec 1994): 393–409.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90023-XDavid Harbord, Tom Hoehn Barriers to entry and exit in European competition policy, International Review of Law and Economics 14, no.44 (Dec 1994): 411–435.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90024-8David Gabel Competition in a Network Industry: The Telephone Industry, 1894–1910, The Journal of Economic History 54, no.33 (Mar 2009): 543–572.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700015035William C. Mitchell, Michael C. Munger Doing Well While Intending Good: Cases in Political Exploitation, Journal of Theoretical Politics 5, no.33 (Jul 1993): 317–348.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692893005003002 George Bittlingmayer The Stock Market and Early Antitrust Enforcement, The Journal of Law and Economics 36, no.1, Part 11, Part 1 (Oct 2015): 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1086/467263 R. H. Coase Law and Economics at Chicago, The Journal of Law and Economics 36, no.1, Part 21, Part 2 (Oct 2015): 239–254.https://doi.org/10.1086/467274 George L. Priest The Origins of Utility Regulation and the "Theories of Regulation" Debate, The Journal of Law and Economics 36, no.1, Part 21, Part 2 (Oct 2015): 289–323.https://doi.org/10.1086/467276MARK F. GRADY TOWARD A POSITIVE ECONOMIC THEORY OF ANTITRUST, Economic Inquiry 30, no.22 (Apr 1992): 225–241.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1992.tb01655.xPeter Newman, Murray Milgate, John Eatwell P, (Jan 1992): 115–244.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11721-5_3Roland H. Koller Predatory pricing: where do we stand?, (Jan 1992): 133–145.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2795-0_8Robert Wilson Chapter 10 Strategic models of entry deterrence, (Jan 1992): 305–329.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0005(05)80013-XR.David Simpson Signaling in an infinitely repeated Cournot game with output restrictions, International Journal of Industrial Organization 9, no.33 (Sep 1991): 365–388.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(91)90017-FF. M. Scherer Antitrust: Ideology or economics?, Critical Review 5, no.44 (Mar 2008): 497–511.https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819108443239Alexander C. Larson The FCC's net revenue test as a predation and cross-subsidy safeguard, Utilities Policy 1, no.44 (Jul 1991): 319–325.https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-1787(91)90072-DClement G. Krouse COMPETITION FOR MONOPOLY, II: ENTRY AND EXIT, Bulletin of Economic Research 43, no.33 (Jul 1991): 197–222.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.1991.tb00493.xDavid Friedman Law and Economics, (Jan 1991): 371–380.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21315-3_47Paul Milgrom Predatory Pricing, (Jan 1991): 574–577.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21315-3_76Alexander Larson Predatory Pricing Safeguards and Telecommunications Regulation, (Jan 1991): 51–69.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4048-9_4John S. Dodgson, Y. Katsoulacos Competition, contestability and predation: the economics of competition in deregulated bus markets, Transportation Planning and Technology 15, no.2-42-4 (Jan 1991): 263–275.https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069108717458Jonathan Preston Explaining competitive practices in the bus industry: the British experience, Transportation Planning and Technology 15, no.2-42-4 (Jan 1991): 277–294.https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069108717459Gary W. Bowman, Erwin A. Blackstone Low price conspiracy: Trade regulation and the case of Japanese electronics, Atlantic Economic Journal 18, no.44 (Dec 1990): 59–67.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299020John R. Lott Predation by public enterprises, Journal of Public Economics 43, no.22 (Nov 1990): 237–251.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(90)90032-D David Reiffen , and Andrew N. Kleit Terminal Railroad Revisited: Foreclosure of an Essential Facility or Simple Horizontal Monopoly?, The Journal of Law and Economics 33, no.22 (Oct 2015): 419–438.https://doi.org/10.1086/467212Reuven Brenner Innovations and Antitrust, (Jan 1990): 235–257.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2073-6_13Gregory T. Gundlach Predatory Practices in Competitive Interaction: Legal Limits and Antitrust Considerations, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 9, no.11 (Nov 2018): 129–153.https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569000900110Malcolm R. Burns New evidence on predatory price cutting, Managerial and Decision Economics 10, no.44 (Dec 1989): 327–330.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090100410David Friedman Law and Economics, (Jan 1989): 173–182.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20313-0_21Janusz A. Ordover, Garth Saloner Chapter 9 Predation, monopolization, and antitrust, (Jan 1989): 537–596.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(89)01012-5Gabrielle A. Brenner, Reuven Brenner Les innovations et la Loi sur la concurrence, L'Actualité économique 65, no.11 (Feb 2009): 146–162.https://doi.org/10.7202/601484arKeith Weigelt, Colin Camerer Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications, Strategic Management Journal 9, no.55 (Sep 1988): 443–454.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090505Charles W. McCall Rule of reason versus mechanical tests in the adjudication of price predation, Review of Industrial Organization 3, no.33 (Mar 1988): 15–44.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229564Paul Milgrom Predatory Pricing, (Nov 2016): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1778-1David Friedman Law and Economics, (Oct 2016): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_693-1 Malcolm R. Burns Predatory Pricing and the Acquisition Cost of Competitors, Journal of Political Economy 94, no.22 (Oct 2015): 266–296.https://doi.org/10.1086/261374David Encaoua, Paul Geroski, Alexis Jacquemin Strategic Competition and the Persistence of Dominant Firms: a Survey, (Jan 1986): 55–89.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18058-5_2C. W. L. Hill Diversified growth and competition: the experience of twelve large UK firms, Applied Economics 17, no.55 (May 2006): 827–847.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036848500000039J. VICKERS The Economics of Predatory Practices, Fiscal Studies 6, no.33 (Aug 1985): 24–36.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1985.tb00406.x James C. Miller III , and Paul Pautler Predation: The Changing View in Economics and the Law, The Journal of Law and Economics 28, no.22 (Oct 2015): 495–502.https://doi.org/10.1086/467098 R. Mark Isaac , and Vernon L. Smith In Search of Predatory Pricing, Journal of Political Economy 93, no.22 (Oct 2015): 320–345.https://doi.org/10.1086/261302JOHN M. BARRON, MARK A. LOEWENSTEIN, JOHN R. UMBECK PREDATORY PRICING: THE CASE OF THE RETAIL GASOLINE MARKET, Contemporary Economic Policy 3, no.33 (Mar 1985): 131–139.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1985.tb00814.xLacy Glenn Thomas Antitrust and the Issue of Competitive Advantage: Economic Analysis and United States v. IBM, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 10, no.11 (Nov 2018): 165–187.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1985.tb00503.xGerald A. Hanweck, Stephen A. Rhoades Dominant firms, “deep pockets,” and local market competition in banking, Journal of Economics and Business 36, no.44 (Dec 1984): 391–402.https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-6195(84)90021-3Paul Milgrom, John Roberts Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence, Journal of Economic Theory 27, no.22 (Aug 1982): 280–312.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(82)90031-XMalcolm R. Burns Outside Intervention in Monopolistic Price Warfare: The Case of the “Plug War” and the Union Tobacco Company, Business History Review 56, no.11 (Jun 2012): 33–53.https://doi.org/10.2307/3114974Linda Elizabeth DeAngelo Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation, Journal of Accounting and Economics 3, no.22 (Aug 1981): 113–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90009-4 Kenneth G. Elzinga , Journal of Political Economy 88, no.55 (Oct 2015): 1055–1057.https://doi.org/10.1086/260925David D. Friedman In Defense of Thomas Aquinas and the Just Price, History of Political Economy 12, no.22 (Jun 1980): 234–242.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-12-2-234Richard B. McKenzie, Bruce Yandle The Logic of "Irrational" Politics: Nixon's Reelection Committee, Public Finance Quarterly 8, no.11 (Aug 2016): 39–55.https://doi.org/10.1177/109114218000800103KENNETH G. ELZINGA The Robinson-Patman Act: A New Deal for Small Business, (Jan 1979): 63–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-733950-4.50011-0Randall Mariger Predatory price cutting: The standard oil of New Jersey case revisited, Explorations in Economic History 15, no.44 (Oct 1978): 341–367.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(78)90043-8 Richard A. Posner An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration, The Journal of Legal Studies 2, no.22 (Oct 2015): 399–458.https://doi.org/10.1086/467503Donald J. Boudreaux Standard Oil and Microsoft: Antitrust Lessons, (): 860–863.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_191 References, (): 257–274.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49601-4_8Michael Reksulak, William F Shughart, Robert D Tollison, Atin Basuchoudhary TITAN AGONISTES: THE WEALTH EFFECTS OF THE STANDARD OIL (N. J.) CASE, (): 63–84.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-5895(04)21002-8 L. G. Telser Cutthroat Competition and the Long Purse, The Journal of Law and Economics 9 (Oct 2015): 259–277.https://doi.org/10.1086/466627
Referência(s)