Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

A Vegetative Mutant, and the Principle of Homoeosis in Plants

1909; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 47; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/329802

1940-1205

Robert Greenleaf Leavitt,

Plant Diversity and Evolution

Previous articleNext article FreeA Vegetative Mutant, and the Principle of Homoeosis in PlantsRobert Greenleaf LeavittRobert Greenleaf LeavittPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 47, Number 1Jan., 1909 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/329802 Views: 160Total views on this site Citations: 33Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in the Botanical Gazette (1876-1991), which is continued by International Journal of Plant Sciences (1992-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Hongli Chang, Weihong Ji, Yule Xie, Shujun He, Zhenfeng Xie, Fengjie Sun Morphological Characterization of Metamorphosis in Stamens of Anemone barbulata Turcz. (Ranunculaceae), Agronomy 13, no.22 (Feb 2023): 554.https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020554Rolf Sattler Kaplan’s Principles of Plant Morphology: A Critical Review, The Botanical Review 88, no.22 (Jun 2022): 257–270.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-022-09280-8Johann Hohenegger Evolution, Motor of the Changing Biosphere, (Oct 2021): 275–290.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4457-3_17Xiumei Li, Tian Fan, Pu Zou, Wenhu Zhang, Xiuju Wu, Yixin Zhang, Jingping Liao Can the anatomy of abnormal flowers elucidate relationships of the androecial members in the ginger (Zingiberaceae)?, EvoDevo 11, no.11 (Jun 2020).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-020-00157-8Carolina Concha, Richard W.R. Wallbank, Joseph J. Hanly, Jennifer Fenner, Luca Livraghi, Edgardo Santiago Rivera, Daniel F. Paulo, Carlos Arias, Marta Vargas, Manu Sanjeev, Colin Morrison, David Tian, Paola Aguirre, Sabrina Ferrara, Jessica Foley, Carolina Pardo-Diaz, Camilo Salazar, Mauricio Linares, Darli Massardo, Brian A. Counterman, Maxwell J. Scott, Chris D. Jiggins, Riccardo Papa, Arnaud Martin, W. Owen McMillan Interplay between Developmental Flexibility and Determinism in the Evolution of Mimetic Heliconius Wing Patterns, Current Biology 29, no.2323 (Dec 2019): 3996–4009.e4.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.010Nathanaël Prunet, Elliot M. Meyerowitz Genetics and plant development, Comptes Rendus Biologies 339, no.7-87-8 (Jul 2016): 240–246.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.003Robert G. Franks Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Floral Development, (Dec 2013): 263–273.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9408-9_13George Acquaah, Joseph W. Saunders, Lowell C. Ewart Homeotic Floral Mutations, (Jun 2010): 63–99.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650363.ch4Gerd Bossinger Segments (Phytomers), (Mar 2009).https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0002093.pub2 Louis P. Ronse De Craene The Evolutionary Significance of Homeosis in Flowers: A Morphological Perspective Ronse De Craene, International Journal of Plant Sciences 164, no.S5S5 (Jul 2015): S225–S235.https://doi.org/10.1086/376878Francisco Vergara-Silva Plants and the Conceptual Articulation of Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Biology & Philosophy 18, no.22 (Mar 2003): 249–284.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023936102602Gerd Bossinger Segments (Phytomers), (Oct 2001).https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0002093Claudia Brückner Clarification of the carpel number in Papaverales, Capparales, and Berberidaceae, The Botanical Review 66, no.22 (Apr 2000): 155–307.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858151C. Brückner Carpelloid stamens in Papaveraceae JUSS. and Brassicaceae BURNETT (Cruciferae JUSS.) and their bearing on theories of gynoecium organization, Feddes Repertorium 107, no.5-65-6 (Dec 1996): 321–337.https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.4921070508C. Brückner Carpelloid stamens in Papaveraceae J USS . and Brassicaceae B URNETT (Cruciferae J USS .) and their bearing on theories of gynoecium organization, Feddes Repertorium 107, no.5-65-6 (Apr 2008): 321–337.https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.19961070508Vittoria Nuti Ronchi Mitosis and Meiosis in Cultured Plant Cells and Their Relationship to Variant Cell Types Arising in Culture, (Jan 1995): 65–140.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62486-9D. J. Mabberley, A. Hay Homoeosis, canalization, decanalization, ‘characters’ and angiosperm origins, Edinburgh Journal of Botany 51, no.11 (Apr 2010): 117–126.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428600001761Rolf Sattler HOMOLOGY, HOMEOSIS, AND PROCESS MORPHOLOGY IN PLANTS, (Jan 1994): 423–475.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-318920-2.50019-6Naida L. Lehmann, Rolf Sattler Homeosis in floral development of Sanguinaria canadensis and S. canadensis ‘Multiplex’ (Papaveraceae), American Journal of Botany 80, no.1111 (Nov 1993): 1323–1335.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15372.xNaida L. Lehmann, Rolf Sattler IRREGULAR FLORAL DEVELOPMENT IN CALLA PALUSTRIS (ARACEAE) AND THE CONCEPT OF HOMEOSIS, American Journal of Botany 79, no.1010 (Oct 1992): 1145–1157.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb13710.xV. Albert, S. Williams, M. Chase Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution, Science 257, no.50765076 (Sep 1992): 1491–1495.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1523408W. A. Charlton Homoeosis and shoot construction in Azara microphylla Hook. (Flacourtiaceae), Acta Botanica Neerlandica 40, no.44 (Apr 2015): 329–337.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1991.tb01563.xBruce K. Kirchoff HOMEOSIS IN THE FLOWERS OF THE ZINGIBERALES, American Journal of Botany 78, no.66 (Jun 1991): 833–837.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb14485.xR. Scott Poethig Phase Change and the Regulation of Shoot Morphogenesis in Plants, Science 250, no.49834983 (Nov 1990): 923–930.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.250.4983.923Rolf Sattler HOMEOSIS IN PLANTS, American Journal of Botany 75, no.1010 (Oct 1988): 1606–1617.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb11234.xCLAIRE COONEY-SOVETTS, ROLF SATTLER Phylloclade development in the Asparagaceae: an example of homoeosis, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 94, no.33 (May 2008): 327–371.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1986.tb01053.xSergei V. Meyen Basic features of gymnosperm systematics and phylogeny as evidenced by the fossil record, The Botanical Review 50, no.11 (Jan 1984): 1–111.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02874305G. Cusset The Conceptual Bases of Plant Morphology, (Jan 1982): 8–86.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7636-8_2Timothy A. Dickinson Epiphylly in Angiosperms, The Botanical Review 44, no.22 (Apr 1978): 181–232.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02919079Rolf Sattler A new conception of the shoot of higher plants, Journal of Theoretical Biology 47, no.22 (Oct 1974): 367–382.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90204-5T. A. DICKINSON, R. SATTLER Development of the epiphyllous inflorescence of Phyllonoma integerrima (Turcz.) Loes.: implications for comparative morphology*, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 69, no.11 (Jun 2008): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1974.tb01609.xS. V. Meyen Plant morphology in its nomothetical aspects, The Botanical Review 39, no.33 (Jul 1973): 205–260.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860118R. Bloch Abnormal development in plants: A survey, (Jan 1965): 1803–1830.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50088-6_43