Influence of splints and temporary crowns upon electric and thermal pulp‐testing procedures
1976; Wiley; Volume: 84; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1600-0722.1976.tb00492.x
ISSN1600-0722
AutoresH.‐J. FULLING, Jens Ove Andreasen,
Tópico(s)Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering
Resumoabstract – The influence of different splints and temporary crowns upon the reliability of electric and thermal pulp‐testing procedures was examined in 10 patients with vital maxillary central incisors and 10 patients with unilateral pulp necrosis of a central incisor. The pulp‐testing procedures were: (1) Bofors Pulp Tester®, (2) Siemens Sirotest®, (3) heated guttapercha, (4) ice, and (5) carbon dioxide snow (Odontotest®). The splints or temporary crowns were: (1) silver cap splint, (2) acrylic cap splint, (3) Hawley orthodontic plate, (4) Saur's arch bar, (5) orthodontic bands, (6) stainless steel crown, and (7) stainless steel crown with labial surface removed. A reliable electrometric pulp response could only be elicited if the pulp tester was applied directly upon enamel and preferably upon the incisal edge. In this instance metal splints or partial steel crowns applied to the tooth had no effect on the pain threshold. A false positive reaction in case of pulp necrosis was only elicited when the electrode was placed directly upon metal which contacted neighboring vital teeth. The use of ice and heated guttapercha appeared to be of limited value, due to inconsistent pulp responses. Carbon dioxide snow gave a reliable response, unless applied on the incisal edge.
Referência(s)