The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research
1959; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 67; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/258177
ISSN1537-534X
Autores Tópico(s)Innovation Policy and R&D
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Simple Economics of Basic Scientific ResearchRichard R. NelsonRichard R. Nelson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 67, Number 3Jun., 1959 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/258177 Views: 374Total views on this site Citations: 1412Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1959 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Stefano Clò, Marco Frigerio, Daniela Vandone Financial support to innovation: The role of European development financial institutions, Research Policy 51, no.1010 (Dec 2022): 104566.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104566Jin-Uk Choi, Chang-Yang Lee The differential effects of basic research on firm R&D productivity: The conditioning role of technological diversification, Technovation 118 (Dec 2022): 102559.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102559Daniele Rotolo, Roberto Camerani, Nicola Grassano, Ben R. Martin Why do firms publish? A systematic literature review and a conceptual framework, Research Policy 51, no.1010 (Dec 2022): 104606.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104606Etienne Billette de Villemeur, Jack W. Scannell, Bruno Versaevel Biopharmaceutical R&D outsourcing: Short-term gain for long-term pain?, Drug Discovery Today 27, no.1111 (Nov 2022): 103333.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2022.08.001A. A. Auzan, A. A. Kurdin Institutional Aspects of the Evolution of Scientific Schools, Studies on Russian Economic Development 33, no.55 (Sep 2022): 529–534.https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700722050045Nicolas Carayol, Elodie Carpentier The spread of academic invention: a nationwide case study on French data (1995–2012), The Journal of Technology Transfer 47, no.55 (Oct 2021): 1395–1421.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09888-9Xi Zhang, Rui Li, Jinglei Zhang The diminishing marginal contribution of R&D investment on green technological progress: a case study of China’s manufacturing industry, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 102 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23183-6Ibrahim A Shaikh, Krithika Randhawa Industrial R&D and national innovation policy: an institutional reappraisal of the US national innovation system, Industrial and Corporate Change 31, no.55 (Apr 2022): 1152–1176.https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtac019Lia Sheer Sitting on the Fence: Integrating the two worlds of scientific discovery and invention within the firm, Research Policy 51, no.77 (Sep 2022): 104550.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104550Byunggeor Moon Unleash liquidity constraints or competitiveness potential: The impact of R&D grant on external financing on innovation, European Research on Management and Business Economics 28, no.33 (Sep 2022): 100195.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100195Kun Su, Ji Wu, Yue Lu With trust we innovate: Evidence from corporate R&D expenditure, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 182 (Sep 2022): 121834.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121834Beatriz Corchuelo Martínez-Azúa, Celia Sama-Berrocal Objectives of and Barriers to Innovation: How Do They Influence the Decision to Innovate?, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 8, no.33 (Aug 2022): 134.https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030134Ozgur Aydogmus Increasing returns and path dependence in knowledge creation and their effects on the dynamics of patent pools, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 62 (Sep 2022): 467–477.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.06.006Rupika Khanna, Chandan Sharma Impact of information technology on firm performance: New evidence from Indian manufacturing, Information Economics and Policy 60 (Sep 2022): 100986.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100986Mashudu Patience Mamathaba, Kowiyou Yessoufou, Annah Moteetee What Does It Take to Further Our Knowledge of Plant Diversity in the Megadiverse South Africa?, Diversity 14, no.99 (Sep 2022): 748.https://doi.org/10.3390/d14090748David Grandadam, Patrick Cohendet, Raphaël Suire Building and nurturing grassroots innovation: A policy framework based on the local commons, European Planning Studies 30, no.88 (Nov 2021): 1577–1595.https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1998385Shunli Qiu, Qinwei Cao, Meng Jiao, Sijing Liang Research types and innovation performance: the mediating effect of paper influence and patent novelty, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 34, no.88 (May 2021): 919–932.https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1933412Danlin Shen, Carl R. Chen, Xinyan Yan, Zhihong Yi Do credit market accessibility and legal protection shape corporate innovation?, Journal of Financial Research 25 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12297Zhenbing Yang, Zhuo Chen, Shuai Shao, Lili Yang Can housing price regulation improve R&D performance in universities? Evidence from China, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 82 (Aug 2022): 101252.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101252Deepa Scarrà, Andrea Piccaluga The impact of technology transfer and knowledge spillover from Big Science: a literature review, Technovation 116 (Aug 2022): 102165.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102165Ivan Lugovoi, Dimitrios A. Andritsos, Claire Senot Novelty and scope of process innovation: The role of related and unrelated manufacturing experience, Production and Operations Management 37 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13793Cristian Mardones, Luis Sepúlveda Public funding effects on inputs and outputs from the innovative process in Chilean firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 31, no.55 (Oct 2020): 416–445.https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1827574José Pablo Montégu, Julio A. Pertuze, Carolina Calvo The effects of importing activities on technological and non-technological innovation: evidence from Chilean firms, International Journal of Emerging Markets 17, no.77 (Nov 2021): 1659–1678.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2020-0534Marianne Steinmo, Thomas Lauvås, Einar Rasmussen How R&D subsidies alter firm activities and behaviour, Innovation 24, no.33 (Jan 2022): 381–406.https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.2015356Christos Dimos, Geoff Pugh, Mehtap Hisarciklilar, Ema Talam, Ian Jackson The relative effectiveness of R&D tax credits and R&D subsidies: A comparative meta-regression analysis, Technovation 115 (Jul 2022): 102450.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102450Kyle R. Myers, Lauren Lanahan Estimating Spillovers from Publicly Funded R&D: Evidence from the US Department of Energy, American Economic Review 112, no.77 (Jul 2022): 2393–2423.https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20210678Verónica Robert, Gabriel Yoguel Exploration of trending concepts in innovation policy, Review of Evolutionary Political Economy 3, no.22 (Feb 2022): 259–292.https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-022-00064-9Juyeon Lee, Seung-Pyo Jun, Chul Lee Does demand-side innovation policy drive lock-in? Global evidence from solar energy in 155 countries, Energy Research & Social Science 89 (Jul 2022): 102539.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102539Kai Chang, Yu Long, Jiahui Yang, Huijia Zhang, Chenqi Xue, Jianing Liu Effects of subsidy and tax rebate policies on green firm research and development efficiency in China, Energy 104 (Jul 2022): 124793.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124793Suelene Mascarini, Renato Garcia, Nicholas Vonortas The relationship between public support and the degree of novelty of innovation, Innovation and Development 26 (Jun 2022): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2022.2092682David J. Bulman, Xun Yan, Qiong Zhang Picking Losers: How Career Incentives Undermine Industrial Policy in Chinese Cities, The Journal of Development Studies 58, no.66 (Mar 2022): 1102–1123.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2043280Wenxin Guo, Joseph A. Clougherty Cross-border acquisition activity by Chinese multinationals and domestic-productivity upgrading, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 39, no.22 (Oct 2020): 659–695.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09742-wJoão Ricardo Faria, Greg Tindall, Siri Terjesen The Green Tobin's q: theory and evidence, Energy Economics 110 (Jun 2022): 106033.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106033Matthew B. Baker, Anton W. Bosman, Martijn A.J. Cox, Patricia Y.W. Dankers, Aylvin Dias, Pascal Jonkheijm, Roxanne Kieltyka Supramolecular Biomaterials in the Netherlands, Tissue Engineering Part A 28, no.11-1211-12 (Jun 2022): 511–524.https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2022.0010Yefei Hu, Dayong Liu Government as a non-financial participant in innovation: How standardization led by government promotes regional innovation performance in China, Technovation 114 (Jun 2022): 102524.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102524Lea Jančičková, Renáta Pakšiová APPLICATION OF THE SUPER-DEDUCTION OF R&D COSTS BY TAX ENTITIES IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC ACCORDING TO THE GRAND CRITERION NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES, Acta academica karviniensia 22, no.11 (May 2022): 62–74.https://doi.org/10.25142/aak.2022.005Anders Kärnä, Johan Karlsson, Erik Engberg, Peter Svensson Political failure: a missing piece in innovation policy analysis, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 120 (May 2022): 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2022.2070843Scott W. Hegerty, Arkadiusz M. Kowalski, Małgorzata S. Lewandowska Complementarity of additionalities resulting from European Union funds: Perspective of the users of research infrastructures, Review of Policy Research 27 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12480Thomaz Wood, Renato Souza, Miguel P. Caldas The relevance of management research debate: a historical view, 1876–2018, Journal of Management History 28, no.33 (Feb 2022): 409–427.https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-10-2021-0056Santhi Perumal, Shyam Sreekumaran Nair Impact of views about knowledge and workplace relationships on tacit knowledge sharing, Knowledge Management Research & Practice 20, no.33 (Jul 2021): 410–421.https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.1947756Kevin Mulligan, Helena Lenihan, Justin Doran, Stephen Roper Harnessing the science base: Results from a national programme using publicly-funded research centres to reshape firms’ R&D, Research Policy 51, no.44 (May 2022): 104468.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104468Yunlong Duan, Zhiqing Deng, Hanxiao Liu, Meng Yang, Meiwu Liu, Xiang Wang Exploring the mediating effect of managerial ability on knowledge diversity and innovation performance in reverse cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing corporations, International Journal of Production Economics 247 (May 2022): 108434.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108434Ruifa Hu, Changxin Yu, Yanhong Jin, Carl Pray, Haiyan Deng Impact of Government Policies on Research and Development (R&D) Investment, Innovation, and Productivity: Evidence from Pesticide Firms in China, Agriculture 12, no.55 (May 2022): 709.https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050709Lindomayara França Ferreira, José Ricardo de Santana, Márcia Siqueira Rapini, Fábio Rodrigues de Moura Financiamento à pesquisa em energia renovável no Brasil: uma análise a partir do Fundo Setorial de Energia, Nova Economia 32, no.22 (May 2022): 505–537.https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/6984Joost Heijs, Alex J. Guerrero, Elena Huergo Understanding the Heterogeneous Additionality of R&D Subsidy Programs of Different Government Levels, Industry and Innovation 29, no.44 (Oct 2021): 533–563.https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1990024Wolf-Hendrik Uhlbach, Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Thomas Scherngell Public R&D funding and new regional specialisations: The contingent role of technological relatedness, Industry and Innovation 29, no.44 (Mar 2022): 511–532.https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2043147Yilin Zhang, Changyuan Gao, Jing Wang Financing constraints and innovation performance: the moderating role of the network location of cross-border innovation cooperation among Internet enterprises, European Journal of Innovation Management 34 (Apr 2022).https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2021-0392Giovanni Cerulli, Marco Corsino, Roberto Gabriele, Anna Giunta A dose–response evaluation of a regional R&D subsidies policy, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 31, no.33 (Jul 2020): 173–190.https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1792604Paola D'Orazio, Philipp Löwenstein Mobilising investments in renewable energy in Germany: which role for public investment banks?, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 12, no.22 (Jun 2020): 451–474.https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1777062Michele Pezzoni, Reinhilde Veugelers, Fabiana Visentin How fast is this novel technology going to be a hit? Antecedents predicting follow-on inventions, Research Policy 51, no.33 (Apr 2022): 104454.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104454Hailin Yao, Wei Huang Effect of R&D Subsidies on External Collaborative Networks and the Sustainable Innovation Performance of Strategic Emerging Enterprises: Evidence from China, Sustainability 14, no.88 (Apr 2022): 4722.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084722Sangyun Han The effect of performance feedback on strategic alliance formation and R&D intensity, European Management Journal 138 (Apr 2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.03.010Mesfin Mala Kalko, Obsa Teferi Erena, Sara Adugna Debele Technology management practices and innovation: Empirical evidence from medium- and large-scale manufacturing firms in Ethiopia, African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 88 (Mar 2022): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2022.2040828Simone Franzò, Paolo Landoni, Gabriele Colombo, Roberto Verganti The role of publicly funded collaborative projects in implementing open innovation, Innovation 15 (Mar 2022): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2022.2055040Bart Leten, Stijn Kelchtermans, Rene Belderbos How does basic research improve innovation performance in the world’s major pharmaceutical firms?, Industry and Innovation 29, no.33 (Dec 2021): 396–424.https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1997723Jochen Gläser, Mitchell Ash, Guido Buenstorf, David Hopf, Lara Hubenschmid, Melike Janßen, Grit Laudel, Uwe Schimank, Marlene Stoll, Torsten Wilholt, Lothar Zechlin, Klaus Lieb The Independence of Research—A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects, Minerva 60, no.11 (Sep 2021): 105–138.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8Tanel Hirv The interplay of the size of the research system, ways of collaboration, level, and method of funding in determining bibliometric outputs, Scientometrics 127, no.33 (Feb 2022): 1295–1316.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04232-2Linde Colen, René Belderbos, Stijn Kelchtermans, Bart Leten Reaching for the stars: When does basic research collaboration between firms and academic star scientists benefit firm invention performance?, Journal of Product Innovation Management 39, no.22 (Dec 2021): 222–264.https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12607Andrea Filippetti, Antonio Vezzani The political economy of public research, or why some governments commit to research more than others, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 176 (Mar 2022): 121482.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121482S. Amoroso, D. B. Audretsch The role of gender in linking external sources of knowledge and R&D intensity, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 31, no.1-21-2 (Dec 2020): 3–19.https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1844038Enrique Acebo, José-Ángel Miguel-Dávila, Mariano Nieto Do financial constraints moderate the relationship between innovation subsidies and firms' R&D investment?, European Journal of Innovation Management 25, no.22 (Dec 2020): 347–364.https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2020-0286Ana Teresa Santos, Sandro Mendonça The small world of innovation studies: an “editormetrics” perspective, Scientometrics 25 (Feb 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04279-9Shufang Zhao, Muhammad Hafeez, Chaudhry Muhammad Nadeem Faisal Does ICT diffusion lead to energy efficiency and environmental sustainability in emerging Asian economies?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, no.88 (Sep 2021): 12198–12207.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16560-0Francesca de Nicola, Pinyi Chen The Returns to Innovation in East Asia: The Role of the Business Environment and Firms' Characteristics, 120 (Feb 2022).https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9921Zhenbing Yang, Zhuo Chen, Shuai Shao, Lili Yang Unintended consequences of additional support on the publications of universities: Evidence from China, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 175 (Feb 2022): 121350.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121350LINDA TEGARDEN, YOLANDA SARASON, ELLEN KRUPAR IDENTITY AND STRATEGY AS A DUALITY: THE CASES OF IBM AND CORNING IN THE COMMERCIALISATION OF FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY, International Journal of Innovation Management 26, no.0202 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919622500190Erkan GÜRPINAR, Özgür Hakan AYDOĞMUŞ Kamu Malı Olarak Bilginin Sınırları: Örtük Bilgiye Stratejik Bir Yaklaşım, Journal of Yaşar University 17, no.6565 (Jan 2022): 173–188.https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.902290James R Brown, Gustav Martinsson, Christian Thomann, David Denis Can Environmental Policy Encourage Technical Change? Emissions Taxes and R&D Investment in Polluting Firms, The Review of Financial Studies 102 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhac003Ozgur Aydogmus, Erkan Gürpinar Science, Technology and Institutional Change in Knowledge Production: An Evolutionary Game Theoretic Framework, Dynamic Games and Applications 39 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-021-00416-wHyensup Shim, Kiyoon Shin Empirical Analysis of Evidence-Based Policymaking in R&D Programmes, Sustainability 14, no.11 (Dec 2021): 311.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010311S. Niggol Seo The Economics of Pandemics as a Globally Shared Experience: A Theory, (Jan 2022): 233–281.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91021-1_8Sebastian Damrich, Terence Kealey, Martin Ricketts Crowding in and crowding out within a contribution good model of research, Research Policy 51, no.11 (Jan 2022): 104400.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104400Samuele Murtinu, Nicolai J. Foss, Peter G. Klein The Entrepreneurial State: An Ownership Competence Perspective, (Apr 2022): 57–75.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94273-1_4Chiara Franzoni, Paula Stephan, and Reinhilde Veugelers Funding Risky Research, Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy 1 (May 2022): 103–133.https://doi.org/10.1086/719252Yunqiang Liu, Sha Liu, Xiaoyu Shao, Yanqiu He Policy spillover effect and action mechanism for environmental rights trading on green innovation: Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 153 (Jan 2022): 111779.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111779Terence Kealey, Martin Ricketts The Contribution Good as the Foundation of the Industrial Revolution, (Dec 2021): 19–57.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108692915.003Alberto Méndez-Morales, Rafael Ochoa-Urrego, Timothy O. Randhir Measuring the quality of patents among Latin-American universities, Studies in Higher Education 31 (Dec 2021): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.2020749Aruhan Bai, Cong Wu, Kejia Yang Evolution and Features of China’s Central Government Funding System for Basic Research, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 6 (Dec 2021).https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.751497Eva M de la Torre, Maryam Ghorbankhani, Federica Rossi, Marti Sagarra Knowledge transfer profiles of public research organisations: the role of fields of knowledge specialisation, Science and Public Policy 48, no.66 (Aug 2021): 860–876.https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab061Teresa Hogan, Mark Humphery‐Jenner, Tran T.L. Huong, Ronan Powell Market dominance, R&D grant funding, and innovation outcomes, R&D Management 21 (Dec 2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12520Buil Chung, Youngsoo Ryu, SeungKu Ahn The effect of government R&D subsidies on corporate R&D investment in South Korea: verification using meta-analysis, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 18 (Dec 2021): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2021.2014341Micah S. Ziegler, Juhyun Song, Jessika E. Trancik Determinants of lithium-ion battery technology cost decline, Energy & Environmental Science 14, no.1212 (Jan 2021): 6074–6098.https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE01313KMichiko Iizuka, Yoko Ikeda Regulation and innovation under the 4th industrial revolution: The case of a healthcare robot, HAL by Cyberdyne, Technovation 108 (Dec 2021): 102335.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102335Alex Coad, Agustí Segarra-Blasco, Mercedes Teruel A bit of basic, a bit of applied? R&D strategies and firm performance, The Journal of Technology Transfer 46, no.66 (Oct 2020): 1758–1783.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09826-1Bastian Krieger, Maikel Pellens, Knut Blind, Sonia Gruber, Torben Schubert Are firms withdrawing from basic research? An analysis of firm-level publication behaviour in Germany, Scientometrics 126, no.1212 (Oct 2021): 9677–9698.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04147-yCharles Delmotte Simple rules and the Political Economy of Income Taxation: the strengths of a uniform expense rule, European Journal of Law and Economics 52, no.2-32-3 (Mar 2021): 323–339.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-021-09693-7Cristian Mardones, Andrés Velásquez Macroeconomic, intersectoral, and environmental effects of R&D subsidies in Chile: An input-output approach, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173 (Dec 2021): 121112.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121112 The Gift and Open Science, Durkheimian Studies 25, no.11 (Dec 2021): 187–203.https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2021.250108Jude N. Edeh, Francisco J. Acedo External supports, innovation efforts and productivity: Estimation of a CDM model for small firms in developing countries, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173 (Dec 2021): 121189.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121189Yuchen Gao, Si Zhang, Yimei Hu THE EFFECTS OF PUBLIC R&D SUBSIDIZED LOANS ON FIRMS’ R&D OUTPUTS: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA, Journal of Business Economics and Management 22, no.66 (Nov 2021): 1655–1678.https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.14581Erkan GÜRPINAR BİLGİ EKONOMİSİNE STRATEJİK BİR YAKLAŞIM, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi (Nov 2021).https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.880553Tõnis Eerme, Niina Nummela Value Generation Through Public Procurement of Innovative Earth Observation Applications: Service-Dominant Logic Perspective, New Space 35 (Nov 2021).https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2021.0016Siying Long, Zhongju Liao Are fiscal policy incentives effective in stimulating firms' eco‐product innovation? The moderating role of dynamic capabilities, Business Strategy and the Environment 30, no.77 (Apr 2021): 3095–3104.https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2791Nils Grashof Putting the watering can away –Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework, Research Policy 50, no.99 (Nov 2021): 104335.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104335Charles Ayoubi, Michele Pezzoni, Fabiana Visentin Does It Pay to Do Novel Science? The Selectivity Patterns in Science Funding, Science and Public Policy 48, no.55 (Jun 2021): 635–648.https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab031Giovanni Filatrella, Nicola De Liso The R&D stochastic component within the ‘sailing-ship effect’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 30, no.77 (Jun 2020): 731–749.https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1772707Jin-Uk Choi, Chang-Yang Lee Do government-funded patents have higher quality than privately-funded patents?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 47 (Sep 2021): 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2021.1967151Gloria Sanz Lafuente Atoms for feeding: radioisotopes from the laboratory to the market, 1946–1960, Scandinavian Economic History Review 69, no.33 (Oct 2021): 301–323.https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.2021.1984297René Belderbos, Marcelina Grabowska, Stijn Kelchtermans, Bart Leten, Jojo Jacob, Massimo Riccaboni Whither geographic proximity? Bypassing local R&D units in foreign university collaboration, Journal of International Business Studies 52, no.77 (Apr 2021): 1302–1330.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00413-6Véronique Dutraive, Richard Arena, Pierre-Jean Benghozi, Thierry Burger-Helmchen Industrie et comportements créatifs : leçons du passé et recherches actuelles, Revue d'économie industrielle , no.174174 (Sep 2021): 15–32.https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.10029Martina Cernikova, Sarka Hyblerova TAX SUPPORT EVALUATION FOR R&D ACTIVITIES OF COMPANIES, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 27, no.55 (Aug 2021): 1057–1071.https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.15147Kim Kiman, Yu Jongmin Linear or Nonlinear? Investigation an Affect of Public Subsidies on SMEs R&D Investment, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 28 (Jul 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00823-9Edgard Alberto Méndez-Morales, Carlos Andrés Yanes-Guerra Financial system specialization and private research and development expenditure: research for OECD countries, Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science 26, no.5151 (Jul 2021): 41–60.https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-10-2019-0256Belton M. Fleisher, William H. McGuire, Xiaojun Wang, Min Qiang Zhao Induced innovation: evidence from China’s secondary industry, Applied Economics 97 (Jul 2021): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1937037Keungoui Kim, Junseok Hwang, Sungdo Jung, Eungdo Kim The Optimal Diversification Strategy in Pharmaceutical Industry: Balance-centred or Hetero-centred?, Science, Technology and Society 26, no.22 (May 2021): 272–295.https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218211005616Hugo Hopenhayn and Francesco Squintani On the Direction of Innovation, Journal of Political Economy 129, no.77 (May 2021): 1991–2022.https://doi.org/10.1086/714093Güzide KARAKUŞ AR-GE / TASARIM MERKEZİ NEDİR? TÜRKİYE’DE AR-GE ve TASARIM MERKEZİ KURULUM SÜRECİNE İLİŞKİN BİR ARAŞTIRMA, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (Jul 2021).https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.774880Ganesh Sitaraman, Anne Alstott Politics, Policy, and Public Options, (Jun 2021).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108767552Mariana Mazzucato, Henry Lishi Li The Entrepreneurial State and Public Options, (Jul 2021): 20–44.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108767552.003Arkadiusz Michał Kowalski, Małgorzata Stefania Lewandowska, Małgorzata Rószkiewicz Innovation policy and performance of Polish enterprises: in search for cluster cooperation additionality, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25 (Jun 2021): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1937068 Cross‐Over Trials, (Oct 2021): 339–353.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119238614.ch17 Pharmaco‐economics and Portfolio Management, (Oct 2021): 507–539.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119238614.ch24C. Mantzavinos Science, institutions, and values, European Journal of Philosophy 29, no.22 (Sep 2020): 379–392.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12579Alexandra Graddy-Reed, Lauren Lanahan, Jesse D'Agostino Training across the academy: The impact of R&D funding on graduate students, Research Policy 50, no.55 (Jun 2021): 104224.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104224Henry Chesbrough, Sohvi Heaton, Liang Mei Open innovation with Chinese characteristics: a dynamic capabilities perspective, R&D Management 51, no.33 (Oct 2020): 247–259.https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12438Yiannis E. Spanos Exploring heterogeneous returns to collaborative R&D: A marginal treatment effects perspective, Research Policy 50, no.55 (Jun 2021): 104223.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104223Xin Xiang How does the internal capital market influence R&D spending? New evidence, International Journal of Emerging Markets 106 (May 2021).https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0822Nicolas Carayol, Valerio Sterzi The transfer and value of academic inventions when the TTO is one option, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 30, no.22 (Feb 2021): 338–367.https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12411Daniel P. Gross, Bhaven N. Sampat The Economics of Crisis Innovation Policy: A Historical Perspective, AEA Papers and Proceedings 111 (May 2021): 346–350.https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211106Bastian Rake Do publication activities of academic institutions benefit from formal collaborations with firms?, Innovation 23, no.22 (Oct 2019): 241–265.https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1679024Yi He, Shengdao Gan, Liang Xiao Can foreign suppliers act as “innovation springboards” for firms? Evidence from China, Research in International Business and Finance 56 (Apr 2021): 101353.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101353Hans Gersbach, Ulrich Schetter, Maik T. Schneider MACROECONOMIC RATIONALES FOR PUBLIC INVESTMENTS IN SCIENCE, Economic Inquiry 59, no.22 (Dec 2020): 575–599.https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12921Frederick Dongchuhl Oh, Heejin Yoon Social Capital and Firm Innovation: Evidence from Cooperative Banking in Korea*, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 50, no.22 (Apr 2021): 147–175.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12333Beatriz Pereira de Almeida, Eduardo Gonçalves, André Suriane da Silva, Raquel Coelho Reis Internalization of knowledge spillovers by regions: a measure based on self-citation patents, The Annals of Regional Science 66, no.22 (Sep 2020): 309–330.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-020-01022-1Dandara Souza Araújo Nascimento, Roney Fraga Souza, Jaim José da Silva Junior, Lucas Rodrigo da Silva Projeções exponenciais da ciência brasileira: modelos e análises quantitativas da produção científica nacional publicada nos últimos 30 anos, Informação & Informação 26, no.11 (Mar 2021): 53.https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2021v26n1p53Blandine Laperche Large Firms’ Knowledge Capital and Innovation Networks, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 12, no.11 (Jun 2016): 183–200.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0391-7Ashish Arora, Sharon Belenzon, Lia Sheer Knowledge Spillovers and Corporate Investment in Scientific Research, American Economic Review 111,
Referência(s)