Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Geochemistry of Neoarchean (ca. 2.55-2.50 Ga) volcanic and ophiolitic rocks in the Wutaishan greenstone belt, central orogenic belt, North China craton: Implications for geodynamic setting and continental growth: Discussion

2007; Geological Society of America; Volume: 119; Issue: 3-4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1130/b26022.1

1943-2674

Guochun Zhao, Alfred Kröner,

earthquake and tectonic studies

Research Article| March 01, 2007 Geochemistry of Neoarchean (ca. 2.55–2.50 Ga) volcanic and ophiolitic rocks in the Wutaishan greenstone belt, central orogenic belt, North China craton: Implications for geodynamic setting and continental growth: Discussion Guochun Zhao; Guochun Zhao 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Alfred Kröner Alfred Kröner 2Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar GSA Bulletin (2007) 119 (3-4): 487–489. https://doi.org/10.1130/B26022.1 Article history received: 20 Apr 2006 accepted: 18 Jul 2006 first online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Guochun Zhao, Alfred Kröner; Geochemistry of Neoarchean (ca. 2.55–2.50 Ga) volcanic and ophiolitic rocks in the Wutaishan greenstone belt, central orogenic belt, North China craton: Implications for geodynamic setting and continental growth: Discussion. GSA Bulletin 2007;; 119 (3-4): 487–489. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B26022.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search We read with interest the contribution by Polat et al. (2005) on the origin of Neoarchean volcanic and ophiolitic rocks in the Wutaishan greenstone belt, northern China, and their geo-dynamic setting. We do not dispute the quality of the authors' data and their interpretations, but we disagree with their tectonic model, which ignores field evidence and a large amount of precise zircon ages recently obtained for the Hengshan–Wutaishan–Taihangshan mountain belt. In the model shown in their Figure 9, Polat et al. (2005) proposed a Late Archaean continent–arc–continent collision system, in which the high-grade Hengshan and Fuping complexes represent two exotic... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.